|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 11, 2016 2:19:38 GMT -5
Janet
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 11, 2016 2:14:37 GMT -5
To be fair, Spider-Gwen started out as a one-shot alternate universe Spider-Man during the Spider-Verse event. Everyone went nuts for the concept, so she got her own book.
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 10, 2016 19:29:59 GMT -5
Hiding
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 10, 2016 5:46:13 GMT -5
*looks up from orgiastic pagan debauchery*
"Oboy! A banquet!"
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 10, 2016 5:39:10 GMT -5
That's great if it's bringing in new and/or younger readers, sometimes I think that's a demographic that the Big Two have overlooked quite a bit recently in their mad rush to produce the next BIGGEST event. While the idea of Deadpool becoming a genre unto himself worries me (hate the character), I'm more puzzled by all this recent hype/interest/portrayals of Gwen Stacy. Spider-Gwen, Gwenpool, she's made a major comeback for someone who's dead. (Although if you go by possible spoilers for the upcoming 'Dead No More' event in the Spider-titles, this may change as well) I'm guessing a lot of it is to do with the Amazing Spider-Man movies.
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 10, 2016 5:37:12 GMT -5
Injection: End of volume 1, volume 2 will start at the end of this year. Oh good! This means we should get the second tpb pretty soon (I'm tpbs/HCs only these days).
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 9, 2016 5:23:59 GMT -5
Prince
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 9, 2016 5:22:26 GMT -5
I'll have to check it out! Like all right-thinking people, I loved the Ellis run, but went off it when the extremely overrated Brian Wood took over.
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 9, 2016 5:17:07 GMT -5
It's a bit o' fun, innit?
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 9, 2016 5:09:34 GMT -5
An evil act (killing that animal) doesn't have to be identically evil to another evil act (the Stanford rape) to still be evil. IMHO, of course. Does, say, Michael Vick get a pass because his depravity was limited to dogs rather than people? Not that Immanuel Kant was some sort of omniscient observer, but his declaration that “He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals" comes to mind here. He's hardly the only great thinker who has concluded as much. We can agree to disagree then, as I don't see anything evil about killing an animal, for either food or sport, unless the killing was done via torturous means. Millions of chickens, cows, and pigs are killed every year so that meat can be eaten, yet few consider those killings "evil", and I don't consider a hunter putting a bullet into a deer to be evil either, especially if they are going to eat the venison. What does lion taste like, I wonder? I'll only consider hunting a sport when the animals are given rifles as well.
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 8, 2016 5:51:24 GMT -5
Travel
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 8, 2016 4:44:04 GMT -5
Hammer
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 8, 2016 2:35:16 GMT -5
Carry
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 7, 2016 4:24:53 GMT -5
Cap
|
|
|
Post by Spike-X on Jun 7, 2016 0:20:46 GMT -5
Bullet
|
|