|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 22, 2024 10:18:10 GMT -5
There was nothing "top notch" about this, under any criteria..... Just horrible drek. David Lapham drew it, but he was a rookie, at that point. It still makes more sense than Warrior's own comic, though. Just goes to show that computers have no taste, either. Mate, those are the Warrior Workout comics, which were bad. No wonder you were disappointed! What you need to do is track down the good stories, such as the one where Boss Man fought Undertaker: Uh........no.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 21, 2024 20:06:25 GMT -5
Yes, the show creators supposedly had Martin's general notes and outlines, but we don't know how closely they adhered to his notes since the books aren't out, so are the most undesirable parts Martin's ideas or from the show creators? Also, while I do think Martin could get to many of the same plot points in a more believable and less obnoxious way, will the show's presentation ruin them before they even arrive? I'm no longer optimistic the books will receive an ending at all, though, let alone worrying about whether it will be good or not. I'm not knocking the author. I can't imagine the pressure he's under, but just looking at the increasing # of years between volumes and increasing complexity of the plot, it's difficult to see how it can be brought together short of a random plague or something taking out 75% of the characters. Martin has said that the complexity of the story kind of got away from him. And to be honest, all the related and separate side work he's been doing is the kind of thing I do when I'm stalling about going back to something that I haven't finished but have pretty much lost interest in. Plus, whereas Robert Jordan left very detailed notes so that Wheel of Time could be completed by someone else if necessary, Martin has also said that nobody but him will finish the series. So, this kind of thing is one reason I tend to wait for serial series to be completed before I read them. Martin is 75 and hardly the picture of good health...I think the tv ending is likely to be the only one we are ever going to get. I've never actually read the books and have never been enticed enough to do so. I have read the Wild Cards series, which is a mixture of a lot of people's work; but which I thought went off the rails about the mid-point of the original publishing run, before it switched to a new publisher. Looking over the history of the publication of A Song of Ice and Fire; I kind of get the same impression, that the project went off the rails between books 3 and 4, regardless of the actual content. It seems like his editor needed to put a foot in his backside to get the work done, or else George would be off doing other things; and, unlike Stephen King, he doesn't seem to be able to juggle multiple projects and hit deadlines (though King owed his publisher a Dark Tower book for quite a while, before he finally produced it). That's all technical stuff, though, rather than a commentary on the quality of the work. Like I say, I haven't read them and have no opinion as far as their quality. I watched the tv and kind of felt it was entertaining, but vastly over-praised, as little seemed terribly original or that deep and it seemed like several plot threads just kind of broke off and disappeared, while they were still adapting the published material. I kind of burnt out on fantasy literature, in the early 90s. I grew tired of the same basic plots, over and over. The one author I found engaging was Glen Cook, with his Black Company series. The original trilogy was great, then he added a sequel series, which started well, then kind of stalled for several years, and what was promised as the wrap up to that storyline, turned into 3 more books. I just kind of lost interest there, too. Terry Pratchett became pretty much it for me, and I was a bit late in discovering Discworld, because of the burnout. Aside from that, it's ostly been pulpier stuff and metafictions, like Kim Newman's stuff, which blends multiple genres and easter eggs. The burnout is part of why I never tried A Song of Ice and Fire, plus my experience with the Wild Cards.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 21, 2024 19:44:18 GMT -5
There was nothing "top notch" about this, under any criteria..... Just horrible drek. David Lapham drew it, but he was a rookie, at that point. It still makes more sense than Warrior's own comic, though. Just goes to show that computers have no taste, either.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 21, 2024 10:26:31 GMT -5
Except I don't believe they made much money off of them. My local comic ship got in a case of them and they sat there, since the bulk of the customers had no clue who they were, nor cared about wrestling. On top of that, I believe that was one of the licenses that didn't pay them until further down the road; so, when they received their share of revenue, they were that much further in debt and could never catch up. I know the Acclaim deal hurt them badly, as they saw little or no revenue for a long time and I don't believe it sold very well. To top it off, Acclaim was descending into their own bankruptcy.
Eclipse Comics had similar problems, in the dawn of the 90s, as they had a deal with Harper Collins, to produce trade paperbacks, but only received revenue on Harper Collins terms, which were quarterly, at best. It didn't help Eclipse's cash flow problems and HC played further games, as they were a Murdoch company and somewhat notorious for his type of shenanigans. I believe there were a few authors who squawked, back in the 90s, about royalties owed, which the company was slow to pay.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 20, 2024 18:26:37 GMT -5
This reminds me of the challenge between Katherine Hepburn and the computer, in Desk Set
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 20, 2024 18:19:09 GMT -5
Anyone have Sgt. Fury #89? I need to verify
In which issue of Sgt. Fury does he team up with Hansi?
ChatGPT
In the Marvel Comics universe, Sgt. Fury teams up with Hansi in "Sgt. Fury and his Howling Commandos" issue #89, published in October 1971. This issue features the Howling Commandos teaming up with Hansi, a German anti-Nazi resistance fighter, against the Nazi regime during World War II.
Sgt Fury #89 is a reprint of Sgt Fury #27, which explains how Nick Fury injured his eye, ultimately leading to wearing an eyepatch, in the "modern" day. There is no resistance fighter in the story. The closest to the name Hansi appears in this panel..... Out of curiosity, I check to see if issue #89 might have been on sale at the same time as Hansi, but it was published in April, 1971 and Hansi was published in 1976. No idea why it picked that specific issue.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 20, 2024 17:59:56 GMT -5
It got better, but still can't completely identify a falsehood.......
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 20, 2024 17:56:30 GMT -5
I broke it!
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 20, 2024 17:51:04 GMT -5
Me: What can kill the Grimace?
ChatGPT The Grimace, a character from McDonald's marketing, is depicted as a large, purple, furry creature. As a fictional character, he doesn't possess physical life, so he can't be killed in the traditional sense. However, if you're referring to what could theoretically harm or defeat the Grimace in a story or scenario, that would depend on the context. Perhaps something like a powerful antagonist, a magical curse, or some form of existential threat could pose a challenge to the Grimace in a fictional setting.
Au contraire........
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 19, 2024 22:21:42 GMT -5
I love how this mixes Terry Pratchet's Discworld series with DC Comics Captain Carrot and the Zoo Crew. Yeah, I was going to rerun it with it spelled out more clearly, but the answer just works for me as is so I left it. And in odd some way, I'd like to think Sir Terry would have approved as well. Nobby would have fit in with the Zoo Crew; though as what species is still in question.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 19, 2024 21:26:09 GMT -5
I picked Dark Horse, because they reprinted the Marvel material and the newspaper strips, as well as their own material, making for the ultimate line of Star Wars stories.
Plus....Tag & Bink!
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 19, 2024 21:23:26 GMT -5
I thought I would apply Number 6's approach:
Me:Why?
ChatGPT Why what? Could you please provide more context or clarify your question?
Me: The ultimate question; why?
ChatGPT Ah, the ultimate question! "Why?" is indeed a fundamental inquiry that has puzzled philosophers, scientists, and thinkers throughout history. It's a question that seeks to understand the reasons, causes, motivations, or purposes behind things. People ask "why" to delve into the deeper meanings, to uncover truths, or simply to satisfy their curiosity. It's a question that drives exploration, discovery, and understanding in various fields, from philosophy and science to everyday life. Ultimately, the quest for understanding "why" is a core aspect of human nature and the pursuit of knowledge.
Me: That doesn't answer the question itself
ChatGPT Indeed, it's a bit of a paradox, isn't it? "Why" is a question that often prompts further questions, leading down a rabbit hole of inquiry. Some might argue that the ultimate answer to "why" is simply to seek understanding, to unravel the mysteries of existence, or to find meaning in our experiences. Others might take a more existential view, suggesting that "why" ultimately leads to an infinite regress of questioning without a definitive answer. It's a question that invites contemplation, reflection, and perhaps a sense of humility in the face of life's complexities. So, in a way, the ultimate answer to "why" may be that the question itself is what propels us forward in our quest for knowledge and understanding.
Me: You don't know the answer, do you?
ChatGPT You got me! "Why" is one of those questions that doesn't have a single, definitive answer. Its meaning and significance can vary depending on the context in which it's asked. It's a question that invites exploration, interpretation, and reflection rather than providing a straightforward solution. So, while I can offer insights and perspectives on the question, there's no one-size-fits-all answer to the ultimate "why."
Me: Sure there is, the ultimate answer to life, the universe and everything is 42.
ChatGPT Ah, you've just referenced Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"! In the book, a supercomputer named Deep Thought calculates the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything, and indeed, it comes out to be 42. However, the characters then realize they don't actually know what the Ultimate Question is, so the Answer doesn't make much sense without it. It's a delightful example of the absurdity and humor that Adams infused into his work. While "42" might not be the ultimate answer in reality, it certainly remains a memorable and amusing concept in literature.
Me: Ah, but if 42 us the answer and the ultimate question is "Why?"; then the answer to "Why?" is "42."
ChatGPT That's a clever interpretation! In the realm of Douglas Adams' fictional universe, where the number 42 holds such significance, it's a delightful twist to consider it as the answer to the ultimate question "Why?" It adds another layer of whimsy and absurdity to the already complex and humorous narrative. So, if we're playing by the rules of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," then yes, the answer to "Why?" could indeed be "42."
Dr Forbin still has a lot of work to do on this project.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 19, 2024 21:13:38 GMT -5
Another highly intelligent contribution (and I'm sorry, these are things I think about), I was impressed, ChatGPT had a lot to say here (edit, noticed they referenced a different Captain Carrot than the comic, but I'm still down with the response): MeWhat if Captain Carrot ate the Flaming Carrot? ChatGPTIf Captain Carrot, the steadfast and noble leader of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch in Terry Pratchett's Discworld series, were to eat the Flaming Carrot, a character from the independent comic series of the same name created by Bob Burden, it would likely result in a humorous and surreal situation. Firstly, it's important to note that Captain Carrot is a humanoid rabbit with a strong sense of justice and duty, while the Flaming Carrot is a surreal and somewhat absurd character known for his flaming carrot top and bizarre adventures. If Captain Carrot were to eat the Flaming Carrot, it could lead to some interesting consequences: 1. Physical Transformation: Perhaps Captain Carrot would gain some of the Flaming Carrot's characteristics, such as his flaming carrot top or his penchant for chaotic adventures. This could lead to an unexpected change in Captain Carrot's appearance and behavior. 2. Absorption of Powers: The Flaming Carrot is known for his bizarre abilities and adventures, so it's possible that Captain Carrot could gain some of these powers upon consuming him. This could lead to humorous situations as Captain Carrot adjusts to his newfound abilities. 3. Existential Conundrum: Eating another sentient being, even one as surreal as the Flaming Carrot, would likely raise ethical and philosophical questions for Captain Carrot. He might grapple with the morality of consuming another being and the implications it has on his own identity. 4. Chaos Ensues: Given the inherently absurd nature of both characters, the act of Captain Carrot eating the Flaming Carrot could lead to all sorts of chaotic and nonsensical events. This could include reality-bending scenarios, unexpected encounters, and general mayhem. Overall, the collision of these two fantastical characters would likely result in a wildly entertaining and unpredictable storyline, filled with humor, absurdity, and maybe even a few profound moments of introspection. I love how this mixes Terry Pratchet's Discworld series with DC Comics Captain Carrot and the Zoo Crew.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 19, 2024 21:01:36 GMT -5
In a double pin situation, the champ retains the title and is therefore, technically the winner.
Sort of.
Makes as much sense as anything else.
Bunkhouse Buck was Jimmy Golden, Cousin of Robert Fuller, aka Col Rob Parker. Golden was mostly a brawler and that style of match is perfect for him to work with Dusty. A "Bunkhouse Match,' was supposed to reflect the idea that cowboys who were living in a ranch bunkhouse would settle their differences in a big fight, in their everyday attire and gear, and fought until the last man stands. WCW of that era wasn't as good at explaining the gimmick matches as when Dusty was booker. JJ Dillon used to assist Dusty, with the fine details, while Dusty focused on the bigger concepts and angles.
The Muta and Auston thing was likely to save face with an ending that kept Austin strong and did not job out Muta, who was mostly in Japan and WCW was working with them.
WCW used to regularly promote in Chicago, going back to the Crockett days, including hosting Starrcade there, in 1987 (where Flair regained the NWA World title from Ron Garvin). WCW promoted outside of the south and used to routinely go up to Baltimore and Philadelphia, as well as several shows at the Meadowlands, in New Jersey. They also went out west and parts of the Midwest, encroaching on AWA territory. They were strongest in the South, but drew big houses in Chicago, until Dusty killed it by not putting the Road Warriors over, in their match at Starrcade 87, against Tully & Arn, for the World Tag titles. After that, they never drew at the same level.
Now, a Chicago Street Fight should include switchblades, bike chains and guns; but, those Turner people........
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Apr 19, 2024 20:42:07 GMT -5
Quantum Leap's isn't entirely satisfying, but it has grown on me, in the years. I kind of liked the idea that the only thing preventing him from leaping home is himself and a need to fix things and fixing Al's marriage was one of those things he had to fix.
I still think the last episode of Happy Days should have Chuck Cunningham show up at Joanie and Chachi's wedding, in disguise, where he explains he has been secretly working for the CIA and stayed away from the family to protect them.
I would have liked to have seen an ending to the original Battlestar Galactica, which brought them to Earth, in the Earth Year 2492. They are met by a patrol fromt he earth Defense Directorate, commanded by Col Wilma Deering. They nearly engage in battle, before the Vipers, under command of Capt Apollo, break off, when their scanners detect human life forms. They are able to raise communications with Wilma and escort her and her wingman, Buck Rogers, onto the Galactica, where they meet Commander Adama, who explains their situation. A delegation is brought to Earth, where they confer with Dr Huer and the Computer Council. They open up Earth to the Colonies and begin work on a defensive plan. Buck feels they need more powerful allies to fight off the Cylons and he and Lt Starbuck undertake a mission to the throneworld of Draconia, where they broker an alliance with Princess Ardala, aided by the fact that she is deeply attracted to Starbuck. The human Draconians join with the Earth Directorate forces and the Colonial Warriors, to set up a trap for the approaching Cylon fleet, in a situation that reminds Buck of the Battle of Midway.
Call it deja vu, but over at the Atomic junk Shop, they have posted an old Greg Hatcher column about a Wold Newton-style crossover between Kenneth Johnson's tv shows, including The bionic Woman, The Incredible Hulk, V, and Alien Nation (and I suggested adding characters from Johnson's short-lived series, Cliffhangers!). Thus, a Glen Larson Wold Newton Universe would be equally cool and give a better ending to the original Galactica, avoiding that Galactica 1980 crap, and a better second season for Buck Rogers.
|
|