|
Post by Farrar on Dec 1, 2020 16:41:46 GMT -5
DECEMBER 1970Superman 234
The attempt to revamp Superman continues until the next attempt to revamp Superman. A bland and ugly cover. Sorry, Neal. I can't stand most of Adams's Superman-related covers from that era. So over the top, and not in any good or dramatic way. Adams did superb covers for the Batman books, the horror books, and many others, but he was so wrong for the Superman family of comics, which required Curt Swan's cool classicism.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Dec 1, 2020 18:40:11 GMT -5
DECEMBER 1970Superman 234
The attempt to revamp Superman continues until the next attempt to revamp Superman. A bland and ugly cover. Sorry, Neal. I can't stand most of Adams's Superman-related covers from that era. So over the top, and not in any good or dramatic way. Adams did superb covers for the Batman books, the horror books, and many others, but he was so wrong for the Superman family of comics, which required Curt Swan's cool classicism. Right! And the coloring on that cover... bleeah! Compare it to this one from a few years earlier. Similar theme, but much more pleasing to the eye, nicely capturing both the drama of the moment and the charm, if I may call it that, so in keeping with the small-town flavor of Superboy.
|
|
|
Post by tarkintino on Dec 1, 2020 19:49:59 GMT -5
Batman 229A rare bad Neal Adams cover. Wha--?? Impossible! Now, go wash your mouth out with-- Kirby's Superman. Yikes. ...and "Vykin the Black?" Uh...yeah. He did not need "black" as part of the name, like all of the other characters who had "black" in their names. Thankfully, John Stewart was not named "Black Green Lantern", and there was no "Black Falcon" or "Black Tyroc" or "Black Storm".....
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2020 1:53:12 GMT -5
What I currently own in single issue form form this month...
Creatures on the Loose #10 (Hail Kull!) G.I. Combat #146 (Kubert!)
just two. I do have New Gods #1, but it's the Millennium Edition, not the original.
-M
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Dec 14, 2020 16:01:32 GMT -5
December 1970My DCs off the standsOnce again, not much off the stands. As I have mentioned, my neighborhood candy stores seemed to be stocking fewer and fewer comics. I still bought plenty of back issues at the collectibles store, but my new comic book buying decreased. That month I only bought these two DCs off the stands, on separate occasions: Adventure #397: I remember I had this one only because I copied the cover positions of Supergirl and Derek for a school art project. With each issue Sekowsky's Supergirl was getting sillier and sillier...and there was no excuse for Sekowsky's assinine back-up feature for some nobody called Tracey Thompson (who?!). Forever People #1: I remember I bought this while visiting my grandmother. I sooo missed Kirby from the FF, and I really wanted to like his new DC stuff. What can I say other than this comic was a massive disappointment. For one thing by this time I was used to Kirby inked by Sinnott--so seeing him inked by Colletta (whose work I usually liked) was a comedown. Colletta-on-Kirby was fine for my back issues, but this was 1970 dammit! And the dialogue, the story, oh it all seemed so hopelessly old-fashioned; and almost as silly as Sekowsky was becoming. And it was so disappointing that the great Kirby had the sole woman member of the team as nothing more than a damsel in distress (I should have known, from the cover , and from her costume--a scanty (of course!) Wilma Flintstone-okay-more-like-Betty-Rubble outfit). I think this may have been the only issue of Forever People I managed to buy back when it was published. I did buy a couple of more FP issues a couple of years ago when I got back into comics.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Dec 14, 2020 16:35:30 GMT -5
OMG Prince Hal I saw all those images in your post and thought, wow, he bought soooo many comics that month! Then I realized it was for two months--November and December. I've been so busy I completely lost track of the date! So I'm playing catch up. First, here's November 1970 for me: Marvel off the stands November 1970Avengers #84: Great cover of course. And not a bad story, I liked the return of Arkon; and the Enchantress from the last issue. It was also good to see the black Knight with the team again. Big John was in element in this sword and sorcery setting. Fantastic Four #107: And now--Big John! Yes, after 4 issues of Romita valiantly stepping into Kirby's oversized shoes, and IMO failing (sorry everyone-- I know there are a lot of Romita FF fans here, but his FF just didn't do it for me *ducks to avoid tomatoes*) here was an penciler more to my liking. Buscema inked by Joe Sinnott gave the book a more Kirby-Sinnott-feel, at least to me back then. I liked the pacing of this story too, several pages of the earlier story (FF vs. the "Monster") winding down even as it led into another story (Reed giving Ben the ability to regain his pre-cosmic rays form). This was reminiscent of how the FF rolled during the Lee-Kirby glory days. And of course the Buscema-Sinnott team produced some beautiful people. Here's Ben and Alicia. DC off the stands November 1970Unlike Prince Hal, during this time I couldn't find too many DCs on sale; my neighborhood candy stores didn't stock too many DCs back then. That month the only DC I know I picked up was this POS comic Adventure #401: I've mentioned my love of Sekowsky's Wonder Woman, Sadly he misfired bigtime on Supergirl. With every issue his art was getting increasingly sloppy and this story was just plain ridiculous; it turns out to be a dream. It's like Sekowsky had run out of story ideas so he took the easy out. To make matters worse there was a new back-up feature by Sekowsky, about some nobody named Tracey Thompson. I mean, the Legion was booted out of Adventure for this drek??? As with the WW comic, Sekowsky was editing--writing--and drawing Adventure. He should've just stuck with the Wonder Woman comic. Yeah, Arkon's return didn't have quite the same epic feeling as the first appearance but still a good story with a great cover. Arkon is one of my favourite Avengers antagonists, though subsequent appearances didn't always make the best use of the character (e.g. Claremont's X-Men Annual).
I remember this FF story only vaguely, so it doesn't seem to have made as big an impression on me as some of the preceding issues, in spite of the Buscema/Sinnott artwork.
First I've ever seen that Supergirl cover. She doesnt look scared, she looks like she's doing some kind of weird dance.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Dec 21, 2020 18:54:48 GMT -5
Continuing with December 1970Another lean month. As I have mentioned, it was getting harder and harder to find the specific superhero comics I liked in my neighborhood. There were plenty of Archies on sale, and I bought those off the newsstands, but I don't remember which ones or any of the stories. For Marvel that month, this is all I got off the stands: Amazing Adventures #5: cover by John Buscema. I'd bought issue 1 and 2, missed #3 and #4, and managed to pick up #5. Things had changed since issue #2; Adams had replaced Kirby as the Inhumans penciler and Colan had replaced Big John as the Black Widow penciler. I wasn't crazy about Adams's Inhumans; he made them all look too ugly, IMO. And I hated the way he drew boots for Black Bolt. I know, I know, it's more "realistc." But it looked awful, like BB was dressed in a hot rubber suit. Give me Kirby's BB or Buscema's sleek BB on the cover. Colan on the Black Widow was a different story; Buscema made her look glossy, but Colan made her look gritty, which was more fitting for the ambience of her feature. Colan gave her series a film noir-ish look; also the Everett inks were a perfect complement. Avengers #85: another cover by John Buscema. This cover's always been a favorite of mine. Story is okay; four of the Avengers get trapped in an alternate reality, and we get to see the Squadron Supreme (aka JLA analogues) here. I wasn't reading the Justice League comic at the time, but obviously writers Roy Thomas and Mike Friedrich coordinated Avengers #85 and JLA #87 (both on sale this month), since the JLA contained some Avengers stand-ins. Can you spell "covert crossover" ? Check out an earlier Dec. 1970 post upthread by Prince Hal that depicts the Silver Sorceress, Jack B. Quick, and others.Fantastic Four #108: cover by--him again? Yes please--John Buscema. It's my third favorite JB cover among these three by him and that's about the best thing I can say about this issue, which is a mess. Johnny Storm thinks he's having a dream and get this, his dream consists of Kirby images. You see, the beginning of this story uses mostly Kirby art (which was intended for an earlier FF issue) but when Johnny wakes up we're looking at Buscema art. So the book looks very disjointed and poorly cobbled together IMO. It's been said Marvel decided to use the Kirby pages because Kirby's Forever People and New Gods (for DC natch) were debuting on the stands this very same month. Not a classy move by Marvel, again IMO. Btw there was a hardcover called Fantastic Four Lost Adventures that contained the Kirby pencils inked by Sinnott and added to and expanded by Ron Frenz doing his best Kirby imitation. I bought the book a few years ago and the "lost adventure" was just as unsatisfying as the story in #108. The book is worth owning, though, for the repros of the uninked Kirby pencils, which are also included.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2021 7:40:12 GMT -5
Books that were on sale in January 1971 that I currently own...
Astonishing Tales #5 Conan the Barbarian #4 Mr. Miracle #1 Our Fighting Forces #130 Phantom Stranger #12 Savage Tales #1 Tomahawk #133
all acquired much later, as I was a wee lad of 1 1/2 in Jan '71.
-M
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Jan 7, 2021 11:24:02 GMT -5
JANUARY 1971Adventure 403 (Giant) Reprint heaven with the Legionnaires, courtesy Jerry Siegel and Edmond Hamilton, with a John Forte grand slam on the art. Aquaman 56 The end of the Silver Age for Aquaman in a memorable story about pollution in Lake Erie, vigilantism, and Detroit’s own costumed crime-fighter, the Crusader. A story well worth looking for, as it anticipates the themes of Watchmen and Alan Moore’s deconstructionist approach to super-heroes. Like many other under-the-radar DC titles at this time, Aquaman explored new ground and played with the conventions of comic books (as opposed to comic book conventions). I hated to see this title disappear. It would be only Justice League and the occasional B and B appearance for Aquaman for the next three and a half years, when he got a four-issue back-up in Adventure; over four years till he appeared on a cover after inheriting Adventure from the Spectre; and more than six till DC revived the Aquaman title with #57 in the spring of 1977. Batman 230 Another ”torn from today’s headlines” stories as Batman meets the Guardian Angels… er, the Black Barons. This kinds of stories never work with Batman. Well, not with THE Batman, anyway.
Conan 4 Very few books increase in quality as quickly as Conan did. And with this issue, it begins monthly publication. Proof that this little beauty is catching on. Detective 409 I still think this would have been a better cover if the figures were in each other’s position. The interior art didn’t come too close to capturing the mood of the cover. Justice League of America #88 Approximately number 62 in an interminable series of disgraced, humiliated, loser Justice Leaguers covers. What th’? Mike Friedrich, God bless him, is still getting his sea legs as a writer. They’re more like D-minus legs, though.
Mister Miracle #1 Great cover, original story, headlong excitement. And how can you not love Oberon, the dwarfish alte cocker and technology maven? Our Army at War #230 The usual good stuff, especially because of the USS Stevens story and the naturalistic style of Sam Glanzman. Our Fighting Forces #130 Superb cover, and a book I remember well because it provided a typical respite of comic book comfort food on a particularly bleak, dispiriting Saturday afternoon.
Savage Tales #1 The Grail of the Month. Couldn’t find it anywhere until for some odd reason I was in good old Tony’s candy store slash bookie joint. (Now that I think of it, it was probably to see a friend who worked there.) Anyway, there on Tony’s dusty, neglected magazine rack was the one and only copy of Savage Tales I still have ever seen. “The Frost Giant’s Daughter” by Barry Smith was the crown jewel of the issue.
Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen #136 An ugly cover, but more Kirby insanity lay within! Weisinger had to be so pissed that Kirby was doing one of “his” comics. Kirby’s covers clearly outshone these Neal Adams toss-aways. Tomahawk #133 Like Aquaman, (Son of) Tomahawk, another comic residing in the sticks of DC, gave you far more than your money’s worth every issue. World's Finest #201 I think it was the rare combination of Infantino and Adams that got me to buy this. (Pausing to check the interior.) Yeah, it had to be, because the story was completely harebrained.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,872
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on Jan 9, 2021 14:09:28 GMT -5
Books I own from this month that I acquired after the fact (I was born eight years and one month after this date!):
Archie #207 Aquaman #56 Astonishing Tales #5 Avengers #86 Batman #230 Detective Comics #409 Savage Tales #1 (and I got it for only $40!!!) Teen Titans #32 X-Men #69
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Jan 10, 2021 3:04:15 GMT -5
At first glance I thought Astonishing Tales #5 was a comic I'd read back then butlooking at the credits I see that Wally Wood didn'tdraw the Dr. Doom story this issue, so now I'm not so sure. I'd have to look at the Ka-Zar story, which according to the credits was still being drawn by BWS, to see if I remembered it.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Jan 13, 2021 11:31:32 GMT -5
JANUARY 1971
..... Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen An ugly cover, but more Kirby insanity lay within! Weisinger had to be so pissed that Kirby was doing one of “his” comics. Kirby’s covers clearly outshone these Neal Adams toss-aways. .... At this time JO was under Murray Boltinoff's auspices, if only for a few months before the King arrived at DC. Weisinger had left DC several months earlier, and from what I've read he couldn't wait to leave (though he was entertaining an offer to come back in 1978, before he died of a heart attack). When Weisinger retired from DC in 1970, his fiefdom was split up among several editors: Boltinoff got Action and Jimmy Olsen (as mentioned, a placeholder for a few issues until Kirby) and continued with Superboy (which he'd edited since 1968); Schwartz got Superman and World's Finest; Mike "Mod Wonder Woman" Sekowsky of course got Adventure (Supergirl); and E. Nelson Bridwell got Lois Lane and (continued with) the Superman-related Giant issues.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Jan 13, 2021 11:37:18 GMT -5
JANUARY 1971
..... Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen An ugly cover, but more Kirby insanity lay within! Weisinger had to be so pissed that Kirby was doing one of “his” comics. Kirby’s covers clearly outshone these Neal Adams toss-aways. .... At this time JO was under Murray Boltinoff's auspices, if only for a few months before the King arrived at DC. Weisinger had left DC several months earlier, and from what I've read he couldn't wait to leave (though he was entertaining an offer to come back in 1978, before he died from a heart attack). When he retired from DC in 1970, his fiefdom was split up among several editors: Boltinoff got Action and Jimmy Olsen (as mentioned, a placeholder for a few issues until Kirby); Schwartz got Superman and World's Finest; Mike "Mod Wonder Woman" Sekowsky of course got Adventure (Supergirl); and E. Nelson Bridwell got Lois Lane and (continued with) the Superman-related Giant issues. Thanks for this info! I have to double-check my assumptions! I didn't realize that Boltinoff had taken this over. He was one of my favorite editors ( Tomahawk; Doom Patrol; Bob Hope, e.g.), and of course, he used Adams a lot on his covers, so it makes sense he'd use him here. Still, like you, I never really thought he did justice to Superman covers.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Jan 13, 2021 18:22:12 GMT -5
January 1971
Oh, I have plenty of Jan. '71s now, thanks to back issues, Showcase, Essentials, and other collected volumes--but back then? It was getting harder and harder to find anything on the stands in my neighborhood. For Marvel that month these were my only new comics: Avengers #86: part two of a Squadron Supreme story. Great John Buscema cover, with Sal Buscema back as the penciler for the interior art. Fantastic Four #109: John B cover and interior art.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Jan 23, 2021 13:15:15 GMT -5
^^^ While I was not very impressed with that month's Marvels--I felt the stories were lackluster--it was a different story with the DCs. Jan. 1971: These (below) were the only two DCs I got off the stands: Adventure #403: As I have mentioned distribution was spotty back then, at least in my neighborhood, so I had not been able to find many Action issues (with the Legion back-up feature); and at the time I was not aware that the Legion was now the back-up feature in Superboy. So I couldn't believe my luck when I saw this particular comic on the stands spotlighting not only the Legion but my favorite Legionnaires--Light Lass, Saturn Girl, Lightning Lad. As Prince Hal noted upthread, this was a giant issue compiling the Lightning Lad death-resurrection stories from the Siegel-Hamilton-Forte Legion era. I had already read one of the stories in Adventure #312, one of my cherished back issues, but I'd not read the rest of this arc. Fabulous issue! Swan redid his iconic #312 cover for this Giant and made it even more iconic. Wonder Woman #193: I'd missed a few WW issues, so I was also glad to see this one on the stands. Back then I wasn't a fan of sword and sorcery tales so I'd been bored by some of the preceding WW stories (while admiring Sekowsky's magical way with demons, monsters, etc.). But I much preferred it when WW/Diana fought real people; I mean, she was depowered, so wouldn't it make sense she'd fight more realistic, down-to-earth foes? Anyway I loved this issue, since here she was fighting ordinary people, not super-powered fantastical creatures. And she was operating in a run-down neighborhood, which was like the one I was living in. I could relate to her. This was, and remains, one of my all-time favorite mod-WW issues.
|
|