I've definitely heard/read people calling Huckabee-Sanders and Ivanka some pretty extreme names based on their simply being female, been awhile but for Palin too, plus all the ridiculing variations on the Trump name. I don't even refer to Donald Trump by anything other than Trump. I will admit guilt at calling Rush Limbaugh Rush Limpdick and Michael Moore Michael Moron though. I guess Limbaugh and Moore are entertainers, so if Trump were still just an entertainer maybe I'd have something to call him, I just never watched an Apprentice or whatever else he was doing other than an SNL appearance I guess. Leonardo Decapitated and Sandra Bollocks are a couple of my others, no idea why, I don't hate their acting at all, just get so much celebrity 'news' sometimes (and every local news show seems to include movie reviews these days), guess I'm a reactionary there.

Often true. but there's other options as well.
I keep thinking of the recent bad joke Trevor Noah did about the french world-cup winning team, when he celebrated them as african, because the majority of hte team is colored
Lots of people were quick to label the joke (and him?) as racist, left and right, when it obviously wasn't the case. It wasn't racist, it was just lame : how many times do you think they heard before that?
True, they probably often heard it a thousand times before, but with actual racist meaning.

Where it got truly bizarre is that when called out, he had the weirdest defense : he claimed he made the joke to highlight the hipocrisy of the french officials who deem french colored when they are heroes, and illegals when they are not... well... heroes...
That may be very true, and not just in France, but the issue is that this was not the criticism he got from the french : the first ones who expressed real offence were the french NBA players, all blacks...
What this highlighted was very interesting in my opinion, in understanding the deep cultural differencies in countries such as France where nationality comes by birtright, nationality is more important than cultural identity, as it is in the US, where everyone mostly define themselves by their cultural origin/identity (afro-american, latino, irish, italo-american, gay, christian, etc).
This made me realize more than ever that this is a very americno-american paradigm, and probably a source of much tension.
I'm not saying that France doesn't have related issues, but at least, their minorities fully embrace their french common history, in good and bad.

So when Trump gets almost instantly labeled racist when he attacks Watters, Lemon and James for their low IQ, it most probably is grounded in some kind of vague lazy racism (he can't ignore that the trope exists!), but I guess that theattack in itself suffices to criticize his statements : he is the president and shouldn't attack citizens unless they commited a crime.

I must say though, that I recently heard Howard Stern saying many unkind things about Jamie Foxx, about his character, and I saw no backlash about him being racist for htat. But maybe that is because people hate Foxx, or because Stern is jewish, so you couldn't attack hm either?

Sorry but that one doesn't sit well.

So far, you've made numerous claims that were completely false (Russia has only one party, Putin was head of the KGB, was a member of the communist party and a high ranking one, the pravda newspaper is the official voice of Putin and his party, Russia has almost no trade with anyone but countries such as Iran, De Gaulle was responsible for horrible things during the Indochine war (despite the fact he wsn't there and not in the governement...), etc...).
Some of them you walked back after you realized after googling that what I said was true, some you haven't adressed.
And I'm not even talking about the fact that Putin and his party are not communist, because, I understand where you're thinking gets IMO Skewed (Putin is evil, the soviet communist party is evil, they are both from Russia, therefore Putin is a communist, or something along those lines).

But never once did I assume you were lying, I always gave you the benefit of doubt and believed you were only mistaken on specific facts.

But somehow, even if on those specific facts, I wasn't wrong at all, that means I'm supporting Russia AND am a troll?! While you were the one making all those factually untrue claims?
Wow

There were lots of points that fall into the matter of opinions and subjectivity, and those I fully accept debate on, and don't look for excuses to avoid risking being wrong. Being wrong is part of the process of learning, as long as you aknowledge it.
I didn't attempt to riddicule your opinions and didn't insult you. Stating facts about communist history that you got wrong isn't selling you communism. I don't know why you're doing that, but please stop painting me in that dishonest fashion, I'm sure you're better than that, as you more than often prove here on the boards.

Can we at least fart in one's general direction?

“The bombs never fell. They didn’t have to. Russia’s pact with Japan, Africa and South America kept her fat and cozy. To America half the world was closed. Her few remaining friends bled the frightened giant dry, while her spoiled children ate well. As ever, America pretended it wasn’t happening. She wanted more and found the cupboards bare.”

-Timothy Truman (Scout #1, September 1985)

Chillingly prophetic opening paragraph of Scout #1.

What’s to spin? Are you saying the troops were pro-fascist?

Did he say antifa? Oh wait he didn’t.

Even assuming your characterization of unemployed dimbassss is correct.

You jump to an awful lot of conclusions based on zero evidence.