|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Sept 6, 2014 14:46:42 GMT -5
That Criterion release ,besides her bio doc, has a 45 minute filmed interview with her a few years before she passed away. Hopefully you might find it at your local library
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Sept 6, 2014 15:03:12 GMT -5
That Criterion release ,besides her bio doc, has a 45 minute filmed interview with her a few years before she passed away. Hopefully you might find it at your local library I have it! Two or three years ago, I decided it was way past time to have my own copy of Pandora's Box!
I also have the Louise Brooks biography by Barry Paris and the book that collects her essays on film, although the title escapes me at the moment.
And a Valentina collection by Guido Crepax.
Louise Brooks is a longtime obsession.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Sept 6, 2014 15:03:58 GMT -5
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) Just watched this for the first time and for the most part enjoyed it. Paul Newman and Robert Redford have great chemistry together. The only thing that took me out of the movie was the bicycle riding montage which was absolutely ridiculous. The constant use of musical montages gets a bit tedious. Other than that it's a solid popcorn movie and a classic Western.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Sept 6, 2014 16:21:27 GMT -5
I haven't seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid for a while but, yeah, it's one of the best movies of the late 1960s. And it doesn't bother me a bit that those montages are ridiculous (you're probably right about that. I never noticed. I think that kind of thing was just what they did in the movies in the 1960s), they're part of the charm.
The next time you see it, you'll like the montages a lot better.
The Sting is really good, too.
And Paper Moon.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Sept 6, 2014 17:54:45 GMT -5
Svengoolie is showing Werewolf of London tonight!
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Sept 6, 2014 18:05:49 GMT -5
Svengoolie is showing Werewolf of London tonight! I've seen this a bunch of times. The best things about it are Warner Oland and Valerie Hobson.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Sept 6, 2014 18:10:46 GMT -5
Here's a recommendation for film buffs who like the occasional 1950s French film to add a little variety to your cinema viewing. Right now, TCM On Demand has a 1952 film available, it's called Forbidden Games (Jeux Interdite) and I've watched the first ten minutes and I'm mesmerized! You know how you sometimes get sucked into the opening of a movie and you're in the movie right from the start? I'm getting that feeling!
If you're not sure about it, just watch the first ten minutes and see if you don't get sucked in!
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Sept 6, 2014 18:41:40 GMT -5
Here's a recommendation for film buffs who like the occasional 1950s French film to add a little variety to your cinema viewing. Right now, TCM On Demand has a 1952 film available, it's called Forbidden Games (Jeux Interdite) and I've watched the first ten minutes and I'm mesmerized! You know how you sometimes get sucked into the opening of a movie and you're in the movie right from the start? I'm getting that feeling! If you're not sure about it, just watch the first ten minutes and see if you don't get sucked in! Yes ,I believe I reviewed that on this board awhile back. Fantastic movie. Your made of stone if it doesn't effect you. I'm sure I gave it 10 stars. Its available from Criterion. They know whats good
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Sept 6, 2014 19:51:41 GMT -5
Here's a recommendation for film buffs who like the occasional 1950s French film to add a little variety to your cinema viewing. Right now, TCM On Demand has a 1952 film available, it's called Forbidden Games (Jeux Interdite) and I've watched the first ten minutes and I'm mesmerized! You know how you sometimes get sucked into the opening of a movie and you're in the movie right from the start? I'm getting that feeling! If you're not sure about it, just watch the first ten minutes and see if you don't get sucked in! Yes ,I believe I reviewed that on this board awhile back. Fantastic movie. Your made of stone if it doesn't effect you. I'm sure I gave it 10 stars. Its available from Criterion. They know whats good That was one of the most amazing things I've ever seen. I'm mad at myself for not watching it earlier. (It's been on TCM a couple of times in the last year and a half and I was kind of curious, but I just kept letting it pass by.)
That owl in the mill. That was pretty awesome. There was a lot of awesome in that movie, but I can mention the owl without giving anything away.
Ten stars for sure. Maybe the best French film I've ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Sept 6, 2014 20:44:21 GMT -5
Forbidden Games (1952) Directed by Rene Clement. With Bridget Fossey and Georges Poujouly.
One of the most amazing films I've ever seen. I give it a 10. Ish gave it a 10 when he reviewed it a few months ago. Movies like this one are the reason I watch so many movies that I don't know that much about. Every once in a while you stumble into something amazing that you never knew it existed.
It's 1940 and the Nazis are attacking France. Civilians from Paris are fleeing the chaos. Forbidden Games focuses on a little girl named Paulette trying to make sense of the tragedy and death around her as she finds herself a refugee with a peasant family.
I don't really want to say anything else about it. It was just on TCM, so it should be on TCM On Demand for a few days. Watch the first ten minutes and see if you aren't sucked in.
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Sept 6, 2014 21:38:04 GMT -5
Found the review. Here's what I wrote up back on June 12th
Forbidden Games (1952) Brigitte Fossey,Georges Poujouly D-Rene Clement
A girl of perhaps five or six is orphaned in an air raid while fleeing Paris with her parents early in World War II. She is befriended by a pre-adolescent peasant boy after she wandered away from the other refugees, and is taken in for a few weeks by his family. The children become fast friends, and the film follows their attempt to assimilate the deaths they both face, and the religious rituals surrounding those deaths, through the construction of a cemetery for all sorts of animals. Child-like and adult activity are frequently at cross-purposes, however.
This is a movie that will haunt me forever.The opening act with the refugees crossing a bridge and getting caught by the bombs and strafing gun fire resulting in a little orphan girl holding on to her dead dog will break your heart.But this is not a morbid movie,surprisingly.You'll be riveted as the young girl and the boy she befriends come to understand the meaning of death.Its sad and heart-wrenching to watch but done a child-like innocence and fun.
You will instantly love the little girl Paulette (Fossey).The simple guitar background music is perfect too.This is a legendary film.10 of 10 stars
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Sept 6, 2014 21:48:29 GMT -5
Two films I watched recently include 1969's Daddy's Gone-A-Hunting, a suspensful nutcase stalker movie. Also enjoyable was 1944's The Purple Heart where some American pilots crash land and are picked up by the Japanese after a bombing raid of Tokyo. The whole movie revolves on their trial, charged with war crimes by Japan.The trial gives this war film a unique angle
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Sept 7, 2014 9:25:05 GMT -5
Ride Lonesome (1959) Directed by Budd Boetticher With Randolph Scott, Karen Steele, James Best, Pernell Roberts, Lee Van Cleef and James Coburn
The Boetticher-Scott westerns are all very solid movies.
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Sept 7, 2014 9:27:42 GMT -5
I haven't seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid for a while but, yeah, it's one of the best movies of the late 1960s. And it doesn't bother me a bit that those montages are ridiculous (you're probably right about that. I never noticed. I think that kind of thing was just what they did in the movies in the 1960s), they're part of the charm. Also the New York sequence was a very good way of encapsulating and conveying th experience to the audience without having to spend a lot of time on incidents that weren't vital to the story.
|
|
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Sept 7, 2014 10:27:31 GMT -5
Holy space travel, Batman! When stuck with a mountain of ironing (family of four, right?) I like to watch old movies on Youtube; usually B flicks that don't require paying too much attention. Yesterday's film was quite a surprise, and a good one. It's a science-fiction story, far more accurate (scientifically-speaking) than most of what could be seen in its era. It's got a spaceship with a racially-integrated crew. Gender equality is treated as a matter of course. Humanity is united and is at peace in a society geared toward the betterment of all and the pursuit of knowledge. Sounds like the premise of Star Trek? Yes it does, but it's The first spaceship on Venus, an East German/Polish film from 1960 (badly dubbed in English, but that's hardly the producers' fault). The acting is woody, I'll admit that, and there is a distinct lack of personal emotional tension. Everything is quite... soviet-like, would be the word? As in "every crew member, being of good will and sound principles, does their job to the best of their ability using reliable machines"? But there are so many refreshing aspects to this film that I'll easily forgive it these little faults. To begin with, this is real science- fiction, not science-fantasy. When you stop a rocket's engines in space, for example, it doesn't slow down; you need "braking rockets" to do the job. An airplane cannot fly properly in a heavy gravity field. Alien beings do not speak English, nor anything resembling human speech. Astronauts are scientists first and foremost, not reckless action heroes. Politics are treated very lightly. Yes, the tone is clearly socialistic: humanity is united, everyone is honest and hardworking, every machine provided by the system works fine and so on. There is no traitor on board, there is no weak link to the team, there is no evil foreign spy, there is no coward who will chicken out at the critical moment just so the hero will look better. In fact, there is no single hero -although two characters go out in pretty heroic fashion. The film also eschews what I view as a cardinal sin in general fiction: a chess scene in which supposedly good real players get checkmated by a surprise move. Come on, people, that's impossible!!! Only amateur players can't see two or three moves in advance. Here, we have a scientist who's playing against a robot; he first remarks how the machine elegantly foiled his gambit by moving a piece, and a bit later learns that it will be checkmate in a few moves. That's how it's done, Hollywood! (And yes, Star Trek, I'm looking at you). The plot is neat, and the film manages to preserve a sense of mystery even as we discover things, a bit like 2001 would do a few years later. The concluding message is kind of old-fashioned ("humanity should really not nuke itself out of existence") but I'm sure that it carried a lot of weight in 1960. Recommended to all those who have some ironing to do, and even to those who simply want to see an intelligent B-movie.
|
|