|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Mar 28, 2021 13:24:40 GMT -5
Donald Duck and the Mummy's Ring (Four Color #29) (...) As noted in my post in the " What classic comics have you read lately?" thread, I just re-read this story recently. I definitely agree that this is a prime example of a Barks adventure story, with the fast-moving plot that sees his characters facing all kinds of perils and also traveling to exotic locales. I have to say, though, reading these as an adult, I'm really noticing the casual racism and/or ethnic stereotypes that pepper his stories (as aspect that I largely didn't notice when I first read them as a preteen). In this specific case, there's definitely a dose of Orientalism in the faux-Egyptian settings. I can't say I'm coming to any kind of coherent conclusion with this line of thought, because this aspect isn't a deal-breaker for me - I still enjoy reading a good Barks Duck story. It's clearly there. More or less depending on the location of the story. That one didn't stick out to me as much as the recent "Volcano Valley." And "Darkest Africa" is coming up soon...and it's a doozy. Like you, for me, they aren't deal breakers. But I'm also a middle-aged white male. I'm the definition of privilege. Some of them are very problematic and honestly should at least have warnings.
|
|
|
Post by EdoBosnar on Mar 28, 2021 17:40:14 GMT -5
(...) Like you, for me, they aren't deal breakers. But I'm also a middle-aged white male. I'm the definition of privilege. Some of them are very problematic and honestly should at least have warnings. Yeah, they probably should - esp. when stuff like that panel MDG pointed out a few weeks ago tends to pop up.
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Mar 29, 2021 8:42:23 GMT -5
(...) Like you, for me, they aren't deal breakers. But I'm also a middle-aged white male. I'm the definition of privilege. Some of them are very problematic and honestly should at least have warnings. Yeah, they probably should - esp. when stuff like that panel MDG pointed out a few weeks ago tends to pop up. As my son said, "They're okay when they stay in Duckburg, but when they go to foreign lands it's asking for trouble."
|
|
|
Post by EdoBosnar on Mar 29, 2021 12:52:10 GMT -5
As my son said, "They're okay when they stay in Duckburg, but when they go to foreign lands it's asking for trouble." That may be true, but then you miss out on a lot of the best Barks stories, which read like exciting boys' adventure stories. Off the top of my head, I'd say Donald Duck and the Golden Helmet and Donald Duck & the Pixilated Parrot (which I just very concisely reviewed in the "What classic comics have you read lately?" thread - link on preceding page) can be safely given to small children.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Mar 29, 2021 13:56:37 GMT -5
Ghost of the Grotto (Four Color #159, Aug. 1947) A mere three months after his last appearance Donald had another Four Color one-shot. To me this is a sign that Barks and the Ducks are selling well. And with a cover like this one, how could they not? That is just pure fun and adventure. The story starts with Donald and the boys on a multi-ethnic island where they are renting a boat to harvest kelp. As the kelp beds are nearly played out they get the idea to try to harvest from the middle of "Skull-eye Reef" where there are kelp beds that have never been touched. On the island we find out that this is the night, once every fifty years when a local boy is stolen from the island never to be seen again. The gang gets the boat positioned on top of the reef so they can harvest kelp. And that way leads...adventure. This story is, I think, a turning point for the long adventure stories. It's incredibly atmospheric with a palpable sense of gothic danger as the boys are menaced by the "Ghost of the Grotto" an eerie man in ancient armor who makes off with Dewey. Ultimately we find out that the "ghost" is one of the kidnapped children and they have been guarding the treasure in a British ship that was marooned in the eye of the reef and are awaiting the return of Sir Francis Drake. The story is atmospheric and the limited setting actually plays to Barks' strengths in this period and against some of this weaknesses. We definitely worry about the fate of Dewey. Not that there isn't some laughs. It wouldn't be a Duck adventure without a few. But they're secondary. And generally were played for menace before the laughs come with the defeat of that particular menace (in this case a very large octopus). As I said, this feels like a turning point for the long adventure stories. It's more adventure than comedy and the peril feels more perilous. I'd say this is probably the best long story so far.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Aug 24, 2021 12:04:06 GMT -5
Adventure Down Under (Four Color #159, Aug. 1947) The second feature of F.C. 159 is another adventure story, this time taking Donald and the boys "down under" to Australia. The boys ask Donald for a vacation before school starts and Donald oddly agrees to take them to Catalina. On the way, they come across a hypnotist who hypnotizes Donald into being a "homesick kangaroo." Acting as a kangaroo Donald buys tickets for he and the boys to Australia so they can get back home. After sleeping on the plane to Australia the hypnosis wears off and Donald realizes he's not a kangaroo and he and the boys are in Australia. As he's complaining that Australia is "too civilized" an Australian gentleman offers him a job hunting kangaroos, particularly "Mournful Mary" the Queen of the Kangaroos. who lost her baby and has been the terror of the Outback. Donald and the boys arrive at a sheep station beset by kangaroos and almost instantly start trying to capture Mournful Mary...but she's too clever. Donald disguises himself as a kangaroo and is captured by Mary who seems to have decided that Donald the Kangaroo should replace her lost baby. The boys attempt to track Donald through the outback while Donald attempts to and finally manages to escape from Mary. Unfortunately Donald is capture by Aborigines...who appear to want to fatten him up for dinner. Ultimately Mary ends up saving Donald and the boys from the Aborigines, only to fall in to one of the pit traps that they had earlier made to capture her. The sheep station owner is going to shoot Mary, but Donald convinces him to let he and the boys take her back to America with them. Overall this is a fun little adventure. I know that it's held in some regard by, for example, Inducks, but I don't find it nearly as good as Ghost in the Grotto. The really problematic part is the portrayal of the Aboriginal Australians. Visually Barks doesn't really caricature them as he will in a few months in "Darkest Africa." And they are, as best I can tell, among the only actual humans (as opposed to humanish people with dogs noses) that Barks will use. On the other hand their speech patterns are terribly stereotypical. And the characterization of them as cannibals is way out of bounds. I note that when the story was reprinted in Donald Duck Adventures #11 in 1988 the speech balloons were altered to a more normal speech pattern. Definitely problematic today. The next one, Four Color 178, she is a BIG deal.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Apr 29, 2022 17:23:25 GMT -5
Christmas On Bear Mountain (Four Color #178, Dec. 1947) Four months after The Ghost in the Grotto and Adventure Down Under, Barks gives us what is almost unquestionably his greatest contribution to comics, ducks, popular culture. It may not have seemed like it at the time. It almost unquestionably didn't. But the first appearance of Uncle Scrooge, who seemed likely to be a one-dimensional throw-away character, became magic. The story starts out as so many do. It's almost Christmas and Donald is again broke. He and the boys are bemoaning that there will be no money for Christmas. No money for presents, trees, food, etc. A mention from one of the boys of "rich old Uncle Scrooge" leads to us first seeing the iconic old boy. This is not the Scrooge we will come to know. He hates everyone and everyone hates him. He decides to invite Donald and the boys to his mountain cabin as an opportunity to have some fun by scaring them and seeing if Donald is a brave duck. Scrooge's plan is to scare the boys by wearing a bear suit and sets that stage in his invitation to the boys by telling them to watch out for bears. The boys arrive and find presents for the boys, a refrigerator full of rich food and a snowy mountain cabin. The one thing that is missing is a Christmas tree. Donald is terrified that there are bears around, but the boys assure him they'll be sleeping. Scrooge tries to reach the cabin in order to scare them, but is turned back by a snowstorm. The following day the boys despair that there isn't a Christmas tree and they convince Donald to go out get a tree, but all they can find is a hollow old snag. Unbeknownst to them there is a bear cub in the snag. The cub wakes up and begins wrecking havoc in the cabin, the noise and the uproar terrifying Donald. Eventually the boys discover that it's just a little cub and that information emboldens Donald. But, meanwhile, the bears mother discovers him missing and makes her appearance tearing down the door of the cabin and ultimately driving Donald and the boys out in to the cold. In lieu of freezing and starving, Donald and the boys decide to try to sneak in and tie up the mother as she is napping. At almost the same time Uncle Scrooge shows up in his bear suit. Donald starts toward the sleeping mother, but faints. Meanwhile, the boys are chasing the cub. Scrooge sees the boys chasing the cub and is impressed. He then sees Donald in a faint beside the mother, but takes it as Donald being fearless and sleeping comfortably with a bear. He flees the scene in a less than fearless manner and now plans great things for the four the next day. The next day (we have no idea how the boys got away from the bears and the cabin) enjoying a Christmas feast. Scrooge presents Donald with a bear skin that makes Donald faint again. But the boys save the day. Just an incredibly important story...but you really can't tell that it will be. Without knowing how things would turn out, one would not have thought that Scrooge would be much more than a one-off character. At the most you'd expect him to maybe show up as a character of the lie of Gladstone Gander, a character who would be used for a certain type of story, but not the type to carry his own book, much less become as important a character as Donald himself.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on May 20, 2022 10:50:42 GMT -5
I think that technically what should come next is one of the most controversial and least reprinted Barks stories. But instead we're going to take a rare look at a 10-pager that introduces a major character. And we'll circle back to that controversial adventure story. Wintertime Wager (Walt Disney's Comics & Stories #88 - Jan. 1948) By and large I've skipped Barks' 10-pagers, not because they aren't fun little stories, but because they tend not to have a big impact on the larger Duck Universe. But that's not the case with this one, because we get the introduction of a major player in a fairly minor story. Donald's cousin Gladstone Gander. Much like Scrooge in Christmas on Bear Mountain, this is not the Gladstone we would come to know and love/hate. No sign of his unnatural luck. He's simply here as a foil for Donald. The story is pretty simple. It's Christmas Day and the coldest day of the year (so cold that the Penguin Club has cancelled its daily swim) and Gladstone comes to take possession of Donald's house. It seems that in the heat of July Donald had bragged that he would swim in Frozenbear Lake on Christmas and signed a note to that effect promising his house to Gladstone if he failed to do so. Of course Donald tries (though not very hard) to do a swim, but can't do so because of the cold, despite the boys doing their best to get him in to the water. Just as it appears that Gladstone is going to get Donald's house, Daisy comes to the rescue. It seems that at the same time Donald bragged about swimming any day, Gladstone bragged that he could drink two gallons of lemonade in an hour or he'd give Donald back his house. This, of course, gives way to comical drinking by Gladstone. Gladstone, ultimately must surrender and Donald gets to keep his house. Daisy has saved the day. But for how long? Ultimately this story is only important because of the first appearance of Gladstone, though it's not the Gladstone we will come to know. But it's a very very funny 10-pager. It also shows that Daisy and the boys are the anchors that keep Donald from completely ruining his life. This really is one of the high-points for Daisy in her entire history. Just as a little legal aside, I'm not at all sure that the agreement that Donald signed is actually enforceable. The tenets of an enforceable contract at common law were offer, acceptance and consideration. We have the offer and the acceptance, but there doesn't appear to have been any consideration tendered between Donald and Gladstone.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on May 22, 2022 8:44:06 GMT -5
Wintertime Wager (Walt Disney's Comics & Stories #88 - Jan. 1948) I'm so glad to see you maintaining this thread, Slam. You're finally getting to some stories I haven't read! God, this is hilarious. Agreed. Daisy is far more often the source of conflict. Perhaps that was some of the appeal of adding a new regular: it gives her the opportunity to play a more supportive role. Unless I'm mistaken, Donald only had one other recurring antagonist--his neighbor--and I'm not even sure Jones had made all that many appearances by this point. Genuinely curious about this. What does "consideration" mean in this context?
|
|
|
Post by Calidore on May 22, 2022 9:13:11 GMT -5
This is pretty much a dead-on prediction of many moments in Elden Ring 75 years later.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on May 22, 2022 17:31:24 GMT -5
Wintertime Wager (Walt Disney's Comics & Stories #88 - Jan. 1948) I'm so glad to see you maintaining this thread, Slam. You're finally getting to some stories I haven't read! God, this is hilarious. Agreed. Daisy is far more often the source of conflict. Perhaps that was some of the appeal of adding a new regular: it gives her the opportunity to play a more supportive role. Unless I'm mistaken, Donald only had one other recurring antagonist--his neighbor--and I'm not even sure Jones had made all that many appearances by this point. Genuinely curious about this. What does "consideration" mean in this context? Basically it is something of value that each party to a contract gets. Most of the time it boils down to an exchange of money for goods or services. But it doesn’t have to be monetary. In this case it doesn’t appear that Donald gains anything of value from the contract which would make it fail for lack of consideration. This is closer to a wager, which may or may not be lawful, but it’s certainly not phrased that way.
|
|
|
Post by zaku on May 23, 2022 2:07:31 GMT -5
This "Uncle Scrooge" new character will never stick! ;-)
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Dec 28, 2022 15:09:48 GMT -5
Darkest Africa (March of Comics #20, 1948) (I'm not posting the cover because it's just a generic gag cover). And now we come to one of the most controversial of the adventure stories. This one has it all. Racist imagery. Cruelty to animals. Suicidal ideations. I guess there's no misogyny because there are no women in the story. It starts out in a typical Duck fashion. Huey, Dewey and Louie are chasing butterflies for a school project and Donald is actually helping them. He goes after a "rare specimen" when his net collides with that of another butterfly collector...an evil butterfly collector. Donald tricks his way in to the win and the interplay is observed by a third butterfly collector who wants Donald to go to Africa and capture an very rare specimen for him. Donald doesn't want any part of it until Prof. McFiendy outright steals the boys butterfly collection and then the fight is on. Donald and the boys follow McFiendy to Africa...and the problems with the story start early. Donald and McFiendy go through a series of encounters as they head toward the Whambesi River where the butterfly has been reported. After one encounter Donald suspects their food has been poisoned. So, of course, he poisons a crocodile to find out. After another encounter they are stranded without a boat on a river island. So, of course, the boys kill another croc to get away. They are clearly not Junior Woodchucks who are dedicated to helping wildlife at this point. Ultimately Donald is able to find the butterfly and catch it. Meanwhile the boys have gathered up a jar of caterpillars to take back as part of their school project. But McFiendy has bribed some local cannibals to kidnap the boys so Donald will have to trade the butterfly for the nephews. And...yeah...it's really that bad. Donald turns over the butterfly to McFiendy and gets the boys back. As McFiendy heads back to the coast Donald gets a great idea. He'll start a wildfire and endanger a herd of elephants to stop McFiendy and get the butterfly back. The plan works and Donald and the boys get the butterfly back. On the ship back to America McFiendy decides he can't live without the butterfly and is about to fling himself off the boat when there appears more of the Almostus Extintus'. The boys' caterpillars have turned in to that rare butterfly and it is no longer rare. This one hasn't been reprinted very often and as far as I can tell the only unexpurgated version is in the new Fantagraphics Complete Barks volumes. The other times it was re-inked to be marginally less racist. I'm generally pretty good at putting stuff aside and reading from the viewpoint of the time. But this one is just so bad. Even worse than Volcano Valley. The names Barks uses for the supporting characters and the butterflies are pretty funny. Sir Gnatbugg-Mothley, Prof. Argus McFiendy, Almostus Extinctus, and Pippus Connipus. That's really about all there is to recommend it because in general it's just not a great story and it's just so damn problematic.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 28, 2022 16:14:37 GMT -5
It is soooo good to see this thread back again!
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Dec 28, 2022 16:16:34 GMT -5
It is soooo good to see this thread back again! I'm really going to try to keep up with my review threads. I'm not promising anything. I'm not good at them. But I'm going to try.
|
|