|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2015 8:58:38 GMT -5
I haven't seen San Andreas, but I read this... somewhat uncomplimentary... review on another board I frequent: A huge crack appears in the road as we're driving to save our daughter; oh look - there's an airfield so we can fly over. Oh no, the planes run out of fuel, let's parachute and perform the perfect landing There's buildings falling all around - but we're not covered in one spec of dust, so let's have a long chat about where our marriage failed (while said daughter is trapped in the rubble) Oh dear, the road to the meeting point is inaccessible: but look! There just happens to be a spare boat. What a surprise : we're the only boat that can combat the tidal wave. Arrive in the city by boat..funny how there's a clear path to the exact building we bed to get to (while tons of rubbish, debris and dead bodies float idly by. Meanwhile scientist who predicts the quake just happens to know someone able to hack into TV network to broadcast warning. Daughter trapped in building with handsome young man, cue obligatory snog. They escape. Boy gets injured but can somehow run up 15 flights of stairs... Dad rescues daughter - oh no she's dead. Mum cries, dad gives kiss of life one last time. And daughter coughs up water and lives. At the end of the film, family surveys the ruined city. Cue unfurling of the American flag.
Wooden acting, poor predictable script.
That's from a cynical Brit, so YMMV
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Jun 5, 2015 22:08:58 GMT -5
The only thing I can say about San Andreas is that my son Connor collapses in gales of laughter every time he sees the trailer. It really does look ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 18:08:49 GMT -5
I haven't seen San Andreas, but I read this... somewhat uncomplimentary... review on another board I frequent: A huge crack appears in the road as we're driving to save our daughter; oh look - there's an airfield so we can fly over. Oh no, the planes run out of fuel, let's parachute and perform the perfect landing There's buildings falling all around - but we're not covered in one spec of dust, so let's have a long chat about where our marriage failed (while said daughter is trapped in the rubble) Oh dear, the road to the meeting point is inaccessible: but look! There just happens to be a spare boat. What a surprise : we're the only boat that can combat the tidal wave. Arrive in the city by boat..funny how there's a clear path to the exact building we bed to get to (while tons of rubbish, debris and dead bodies float idly by. Meanwhile scientist who predicts the quake just happens to know someone able to hack into TV network to broadcast warning. Daughter trapped in building with handsome young man, cue obligatory snog. They escape. Boy gets injured but can somehow run up 15 flights of stairs... Dad rescues daughter - oh no she's dead. Mum cries, dad gives kiss of life one last time. And daughter coughs up water and lives. At the end of the film, family surveys the ruined city. Cue unfurling of the American flag.
Wooden acting, poor predictable script.
That's from a cynical Brit, so YMMV The special effects are quite impressive though
|
|
|
Post by Pharozonk on Jun 6, 2015 19:19:20 GMT -5
The only thing I can say about San Andreas is that my son Connor collapses in gales of laughter every time he sees the trailer. It really does look ridiculous. I still can't tell whether it's trying to be ironic or if it's really meant to be that sincerely serious.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Jun 8, 2015 12:16:06 GMT -5
Upcoming Ridley Scott movie based on the Andy Weir novel.
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on Jun 8, 2015 12:48:51 GMT -5
It seems Joesph Gordon Levitt is still serious about making a Sandman Movie
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2015 18:43:48 GMT -5
First one-minute tv spot for the new 007 SPECTRE...
|
|
|
Post by Pharozonk on Jun 14, 2015 16:36:39 GMT -5
I went to a midnight premiere showing of Jurassic World. I haven't been this angry in a movie theater since I saw Transformers 4. Like that terrible showing, at one point I considered leaving the theater. The only difference? When I was watching Transformers, I didn't have a ride to leave even if I wanted to. I actually sat through the entirety of Jurassic World, clenching my fists to keep myself from yelling like Mark Waid when he saw Man of Steel. The reasons this movie fails: The big reason this movie failed for me was that it used the hackneyed "it's a stupid premise so why try at all" excuse so the filmmakers can bloat out their two hour running time with CGI out the ass and paper thin characters and plotting, both of which are common to the generic summer blockbuster fare we've been getting for the past decade. However, here's the thing: the original Jurassic Park was NOT a stupid Michael Bay piece of junk. Obviously, it had dinosaurs tearing the island a new one and chasing people, but there was meaning to it. It raised interesting questions about the nature of science and our own ignorance of the consequences of progress. Jurassic World, on the other hand, uses the EXACT same theme from the first movie and since it's a sequel there's no fucking reason why anyone would try to build a park a second time! They even have a meta moment where one of the characters brings this same problem up themselves and it's just brushed off as winking fourth wall fan service.
Another big reason this movie doesn't work is how dull and generic the characters are. Chris Pratt's character, Owen Grady, is basically doing his best Han Solo/Indiana Jones impression, but about 10X douchier and with a slight sense of misogyny. The filmmakers paint him as this heroic "man's-man", perfect in every way cliche action hero so you think that he's going to have some major flaw that screws him over...AND THEN HE DOESN'T! He literally is right about everything that happens in this movie and never undergoes a character arc of his own. He's the exact same douche he was at the beginning of the movie, except now he's got a hot girlfriend and no job. Speaking of his girlfriend, Bryce Dallas Howard's Claire Dearing's character is as underwritten as anything else happening in this movie. The character is supposed to be this apathetic, career devoted businesswoman who cares little for family or ever settling down and it's obvious that the filmmakers are going to set her up for an arc where she learns to care for other people. However, there's no pivotal point in the story where she suddenly starts caring about her nephews or Owen. She's just cold and removed one minute and the next she's as overprotective as a mother grizzly bear. The romance between her Owen is shoehorned in for the sake of it's own existence and I never for one minute bought that these two people would ever fall in love with each other nor would the sequence of events in the film cause them to since there's never a slow moment where the two share an intimate moment that would show the slightest shred of chemistry. She just shoots a pterodactyl in the head and that somehow gives the two the hots for each other? True love, I guess?
The movie also suffers from the modern genre cinema trope of the overuse of Easter eggs and punch you in the face references that are cute the first time, but quickly become painfully trite when you realize this crap is actually driving the plot along! The two boys discover the remains of the visitor center from the original Jurassic Park and somehow hotwire a jeep that hasn't been used in twenty years to escape from the jungle, even though the motor as probably rusted by then due to constant rain. The worst instance of this, however, is the climax when the Indominus Rex as attacking the protagonists near the front of the park. Claire releases the T-Rex from it's paddock to fight the monster and it basically turns into the shitty Rex vs Spino fight from JP III all over again. Even worse, suddenly velociraptors are working WITH the T-Rex as if they're somehow buddies now, complete with the raptor running into the battle in a slow motion zoom straight out of a bad early 2000's action flick. They even share a glance of approval after the fight like they were rivals in a Fast and the Furious movie or something! It's obvious the movie is trying to buy my love off my nostalgia for the ending to the first movie where the T-Rex saves the people by attacking the raptors, but this ending is nothing more than a brainless dinosaur brawl with no tension or weight. In the original movie, you never knew what character might survive to the end of the movie since the movie was never sold on the popularity of the actors as the main attraction to come see the movie. In Jurassic World's case, all the advertising has advertised the hell out of Pratt and Howard's presences so we know they would never die in the movie so there's no reason to care what happens in the plot since any scene where they are in danger is meaningless. The filmmakers don't have the balls to kill off a rising star like Pratt so there's no sense of dread when the dinosaurs attack since we know he'll never die. It's tedious and boring.To add insult to injury, the Mososaurus is the only reason the Indominus Rex is even killed, since it bursts out of the water and eats the monster in the last minute, which makes the T-Rex and raptors superfluous since if the I-Rex had just wandered close enough to the dock it would have gotten eaten anyway!
Even as it's own story, this movie is, at best, generic and mediocre. There's nothing original or interesting happening anywhere in this movie. It's like a mix of Friday the 13th and the 1998 American Godzilla movie. The Indominus Rex's "killing for the sake of killing" behavior basically turns the dinosaur into a slasher movie villain, which misses the point entirely. These are animals, NOT people. The reason they killed in the original movie was for food or to protect their territory/young. It made sense in that context since that's how animals in the wild would behave. Furthermore, it brings the theme back of the movie back into focus since it underscores why these animals should have stayed extinct since they would become the top of the food chain once again.
I've seen a lot of people who like this film tell naysayers that they should "view it as it's own film" instead of comparing it to the original Jurassic Park.However, this movie doesn't get to pull the "view it as its own story" card when it goes out of its way to insert winking fan service at every opportunity it gets. Hell, fanservice even becomes a plot point at several times in the movie (i.e. the boys finding the original visitor center and hot wiring a jeep to escape). This movie reeks of the same out of place fanservice that plagued the Abrams helmed Star Trek movies, thinking that trying to give the audience a nostalgia rush is a substitute for good writing. Instead, this movie constantly relies on cheap callbacks to a movie's legacy that it neither fully understands or respects.This movie fails to understand why the original was so successful. Instead of aiming for restraint and focus on proper storytelling, the entire movie is nothing more than a giant set piece for rampant destruction porn and death.
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on Jul 25, 2015 11:40:02 GMT -5
Man, I just saw a trailer for Del Toro's new movie Crimson Peak and I honestly can't remember the last time I got this excited about a movie:
Del Toro is hands down my favorite filmmaker and horror has always been my favorite genre and this looks like a 30's Universal Horror movie given a modern day budget. I'm so pumped!
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Aug 4, 2015 22:33:15 GMT -5
NSFW Deadpool trailer
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on Aug 6, 2015 10:56:54 GMT -5
I really dislike Deadpool...like a lot, and Ryan Reynolds usually annoys me but that was funny.
|
|
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Aug 6, 2015 15:14:33 GMT -5
The reference to a green-colored animated suit was kind of a cheap shot, but very amusing!
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 7, 2015 4:02:55 GMT -5
I haven't bought a Deadpool comic since his first mini series. It was jarring to see those wise cracks coupled together with over the top violence . Yikes!
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Aug 7, 2015 9:05:49 GMT -5
I will be the one to come to Deadpool's defense. The version of the character that has become popular recently and in this movie is VASTLY DIFFERENT from the original incarnation as a generic 90s badass mercenary. Like, completely different. Other than sharing the name and basic core concept, they are almost nothing alike. He was really fleshed out in his solo series, and Gail Simone was particularly good with him. I understand if you don't want to pick up a Deadpool book at this point, but the character really is much different and much better now. Very funny when written well.
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Aug 7, 2015 10:27:06 GMT -5
I will chime in with impulse, and agree, especially as a person that has read him from New Mutants #98. What the movie appears to be, and Ultimate Spiderman cartoon, (and video game for that matter) which I have watched, is an EXtreme third wall breaking jacka$$ version of what he was. While I have not read anything of him past Agent X, I can take him in same doses on say Ultimate Spiderman (as that is the basic punch line of the cartoon in it's entirety, third wall breaking), I don't think the movie will have the pull for me to see it beyond Netflix, when it gets there. Circle Chase and the self titled mini series are great for me. They reminded me of a violent, teen ranted to mature rated banter spewing Spiderman. Joe Kelly did a good job in the on going, and there was a lull in the mid to tail end before Gail Simone took over. But he has a heart, and there's more to him that slicing and dicing and shooting his mouth off (one of the reasons I like the self title mini above all other books). But with what I've seen of him in other media besides comics in recent years, that's all Marvel seems to want to turn him into. A foul mouth jacka$$. Even if it's still in an all ages show like Ultimate Spiderman.
But I will say, despite all that, and the differences in the character he's been, I still don't think someone that's annoyed at Deadpool now is going to like any age of Deadpool. While he's changed, he's kinda like Rick Jones, always the same pointless (if that's your assessment) character.
|
|