|
Post by tolworthy on Aug 10, 2016 14:58:27 GMT -5
Yes, it was a was a very exciting time to be a Marvel fan, wasn't it? Not for everyone, though. I'm fully expecting tolworthy to chime in with his explanation of how the great Marvel expansion was a sell-out that compromised the integrity of the brand. To hear is to obey. I agree with the OP. That was a very exciting time*. It was like hearing that George Lucas was going to expand the Star War universe, or that the Matrix was having not one but two sequels. *Even second hand. I was born in 1968. As a child I occasionally found post 1968 comics. They were rare jewels, full of colour and hyperbole and promise, gateways to an exploding universe of wonder. I was a happy child and felt I was living in a golden age. Comics were so much better than those crude simplistic reprints from before I was born. But as I grew up life did not turn out as planned. The joy went out of comics. I began to think that 1968 was a huge mistake, and looked on pre-1968 as a time of great promise that was ruined. But happy endings! Four years ago I met my new wife, and life has been getting better and better. So expect me to start posting about how "New 52" and "Marvel Now" are unappreciated masterpieces.
|
|
|
Post by hondobrode on Aug 10, 2016 18:25:25 GMT -5
I'd read this a little while back from one of the history of comics books that expanded upon the business workings of DC / National and their crooked newsstand distribution business.
Darn it I wish I could think of the name of that book.
One of the best on the subject I'd ever read.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,872
|
Post by shaxper on Aug 10, 2016 18:38:59 GMT -5
I'd read this a little while back from one of the history of comics books that expanded upon the business workings of DC / National and their crooked newsstand distribution business. Unfair as the arrangement may have seemed, I'm still impressed they were willing to carry Marvel at all. Their best competitor may never have succeeded to the extent that it did without DC/Independent's finite assistance in those early years.
|
|
|
Post by hondobrode on Aug 10, 2016 18:43:33 GMT -5
DC simply didn't see Marvel coming, and thought they were untouchable.
Up until Marvel, DC was exactly that, at least in the spandex market.
DC figured, oh well, they'll never be a legitimate threat to us, so why not make some money off of them ?
I wasn't taking a direct shot at DC in my earlier post; it's just that most newsstand distribution, at least back then, has been documented as being very monopolistic, and, like this book detailed, had mafia connections.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,872
|
Post by shaxper on Aug 10, 2016 19:23:18 GMT -5
DC simply didn't see Marvel coming, and thought they were untouchable. And yet they did limit Marvel's distribution, so they perceived some level of threat and were therefore taking some risk distributing Marvel at all, but I agree that there was no way DC expected Marvel to become what it did. It's fine if you were. I tend to villainize them for this practice as well (and for a lot of shady things DC did back in the day). It only occurred to me while reading your post above that it was actually interesting that they chose to carry Marvel at all. Would an anti-monopoly enforcement agency come busting through the window if Independent opted only to carry DC titles? I need to read this book when you remember the title. I've heard things here and there about this, but I've never seen the facts.
|
|
|
Post by Cei-U! on Aug 10, 2016 19:49:27 GMT -5
FYI, Marvel was not the only comics line distributed by Independent News. ACG also was, and was also restricted in the number of titles they could offer.
1968 was a very special year for me. It was the year I started getting an allowance ($20 a month, of which I was expected to save half) and began seriously collecting comics. I was thrilled by the expansion, eagerly snatching up those early issues of Captaion America, Iron Man, Sub-Mariner, Dr. Strange, Nick Fury, Captain Marvel, and Silver Surfer, as well as Fantastic Four, Thor, Amazing Spider-Man, Daredevil, and The Avengers. It wasn't until my senior year (1974-75) that I picked up the two issues of Spectacular Spider-Man, not until college that I acquired the '68 issues of Incredible Hulk, Sgt. Fury, and X-Men, and not until recent years that I started collecting Captain Savage, a run I only completed last year. I've never seen an issue of either Groovy or Pussycat.
The only DC titles I picked up at the time were those featuring Batman, including Brave & Bold, World's Finest and Justice League.
Cei-U! I summon that long-vanished 10-year-old!
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Aug 11, 2016 8:12:09 GMT -5
...a time of great promise that was ruined. Isn't that the history of comics? Whether the patriotic explosion of the Golden Age, the noir beauty of the post-war Spirits, the excesses of the Atom Age, the excitement of the Stan/Steve/Jack years, the early Warrens under Goodwin, the first wave of undergrounds, the new blood of the late bronze, the indies of the mid-80s, DC under Kahn, Giordano, and Levitz--5-7 years seems to be the limit before the industry (or a publisher) morphs again.
|
|
|
Post by tolworthy on Aug 11, 2016 10:27:30 GMT -5
It was the year I started getting an allowance ($20 a month, of which I was expected to save half) If only you could go back in time and tell your young self: the best possible savings strategy in 1968 (better than the bank, anyway) would be to buy up as many 12 cent comics as possible, store them in perfect condition, and sell them in the early 1990s before the market crashed.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,872
|
Post by shaxper on Aug 11, 2016 11:03:15 GMT -5
sell them in the early 1990s before the market crashed. I'm no expert on the market, but many of my completely unremarkable silver and bronze age back issues are selling on ebay for a lot more than they were worth when I bought them a decade and a half back, and that's in lower grade.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2016 11:24:37 GMT -5
Yes, it was a was a very exciting time to be a Marvel fan, wasn't it? At that time I was strictly an FF, Avengers and X-Men reader, but like many others I couldn't help but get caught up in the hype generated by the house ads and the Bullpen Bulletins. Just from the house ads alone--seeing that great Sub-Mariner #1 cover by Buscema, the Iron Man #1 cover by Colan, Cap #100's cover by Kirby--they all took my breath away. It was a great time to be a comic book fan period. DC was still riding the Batman mania, Marvel had all the new books, Charlton had their Action Heroes line & Gold Key still had Magnus & Solar! And I was buying all that I could afford...(with my allowance...about $1 a week). Ohhhhh, we have Richie Rich among us! Mine was 50 cents.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2016 11:27:24 GMT -5
FYI, Marvel was not the only comics line distributed by Independent News. ACG also was, and was also restricted in the number of titles they could offer. 1968 was a very special year for me. It was the year I started getting an allowance ($20 a month, of which I was expected to save half) and began seriously collecting comics. I was thrilled by the expansion, eagerly snatching up those early issues of Captaion America, Iron Man, Sub-Mariner, Dr. Strange, Nick Fury, Captain Marvel, and Silver Surfer, as well as Fantastic Four, Thor, Amazing Spider-Man, Daredevil, and The Avengers. It wasn't until my senior year (1974-75) that I picked up the two issues of Spectacular Spider-Man, not until college that I acquired the '68 issues of Incredible Hulk, Sgt. Fury, and X-Men, and not until recent years that I started collecting Captain Savage, a run I only completed last year. I've never seen an issue of either Groovy or Pussycat. The only DC titles I picked up at the time were those featuring Batman, including Brave & Bold, World's Finest and Justice League. Cei-U! I summon that long-vanished 10-year-old! Did I call Farrar Richie Rich just now? I stand corrected.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Aug 11, 2016 11:28:25 GMT -5
There always seemed to me something of The Dirty Dozen in the Captain Savage series. The Raiders, while not criminals, were a far more motley crew than Fury’s Howling Commandos, drawn from different services as well as the usual stereotypical different backgrounds.
Savage was a submarine captain; his sergeant (Yakkety Yates) was a Marine who was somewhat resentful of Savage; his Man Friday, “Blarney” Stone, had come along with Savage when he formed the Raiders. Essentially, though, the group was the Howlers on the other side of the International Date Line: Stone and Dum Dum Dugan were the gruff but lovable Irish guys; Jacques “Frenchy” LaRocque was a lover boy like Dino; Jay Little Bear filled the racial stereotype slot a la Gabe Jones, with a bow and arrow replacing Gabe’s bugle; Yates was a little bit Dum Dum, leavened with a dash of Fury himself; Lee “Nondescript” Baker might as well have been wearing a Cannon Fodder sweatshirt. He was as bland as could be, an idealistic teacher turned commando, Junior Juniper with even less personality. They even added a Percy Pinkerton-type when Rolfe Harrison, an Australian, joined them on a few missions.
With the appropriate name changes, the dialogue from a Savage issue is impossible to distinguish from a Fury issue.
Marvel never seemed to be able to get a handle on the series, and too often simply made it the Howlers in the Pacific. I’m guessing they set the series in the Pacific because the Howlers owned the ETO. Unlike the DC war characters, the Howlers were bigger than the war; they were more like G.I. superheroes than G.I.s Thus there was no room for a similar group. The problem with that was that for whatever reason, war comics set in the Pacific never seemed to have the same cachet or popularity as those set in Europe, with Gunner and Sarge in Our Fighting Forces being the only exception I can recall. (Much later, the USS Stevens series by Sam Glanzman was both popular and excellent, but as good as it was, it was never a headliner.
DC had tried with Capt. Storm, on the heels of JFK and PT 109, but it lasted 18 issues, one less than Captain Savage. (Ironically the final issue of Storm was published simultaneously with the second issue of Savage.) There was a reason that Storm, Gunner, and Sarge became three of the four Losers. Other than that, all there had been, IIRC, was the Fighting Devil-Dog strip in OFF featuring Sgt. Rock's brother Lt. Larry Rock, but that only ran a couple of issues.
The Savage series lurched around a bit, rarely venturing far from the Fury formula, or even from the Fury cast. Virtually every issue featured some link to the Howlers, a Howler, Baron Strucker, or Hydra. The Samurai Squadron were the Raiders’ own Blitzkrieg Squad. Ben Grimm, naturally, appeared. It’s as if Marvel didn’t trust the idea enough or hadn’t thought it out enough to let it just find its sea-legs, so to speak.
As innovative as Marvel was, and as much as I loved the expansion of the line in 1968, one might argue that Marvel was becoming imprisoned by the tropes that had led to their initial success.
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Aug 11, 2016 11:40:11 GMT -5
Did I call Farrar Richie Rich just now? I stand corrected. Dan, I wish I could accept the accolade, short-lived as it was; but it was actually md62 who'd mentioned his dollar allowance (subsequently superseded by Cei-U's $20). The quoted portions in these comments can be confusing. Anyway, in the interests of disclosure I think I was closer to md62 and you...IIRC my allowance was in the range of 50 cents to a buck for several years. So to satisfy my comic book buying needs back then I often had to depend on the kindness of generous grandparents!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2016 11:47:02 GMT -5
Did I call Farrar Richie Rich just now? I stand corrected. Dan, I wish I could accept the accolade, short-lived as it was; but it was actually md62 who'd mentioned his dollar allowance (subsequently superseded by Cei-U's $20). The quoted portions in these comments can be confusing. Anyway, in the interests of disclosure I think I was closer to md62 and you...IIRC my allowance was in the range of 50 cents to a buck for several years. So to satisfy my comic book buying needs back then I often had to depend on the kindness of generous grandparents! I ... uh ... might have made the occasional unauthorized withdrawal from my great-aunt's & mother's purses. Those 80-Page Giants & Sgt. Furys & Hulks & Not Brand Ecchs weren't going to buy themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2016 11:51:57 GMT -5
There always seemed to me something of The Dirty Dozen in the Captain Savage series. The Raiders, while not criminals, were a far more motley crew than Fury’s Howling Commandos, drawn from different services as well as the usual stereotypical different backgrounds. Savage was a submarine captain; his sergeant (Yakkety Yates) was a Marine who was somewhat resentful of Savage; his Man Friday, “Blarney” Stone, had come along with Savage when he formed the Raiders. Essentially, though, the group was the Howlers on the other side of the International Date Line: Stone and Dum Dum Dugan were the gruff but lovable Irish guys; Jacques “Frenchy” LaRocque was a lover boy like Dino; Jay Little Bear filled the racial stereotype slot a la Gabe Jones, with a bow and arrow replacing Gabe’s bugle; Yates was a little bit Dum Dum, leavened with a dash of Fury himself; Lee “Nondescript” Baker might as well have been wearing a Cannon Fodder sweatshirt. He was as bland as could be, an idealistic teacher turned commando, Junior Juniper with even less personality. They even added a Percy Pinkerton-type when Rolfe Harrison, an Australian, joined them on a few missions. With the appropriate name changes, the dialogue from a Savage issue is impossible to distinguish from a Fury issue. Marvel never seemed to be able to get a handle on the series, and too often simply made it the Howlers in the Pacific. I’m guessing they set the series in the Pacific because the Howlers owned the ETO. Unlike the DC war characters, the Howlers were bigger than the war; they were more like G.I. superheroes than G.I.s Thus there was no room for a similar group. The problem with that was that for whatever reason, war comics set in the Pacific never seemed to have the same cachet or popularity as those set in Europe, with Gunner and Sarge in Our Fighting Forces being the only exception I can recall. (Much later, the USS Stevens series by Sam Glanzman was both popular and excellent, but as good as it was, it was never a headliner. DC had tried with Capt. Storm, on the heels of JFK and PT 109, but it lasted 18 issues, one less than Captain Savage. (Ironically the final issue of Storm was published simultaneously with the second issue of Savage.) There was a reason that Storm, Gunner, and Sarge became three of the four Losers. Other than that, all there had been, IIRC, was the Fighting Devil-Dog strip in OFF featuring Sgt. Rock's brother Lt. Larry Rock, but that only ran a couple of issues. The Savage series lurched around a bit, rarely venturing far from the Fury formula, or even from the Fury cast. Virtually every issue featured some link to the Howlers, a Howler, Baron Strucker, or Hydra. The Samurai Squadron were the Raiders’ own Blitzkrieg Squad. Ben Grimm, naturally, appeared. It’s as if Marvel didn’t trust the idea enough or hadn’t thought it out enough to let it just find its sea-legs, so to speak. As innovative as Marvel was, and as much as I loved the expansion of the line in 1968, one might argue that Marvel was becoming imprisoned by the tropes that had led to their initial success. And yet, as we all know, the series produced what the most discerning experts agree is the 6th-best comic -- & single best non-annual or -Giant, period -- ever published.
|
|