|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 16, 2016 17:22:50 GMT -5
...
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 18, 2016 19:56:01 GMT -5
...
.
|
|
|
Post by hondobrode on Aug 19, 2016 8:35:51 GMT -5
I actually have a not-that-far-from-complete run of Marvel Tales because I'm a cheapskate and they provide an inexpensive way to get Silver Age Spider-Man tales as single issue "floppies", printed on newsprint, which is how I like to read them, as opposed to buying modern trade collections. I agree with Icctrombone that, actually, sometimes the new covers that Marvel put on these reprints were better than the originals. Not often, admittedly, but that was definitely the case on occasion. I'm off out to my Mum's just now, but perhaps I'll post some examples of what I mean a bit later on. Sometimes Marvel Tales utilized the original covers, but doctored them slightly, such flipping them like a mirror image or recolouring them, which was kind of interesting -- especially in the '80s when you'd get old Silver Age covers coloured in the more day-glo palette of the times. Something else that the '70s and '80s Marvel Tales reprints had over the original comics was that often the printing process and/or printing technology had improved so that, actually, the interior art looked better in the reprint than it did in the original. A friend of mine has some original issues of Amazing Spider-Man from the Lee/Romita era and we compared my copies of those same stories from the early '70s in Marvel Tales and, yeah, the improvement in printing quality is very noticeable. If you don't mind having edited reprints of the original stories, missing some pages with many of those reprints, than yes it was a cheap way to get those stories I didn't know that as a kid until years later. That really chaps my hide.
|
|
|
Post by hondobrode on Aug 19, 2016 8:42:35 GMT -5
This is so random: Vengeur had been, up until this issue, a horror anthology. Suddenly, here's Spider-Man, battling... Kang-Pin? Crazy !
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Aug 19, 2016 10:50:17 GMT -5
Where's Sue on this cover? Or on MGC #36, the cover in the OP? Oh...I get it; she's invisible. Hey Starlin and Sal (and/or Romita Sr. or M. Severin, if they laid these covers out)--it's called the Fantastic Four. Anyway... thanks to the collectibles store in my neigborhood where I bought back issues, I had a pretty complete collection of FF from #34 through #116. I filled in the pre-#34 blanks with MCIC/MGC and stopped buying MGC once it had caught up with the FF issues I owned.
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 19, 2016 18:50:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 19, 2016 19:17:02 GMT -5
...
|
|
|
Post by Farrar on Aug 20, 2016 13:47:05 GMT -5
MGC contained two FF reprints--#46 and #47--so the MGC #34 cover was a remake of #47's cover.
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 20, 2016 17:31:20 GMT -5
Good catch .
|
|
|
Post by MWGallaher on Aug 20, 2016 17:51:55 GMT -5
This one: reprinting from this one: was the first all-reprint comic that really intrigued me. I'd bought a few DC Giants and Super-Specs, I think, but for some reason--probably the Kirby/Everett Hulk story--this one made a real impact. I loved this issue: I loved the logo, the cover illustration by Alan Weiss, the circles with Hulk and Subby, the dark, primitive art, the very title itself.
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 21, 2016 3:50:05 GMT -5
...
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 21, 2016 4:03:41 GMT -5
This is a sentimental favorite for me. Although it doesn't depict any of the actual reprinted stories, having all the characters charging on the cover has always been cool to me.
|
|
|
Post by dbutler69 on Aug 22, 2016 15:07:45 GMT -5
I like the Tales of Suspense cover better.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Aug 22, 2016 15:55:30 GMT -5
I actually like the reprint cover by Starlin. . Stop pulling our legs, icc! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 22, 2016 19:14:59 GMT -5
I actually like the reprint cover by Starlin. . Stop pulling our legs, icc! ;D I'm an unashamed Starlin zombie.
|
|