|
Post by rberman on May 6, 2018 20:30:07 GMT -5
I'm not offended. Looking over the "My Two Cents" sections of my New X-Men thread currently running, the length tends to be 200-400 words, occasionally as low as 100 or as high as 500. Do I have more than that to say on a given issue? Maybe. I'm trying to stick analysis of the overall themes and plot direction of each issue rather than analyzing the minutiae of either plot or art. Just curious: why? Personal interest, I suppose. Like, on these Igor Kordey drawn issues of New X-Men, I could stop to post every terribly drawn face, but that would be tedious. I mentioned my opinion of his art in one review and felt content on subsequent issues just to mention that he is the artist without reiterating my broken-record complaint about his performance. Or take character moments like jokes. It's tempting to mention or post every panel with a funny quip, but I'm not confident that the reader really wants that or can even appreciate it outside of the context of the pages preceding and following it. So I try to mention the contents representatively rather than exhaustively.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 20:32:23 GMT -5
Personal interest, I suppose. Like, on these Igor Kordey drawn issues of New X-Men, I could stop to post every terribly drawn face, but that would be tedious. I mentioned my opinion of his art in one review and felt content on subsequent issues just to mention that he is the artist without reiterating my broken-record complaint about his performance. Or take character moments like jokes. It's tempting to mention or post every panel with a funny quip, but I'm not confident that the reader really wants that or can even appreciate it outside of the context of the pages preceding and following it. So I try to mention the contents representatively rather than exhaustively. Oh, I agree that you don't want to be tedious and repetitive. I got the impression you were saying there were levels to which you could take the reviews that you were choosing not to go to. As I said in my last post (we posted at the same time), I've seen you write some pretty smart analyses. You have the depth and the understanding. I'd love to see you bring it to the table more often.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on May 6, 2018 20:34:12 GMT -5
By the way, rberman , your review of Watchmen for the CCF Top 100 Sagas was pretty top notch. I particularly loved this portion: I'd love to see more of that level of analysis in your reviews. Thanks! Mind you, that was a "view from 10,000 feet survey" of twelve issues of some of the most densely plotted and thematically rich comic book story/art ever, so it was easy to say a little about a topic on which I could have said a lot, and about which many more informed people have already said so much.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 20:35:34 GMT -5
By the way, rberman , your review of Watchmen for the CCF Top 100 Sagas was pretty top notch. I particularly loved this portion: I'd love to see more of that level of analysis in your reviews. Thanks! Mind you, that was a "view from 10,000 feet survey" of twelve issues of some of the most densely plotted and thematically rich comic book story/art ever, so it was easy to say a little about a topic on which I could have said a lot, and about which many more informed people have already said so much. And yet these ideas were big enough that they could easily have been expanded out across the span of 12 reviews
|
|
|
Post by rberman on May 6, 2018 20:41:45 GMT -5
Personal interest, I suppose. Like, on these Igor Kordey drawn issues of New X-Men, I could stop to post every terribly drawn face, but that would be tedious. I mentioned my opinion of his art in one review and felt content on subsequent issues just to mention that he is the artist without reiterating my broken-record complaint about his performance. Or take character moments like jokes. It's tempting to mention or post every panel with a funny quip, but I'm not confident that the reader really wants that or can even appreciate it outside of the context of the pages preceding and following it. So I try to mention the contents representatively rather than exhaustively. Oh, I agree that you don't want to be tedious and repetitive. I got the impression you were saying there were levels to which you could take the reviews that you were choosing not to go to. As I said in my last post (we posted at the same time), I've seen you write some pretty smart analyses. You have the depth and the understanding. I'd love to see you bring it to the table more often. I don't really have anything more insightful to say that I choose not to say. There are more random "Hey, look at this minor detail" things I could say, but nothing that contributes to the overall thesis I'm trying to build concerning each particular issue's themes. In the Astro City reviews, I listed all the proper names in each issue, even the most minor ones, because in the early issues, those names were rife with homage, even if I needed the denizens of this forum to tell me what those homages were. I haven't seen Busiek doing that nearly so much in the last fifty issues of Astro City. So I haven't bothered to name everybody mentioned in Grant Morrison's New X-Men.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on May 6, 2018 20:46:08 GMT -5
Thanks! Mind you, that was a "view from 10,000 feet survey" of twelve issues of some of the most densely plotted and thematically rich comic book story/art ever, so it was easy to say a little about a topic on which I could have said a lot, and about which many more informed people have already said so much. And yet these ideas were big enough that they could easily have been expanded out across the span of 12 reviews I might do that sometime, though I suspect that excellent versions of that project already exist out in the great wide Internetz. Right now I plan to limit myself to 1-2 series at a time here. I already know that after Grant Morrison's New X-Men, I will do Joss Whedon's Astonishing X-Men, which was one of my own top ten series in your poll. And after I finish Astro City (as it currently exists in TPB), I was mulling over doing Alan Moore's Top Ten. After that, maybe Elfquest or Cerebus: High Society or Busiek's Avengers.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 20:46:32 GMT -5
Oh, I agree that you don't want to be tedious and repetitive. I got the impression you were saying there were levels to which you could take the reviews that you were choosing not to go to. As I said in my last post (we posted at the same time), I've seen you write some pretty smart analyses. You have the depth and the understanding. I'd love to see you bring it to the table more often. I don't really have anything more insightful to say that I choose not to say. There are more random "Hey, look at this minor detail" things I could say, but nothing that contributes to the overall thesis I'm trying to build concerning each particular issue's themes. Could just be that you have room to grow. When I began as a reviewer (and I don't claim to be the master, mind you. Just someone who's been doing it for a while), my reviews were often one to three paragraphs because I didn't feel I had much to say. As I continued to read and review, I began to notice more and gain a deeper understanding of it as well, and my reviews inevitably expanded out as a result. Heck, you mentioned my Batman review thread. Compare the first reviews to the most recent ones All I'm saying is that you have room to grow and a good mind for doing so. I hope to see your reviews continue to grow in both length and breadth, not because you feel you have to, but because you'll be learning you have more to say after all. Anyone can write a summary and quick wrap-up. Only rberman can write an rberman analysis.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on May 6, 2018 20:50:02 GMT -5
I don't really have anything more insightful to say that I choose not to say. There are more random "Hey, look at this minor detail" things I could say, but nothing that contributes to the overall thesis I'm trying to build concerning each particular issue's themes. Could just be that you have room to grow. When I began as a reviewer (and I don't claim to be the master, mind you. Just someone who's been doing it for a while), my reviews were often one to three paragraphs because I didn't feel I had much to say. As I continued to read and review, I began to notice more and gain a deeper understanding of it as well, and my reviews inevitably expanded out as a result. Heck, you mentioned my Batman review thread. Compare the first reviews to the most recent ones All I'm saying is that you have room to grow and a good mind for doing so. I hope to see your reviews continue to grow in both length and breadth, not because you feel you have to, but because you'll be learning you have more to say after all. Anyone can write a summary and quick wrap-up. Only rberman can write an rberman analysis. I do pledge not to hold back anything interesting (to me) that I have to say for "My Two Cents". But I'm doing that already. The main things that I could immediately change would be more pictures and/or less detailed summary.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2018 20:52:29 GMT -5
Could just be that you have room to grow. When I began as a reviewer (and I don't claim to be the master, mind you. Just someone who's been doing it for a while), my reviews were often one to three paragraphs because I didn't feel I had much to say. As I continued to read and review, I began to notice more and gain a deeper understanding of it as well, and my reviews inevitably expanded out as a result. Heck, you mentioned my Batman review thread. Compare the first reviews to the most recent ones All I'm saying is that you have room to grow and a good mind for doing so. I hope to see your reviews continue to grow in both length and breadth, not because you feel you have to, but because you'll be learning you have more to say after all. Anyone can write a summary and quick wrap-up. Only rberman can write an rberman analysis. I do pledge not to hold back interesting (to me) that I have to say for "My Two Cents". But I'm doing that already. The main things that I could immediately change would be more pictures and/or less detailed summary. You do what you want to do. I'd love to see more in-depth analysis, and I suspect others would too. If you feel you don't have more in-depth analysis to make, don't force it; just be open to it. If you approach an issue with the intent of analyzing more than summarizing, you might be surprised at what you find
|
|
|
Post by badwolf on Feb 11, 2019 17:41:23 GMT -5
Would it be acceptable to do a "random" review thread rather than follow a particular run or series?
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on Feb 11, 2019 20:54:33 GMT -5
Would it be acceptable to do a "random" review thread rather than follow a particular run or series? Anything that abides by The Rules of the Road is acceptable. We had two different members here writing "Comic Book Shuffle" review threads for a while. However, review threads without any unifying focus or theme do not get included in the Featured Reviews section of the front page.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire2099 on Feb 12, 2019 9:56:59 GMT -5
Would it be acceptable to do a "random" review thread rather than follow a particular run or series? You could also put reviews in the 'what have you read lately' thread.. I have done that from time to time.
|
|
|
Post by badwolf on Feb 12, 2019 10:53:46 GMT -5
Oh yeah, I forgot about that one, thanks.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,197
|
Post by Confessor on Feb 12, 2019 19:52:04 GMT -5
Would it be acceptable to do a "random" review thread rather than follow a particular run or series? You could also put reviews in the 'what have you read lately' thread.. I have done that from time to time. Yeah, I think most of us have used that thread to post mini-reviews on occasion.
|
|
|
Post by captainthor on Aug 21, 2019 13:19:44 GMT -5
Hi. I was hoping to create my own review thread but, for some reason, I cannot create threads on the subforum yet? Any advice on how to solve that one?
|
|