|
Post by wildfire2099 on Jan 16, 2022 18:25:08 GMT -5
Lathe of Heaven by Ursula Le Guin
This was the first book by Ursula Le Guin I really just didn't like that much. I can appreciate the creativity in it... the building of world upon world, as she did, like the story was being written by a group of people in a circle, taking turns with each line. And it (mostly) held together.
What I didn't need is nearly 1/2 the book being spent on the mechanics of dreams and the technology that drove the story.. that part felt VERY 1970s to me. I also dislike near future scenarios that are so very far from the world we know... the changes in the world from 1971 are far too much too soon.. even considering the plot.
I did really like the two main characters... George and Dr. Huber, but I did get really annoyed at the romance bit.. it was totally out of nowhere, as if someone decided the surely the book could not exist without it.
While a medicore outing from such a great author is still not a terrible read, I definitely wouldn't recommend this one over an f her others I've read.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,222
|
Post by Confessor on Jan 17, 2022 21:32:29 GMT -5
One Way Out: The Inside History of the Allman Brothers Band by Alan Paul I've been a fan of The Allman Brothers' Band since my 18th birthday, when a friend's old hippie Dad sat me down with a big spliff and played me the band's Eat A Peach album. Within days I began scouring second hand record shops for their albums and have today built a pretty respectable collection of their late 60s and 70s output. Alan Paul's book isn't a traditional biography of the band, since it mostly consists of interview snippets from the surviving band members, their road crew, managers, record company people and record producers. These interview fragments cover the story of the band in chronological order, with only occasional scene setting and context from Paul himself. This is very much the officially sanctioned version of the ABB story and it's very readable, though perhaps a little lightweight at times. Still, the book taught me heaps about the band that I didn't know before. So, if you're a fan, this is probably worth your while picking up.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Jan 17, 2022 23:31:58 GMT -5
One Way Out: The Inside History of the Allman Brothers Band by Alan Paul I've been a fan of The Allman Brothers' Band since my 18th birthday, when a friend's old hippie Dad sat me down with a a big spliff and played me the band's Eat A Peach album. Within days I began scouring second hand record shops for their albums and have today built a pretty respectable collection of their late 60s and 70s output. Alan Paul's book isn't a traditional biography of the band, since it mostly consists of interview snippets from the surviving band members, their road crew, managers, record company people and record producers. These interview fragments cover the story of the band in chronological order, with only occasional scene setting and context from Paul himself. This is very much the officially sanctioned version of the ABB story and it's very readable, though a perhaps a little lightweight at times. Still, the book taught me heaps about the band that I didn't know before. So, if you're a fan, this is probably worth your while picking up. I only know the Allman Brothers from their radio staples, like Ramblin' Man, but I do like those, for the most part - Whipping Post is the only one that comes to mind that I never much cared for. Were the interviews done by the author specially for this book? If so, that would make it a kind of oral history, something like Please Kill Me, a book about the NYC punk scene in the 70s and early 80s that I enjoyed a lot. I like the format - although, like any literary technique, its success obviously depends on the skill of the writer.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,222
|
Post by Confessor on Jan 18, 2022 5:09:59 GMT -5
One Way Out: The Inside History of the Allman Brothers Band by Alan Paul I've been a fan of The Allman Brothers' Band since my 18th birthday, when a friend's old hippie Dad sat me down with a a big spliff and played me the band's Eat A Peach album. Within days I began scouring second hand record shops for their albums and have today built a pretty respectable collection of their late 60s and 70s output. Alan Paul's book isn't a traditional biography of the band, since it mostly consists of interview snippets from the surviving band members, their road crew, managers, record company people and record producers. These interview fragments cover the story of the band in chronological order, with only occasional scene setting and context from Paul himself. This is very much the officially sanctioned version of the ABB story and it's very readable, though a perhaps a little lightweight at times. Still, the book taught me heaps about the band that I didn't know before. So, if you're a fan, this is probably worth your while picking up. I only know the Allman Brothers from their radio staples, like Ramblin' Man, but I do like those, for the most part - Whipping Post is the only one that comes to mind that I never much cared for. Were the interviews done by the author specially for this book? If so, that would make it a kind of oral history, something like Please Kill Me, a book about the NYC punk scene in the 70s and early 80s that I enjoyed a lot. I like the format - although, like any literary technique, its success obviously depends on the skill of the writer. The interviews were all done by the author for the book, yes.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire2099 on Jan 21, 2022 7:58:25 GMT -5
Moon over Soho by Ben Aaronovitch
I definitely didn't like this one as much as the first one... it felt more like a Sookie Stackhouse novel than the Dresden files... alot of sex, and not alot of plot. The 'mystery' was obvious in about 20 pages. There's still alot of intriguing world building going on though, so I'll probably give it at least one more to see if they're mostly more like the first one than the 2nd.
Peter was a bit of an oaf in alot of the book, but he redeemed himself at end, so that was good. Aaronovitch has really good characters, and he does a really good job at painting a scene and making the world feel like it's filled with real people, but he's going to have to come up with better plots to hold my attention.
|
|
|
Post by EdoBosnar on Jan 23, 2022 5:20:36 GMT -5
Black BettyWalter Mosley, 1994 The fourth Easy Rawlins novel; it’s now 1961, and Rawlins is pretty down and out. He had two sell his house and lives in a rental property with his two adopted children, teenage Jesus and 5 year-old Feather. Jobless as the story begins, he agrees to help a private investigator, Saul Lynx, who asks for his help in finding a woman named Elizabeth Eady. She’s a domestic servant for a wealthy family living in Beverly Hills, and she mysteriously disappeared right after the paterfamilias died. She is also someone Rawlins knows from his past in Houston, where she was known as Black Betty – the woman every man wanted to be with. There’s also a B-plot involving Easy’s friend Mouse, who had just been released from jail for a manslaughter conviction. He’s itching to get revenge on whoever fingered him for killing a guy in an alley behind a bar and Easy, also witness to that event, agrees to help him find the ‘culprit,’ even though he knows it will not end well. These Easy Rawlins books keep getting better as the series progresses. In fact, thinking about it now, if I didn’t have the first three novels in an omnibus edition, I’m not sure the first one, Devil in a Blue Dress, would have led me to read the others. This one, though, makes me regret that currently I only have a few of them left to read.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire2099 on Jan 23, 2022 16:45:53 GMT -5
Choice of Gods Clifford Simak This book reminded me quite a bit of Project Pope.. though of course it was written quite a bit before it. Simak's exploration of the soul, god, and just what it is to be a human is always engaging and thought provoking. While the story is very short of technology (which is the whole purpose), it is very long on ideas. Simak presents the thought that, essentially, all of humanities issues come from the concept of ownership, and presents a North America given back to the Native Americans as evidence. Its an intriguing proposition, but yet the society present has no arts to speak of... no music, no literature, no religion. Yet the people are very happy. Is that the secret? Or is it that they don't know what they're missing? Or perhaps it doesn't matter? Simak brings in 'modern' men at the end of the story, who are completely incredulous as to the society that exists there. Then 'the principle' (God? a supercomputer? an alien? it's left for the reader to decide) tells them to go home, and they do. Whether they'll be back or not is left for another story, but it give so many paths to consider. If you read sci fi because you like stories to make you think, there's none better than Clifford Simak. What about the plot, you say? There's a bit of plot, sure.. but it's really just a framing sequence for the exploration of ideas presented.. it's of no consequence. If you want an exciting plot and deep characters, this is not the book for you.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,222
|
Post by Confessor on Jan 25, 2022 6:35:20 GMT -5
The Stainless Steel Rat's Revenge by Harry Harrison. Unlike the first Stainless Steel Rat book, The Stainless Steel Rat's Revenge is not a novel that I'd previously read as a teenager. It opens to find our hero "Slippery" Jim DiGriz newly married to his quarry from the first book, the murderous assassin Angelina, who is expecting the pair's twins. After engaging in some larceny (just for fun), Jim is once more recruited by Inskipp, the director of the mysterious Special Corps, and sent to the oppressive planet Cliaand to investigate why the Cliaandians are invading other planets. Jim engages in a one-man guerrilla war to stop Cliaand's empire building and, along the way, is aided by a group of female freedom fighters and his wife (once she has given birth to the twins, James and Bolivar diGriz). Putting aside the fact that the reason behind the Cliaandian's ruthless enslaving of other worlds is pretty flimsy (they are invading planets simply to convert all of a newly conquered planet's resources into invading the next planet ), this is, like the first book in the series, a fast-paced adventure, packed with action and humour. That said, it does take a little while to get going: the first half of the book is mostly setting up and, while it's still fairly entertaining, it's not all that gripping. Really, it's only about half way through that author Harry Harrison kicks into high gear and we get an action-packed roller-coaster ride that feels akin to the first book. Overall, I didn't think The Stainless Steel Rat's Revenge was as good as the original book. It felt a little overlong to me, but deGriz is still an immensely likeable character and there was more of Angelina here, which I enjoyed. There was also much more for the other supporting female characters to do than in the preceding book – no doubt due to the burgeoning feminist movement in the late 60s when this book was written. So, this was another fun space opera romp and, though not as good as the first book, still an enjoyable read.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Jan 25, 2022 9:07:48 GMT -5
The Stainless Steel Rat's Revenge by Harry Harrison. This one is two books down on my reading list.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Jan 26, 2022 3:28:28 GMT -5
If I were to read one Harry Harrison book, which should it be? or if I were to read several, which should I start with? Same question, I suppose.
Like Harrison, Simak is another classic SF writer I haven't read much, though I have tried some of Simak's earlier stuff the last few years. I still don't feel I have a handle on him, though. My next will be Time is the Simplest Thing and then Way Station, so at least I know which ones I want to read next.
As far as my own classic SF reading goes, right now I'm in the middle of a long-overdue re-read of Asimov's Foundation trilogy. I'll wait till I finish it before commenting here. After that it'll be some late-50s Sturgeon and Leiber, if I have the stack I'm looking at arranged properly.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,222
|
Post by Confessor on Jan 26, 2022 5:37:52 GMT -5
If I were to read one Harry Harrison book, which should it be? or if I were to read several, which should I start with? Same question, I suppose. Like Harrison, Simak is another classic SF writer I haven't read much, though I have tried some of Simak's earlier stuff the last few years. I still don't feel I have a handle on him, though. My next will be Time is the Simplest Thing and then Way Station, so at least I know which ones I want to read next. As far as my own classic SF reading goes, right now I'm in the middle of a long-overdue re-read of Asimov's Foundation trilogy. I'll wait till I finish it before commenting here. After that it'll be some late-50s Sturgeon and Leiber, if I have the stack I'm looking at arranged properly. Others will be able to provide better answers because I'm only familiar with his Stainless Steel Rat novels, but the first book in that series, The Stainless Steel rat, really is a whole lot of action-packed fun and a pretty quick read.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Jan 26, 2022 10:24:00 GMT -5
The Stainless Steel Rat is probably his best known and biggest book so it's the most reasonable option. If you want something a little less light then Make Room! Make Room! was the basis for the movie Soylent Green. Bill The Galactic Hero is a satire of Heinlein's Starship Troopers, so it's fun to read them close together. And Terry Pratchett called it the funniest SF book ever written.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,222
|
Post by Confessor on Jan 26, 2022 16:20:31 GMT -5
While we're talking recommendations, I've never read any of Robert E. Howard's Conan books. Which one is the best and most accessible; I don't want to necessarily start with the first, if there are better books later on...and assuming that I could jump in as a new reader with a later book. So, which book is most likely to make me fall in love with the series?
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Jan 26, 2022 16:31:41 GMT -5
While we're talking recommendations, I've never read any of Robert E. Howard's Conan books. Which one is the best and most accessible; I don't want to necessarily start with the first, if there are better books later on...and assuming that I could jump in as a new reader with a later book. So, which book is most likely to make me fall in love with the series? My opinion is to go with any of the three volumes of Conan books published by Del Rey in the early 2000s. The Coming of Conan, The Bloody Crown of Conan, and The Conquering Sword of Conan. These are unexpurgated Howard. No pastiches. No fixes. No add-ons. Howard as he was originally published. Or not published, in the case of the partial stories and outlines. Of them I think The Coming of Conan makes the most sense.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2022 16:51:14 GMT -5
While we're talking recommendations, I've never read any of Robert E. Howard's Conan books. Which one is the best and most accessible; I don't want to necessarily start with the first, if there are better books later on...and assuming that I could jump in as a new reader with a later book. So, which book is most likely to make me fall in love with the series? since it is almost all short stories and not novels, I would say any of the three Del Rey collections is the best place to start. They go chronologically by release date I believe. Coming of Conan, Bloody Crown of Conan and The Conquering Sword of Conan are the three books in the series, but you can start with any one of them. These are form the Howard originals not the de Camp/Carter edits. If you can find them, Gollancz did a 2 volume set in the UK doing essentially the same thing (Howard edits not de Camp, chronological by release not in order they happened in Conan's life), the only difference is they use UK spellings not US so colour not color etc. These slightly predated the Del Rey version by a couple of years, so I have these as well as the Del Rey versions. They were later combined into a single volume. Whichever you choose, I suggest the Howard originals not the de Camp edits in the Ace/Lancer editions. If you read them in published order (not in order of where the occur in Conan's life) you get a better sense of the range of types of stories and various "careers" of Conan as an adventurer (king, thief, pirate, mercenary, etc.). If you are looking for which stories to start with, that's a different animal than which books to read. I'd say pick 3 one form the early oeuvre, one in the middle, and one near the end, say Tower of the Elephant (the 3rd published story) People of the Black Circle (the 11the published story) Red Nails (the last published story) to get a sense of writing at different stages. If you want a novel, Hour of the Dragon is the only novel-length adventure, and it comes near the end of the published stories. But again, find something that uses the Howard originals, not the deCamp/Carter edits to get the true flavor of Howard. -M (Slam posted essentially the same thing while I was typing)
|
|