|
Post by tarkintino on Oct 29, 2017 8:15:12 GMT -5
Again, at the time, 2001 was an important chapter used to summarize Kirby's 2nd Marvel phase. Only to you. Most didn't find it as egregious a failure as you did. (and some of those adaptations you mentioned weren't that good). Most of us read it for what it was and moved on to his new work. It in no way defined his second act at Marvel. "Only to you" Hardly. I get your bias, considering your username, but I'm talking about history, not rewriting it to defend someone to the end because he is one of your favorites. I'm discussing the opinion of many fans of that period. They were certainly disappointed by his inferior adaptation, or (to be truthful) bastardization of 2001, which was a major project for Marvel to obtain and promote. This cannot be shoved in a corner as part of his second act at Marvel. Regarding the other adaptations you're trying to downgrade, well, I would bet real money that next to no one would say the work of Al Williamson, Alberto Giolitti and George Perez, et al "weren't that good" (whether the readers appreciated the film source or not), nor have I ever heard or read much criticism of their work on the film projects. Kirby's monumental failure on 2001 does not pull everyone else down with him in the category of film adaptations.
|
|
Pat T
Full Member
Posts: 103
|
Post by Pat T on Oct 29, 2017 8:39:49 GMT -5
Only to you. Most didn't find it as egregious a failure as you did. (and some of those adaptations you mentioned weren't that good). Most of us read it for what it was and moved on to his new work. It in no way defined his second act at Marvel. "Only to you" Hardly. I get your bias, considering your username, but I'm talking about history, not rewriting it to defend someone to the end because he is one of your favorites. I'm discussing the opinion of many fans of that period. They were certainly disappointed by his inferior adaptation, or (to be truthful) bastardization of 2001, which was a major project for Marvel to obtain and promote. This cannot be shoved in a corner as part of his second act at Marvel. Regarding the other adaptations you're trying to downgrade, well, I would bet real money that next to no one would say the work of Al Williamson, Alberto Giolitti and George Perez, et al "weren't that good" (whether the readers appreciated the film source or not), nor have I ever heard or read much criticism of their work on the film projects. Kirby's monumental failure on 2001 does not pull everyone else down with him in the category of film adaptations. I don't understand what your game is here. I don't hold Kirby in as high esteem as most comic fans do, but I can appreciate their feelings about his work. This is clearly a thread started by a passionate fan to discuss a specific period in Jack Kirby's career with people who share an affection for this era. More than one poster has hinted that this might not be the place for you to insult the man's work. It's obvious to me that it's a sensitive subject to these people, and by continually trying to justify all your negativity, you're just pissing them off even more. We all get it. You don't think much of this part of his legacy. Leave the people who do like it alone. You aren't making friends by antagonizing people.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 29, 2017 8:41:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kirby101 on Oct 29, 2017 9:01:10 GMT -5
Only to you. Most didn't find it as egregious a failure as you did. (and some of those adaptations you mentioned weren't that good). Most of us read it for what it was and moved on to his new work. It in no way defined his second act at Marvel. "Only to you" Hardly. I get your bias, considering your username, but I'm talking about history, not rewriting it to defend someone to the end because he is one of your favorites. I'm discussing the opinion of many fans of that period. They were certainly disappointed by his inferior adaptation, or (to be truthful) bastardization of 2001, which was a major project for Marvel to obtain and promote. This cannot be shoved in a corner as part of his second act at Marvel. Regarding the other adaptations you're trying to downgrade, well, I would bet real money that next to no one would say the work of Al Williamson, Alberto Giolitti and George Perez, et al "weren't that good" (whether the readers appreciated the film source or not), nor have I ever heard or read much criticism of their work on the film projects. Kirby's monumental failure on 2001 does not pull everyone else down with him in the category of film adaptations. You continue to place this movie adaptation, and movie adaptations in general on in a much bigger place than they held, especially in the marvel U. 2001 is my favorite movie, and any adaptation wouldn't do it justice. I found Kirby's take interesting but unsuccessful. Your mistake continues to be that you demand this one book by a man who is known for his own creations be what defines his output in this period. You can hate the Eternals or Machineman. You can say his Black Panther sucked and we will agree to disagree. But To make this Treasure Edition anything bigger than a side note is re-writting history to fit your bias. We get it, you don't like Kirby, no one says you have to. And you made your point that you think his 2001 was an unmitigated failure.Do you think we don't understand what you are saying? Do you think you will convince others that his 2001 was crap and that means all his later Marvel work is as well? Who are you trying to convince here? Why the need to keep rehashing this one point?
|
|
|
Post by kirby101 on Oct 29, 2017 10:58:41 GMT -5
Here is an interesting comparison. I like looking through the original art for sale at Heritage Comics. In the current auction they have several Kirby pages. Here are two, one is from Tales to Astonish #98 (1968) inked by Joe Sinnott, when many consider Kirby to do some of his strongest Marvel art. And from Eternals #12 when his abilities are supposedly on the wain.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Oct 29, 2017 11:16:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by brianf on Oct 29, 2017 17:47:06 GMT -5
As a kid buying comics in the later 70's / Early 80's i didn't get Kirby - the stuff he wrote was pretty weird and as a kid who could identify with yer Spider-Mans, I found it hard to picture myself walking around in the worlds that Kirby created. It wasn't until Destroyer Duck - a complete parody not scripted by Kirby - that I felt I "got" him. Going back and and re-reading his stuff as an adult I found myself appreciating his energy and uniqueness. While I understand Kirby was trying to create for the masses, it seems to me he wasn't for everybody.
Some people really need to just learn how to state their opinion then walk away - its ok to disagree, some people will never get your point so going around in circles just makes everyone dizzy.
The King is dead - long live the King!
Peace
|
|
|
Post by kirby101 on Oct 29, 2017 18:03:24 GMT -5
I didn't post the two pages strickley as part of the "2001" debate. I saw them together and thought they were interesting in the overall context of this thread.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 29, 2017 21:53:57 GMT -5
You, sir, win the internet. I burst out laughing when I saw that.
|
|
|
Post by tarkintino on Oct 30, 2017 11:25:55 GMT -5
"Only to you" Hardly. I get your bias, considering your username, but I'm talking about history, not rewriting it to defend someone to the end because he is one of your favorites. I'm discussing the opinion of many fans of that period. They were certainly disappointed by his inferior adaptation, or (to be truthful) bastardization of 2001, which was a major project for Marvel to obtain and promote. This cannot be shoved in a corner as part of his second act at Marvel. Regarding the other adaptations you're trying to downgrade, well, I would bet real money that next to no one would say the work of Al Williamson, Alberto Giolitti and George Perez, et al "weren't that good" (whether the readers appreciated the film source or not), nor have I ever heard or read much criticism of their work on the film projects. Kirby's monumental failure on 2001 does not pull everyone else down with him in the category of film adaptations. You continue to place this movie adaptation, and movie adaptations in general on in a much bigger place than they held, especially in the marvel U. I will touch on your constant negativity toward movie adaptations later. For now, they are not as you are trying to paint them, as they have been many things to comic publishers: a steady profit, prestige, the result of creator interest. Many things, and according to Jim Shooter: So, Star Wars--a film adaptation--essentially saved Marvel. In the years before, Marvel aggressively pursued rights to the biggest sci-fi films of then-recent memory, including the Apes movies and Logan's Run, and yes, 2001, so despite Marvel's mid-late 70s collapse, they did consider film adaptations to be of a class and order important because of reader interest and--as noted earlier--occasionally creator interest. Let's be honest. One, this is alleged to be an open forum. Two, I'm not the only member in this thread (and board) to criticize Kirby's work. Three, the worst, most counter-productive form of argument is to attack the messenger instead of the message. Aside from referring to a suspected bias in the use of your screenname (which is not an attack), it seems to be a couple of pro-Kirby members who have made this personal. I, on the other hand focus only on an assessment of his 2nd phase Marvel work, using 2001 as an example of the problems found in his Marvel work of the period. Sorry, but that is not some egregious act. This forum has endless threads where characters, creators, titles and storylines are examined. When a thread is started with a focus on a period, one would assume it--like others--means its open for analysis of any kind, since that often reflects a good, real world perspective on work, from those who experienced it, and in my case, as it was originally released. George Perez is one of my favorites, but in the Byrne/Perez thread, the criticism of others never prodded me into accusing them of antagonizing me, or giving me a need to suggest negatives that are not there about their character (and would not, as its utterly incorrect) in order to defend Perez, or anyone else. Further, Carmine Infantino's Star Wars work is--obviously-one my favorite periods of the title (hence the avatar and the mix with the Tarkin character name), but in the Star Wars (Marvel) thread, some were quite honest in their criticism of the shortcomings of his work on the book. I posted my side of the analysis, but it never became some would-be character attack on the members in either direction. Something to think about. You speak of saying negative things about Kirby, yet you have wasted no time downgrading movie adaptations (likely because I referred to superior versions in my original 2001 analysis early in this thread, and a few times afterward, so my interest/position was known) as a counter against my 2001 analysis. One can easily suggest you were trying to antagonize me in doing that. I've already addressed why your own bias seeks to downgrade a major project for Marvel, in points above and in my previous post, but let's not pretend you have not made analysis of a man's work a personal, arguably hostile issue (unjustifiably aimed at me) on this board, when it should not be under any circimstances.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,201
|
Post by Confessor on Oct 30, 2017 17:18:45 GMT -5
Just a friendly in-thread reminder for everyone to play nice. Nobody has overstepped the mark thus far, I'm pleased to say, but clearly this is a subject that people feel very passionately about. Remember, if you feel at loggerheads with a fellow poster, it might be better to walk away from a heated discussion, rather than let things descend into acrimony. So, let's all make sure the discussion stays as mature and civilised as it has done so far, so as to not derail codystarbuck's excellent thread. Thanks everyone.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Nov 4, 2017 20:25:23 GMT -5
Black Panther #4 Having returned Hatch 22 to the future, our band of treasure hunters is attacked by statues of King Solomon's burial chamber. T'Challa stops the statue's attack and then tells the others to touch nothing. Zanda argues and T'Challa destroys the brass frogs, less she use them for her own purposes. Then, everything starts tumbling down and the trio skeedaddles. They find a chariot taht T'Challa's grandfather had known of and escape, onyl to end up picked up by a helicopter full of Zanda's mercenaries. they are brought to her capital and put in a plush prison. They are put to a test, where they run up against the Sacred Samurai, whom T'Challa defeats. They are brought before the entire group of collectors and sent to infiltrate the hidden city of the Sacred Samurai. Again, the is fast-paced, pulpy fun and this issue serves to wrap up the adventure of King Solomon's Frog and begin the Quest for the Sacred Water. Kirby takes some shots at collectors, in the form of the movers and shakers of this group, and their need to possess things and the mania behind it. I don't think it is directed to comic collectors; but, does go on to show that obsession can take hold and overwhelm.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Nov 8, 2017 18:51:53 GMT -5
Black Panther #5 T'Challa is seen observing the emaciated body of the Sacred Samurai, the warrior he fought last issue. Zanda and her fellow collectors want the Panther to find the sacred water-skin, which the samurai guarded. It carries the secret if immortality. T'Challa refuses and shows his contempt for these obsessive collectors; but, Zanda ups the ante by revealing a missile, with a nuclear warhead, aimed at Wakanda. if T'Challa doesn't cooperate, she will wipe Wakanda off the map. T'Challa and Mr Little depart in an advanced hovercraft, provided by Zanda. They are flying somewhere over Asia (probably the Himalayas), when teir craft is brought down by an advanced weapon. The wielder then unleashes the Guardian of the Gateway, the legendary Yeti. It attacks T'Challa and we get some classic Kirby combat... The Yeti is brought down, like Goliath, with a well-placed rock to the noggin. Just after surviving the attack, the pair is soon beset by a sword-wielding man, who speaks of the Ronin, who have declared that T'Challa and Mr Little are to die. More intrigue and action from Kirby, more hidden lands and legendary creatures. However, among all of the pulp story elements is more than a bit of philosophizing. T'Challa makes great commentary about the selfish nature of the obsessive collectors and their need to possess rare treasures, whether they belong to someone else of not. This can be seen in a few ways: Kirby's commentary about the plundering of cultural artefacts for public display (a hot topic as King Tut's treasures were to tour the country), about the nature of collectors in general (including those obsessive comic collectors who seemed to want to turn comics into treasures, rather than a storytelling medium), and just a general commentary about the wealthy who seek to possess all, with a general greed to possess things to fill an emotional void in their life. Kirby was a very deep thinker and his stories have several layers to them, beyond the action and adventure. T'Challa has a dialogue with Princess Zanda, who we learn is the daughter of an oil-rich emir, somewhere in the Middle East or North Africa. Zanda speaks of ruling by fear, while T'Challa counters with the wise rule that blends emotion of the ruler with those of the people. Kirby speaks of the difference between the tyrant who controls the population and the benevolent who rules by consent, who puts people first, vs the tyrant who puts himself before the country. Timely commentary, when we see autocratic rulers, even in democracies, who put their own needs before those of the people, as well as autocratic kingdoms, where rivals are rounded up and silenced, while cheered on by a supposed leader of the "Free World." Fans like to dismiss Kirby's writing as simplistic; but allegorical would be more accurate. You just have to look past the pulp surface to see the commentary underneath. Kirby is rather eloquent in these moments and T'Challa voices . Listen to the words Kirby gives T'Challa, as he observes Zanda's tanks, filled with the world's oddities: (T'Challa's words in bold) "It is your weird band of collectors who should be kept as curiosities in these tanks. You are no longer human!"
"Oh, we are human alright. None of us looks forward to eventual death." "Of course! Being cruel, greedy and insensitive; the quality of cowardice is far from alien to your natures! My opinion of your kind still stands Princess Zanda! And, if you intend to include me in your plans, I advise you to forget it!"
"As the leader of your people, you should learn more about the uses of power, T'Challa..." "My people survive and prosper because they have never been abused! I wield power; but, it is a power for peace.""Fear brings peace! Fear gains results! Fear will drive you into my camp, proud one! Don't fight me, Black Panther. I=I am the daughter of an emir! I-I wish to be gentle; but...I-I don't know how..." "To be gentle means to blend your emotions with those of others.""I can do that........ with one such as you..." "Can you? Can you really give, instead of take?"
There is some deep thought there and the dialogue is not the simplistic storytelling of which Kirby's detractors accused him. Kirby was still trying to expand comics beyond what had come before, moving them into more mature realms, even in the books he took on as a favor, rather than created from whole cloth. In that, he is not much different than the likes of Engelhart, Starlin and McGregor, who were the critical darlings of 70s Marvel. Kirby was older than them and had seen much of the world, especially its darker underside, froma youth in the slums to the battlefields of WW2 and the Holocaust. They had read of life, Kirby had lived it, while raising a family. The goal was the same, the perspective was different.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Dec 6, 2017 16:30:27 GMT -5
Black Panther #6 T'Challa and Mr Little face a samurai, guardian of the hidden city, wherein lies the Fountain of Youth. T'Challa disarms the swordsman, who demands that he be allowed the honor of seppuku (which Kirby calls the cruder kara kiri) to regain face. T'Challa refuses and wants to preserve life. He asks to speak to the leader to decide the matter. The samurai, one of 9 ronin who founded the city, leads him into the hidden, underground city (shades of The Phantom Empire), a truly wondrous sight to behold. There, he argues that the samurai live and offers to return the sword to the leader. he must prove himself against the city's champion and a fight begins. While everyone is distracted, Little tries to steal the water from the Fountain. This brings down a s@#$-storm. While this goes on, an unseen half-brother of T'Challa, Gen. Jakarra, brings about a coup at the Wakanda royal palace, unseating the regent N'Gassi. Kirby dabbles in a bit of philosophy, showing that swords don't make great warriors and there is little honor in throwing away life. You can sense Kirby's wartime experiences filtering in here. Meanwhile, he pokes at the Collectors, who seek to possess to exhibit, while ignoring the cultural significance, a battle of collectors vs museums vs tribal guardians. Through it all, Kirby continues in his pulp tales of hidden cities, lost races, and buried treasure. he shows the influences of his youth and the experiences of his adulthood, in one package. He also launches a subplot, obviously inspired by the many coups and counter-coups in Africa, during the tumultuous post-independence years (and to this day), dabbling in an area that Don McGregor explored, in Panther's rage. However, his usurper isn't some super villain rebel, like Erik Killmonger or the White Ape; this is family, a stunted man angry at the world. A Napoleon and Hitler, who has seized power in an African nation with advanced technology and a wonder mineral. Issue 7 T'Challa and Mr Little face a horde of swords. Kirby pulls a swerve and T'Challa reasons his way out of the situation, taking the container of water from Little and giving it back to the leader of the ronin. He secures their safe passage from the city and they return to a rendezvous point, where Princess Zanda's jet copter picks them up. They return to her land and show the collectors empty hands. Zanda threatens to launch missiles at Wakanda; but, T'Challa calls her bluff, again winning via the power and truth of his words. Little reveals a vial of the water and the Collectors descend like vultures. Little tells T'Challa to go and use the diversion, tossing him the vial. It is shattered by a gunshot and Zanda lets him go. meanwhile, in Wakanda, Jakarra unleashes the power of raw vibranium and finds himself transformed, unleashing the danger that the Panther Cult has long guarded against. N'Gassi is fred and takes charge, summoning the royal family and we meet Joseph Itobo, a doctor, as the first arrival. This is something different from Kirby, as the master of dynamic action uses words to end conflict, showing that he had more storytelling tricks in his bag. Oh, there's plenty of action; but, there are real ideas here, life issues at play in this metaphoric tale. Kirby understands storytelling far better than the young punks who made snide comments behind his back in the halls at Marvel. While they said he was out of touch he showed that he was timeless, while they were busy mining his creations. How little has changed. Issue 8 The issue opens with T'Challa's remembrance of how he won the mantle of the Black Panther... His memries are interrupted by the sight of two men in a life raft. he offers aid and discovers they are mobsters, who want to head for Corsica. They try to hijack the copter and cause it to crash. T'Challa survives and begins the long journey to Wakanda, on foot, carrying one of the two surviving men. meanwhile, Jakarra is on a rampage in his monstrous form. The royal family is assembled but wants to avoid their role, while N'Gassi tries to persuade them to lead. Jakarra attacks and the smallest family ember, Joseph, is the one who stands and fights. The others come to his aid and find themselves following his example. The issue ends on a cliffhanger, as T'Challa may not reach Wakanda in time to save it from Jakarra's infection. Good stuff, though mostly setting the scene. Kirby revisits T'Challa's past, as he did in the previous issue, where he told of the crashing of a meteor, which brought vibranium to Wakanda. Now he is adding sci-fi to pulp adventure and myth. Issue 9 T'Challa is weak and passes out in the desert. While this happens, his family fight Jakarra, in Wakanda. they were uniforms, with different color schemes and panther masks, looking like an African Power Rangers team. Khanata (a race car driver) hits Jakarra with a modified car. Zuni (a woman) snares Jakara, while financial dealer Ishanta (male) fires a gas bomb at Jakarra. it slows him enough for Joseph (the doctor), to slap a mask on him, which anesthetizes him. They have succeeded, though they are costing Wakanda money. They lack the wisdom of T'Challa and Joseph experiments on Jakarra. He tames the mind of jakarra; but, the monster awakens and heads for the vibranium mound, like an automaton. While this occurs, T'Challa is found by what turns out to be a group of actors, filming a sci-fi movie in the North African desert. There is a woman, dressed like a princess, a dwarf in a robot costume, and another man in a metal suit. Hmm.......that seems familiar. T'Challa creates a bit of chaos to swipe some transport and head off to Wakanda. The Panther Rangers (or Black Musketeers, as Kirby calls them) are an interesting addition and they get a bit of fun. I almost feel like Kirby is poking fun at those who have mined his past work; but, i think I am projecting my own ideas into his work. The movie set is an obvious nod to Star Wars, which drew much inspiration (or blatantly swiped) from Kirby. Another irony here is that Kirby would be tangentially involved in a con, involving scouting locations for a sci-fi movie, in Iran, during the Hostage Crisis. Kirby had created designs for characters and costumes for a proposed film adaptation of Roger Zelazny's Lord of Light. Kirby also designed potential attractions for a sci-fi-themed amusement park, to be built in conjunction with the film. The project went bankrupt; but, make-up man Jonathan Chambers provided Kirby's artwork to intelligence agents, who used it as a cover story to get a team of American diplomats out of Tehran, as detailed (with much dramatic license) in the film Argo. Issue 10 Jakarra is lumbering towards the vibranium mound and the militia can't stop him (anymore than the JDF could stop Godzilla). The Musketeers have a cure, but, must inject it into Jakarra. T'Challa swipes a plane from the Sudenese military and flies back to the Panther mound, and lands in the secret airstrip inside. he rushes off. The Musketeers move closer to the marauding, mindless Jakarra, hoping to avert the chain reaction he will set off if he enters the vibranium mound. T'Challa shows up, grabs the injector and tries to use it on Jakarra, with much battling and a final prick. Disaster is averted. Kirby kind of rushes the climax; but, it's pretty effective. It does feel rather like a Godzilla film.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Dec 7, 2017 23:31:47 GMT -5
The more I see these Black Panther scans the more I look forward to re-reading the whole series one of these days.
|
|