|
Post by chromehead on May 6, 2018 13:01:44 GMT -5
Ugh. Killer Croc was one of only foes that I can recall the pre-Crisis Batman ever admitting to be scared of (the other is Deathman from Batman 180) and that "Killer Croc and a guy dressed like Caesar are both on the loose? hm. What's the guy in the toga doing? Shouting "Let there be light!" at the sky? Croc can wait!" really doesn't whet the appetite for the next issue. If memory serves, the Croc-centric issue that follows this one is actually really solid.
|
|
|
Post by chadwilliam on May 6, 2018 19:16:22 GMT -5
Ugh. Killer Croc was one of only foes that I can recall the pre-Crisis Batman ever admitting to be scared of (the other is Deathman from Batman 180) and that "Killer Croc and a guy dressed like Caesar are both on the loose? hm. What's the guy in the toga doing? Shouting "Let there be light!" at the sky? Croc can wait!" really doesn't whet the appetite for the next issue. If memory serves, the Croc-centric issue that follows this one is actually really solid. Oh it definitely is, but it also dismisses everything we knew about the previous Croc other than he's a strong guy with scales. When the only thing that writers seem to think they have to get right about Croc is he's big, strong, and green, the character quickly devolves into a poor man's Lizard and canon fodder for the next big, strong guy to come around (in this case, Bane). So while Batman 471 is a good issue, it also helps explain why everything which has followed has been forgettable.
|
|
|
Post by chadwilliam on May 7, 2018 23:03:58 GMT -5
Detective Comics #637 A three part story line during which The Joker, Penguin, and Two-Face escape from Arkham (though I have no idea why The Penguin should be there) and all we get is three panels of said escape due to time constraints. I can't believe that was treated as a subplot (actually, more like a throwaway line so the next writer to use these characters wouldn't have to spend time breaking them out of prison though I think The Joker will be back in without explanation for his next appearance in Robin II) and what we actually got as the presumably more important and interesting main story was this. I'm pretty sure that part one (and I'm certain that if it wasn't one then two) was my last issue of Tec until Knightfall and it's kind of sad to see how the title deteriorated at this point. The last three parter for this title was Dark Genesis and it really felt as though an effort was made for that story - Dick Sprang on covers doing a sort of Nightmare Version of Batman that still looked like Dick Sprang with two different stories going on within - which was soon followed by a great anniversary issue which in turn was succeeded by a Peter Milligan run (which to be honest, didn't really impress me beyond the 'And the Executioner Wore Stiletto Heels' and 'Identity Crisis' with the latter still being one of my favorite Batman tales of the past 35 years) with Jim Aparo never too far away and then we get... this. Like I said, Milligan didn't always impress me (though he's amazing when at the top of his game) and we didn't really need two Abattoir storylines (we didn't even really need one) but a bad issue at this time was almost a guarantee that the next one would be good. How did Detective suddenly become the dumping ground for Batman stories DC wanted to release unnoticed?
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,813
|
Post by shaxper on May 8, 2018 6:06:25 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure that part one (and I'm certain that if it wasn't one then two) was my last issue of Tec until Knightfall and it's kind of sad to see how the title deteriorated at this point. This was the storyline that caused me to drop the Bat titles as a kid too. Contextually, this was the moment where Marvel was suddenly all the buzz, with the release of the Todd McFarlane Spider-Man title the previous summer, and X-Force and Infinity Gauntlet having just dropped a few months prior to this. Meanwhile, Denny O'Neil was giving us...this. Even the cover totally lacks eye appeal. Short-sighted thinking, I'd wager. O'Neil had taken the books bi-weekly for the summer. He did this for the previous two years too, but then he had his key creative teams onboard and launched major multi-part storylines in both titles to correspond to the summer publishing schedule that people still remember today. Dixon and Lyle's "Shadow Box" should have kept that legacy going, but O'Neil counted too much on their marketability post-Robin limited series and not enough on their actual talent at this early point. As for how Louise Simonson ended up heading the 'Tec multipart arc, I can only speculate. I'm not sure where Grant and Breyfogle are at this point -- getting a vacation, preparing for the launching of the Shadow of the Bat title (still eight months away), considering their options outside of working for Denny O'Neil? O'Neil mentions in the letter col of this issue that Grant has written a video game that has just come out, but I'd imagine his work for that project would have concluded months prior to this. So, the Detective Comics creative void was created when Wolfman left (presumably due to a difference of opinion about how Tim Drake should be developed). Peter Milligan stepped in as a filler, but we're about to see him get hired on as a regular. And Grant and Breyfogle are about to get shuffled around yet again. I would argue O'Neil's weakness from Day One as editor has been how little value he's placed in his creative teams. He sees the big picture, the hype, the major storylines, but fails to care much about checking in with his actual creative teams and maintaining communication with them. Now he's allowed a void to last for entirely too long, caused by his need to push for Tim Drake without taking any of his creators' input into account (don't forget Grant and Breyfogle are pissed about Tim Drake too). So it's entirely possible O'Neil doesn't see a problem with what's happening right now. Hey, he gave us twice as much Batman and 'Tec for the summer, as well as multi-part storylines, right?
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on May 8, 2018 13:01:34 GMT -5
By the time I get this far in my reading of Detective Comics #390 to the present, I won't have to read the stories in the Batman title, and I'm very thankful for that.
I love Breyfogle, but everybody seems to like Alan Grant quite a bit more than I do. But he's a lot better than some of the other writers in this period!
So ... I'm really not looking forward to post-Crisis Detective Comics. There's a few good storylines in there (I like both the Penguin arcs and all the appearances of the Ventriloquist and Scarface; also - DICK SPRANG COVERS!) but for me it's mostly a vast wasteland until Knightfall (which is when I started reading Detective Comics after missing all but a handful of issues after #580 or so).
Except Two-Tone! And the psychotic librarian!
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,813
|
Post by shaxper on May 8, 2018 13:06:42 GMT -5
everybody seems to like Alan Grant quite a bit more than I do. I agree with you. Most of the credit he's given is for stories that were co-credited to John Wagner. Grant claims Wagner didn't even help write most of those stories, but then why are they so much better? After Puppetmaster, Ratcatcher, and Cornelius Stirk, Wagner was off the credits and Grant didn't seem to have anything left to say. See, I'm excited for the same reason that you are not -- NO ONE cares about or even seems to remember these stories. It's the great unknown. Any gem I find in this stretch will be big news, and everything else I can have fun mocking
|
|
|
Post by chromehead on May 8, 2018 18:45:40 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure that part one (and I'm certain that if it wasn't one then two) was my last issue of Tec until Knightfall and it's kind of sad to see how the title deteriorated at this point. This was the storyline that caused me to drop the Bat titles as a kid too. Contextually, this was the moment where Marvel was suddenly all the buzz, with the release of the Todd McFarlane Spider-Man title the previous summer, and X-Force and Infinity Gauntlet having just dropped a few months prior to this. Meanwhile, Denny O'Neil was giving us...this. Even the cover totally lacks eye appeal. Short-sighted thinking, I'd wager. O'Neil had taken the books bi-weekly for the summer. He did this for the previous two years too, but then he had his key creative teams onboard and launched major multi-part storylines in both titles to correspond to the summer publishing schedule that people still remember today. Dixon and Lyle's "Shadow Box" should have kept that legacy going, but O'Neil counted too much on their marketability post-Robin limited series and not enough on their actual talent at this early point. As for how Louise Simonson ended up heading the 'Tec multipart arc, I can only speculate. I'm not sure where Grant and Breyfogle are at this point -- getting a vacation, preparing for the launching of the Shadow of the Bat title (still eight months away), considering their options outside of working for Denny O'Neil? O'Neil mentions in the letter col of this issue that Grant has written a video game that has just come out, but I'd imagine his work for that project would have concluded months prior to this. So, the Detective Comics creative void was created when Wolfman left (presumably due to a difference of opinion about how Tim Drake should be developed). Peter Milligan stepped in as a filler, but we're about to see him get hired on as a regular. And Grant and Breyfogle are about to get shuffled around yet again. I would argue O'Neil's weakness from Day One as editor has been how little value he's placed in his creative teams. He sees the big picture, the hype, the major storylines, but fails to care much about checking in with his actual creative teams and maintaining communication with them. Now he's allowed a void to last for entirely too long, caused by his need to push for Tim Drake without taking any of his creators' input into account (don't forget Grant and Breyfogle are pissed about Tim Drake too). So it's entirely possible O'Neil doesn't see a problem with what's happening right now. Hey, he gave us twice as much Batman and 'Tec for the summer, as well as multi-part storylines, right? I can't remember how I fell off the Batman train at this time, but I'm glad I did. I was most interested in Grant / Breyfogle's run over in the main title, then they started stuffing fill in after fill in there. Much as I liked Robin's first miniseries (well, it was okay, I bought the whole thing off the stands), I still wasn't that excited about a follow up with King Snake & Lynx in the pages of Batman. Yeah, I completely fell off buying Batman, and then Knightfall started, which I still haven't fully read.
|
|
|
Post by chromehead on May 8, 2018 19:33:07 GMT -5
]Like I said, Milligan didn't always impress me (though he's amazing when at the top of his game) and we didn't really need two Abattoir storylines (we didn't even really need one) but a bad issue at this time was almost a guarantee that the next one would be good. How did Detective suddenly become the dumping ground for Batman stories DC wanted to release unnoticed? By the time I get this far in my reading of Detective Comics #390 to the present, I won't have to read the stories in the Batman title, and I'm very thankful for that. I love Breyfogle, but everybody seems to like Alan Grant quite a bit more than I do. But he's a lot better than some of the other writers in this period! So ... I'm really not looking forward to post-Crisis Detective Comics. There's a few good storylines in there (I like both the Penguin arcs and all the appearances of the Ventriloquist and Scarface; also - DICK SPRANG COVERS!) but for me it's mostly a vast wasteland until Knightfall (which is when I started reading Detective Comics after missing all but a handful of issues after #580 or so). Except Two-Tone! And the psychotic librarian! Guess I’m the only one who loved Milligan’s “The Bomb” issue? May have been a bit contrived as to why Batman was in that situation, but I thought it was a phenomenal issue.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,813
|
Post by shaxper on May 8, 2018 20:36:36 GMT -5
Much as I liked Robin's first miniseries (well, it was okay, I bought the whole thing off the stands), I still wasn't that excited about a follow up with King Snake & Lynx in the pages of Batman. I'm willing to wager pretty much everyone felt this way and that it cost the Bat Office a lot of readers. The Robin limited sold so well because it was a new, hyped series featuring a new, hyped character. O'Neil's mistake was in assuming anyone would give a damn if he did a sequel in the pages of Batman itself. Each summer, O'Neil had gone biweekly and launched a major storyline, but this time, doing a storyline that was in no way important to Batman alienated long time Batman readers and was a total non-entity to all the speculators and hype fanboys who bought into the original limited series. As I mentioned earlier, this is a year after the launch of the McFarlane Spider-Man #1, and right alongside the launch of X-Force #1 and Infinity Gauntlet #1. Batman was pretty much the LAST DC property other than Lobo that most mainstream fans were buying, and O'Neil made the wrong call at the wrong time, sending them all to the other side. I know that's why I left, it sounds like that's why you left, and I bet a whole lot of other people left under the same circumstance.
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on May 8, 2018 20:55:11 GMT -5
I'll add my voice to the growing chorus, this period was definitely a wasteland. After years of fairly consistent storytelling things got really uneven, really fast.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2018 21:14:32 GMT -5
I'll add my voice to the growing chorus, this period was definitely a wasteland. After years of fairly consistent storytelling things got really uneven, really fast. Totally agree with you on this ... took me a very long time for me to pick up a book on Batman/Detective Comics ...
|
|
|
Post by chromehead on May 8, 2018 23:50:41 GMT -5
Much as I liked Robin's first miniseries (well, it was okay, I bought the whole thing off the stands), I still wasn't that excited about a follow up with King Snake & Lynx in the pages of Batman. I'm willing to wager pretty much everyone felt this way and that it cost the Bat Office a lot of readers. The Robin limited sold so well because it was a new, hyped series featuring a new, hyped character. O'Neil's mistake was in assuming anyone would give a damn if he did a sequel in the pages of Batman itself. Each summer, O'Neil had gone biweekly and launched a major storyline, but this time, doing a storyline that was in no way important to Batman alienated long time Batman readers and was a total non-entity to all the speculators and hype fanboys who bought into the original limited series. As I mentioned earlier, this is a year after the launch of the McFarlane Spider-Man #1, and right alongside the launch of X-Force #1 and Infinity Gauntlet #1. Batman was pretty much the LAST DC property other than Lobo that most mainstream fans were buying, and O'Neil made the wrong call at the wrong time, sending them all to the other side. I know that's why I left, it sounds like that's why you left, and I bet a whole lot of other people left under the same circumstance. Though I don’t remember Infinity Gauntlet coming out at all, I do remember McFarlane madness over at Marvel (of course, Spidey is and always was my fave, but even I knew at the time that McFarlane’s Spidey was pretty watered-down stuff outside the nice art), and I remember X-Force #1 of course, and later, the insanity over Lee’s X-Men #1. Funny enough, not long after this fallow period in Batman, DC came up with Knightfall which DID also take the fanboys by storm. But yeah, they lost the plot big time over the Bat-titles before that. I blame editorial for never nailing down a consistent team on Detective when Grant/Breyfogle left, or keeping one on the main book.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,813
|
Post by shaxper on May 9, 2018 18:48:45 GMT -5
Since we all seem to be in a Jim Starlin mindset as of late, I've been revisiting my reviews of A Death In The Family. Thought I'd post the link again in case anyone else is feeling the same Starlinstolgia.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Jul 19, 2018 16:46:58 GMT -5
]Like I said, Milligan didn't always impress me (though he's amazing when at the top of his game) and we didn't really need two Abattoir storylines (we didn't even really need one) but a bad issue at this time was almost a guarantee that the next one would be good. How did Detective suddenly become the dumping ground for Batman stories DC wanted to release unnoticed? By the time I get this far in my reading of Detective Comics #390 to the present, I won't have to read the stories in the Batman title, and I'm very thankful for that. I love Breyfogle, but everybody seems to like Alan Grant quite a bit more than I do. But he's a lot better than some of the other writers in this period! So ... I'm really not looking forward to post-Crisis Detective Comics. There's a few good storylines in there (I like both the Penguin arcs and all the appearances of the Ventriloquist and Scarface; also - DICK SPRANG COVERS!) but for me it's mostly a vast wasteland until Knightfall (which is when I started reading Detective Comics after missing all but a handful of issues after #580 or so). Except Two-Tone! And the psychotic librarian! Guess I’m the only one who loved Milligan’s “The Bomb” issue? May have been a bit contrived as to why Batman was in that situation, but I thought it was a phenomenal issue. OK, "The Bomb" is one that I like. I didn't much like it when I first read it six or seven years ago, but I liked it this time around, even though it's not one of the issues I singled out for comment on the "Batsplaining" thread.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Jul 21, 2018 2:23:03 GMT -5
I'm almost up to the first chapter of Knightfall in Batman #492. I have read the prelude chapters in Detective Comics and Batman #491, where we see Batman getting more and more tired, and also more snappish and unpleasant, mostly with Alfred. We have also seen panels here and there of Bane and his merry little crew - Monk, Hawk and Eyeball (or something like that) - as they observe and scheme and steal weapons to pass out to the loonies at Arkham Asylum when they set them free. I'm going to leave most of my Knightfall comments on the "Batsplaining" thread because that's where I've been posting as I work my way through Detective Comics #390 to the present, but I would like to make a note of a couple of things that struck me as I was reading these Knightfall preface issues. Bane and his henchmen aren't really very interesting. There. I said it. They are actually kind of dull. Now, that doesn't mean they aren't very good at what they do and it's still believable that they could pull off their plan to cripple Batman. But here's what gets me this time around - these dull characters are very skillfully manipulating most of the great Batman villains for their own ends. That's right - the Joker, the Scarecrow, Croc, Two-Face, etc. are all nothing but pawns of boring ol' Bane and his colorless minions. It seems to me that Two-Face or Scarecrow or even the Joker might realize that there's another force at work in Gotham City … and that force might be gunning for Batman. And I don't think any of these guys want Batman dead unless he (or she) is the one pulling the trigger. Also, they might get very resentful of being manipulated so brazenly. And then there's the issue of Batman letting himself get so exhausted and being so rude to Alfred. I've started thinking of this particular Batman as Knightfall Batman because I think he's such an idiot to let things get so bad that I don't think he's the same character as Batman pre-Knightfall or Batman after Knightfall. How could he be that thoughtless and short-sighted? As much as I like Chuck Dixon as a writer and as much as I love so many of the scenes in Knightfall, the whole thing is actually very contrived, and not particularly cleverly so. I just have trouble accepting that Batman could have been so successful and lasted so long if he was stupid enough to let himself get that exhausted.
|
|