shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 16, 2014 8:02:11 GMT -5
Just throwing this out there... if he's pretty public on facebook, why not ask him? Who knows, maybe he'll tell us I've considered it.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 16, 2014 14:07:51 GMT -5
Wizard #13 (September 1992) Wizard has just received Diamond's "Best New Publisher of the Year Award" for 1991 based upon retailer sales. That would suggest the book was getting serious attention pretty early on, and not just with the later issues. An interesting moment in this issue comes in the regular feature in which Wizard interviews typical kids who read the magazine. This time around, they ask the kids who their favorite characters are. The six characters chosen by the three kids are Superman, The Flash, Batman, Spider-Man, Ice-man, and Sting (from Valiant's Harbinger). I find this fascinating because it offers a neat contrast to the current sales figures being fueled more by speculation and hype than by a lasting fanbase. While it's true these answers are by no means statistically sound, sales would suggest very few people care about DC anymore, and these responses provide pretty solid evidence that this isn't the case. The responses are also a testament to Valiant's rise that one of their characters made the list. No mention of Image in there. And if you're wondering where the Ice-Man pick came from, he'd just been featured pretty prominently in a recent Uncanny X-Men storyline. Patrick McCallum steps away from his Collecting in the '90s column as of this issue (perhaps his rant against "crap" with a foil cover didn't play too well with Shamus?), and he's replaced with one of Shamus' comic book dealer cronies. I like the substance of the article, though: opening a polybag to read the comic should not devalue the comic. Of course, one of the reasons he provides is that those bags will turn your books yellow in twenty years, and when I opened the polybagged Wizard #12 I bought just two days ago, the thing looked pristine. DC and Marvel now both take out multiple ads in Wizard, as does Image and Valiant. Shamus' dealer associates continue to get their ads as well, but there's no further mention of Wizard's Cool Corps. Oh, and the feature interview being given to a Savage Sword of Conan cover artist? I did not see that one coming. Hindsight glimpses into the comic industry:Image and Valiant have completely taken over. The massive X-Cutioner's Song crossover doesn't even make headline news here in favor of news of Portacio moving to Image, Brian Cunningham asks Jim Shooter whether Valiant has plans for an action figure series, four of Wizards Top 5 picks for the month are from Image and Valiant (Shadowhawk #1, Rai #0, Cyberforce #1, and Youngblood #0), the Top 4 in Wizard's Top 10 are all Valiant and Image (see below), and while Marvel is maintaining its market share, the Market Watch section reports that their back issues are falling in demand because all anyone is looking for is Valiant books. As Rai #0 is being released next month, Jim Shooter must have been fired from Valiant long before this point, but it either hasn't been announced or Wizard is not aware of it. I'm particularly perplexed by Brian Cunningham reporting that he'd asked Jim Shooter if Valiant had a line of action figures coming out. Was Shooter keeping the departure a secret, or had Cunningham asked him a few months earlier, only to first report the discussion now? Market shares: Marvel: 56.19% (slight rise) DC: 20.03% (significant drop) Dark Horse: 4.67% (significant drop) Image: 4.32% (slight rise) Valiant: 4.24% (slight rise) Others: 10.55% (slight rise) Industry news:Mostly Image and Valiant related, though Marvel's Spirits of Vengeance launch is underway, and the X-Cutioner's Song crossover has been announced. DC is attempting to stay viable with the launch of Team Titans and the Nightwing limited series, both of which have garnered some praise from fans. Todd Loren, publisher of Revolution Studios, has been found dead. Wizard shaping the comic book market?The market is clearly shaping itself to a large extent by this point, but I find it fascinating that Wizard still isn't taking any further interest in talking Valiant. Unity just concluded, their popularity is higher than ever, they're dominating the back issue market and launching two new titles this month, but there isn't a single article or interview about Valiant here. The Market Watch does present Valiant as the more intellectual of the two startups, based more on ideas and writing than art and hype, and maybe Wizard just assumed the target demographic wouldn't find that as interesting as releasing a special edition magazine this month devoted entirely to Image. Whatever the case, even with Valiant conquering the back issue market, Wizard has clearly chosen to favor Image over Valiant at this point. Wizard's Comic Watch:Marvel Team-up #65: 1st American appearance of Captain Britain Daredevil #272: 1st "Shotgun," a villain featured in Punisher Warzone Wizard's Top 10:Market Watch and the Top 10 are out of sync again. Market Watch reports the Top 3 back issue movers of the month as being Amazing Spider-Man #101, Harbinger #1, and Tales to Astonish #62 1. Harbinger #1 2. Spawn #1 3. Magnus Robot Fighter #0 (send away version) 4. Unity #0 (still no mention of the red variant yet) 5. Spectacular Spider-Man #189 6. New Mutants #87 (that's some fall after being at the top for so long) 7. Uncanny X-Men #266 8. New Warriors #1 9. Uncanny X-Men #9 10. Amazing Spider-Man #101 (the oldest back issue I've ever seen featured on this list!) Final Thoughts:I'm extremely surprised to see Wizard so thoroughly neglecting to give attention to Valiant at this point while doing so very much to promote Image. The Special Edition this month (which I'll review next) further solidifies this impression. I also wonder how much longer it will be before DC announces the Death of Superman, and how much that will do to bring attention and sales back to the company. With a 20% hold on the market and Image and Valiant on the rise, this must have been DC's lowest point for sales since at least the 1950s.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 17, 2014 20:23:17 GMT -5
Wizard: Special Edition (September 1992) (note: could NOT find a good image of the real cover. These are two trading cards using the same artwork) 22 years later, I'm still not entirely sure what the point of this special was. The genesis of the concept appears to have been a promotion for San Diego Comic Con. Though this was sold on newsstands and at LCSes, it featured the convention layout and list of vendors for the convention, as well as talked up its featured guests. Shamus explains that this was the original concept, in a round about way, before going on and on about the double gatefold cover from Image. Really, that cover appears to have been the final central purpose of this publication. Beyond that, this is just an issue of extra articles. Shamus suggests that it's a try out issue of sorts, and that you should write to provide feedback on what you liked and didn't, but here's the break-down: Interview with Stan Lee (nothing bold nor experimental about this. Could have been placed in the next issue) Hollywood Heroes (an extra edition of an already regular feature in the magazine) Limited Knowledge (an article on the popularity of dealer incentive editions easily could have worked as a Collecting in the '90s column) Whirlwind Tour of Comics (less a new feature and more a one-time ultra abridged summary of comic book history) Toying Around (an extra edition of an already regular feature in the magazine) The Hottest Women (seriously. A list of the hottest females in comics) A Look at Comicdoms Most Underrated Talents (again, a one-time feature. It's not like this is a try out for some new perspective on comics and collecting) Amazing Artists (this is really just the amateur Wizard cover gallery again, but this time only showing art from older fans) The Big Boys (overly-simplified synopses of the major publishers in comics. Again, a one-time feature) The Movers and Shakers (can't tell if this is Wizard's write-ups on the hottest creators in the field or just the featured guests at SDCC. Considering no one from Valiant gets mentioned, probably just the folks at SDCC) SDCC info So exactly one of those features (The Hottest Babes) had the potential to become a regular mainstay in the magazine. Beyond that, what the hell was this issue all about? Of Interest:Wizard's synopses of the major comic book publishers are placed in a very specific order. At first, you might chalk it up to preference/bias, but the order actually correlates to the percent of the market that each company controlled as of Wizard #13. The order is: Marvel DC Image Valiant Dark Horse Mirage Malibu (Interesting. This marks the first time Image and Malibu are treated as two separate entities) Tundra Also, this issue marks the first mention of the Unity #0 red variant that would dominate the Wizard Top 10 for a long while after, and it's the first time the X-Men animated series is mentioned as being in production. Finally, did anyone else know there was a Human Target TV series on the air in 1992?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2014 3:22:45 GMT -5
I did know there was a Human Target TV series, but the only reason I know that is I got a Human Target TPB for a dollar at a Black Friday closeout a few years back so I Wiki'd the title.
The issue looks like it's for brand new collectors. I've had a few of those, I think two directly from Marvel. Those ones were more "How to collect comics" along with a "who's who" of their product. But I can see, at the time this mag came out, it being useful. This would be right around when SDCC would blow up I assume. I actually remember being in San Diego a year or two after I quit reading comics, so maybe 1995 or so, and I was at Mission Bay and got bored, and asked a kid who looked like a local if there was a good comic shop in town. He said "I don't know but there's that convention going on..."
That's right. Staying in San Diego, the same weekend as SDCC, and didn't even know it was going on. No crowds, no problem getting a room, no comic book themed anything in sight. I don't know if the celebration makes it to the beach these days, but I know hotels being booked up does for sure.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 18, 2014 19:14:43 GMT -5
The issue looks like it's for brand new collectors. I've had a few of those, I think two directly from Marvel. Those ones were more "How to collect comics" along with a "who's who" of their product. But I can see, at the time this mag came out, it being useful. That would make a lot of sense, and that's probably ultimately what Shamus and the gang decided upon five hours before this hit the presses, but the magazine itself seems less sure of its focus and identity. Heck, it doesn't even have a title beyond "Special Edition." Later Wizard Special Editions would all have a clear focus laid out in the title and steering the entire book. Hard to imagine!
|
|
|
Post by superecwfan1 on Nov 18, 2014 19:25:59 GMT -5
Going back to Wizard's start , I believe Shamus family owned a comic book store. So he knew the retail side of it in a way. From what was told , the magazine basically started in his basement . Then grew from that.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 18, 2014 19:28:19 GMT -5
Going back to Wizard's start , I believe Shamus family owned a comic book store. So he knew the retail side of it in a way. mrp mentioned this as well, but I can't find any info online to verify it. I suppose most independent publications do. It's more a question of how Todd McFarlane got involved in that first issue, as that cover and lead feature placed Wizard squarely in the big leagues and also suggested someone powerful was working with (or behind) Shamus.
|
|
|
Post by superecwfan1 on Nov 18, 2014 19:49:58 GMT -5
Shaxper I believe Shamus mentioned it in a Wizard interview in a magazine later. All I know is I plan a "Rise and Fall" of Wizard Magazine collection for my youtube channel soon (already filmed , just waiting to edit it all). Its a 3 part deal and I will post each part here.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 18, 2014 20:22:58 GMT -5
Shaxper I believe Shamus mentioned it in a Wizard interview in a magazine later. All I know is I plan a "Rise and Fall" of Wizard Magazine collection for my youtube channel soon (already filmed , just waiting to edit it all). Its a 3 part deal and I will post each part here. I'd love to see that. Please share any info you have as well. And if you can remember which issue that came from, that would be incredibly helpful!
|
|
|
Post by superecwfan1 on Nov 18, 2014 21:41:02 GMT -5
Its been years , plus it would take a day to try and go through all my issues of Wizard. I may do it...it brought back memories of when I collected the magazine. Its weird how even with LCS closing and all...I managed to get a Wizard either at Waldenbooks or a LCS from 1994-2008.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2014 3:31:50 GMT -5
It's possible pre-internet a startup trade publication could have easy access to big shot comic book guys. In fact, I bet it wouldn't be too hard today. If you secured the loan and had a few major preorders snd let it be known you were about to release a trade publication that would be all over the place in a few months I bet Marvel would throw their starting lineup at you.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 19, 2014 18:53:00 GMT -5
It's possible pre-internet a startup trade publication could have easy access to big shot comic book guys. In fact, I bet it wouldn't be too hard today. If you secured the loan and had a few major preorders snd let it be known you were about to release a trade publication that would be all over the place in a few months I bet Marvel would throw their starting lineup at you. I wonder. Well, it's a theory worth considering.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 19, 2014 21:04:48 GMT -5
Wizard #14 (October 1992) It's hard to believe it took Wizard 14 issues to do an X-Men cover (Wolverine on the cover of #3 doesn't count), and harder still to believe that this is the cover we got. Still even less believable is the blurb we get about the cover inside: "Though they may be called the X-Men, their female members are the hottest part of the team."There are any number of ways you could have ended that sentence. "The best characterized," "the strongest," "the most complex," and "the most compelling"...but no. They're "the hottest". Truly, Wizard has found its target audience (adolescent boys) and is playing to them, first with the Hottest Babes list in last month's special and now this. In sad contrast, Tom Palmer, author of the most visible feature left in the magazine still trying to cater to more sophisticated readers, outright writes in this month's column: HELP!!! Please help me! I need to know if any of you out there actually read this column. Every time I get my copy of Wizard, I scour the letters page to see if anybody has anything to say about Palmer's Picks. So far, I've been horribly disappointed. If you are reading this and aren't embarrassed about it, send your comments/suggestions (and death threats) to Wizard and somehow your letter will get forwarded to me. I really hope he's exaggerating in implying that he's never yet received a fan letter. His is a solid article with excellent recommendations each month. For example, he's talking Watchmen, V for Vendetta, and Swamp Thing in this issue. And no one's paying attention. Also, there's a shake-up in format this issue as the price guide is suddenly HALF the length of the book (and yet still doesn't list any Golden Age titles). If most people are buying for the monthly price guide, and if you're looking to cut costs (the price guide section is in black and white with very few photos and little formatting required), this is a savvy move. Cut the content and overhead, but keep the book looking as big as it always has. Also, Wizard's news section has finally and appropriately moved to the front of the book, whereas it used to seem like an after-thought. Hindsight glimpses into the comic industry:Lots and lots of comic book films had been optioned by Hollywood at this point. It actually feels like more than the amount of optioned comic book films we're hearing about today, and yet the only one of them listed this month that ever came to be was The Toxic Avenger. The Market Watch section explains with surprise that Marvel and DC Silver and Bronze Age back issues are suddenly in higher demand than ever before. The speculation boom extending to the back issue bins, perhaps? Neal Adams' Continuity Comics gets a big plug this issue. I guess everyone's still trying to find the next Image and Valiant Speaking of Valiant, they've clearly lost out to Image in both popularity and sales as of this issue. Their market share is now 1/5th of Image's, and Wizard has STILL granted exactly three interviews ever to any members of the Valiant staff while Image gets yet another high profile interview in this issue (seems like they get one every issue now). Wizard is still aiming squarely at that adolescent demographic that's more captivated by pictures and speculation than dense planning and solid storytelling. Market shares: Marvel: 51.56% DC: 21.62% Malibu (including image): 10.45% Dark Horse: 4.17% Valiant: 2.4% Others: 9.8% Industry news:Valiant has fired Jim Shooter Marvel's big high profile crossover is the X-Cutioner's Song, while DC's is Eclipso: The Darkness Within DC has launched the Vertigo imprint. Wizard Market Watch criticizes this move and suggests they focus on traditional superheroes more. Marvel shows continued signs of expansion with their purchase of Fleer (the trading card company) Sonic the Hedgehog is getting his own comic Ilya Salkind is trying to get Superman V in production as a total reboot of the series, but Christopher Reeve does not appear interested after the flop of the previous film, and Salkind won't do it without him. The Marvel 2099 line begins this month Valiant just launched their line of Unity trading cards, but even the black and white advertisement looks low budget and lackluster The Valiant dealer incentive books are now earning $125-165 a piece. Wizard also announces with this issue that dealer incentive editions will not be included in the Top 10. Wizard shaping the comic book market?They're certainly trying to get in on the ground floor of the next big indy publisher with their interview with Neal Adams about Continuity Comics, but their preference for Image over Valiant feels more like a reflection of an already existing market trend than an attempt to influence their impressionable fanbase. However, it is interesting how much they're talking up Marvel again (and even, to some extent, DC) now that Marvel has started advertising in Wizard again (and DC just started taking out ads two issues ago). Wizard's Comic Watch:Amazing Adventures #11: Beast goes furry New Mutants Annual #2: First American appearance of Psylocke Wizard's Top 10Marketwatch makes an effort to distinguish itself from the Top 10 this time, solely emphasizing the exploding Valiant dealer incentive books while also explaining that those books will not be featured on the Wizard Top 10 as their lack of availability somehow makes including them unfair. I think it really comes down to the unspoken philosophy pervading both the price guide and Top 10 that all books listed should be books that the kids reading Wizard could foreseeably find and afford. Thus no Golden Age comics in the guide, and rarely anything older than Modern Age in the Top 10. 1. Harbinger #1 2. Solar: Man of the Atom #10 3. Amazing Spider-Man #101 4. Spawn #1 5. Amazing Spider-Man #361 6. New Mutants #87 7. Youngblood #1 8. Uncanny X-Men #201 9. John Byrne's Next Men #1 10. New Warriors #1 Final Thoughts:Has Valiant come and gone so quickly? While their dealer incentive issues are exploding in value and they continue to hold the top 2 slots on the Top 10, those are the only two slots they're holding (two of their books have dropped off the list), their market share has fallen considerably, and Wizard isn't talking about them anywhere near as much as Image. Of course, with Jim Shooter gone, the company's new leaders will be far more free to employ shameless marketing tactics, and that will bring about a quick resurgence. In contrast, it's kind of amazing that Wizard has returned to paying attention to what's happening over at DC and Marvel. In fact, this is truly the first time they've given any amount of attention to DC (talking up Eclipso: The Darkness Within) beyond that all-Batman issue.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,866
|
Post by shaxper on Nov 19, 2014 22:28:24 GMT -5
Breakdown of covers and lead features by publisher Once Image and Valiant hit the scene, I find it interesting where Wizard chose to focus its energies. I only have issues #1-25, and Image and Valiant first really hit the scene with issue #10, so let's examine the #10-25 run and see what it shows us.
1. Image
Covers, lead feature articles, and lead feature interviews in #10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21, 23 (shared), and 25
Total: 9 out of 16 issues (56.25%)
2. Marvel
Covers, lead feature articles, and lead feature interviews in #13, 14, 18, 19, 22
Total: 5 out of 16 issues (31.25%)
3. Valiant (note: Valiant got the cover and lead features in #7, but this was actually before the company hit it big)
Covers, lead feature articles, and lead feature interviews in #17, 23 (shared)
Total: 2 out of 16 issues (12.5%)
4. DC
Covers, lead feature articles, and lead feature interviews in #24
Total: 1 out of 16 issues (6.25%)
A reflection of the market, or Wizard steering the market? Definitely a bit of both, but likely more of the former and less of the latter. As soon as Spawn's success followed and surpassed Youngblood's, Gareb Shamus began planning in advance for nearly every issue of Wizard that followed to feature the Image property launching that month.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2014 3:46:55 GMT -5
Marketwatch makes an effort to distinguish itself from the Top 10 this time, solely emphasizing the exploding Valiant dealer incentive books while also explaining that those books will not be featured on the Wizard Top 10 as their lack of availability somehow makes including them unfair. I think it really comes down to the unspoken philosophy pervading both the price guide and Top 10 that all books listed should be books that the kids reading Wizard could foreseeably find and afford. Thus no Golden Age comics in the guide, and rarely anything older than Modern Age in the Top 10. The pessimist in me thinks the reason they did this is because the dealer incentives were already making dealers a tidy profit, selling for $20 and up straight out of the box. You have to hype the regular version with the million copy print run to get the kids to run out and snag 'em two at a time, so one can stay in the polybag.
|
|