Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 20, 2024 7:24:37 GMT -5
Speaking as a fan of that era of X-men, God Loves, Man Kills is definitely worth a read, although it's an out-of-continuity story. Do you mean "out-of-continuity" as in Elseworlds or What If? Or "out-of-continuity" as in it just doesn't reference any of the then-ongoing X-Men comics? If it's the former and it's not set in the Marvel 616 Universe then that kinda kills my enthusiasm for it TBH. I've never been one for What If type stories. As for the pre-Claremont material, one of the better collections in that regard is X-men Visionaries: Neal Adams, which collects #56-63 and 65, which, includes the famous Sentinels story and then the Sauron/Savage Land/Magneto arc, which I think are the very best of the Roy Thomas run. It's out of print, but used copies should be pretty easy to find (I snagged a copy on eBay from a seller in the UK for less than $10 - although that was over a decade ago). OK, that's good info. Thanks. Otherwise, is the Second Genesis book you mentioned the Panini pocketbook edition? No, it's the volume from the Marvel Ultimate Graphic Novels Collection from Hachette Partworks. These were put out in the UK on a monthly basis with an accompanying magazine, building up week by week into a pretty comprehensive hardback collection of "significant" Marvel storylines. I have a few of these, including the Captain Britain volume and the Daredevil: Born Again one. Here's my Dark Pheonix one... The presentation of these books is really nice: they're sturdy, but not too heavy, with good paper stock, and the colours aren't too bright and garish, which I like when I'm reading reprints of old comic books. Best of all, these can usually be picked up pretty cheaply on eBay or in charity shops. If so, and if you don't mind the format, or buying used books (they're also mostly out of print now), that's a great way to pick up a bunch of Claremont's X-men for a reasonable price - esp. since you're in the UK, where online sellers like World of Books or Awesomebooks usually offer free domestic postage, so you can get most of them for no more than a few pounds each. For example, there is a Panini digest titled God Loves, Man Kills that collects that graphic novel, plus X-men Annual #5 (great story) and X-men #51-53 (all three really Kitty Pryde-focused stories). Another one, Scarlet in Glory, collects most of the same material as From the Ashes book, specifically #169-175. (That one just arrived in the mail this morning - it was the last one I needed to complete the run of my favorite X-men stories, i.e., GS #1/#94 through #175, and also why this is all fresh in my mind now). This is really informative, EdoBosnar. I'll take a look at those. I'm not sure if the smaller size would be off-putting? That said, some of my earliest comic reading memories are of the old early 80s Marvel UK and DC pocketbooks.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 20, 2024 6:58:12 GMT -5
Neither would 3 of the guys you listed, there's only 1 winner, but he certainly would be the favorite fo some people here. If it only counts if they win, then you should only list 1, because the others won't win either. And knowing this board, Miller wouldn't win either as there's not a lot of Miller fans here (I'm a fan but I'm more of an exception in that among the folks here). I like Miller a fair bit. At least through the best of Sin City. But he’s still way down my list. And much further if I include strip creators. Yeah, I like Miller a fair bit too. At least, I like his Daredevil, Batman and Sin City stuff from the 80s and 90s. But no way would he make my Top 5 writer-artists list.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 19, 2024 23:44:40 GMT -5
Claremont also hints that Mystique and Nightcrawler may be related (which was news to me, but I'm sure some of the forum's better read X-Fans can fill me in on the details of that). There's lots of more recent X-Men I haven't read, and I rarely re-read any post-Claremont stuff (as in after his first run). However, I do know this was revisited. I know for sure it was a big part of the story in X-Men Unlimited #4 in the early 90s. That was a quarterly usually with a single big page count story, like an annual on steroids. Prior to that I don't recall it come up. I might need to re-read the Brotherhood story from around #177-178, because I can't remember whether it's mentioned there. Oh, OK....I was thinking that this was something that would've been resolved or answered during Claremont's run. In the next dozen or so issues, I think I assumed. Since you enjoyed some of the John Byrne's stuff, I would recommend the rest of Byrne's run and Dave Cockrum's first run that proceeded it. So that would be Giant Size X-Men #1 and X-Men #94-143. I re-read all of it other past few months. Also, you may like the later stories that involve Rachel starting around Uncanny X-Men #188. The From the Ashes TPB reprinting #168-176 is also worth checking out. I have actually picked up the "Second Genesis" collection, which collects Giant Size X-Men #1 and X-Men #94-103, and I'm planning to read that soon. I'll have a look at the From the Ashes collection too. Two other storylines that I'm kinda curious about are the God Loves, Man Kills graphic novel and the much earlier, pre-Claremont collection, Twilight of the Mutants ( X-Men #50-59). Are either of those worth picking up?
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 19, 2024 14:58:47 GMT -5
This poll is very U.S.-centric and rather limited in scope to superhero comics of the 70s, 80s and 90s. Which is a shame.
Anyway, I voted "other" for Hergé.
Also, just for the record, I'd pick Chester Gould, Frank Hampson and Will Eisner before any of those listed in this poll.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 19, 2024 12:29:18 GMT -5
I think the headscarf might have been there partly just to keep readers in suspense as to the exact appearance of the new mystery character... Oh, absolutely (as I mentioned in my post before last ). Unlike Romita's MJ, Ditko's version is definitely not a happening, swinging '60s chick...just look at her conservative clothing and headscarf. Now admittedly, the headscarf was likely added as just another device to conceal her appearance, but nevertheless, clearly Ditko was intentionally dressing her like a more sophisticated and glamorous woman, a la Grace Kelly, than the free spirited and groovy Ann-Margret influenced character we eventually got.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 19, 2024 12:14:17 GMT -5
I read The Uncanny X-Men #141 and #142 in the "Days of Future Past" trade paperback last night... Traditionally, I've never been much of an X-Men fan, but in the last year I read the "Dark Phoenix" saga and enjoyed it more than I thought I would. The events of these two issues take place only 2 or 3 issues after the "Dark Phoenix" story, which is some going on Chris Claremont's part: two extremely well-regarded and influential storylines within the space of a year! I was a little shocked when I got the trade paperback collection that this arc is only two issues long; I think I was expecting it to be a good five or six issues. Still, despite being disappointed at the length of the story, "Days of Future Past" certainly packs in a lot into a short space. These are two very dense comics, with a lot of dialogue, a lot of big ideas, and quite a lot of panels per page. The story begins in bewildering fashion, with a glimpse of the dystopian far-flung future of…2013(!), where the Sentinels have taken over America and killed most of the mutants and superheroes, including the Fantastic Four and many of the X-Men. The consciousness of Kate (Kitty) Pryde travels back from the future and inhabits the body of her younger self in order to warn the X-Men that they must prevent the assassination of Senator Robert Kelly, which is the pivotal moment that leads to this dark future. Claremont's writing is really good, with a surprising amount of U.S. political satire sprinkled throughout. I guess the fact that 1980 was an election year in America is not a coincidence. Of course, there's plenty of superhero derring-do as well, as the modern-day X-Men face off against the new Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, led by Mystique in her classic late '70s/early '80s costume (my favourite), while the future X-Men battle to stop the Sentinels from triggering a nuclear holocaust. Claremont also hints that Mystique and Nightcrawler may be related (which was news to me, but I'm sure some of the forum's better read X-Fans can fill me in on the details of that). I think these comics must've been fairly ground-breaking back in the day, what with their time travelling/alternate dystopian timeline plot, which appeared way before films like Terminator or Back to the Future popularised such concepts in the public consciousness. Overall, these were two very enjoyable issues. I might just be turning into a bit of an X-Men fan in my old age!
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 19, 2024 10:52:15 GMT -5
Further on Ditko and MJ. The speculation is Mary Jane was Princess Python, who Ditko added to the Circus of Crime. There are some clues about it in the stories and the way she dressed in civilian clothes was just like the panel with MJ. It might also be that Stan did not go along with this in his dialog. Who knows? just fun stuff to think about. I'd never heard this idea about Ditko possibly intending MJ to be a villain, kirby. Fascinating idea. The suggestion that she may've even been Princess Python is doubly fascinating and certainly fits timeline-wise, as she had first appeared in ASM #22. Looking at these panels from ASM #22, which show Princess Python in her civilian clothing... It's clear that Princess Python's style of dress isn't a million miles away from the way Ditko dressed Mary Jane, in terms of it being a bit more glamourous and sophisticated than the more teenage clothing he gave Gwen and Liz. But then again, this was also the way that thousands of young American women dressed in the early-to-mid '60s. Plus, there's no headscarf...which isn't necessarily important, I guess, but if Ditko was intending them to be the same person, you might think he'd give her a headscarf? Like I say, it's fascinating to speculate on this though. One thing though, it is clearly established in Stan's dialog that MJ looks like a movie star. His friends and Aunt May have seen her. Yet Stan forgets this when Aunt May finally gets him to meet her in issue 42, as Peter laments how bad she might be. Yeah, but what self-respecting teenager would take their Mum's/Aunt's/Grandmother's word for it that a girl is attractive?! Besides, as far as I remember, Liz and Betty never mentioned how attractive Mary Jane was to Peter, did they? The thing is, the whole running gag about Aunt May trying to set Peter up with her friend's niece, who he assumes will be an ugly dork, would've mirrored similar experiences that many young male readers would've had with their Mothers, Grandmothers and Aunts. I, for one, can remember my Great Aunt forever trying to set me up with her friend's granddaughters or similar when I was aged 13-16 or so...and they were all 'orrible! The joke of course is that the reader is in on the fact that MJ is legitimately a stunning babe long before Peter realises it.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 18, 2024 19:51:53 GMT -5
Stan Lee and John Romita did not create Mary Jane. Steve Ditko did. He introduced her in ASM #25 after her first mention in issue #15. All these stories were fully plotted by Ditko. In he first appearance, Liz and Betty see she is a knockout. Now we don't know what Ditko eventually intended. And I have no problem attributing her character development to Romita and Lee. But to say Romita and Lee created her. As all Marvel sources say, is flat out false. Yeah, saying that Lee/Romita created MJ is clearly incorrect, though as you point out, the development and design that created the character we all know and love was definitely down to Lee and Romita. But with that understood, I'm not sure how you can definitively say that Ditko created MJ without any input from Stan at all (unless you have a reliable third-party source that I'm unaware of, of course). ASM #25 was the very first issue where Ditko was credited as the plotter, but clearly MJ had been in the background since issue #15, as you say, and was -- prior to the Romita-drawn reveal in ASM #42 -- used as a running gag about this (almost certainly) ugly girl that Aunt May was desperate to fix Peter up with. Stan and Steve's relationship fell apart not long after ASM #25, with the pair reportedly not talking at all for the last year of Ditko's tenure on Spider-Man (Ditko would apparently drop off his finished art, with brief dialogue notes, and Stan would take the artwork and script it, without the two interacting at all). But prior to this total breakdown in communications, Stan would've almost certainly had some input into the discussions about adding another love interest for Peter to the comic. I know that Ditko has written in letters that Lee had no input at all into the stories from the second half of his stint on ASM, but as I pointed out earlier in the thread, some pages back, Ditko is himself an unreliable source and certainly had an axe to grind. As author Sean Howe points out in his book Marvel Comics: The Untold Story, Lee was still having input into the Spider-Man stories that Ditko plotted because he was still writing the dialogue for them and would, in fact, often use the dialogue to change minor story elements or lessen some of Ditko's more extreme objectivism. In a related subject, I think it's fascinating to speculate on what Ditko (and Lee) may've originally intended with Mary Jane before her Lee/Romita makeover. Ditko clearly intended for her to be a stunning beauty (Liz and Betty's reactions in the panels above prove that), but I think he was looking to introduce a love interest for Peter with a more mature, grown-up personality than Gwen or Liz (though not necessarily an older woman). Unlike Romita's MJ, Ditko's version is definitely not a happening, swinging '60s chick...just look at her conservative clothing and headscarf. Now admittedly, the headscarf was likely added as just another device to conceal her appearance, but nevertheless, clearly Ditko was intentionally dressing her like a more sophisticated and glamorous woman, a la Grace Kelly, than the free spirited and groovy Ann-Margret influenced character we eventually got.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 16, 2024 11:58:15 GMT -5
Last night, I read that the first British band to top the US charts were The Tornados, with “Telstar”. Great record! Produced by troubled genius and envelope-pushing independent producer Joe Meek. "Telstar" was a pioneering space age-themed, experimental slice of instrumental pop music. It really did sound like nothing else anyone had heard in 1962.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 16, 2024 11:49:57 GMT -5
I saw the full solar eclipse from Cornwall in 1999. I have also seen two partial eclipses from where I live outside London; one in summer 1982 and another in 2005 or thereabouts.
Solar eclipses are rather eerie, I think. The way the light starts fading and the birds all start singing their evening song in the middle of the day, the way the wind suddenly picks up...it awakens something primeval in you and makes the hairs on your neck stand up. You can absolutely see why they used to freak our ancestors out.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 15, 2024 20:35:09 GMT -5
Elfquest (Marvel/Epic version) #7-#22 I think I might have fallen in love with title you guys (already got The Complete Elfquest 1 and 2 on the way). I think what I've been enjoying about this the most is how well it reads, kind of reminding me of being a kid and how much I loved the Dark Crystal. Love the concept of the Wolfriders and how their lineage is almost kind of casually explained during a battle between Cutter an Winnowill. "Recognition" and "Sending" are also very neat ideas that are seamlessly interwoven into the story I really like Elfquest a whole lot. I've only ever read the black & white original comics and collections, not the colour Marvel reprints, which I think had some redrawn panels (to hide occasional nudity, perhaps??). One of my New Years Classic Comics Resolutions this year was to re-read the first 10 years of the series (1978-1988) and I'm hoping to get to it soon.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 13, 2024 20:45:07 GMT -5
It's been nearly three years since I last posted what albums I've added to my Spotify library, so I shan't dilly-dally: Branch, Michelle The Spirit Room Chicago Hot Streets
Clarkson Kelly Greatest Hits - Volume One Collins, Judy Colors of the Day: The Best of Judy Collins
Cramer, Floyd The Essential Floyd Cramer Denver, John John Denver's Greatest Hits, Volume 2
Dorsey, Jimmy The Very Best of Jimmy Dorsey Dylan, Bob Bob Dylan's Greatest Hits, Volume II Furtado, Nelly The Best of Nelly Furtado
Genesis Turn It On Again: The Hits
Hall, Tom T. 20th Century Masters: The Best of Tom T. Hall Horne, Lena Lena Horne
Ian, Janis Between the Lines It's a Beautiful Day It's a Beautiful Day Jackson, Michael Off the Wall
Jones, Norah Come Away with Me
Kyser, Kay Best of the Big Bands Little Shop of Horrors (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) Linstead, Johannes Sol Luna Tierra Lovett, Lyle Greatest Hits
Mancini, Henry The Essential Henry Mancini
Marx, Richard Greatest Hits McBride, Martina Greatest Hits
Monroe, Bill The Essential Bill Monroe Pablo Cruise Worlds Away
Pink Floyd The Wall Queen Greatest Hits
Springsteen, Bruce Born in the USA Stone, Joss The Best of Joss Stone 2003-2009 Taylor, James Greatest Hits, Volume 2
Train Greatest Hits Turner, Tina All the Best: The Hits
Underwood, Carrie Greatest Hits: Decade #1
Wills, Bob, and His Texas Playboys The Essential Bob Wills and His Texas Playboys Yankovic, Weird Al Dare to Be Stupid Yearwood, Trisha Greatest Hits I also created the following playlists: 100 '90s Classics 75 Country-Western Classics 50 Instrumental Favorites and 50 Christmas Favorites
You can't say I don't have eclectic taste! Cei-U! I summon the tunfest!
You forgot one...
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 12, 2024 19:39:54 GMT -5
Oddly, I think that may be my favorite Haggard song. That's a bold choice but certainly valid. It's a great song...but not my favorite by Hagg. That is absolutely Workin' Man Blues. "Workin' Man Blues" is a really great tune and I especially like the slightly "comedically bleak" sounding pick axe on rock percussion. Some great, great James Burton guitar on that track too. As for my favourite Merle Haggard song, I'm tempted to say "Mama Tried" or maybe "Sing Me Back Home", but in an attempt not to be so obvious, I'm gonna say "Tonight the Bottle Let Me Down" instead.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 11, 2024 16:42:09 GMT -5
Hi to all! I'm Emily and I just recently got into comics Which comics or characters are your favourite?
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,144
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 11, 2024 16:41:34 GMT -5
A few weeks ago, my favorite movie was Napoleon It'd quite like to see that. I've pretty much found director Ridley Scott's work to be sadly lacking over at least the last couple of decades, but he was once called of making incredible cinema, so I live in hope! What did you like about it?
|
|