|
Post by lobsterjohnson on Apr 4, 2016 12:19:06 GMT -5
Saw it yesterday and there's one thing I'm surprised that hasn't been addressed...
S P O I L E R S
was that Jimmy Olsen getting his brains blown out at the start of the film? It seemed like it might have been, but no one seemed too bothered at the Planet. I haven't seen Man of Steel so I don't know if he was even in that, but the fact that he was killed attempting to save Lois and then simply forgotten about was pretty shocking. I know this Superman is supposed to be something of a failure but, I don't know, failing to save Jimmy? Was that supposed to be an easter egg or something? Here's an article where Zack Snyder talks about that. I haven't seen the movie, but that doesn't really seem like a "fun" cameo to me.
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Apr 4, 2016 15:00:57 GMT -5
Saw it yesterday and there's one thing I'm surprised that hasn't been addressed...
S P O I L E R S
was that Jimmy Olsen getting his brains blown out at the start of the film? It seemed like it might have been, but no one seemed too bothered at the Planet. I haven't seen Man of Steel so I don't know if he was even in that, but the fact that he was killed attempting to save Lois and then simply forgotten about was pretty shocking. I know this Superman is supposed to be something of a failure but, I don't know, failing to save Jimmy? Was that supposed to be an easter egg or something? Here's an article where Zack Snyder talks about that. I haven't seen the movie, but that doesn't really seem like a "fun" cameo to me. It's like Snyder can't help but brag about how unimaginative he is.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 4, 2016 20:35:20 GMT -5
Saw it yesterday and there's one thing I'm surprised that hasn't been addressed...
S P O I L E R S
was that Jimmy Olsen getting his brains blown out at the start of the film? It seemed like it might have been, but no one seemed too bothered at the Planet. I haven't seen Man of Steel so I don't know if he was even in that, but the fact that he was killed attempting to save Lois and then simply forgotten about was pretty shocking. I know this Superman is supposed to be something of a failure but, I don't know, failing to save Jimmy? Was that supposed to be an easter egg or something? Here's an article where Zack Snyder talks about that. I haven't seen the movie, but that doesn't really seem like a "fun" cameo to me. Interesting. While I haven't seen BvS, Man of Steel established a "Jenny Olsen" in place of a Jimmy in the Snyderverse. So I guess Snyder isn't even paying attention to his own B.S.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 4, 2016 20:38:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Bronze Age Brian on Apr 4, 2016 21:16:59 GMT -5
Kevin Smith seems to have changed his tune according to his BvS review on the latest Fatman on Batman. Looks like he's able to enjoy it enough to ignore the glaring issues we've talked about here. NSFW Language Alert:
|
|
|
Post by dupersuper on Apr 5, 2016 7:34:14 GMT -5
Superman saying "No one in this world stays good forever" might be the worst moment I've ever seen in a superhero movie. I thought that was just his commentary on the DC movie universe...
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Apr 5, 2016 7:39:56 GMT -5
So I saw it. As everyone stated, it indeed had several flaws, mostly in the plot (the mechanics of why one does what most of the time) but... This reminded me of a crucial point in my history with movies : the first time I ever watched Dario Argento's Suspuria, which was in my mid twenties, quite late in my relationship with movies. By that point, with heavy exposure to the great classics of film from around the world, thanks to my family and abundance of art theaters in Paris, I had grown into favoring plot driven movies. So the premise of Suspuria seemed quite weak to me. But hten I saw the film, and even though the plot was even weaker than what I'd expected, the film became one of the most profound visual experience I ever had in front oof a movie. I'm not saying Snyder is on par with ARgento, but he's meeting him halfways of sors. Was the movie epic? Sure it was, I've never seen so much destruction ever in a movie, ever, not with that kind of physical impact. This was even depressing, just witnessing the destruction of the world. The music was actualy great as well, very different from the horror of Sucker Punch, one of the top 5 worst movies I ever saw. So I guess that in the end, my major complain would be that the clunky plot got in the way of sheer spectacle, which to be honest is the one thing Snyder has the chops for. One other issue with the movie I don't have is how bleak and joyless it is. I think this must come from a generation POV : Most of the people who have that stand started to read comics before the grim and political 80ies, which many welcomed as a nice breath of fresh air. I'm from a generation who started out in comics with those, so in the past few years, I welcomed bookslike Plasticman, Batgirl or Squirel Girl. But the dark and Gloom really is where I come from comicwise, so I really have no issue with that in a superhero movie. Most marvel movies have really dark and sinister villains, but the plot most often is adventures, people seeking power. In this BVS, the villain don't look as grim as their actions, and Luthor's motives are more scary since they are more abstract. To be honest, despite the clunkyness of its politics and philosophies, I greatly enjoyed that this movie at least attempted to have those, howvere I agree or disagree with those. So all in all, I liked it a lot for its ambitions, plus the fact that it had a lot to tell, I didn't feel cheated. What I wish had been different is mostly from a "fan" perspective, which is irrelevant IMHO since WB/DC clearly stated that they wanted to let their director embrace their own vision, and boy did they with Snyder! One might pose as holder of truths and dismiss this movie for being uncharacteristic of the comics he loves, but it would be pretty hypocritic to consider Snyder not being a comicbook fan (his CV speaks for himself). But once again, even if it wasn't, this is irrelevant since Snyder is doing his movie, not yours, and every fan has a movie in his head different than any one else's. On a final note, most of those dream sequences were amazing to watch, and the whole teasing of apokolips earth was enough to have me want for more, and the clues to the possibilities of a justice league obviously had joy in for the fan, I know I was excited! Even the classical ending in the grave had me sujectivly pumped . So now, I can only imagine that the 30 mn longer extended cut will provide much grease to the mechanics, smooth out some hard transitions and plot points, flesh out Alfred, Lex and Diana a little more and I might end up very happy with the movie
|
|
|
Post by chadwilliam on Apr 5, 2016 16:03:46 GMT -5
SPOILERS Superman saying "No one in this world stays good forever" might be the worst moment I've ever seen in a superhero movie.
I think Batman topped that with his reasoning for wanting to kill Superman being "If there's even a one percent chance he's our enemy, we have to take it as an absolute certainty".
|
|
|
Post by Warmonger on Apr 5, 2016 21:43:06 GMT -5
SPOILERS Superman saying "No one in this world stays good forever" might be the worst moment I've ever seen in a superhero movie.
I think Batman topped that with his reasoning for wanting to kill Superman being "If there's even a one percent chance he's our enemy, we have to take it as an absolute certainty".
LOL Two-Face gives better odds Much better Even though I thought Affleck's Batman was the best part of the movie, aside from him murdering dudes left and right...the script also portrayed him as a total dumbass. Worlds Greatest Detective? Not in this universe
|
|
|
Post by Trevor on Apr 9, 2016 15:43:32 GMT -5
Finally saw it, and here's my take:
Man of Steel had an interpretation of Superman that I hated. But you know, there's been thousands of interpretations since 1938 and I'm not going to like them all. I respect a creator's right to their vision, and the people that loved that monstrosity.
So for BvS, I knew going in that the Superman in the film was going to suck. Complaining about that now would be like putting my hand in boiling water multiple times expecting different results. So I ignored my hate for his representation in the film and just gave the rest of it a chance. And I loved it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2016 16:18:28 GMT -5
Now rumor has it that WB is considering rereleasing BvS later this year with the R-rated director's cut that was originally intended for the DVD releaseas a theatrical release instead. Since the movie is not exceeding box office expectations, you have to think they are trying to find a way to get the kind of return on investment from this movie they were hoping for, but didn't get because it didn't have legs at the box office.
-M
|
|
|
Post by Warmonger on Apr 9, 2016 16:39:06 GMT -5
Now rumor has it that WB is considering rereleasing BvS later this year with the R-rated director's cut that was originally intended for the DVD releaseas a theatrical release instead. Since the movie is not exceeding box office expectations, you have to think they are trying to find a way to get the kind of return on investment from this movie they were hoping for, but didn't get because it didn't have legs at the box office. -M Not sure how much this is going to help them I'm sure some diehard fanboys will go see it, but for the people who didn't care for the movie in the first place, I doubt they care. Walking out of the theater, the last thing on my mind was "You know what I could use? Another 45 minutes of that".
|
|
|
Post by Action Ace on Apr 9, 2016 19:49:17 GMT -5
So a Batman and Superman film can't even make as much money as a rated R Deadpool film in the USA? People in charge of the film division at Warner Brothers... PRESS HERE
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Apr 9, 2016 20:15:23 GMT -5
So a Batman and Superman film can't even make as much money as a rated R Deadpool film in the USA? People in charge of the film division at Warner Brothers... PRESS HEREWho knows, maybe this is the start of that superhero movie fatigue so many have been going on and on about. Still, I doubt that in the end of ends BVS will make less than Deadpool, and it still did better then Man of Steel. The audiences already had great Superman and Batman movies, there's less novelty in those. The second avengers movie did less then the first, and while the upcoming Cap may be the best yet, it may also se a decrease in audience, who knows, we'll see Anywasy, as long as I have m ycomic books, I don't care a single second, good super hero movies are just a bonus.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Apr 10, 2016 2:21:16 GMT -5
Since the movie is not exceeding box office expectations, you have to think they are trying to find a way to get the kind of return on investment from this movie they were hoping for, but didn't get because it didn't have legs at the box office. I don't know about expectations, but if they invested an additional 10%, and they're getting more than that at the box office, they should be content. BTW, it's been only two weeks, kind of early to start talking in the past tense. So a Batman and Superman film can't even make as much money as a rated R Deadpool film in the USA? It will make more money, worldwide. Is it really important, where the money comes from?
|
|