|
Post by Reptisaurus! on Mar 7, 2016 21:09:40 GMT -5
The Beatles that the band created BOTH rap (Come Together) and heavy metal (Helter Skelter). Please, please, please don't say things like this. It is painful to me. Helter Skelter was released after Are You Experienced. You can safely argue that Heavy Metal would not be possible without the British Invasion bands in toto but not the Beatles specifically. (The Kinks were probably the most important of the English Bands re: the development of metal, actually.)
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Mar 7, 2016 21:22:26 GMT -5
Your right in many ways. The use of the word "create" when applying to a genre, musical or literary, is fraught with errors. Genres or types of music are not created in a vacuum by one person. They are part of an evolution. A musician cannot help but be influenced from previous things he'/she has heard. When I used Dylan as a rap creator, it was done more so to disprove Shax's theory than a truth of its own. Of course Dylan was influenced, hugely by talking blues from folks like Woody Guthrie or Pete Seeger and a host of others. And I'm sure rap has roots taken from country blues besides folk. I don't pretend to be a musical expert, just a lifetime of awareness. Abstain from using the words "X Created so-and so" and you won't be shown up as foolish
Confessor earlier pointed to the song Tomorrow Never Knows as the creation of tape loops in music or something like that. Again not correct. It was more accurately the first use of such by a popular musician and became public knowledge but (although I admire Lennon tremendously) Lennon shouldn't get credit as the creator. Lennon loved exploring the works of the avant-garde arts-its how he met Yoko. I'm sure he ran across the earlier works of folks like Terry Riley,Steve Reich or others. Frank Zappa employed their use from the beginning in 1965 on his debut album Freak Out. Its a fact that Lennon wanted to do some work with that motif and asked The Beatles long-time Producer George Martin for advice and guidance.
So again- Bill Haley did not invent rock n' roll with the song Rock Around The Clock Siegel and Shuster did not create the first super hero HG Welles did not create science fiction
In all these cases there were earlier examples, maybe you can call them prototypes and these gentlemen helped evolve them. They are thought of as the creators because they had the good fortune of being more popular and getting it into the public arena
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Mar 7, 2016 21:29:26 GMT -5
The Beatles that the band created BOTH rap (Come Together) and heavy metal (Helter Skelter). Please, please, please don't say things like this. It is painful to me. Helter Skelter was released after Are You Experienced. You can safely argue that Heavy Metal would not be possible without the British Invasion bands in toto but not the Beatles specifically. (The Kinks were probably the most important of the English Bands re: the development of metal, actually.) And Steppenwolf's Born To Be Wild was recorded a full year before Helter Skelter and used the term heavy metal in it's lyrics as well.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Mar 7, 2016 21:31:25 GMT -5
As far as the roots of Hip Hop/Rap goes, I would point out the earlier Bob Dylan Subterranean Homesick Blues or even It's All Right Ma (I'm Only Bleeding). The Beatles and John Lennon were huge Bob Dylan fans and I wouldn't be surprised that Dylan influenced John Lennon's penchant for symbolic/ nonsense lyrics like Come Together and Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds. (A) Bob Dylan did not invent talking blues, and (B) talking blues had very, very little influence on rap. Although that might be a slightly better argument than the Beatles invented rap. Still over 99.9% false, but your closer to the truth than Shax. I care a lot about 20th century popular music, and I've been a paid pop music writer on and off for years, but I'm pretty much indifferent to the Beatles. Elvis, too - and by extension the traditional Rolling Stone/Greil Marcus narrative of the development of pop music. BUT.. when you are playing radio tag (flip through the radio dial and identify the musical artist) they are very hard to identify. Not to brag, but I am a combination of Shakespeare, Batman, Jesus and Buhdda at this game. Nobody can beat me. Few have ever come close. But there are many Beatles songs I don't know, and they tend to sound different enough that they are hard to pinpoint. I guess that is a strength of the band. Their voices are the give-away for me, but then there's the problem of distinguishing between the Beatles and the solo stuff - when I was a kid I would sometimes misidentify an early McCartney or Lennon solo song like Instant Karma as a Beatles track I hadn't heard before (I would have been 8 or 9 years old when they broke up). I think Lennon always acknowledged Dylan's influence in a broad way in that he showed them you didn't have to write about boy loves girl in every song, that pop music could talk about anything. Not sure I'd see him a direct influence lyrically, would be interesting to hear Lennon talk about that, if anyone ever asked him. IIRC, Norwegian Wood and You've Got to Hide Your Love Away were deliberate attempts at a Dylanesque sound, by all accounts; as, apparently, Please, Please Me was meant to be in the style of Roy Orbison (have always wished Orbison had covered it ever since hearing that). I always thought the flat-top line in Come Together was a deliberate reference to the Chuck Berry lyric. So our Grade 7 music teacher told us back in 1973-74, at any rate.
|
|
|
Post by Reptisaurus! on Mar 7, 2016 21:44:51 GMT -5
Your right in many ways. The use of the word "create" when applying to a genre, musical or literary, is fraught with errors. Genres or types of music are not created in a vacuum by one person. They are part of an evolution. A musician cannot help but be influenced from previous things he'/she has heard. When I used Dylan as a rap creator, it was done more so to disprove Shax's theory than a truth of its own. Of course Dylan was influenced, hugely by talking blues from folks like Woody Guthrie or Pete Seeger and a host of others. And I'm sure rap has roots taken from country blues besides folk. I don't pretend to be a musical expert, just a lifetime of awareness. Abstain from using the words "X Created so-and so" and you won't be shown up as foolish Confessor earlier pointed to the song Tomorrow Never Knows as the creation of tape loops in music or something like that. Again not correct. It was more accurately the first use of such by a popular musician and became public knowledge but (although I admire Lennon tremendously) Lennon shouldn't get credit as the creator. Lennon loved exploring the works of the avant-garde arts-its how he met Yoko. I'm sure he ran across the earlier works of folks like Terry Riley,Steve Reich or others. Frank Zappa employed their use from the beginning in 1965 on his debut album Freak Out. Its a fact that Lennon wanted to do some work with that motif and asked The Beatles long-time Producer George Martin for advice and guidance. So again- Bill Haley did not invent rock n' roll with the song Rock Around The Clock Siegel and Shuster did not create the first super hero HG Welles did not create science fiction In all these cases there were earlier examples, maybe you can call them prototypes and these gentlemen helped evolve them. They are thought of as the creators because they had the good fortune of being more popular and getting it into the public arena Right, right, right. Good points all around. Comics are a little clearer - Seigel and Shuster codified a set of tropes that are used to define "superhero" to this day, and Simon and Kirby did the same with "romance comics" but even those kinds of arguments don't work for music. There's really no starting point for any particular genre - there's a bunch of bands/individuals doing stuff that sort of sounds like Genre X, there are a bunch of people that are arguably working in genre X or maybe not, and then there are some grounds/people who are definitely Genre X.
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Mar 7, 2016 21:49:51 GMT -5
berkley touched upon something I'd like to deal with tomorrow with more detail, but first, this particular song came out just when Paul McCartney announced in 1970 that The Beatles have officially disbanded. And in those days all we had was a radio to go by. Was this Paul's new song, was it the Beatles's last. For a long time I never heard an announcer ID the artist and it was driving me nuts. A great song-would it have confused you too?
|
|
|
Post by Phil Maurice on Mar 7, 2016 21:58:38 GMT -5
Please, please, please don't say things like this. It is painful to me. Helter Skelter was released after Are You Experienced. You can safely argue that Heavy Metal would not be possible without the British Invasion bands in toto but not the Beatles specifically. (The Kinks were probably the most important of the English Bands re: the development of metal, actually.) Truth. And let's not forget things like The Pink Floyd's Astronomy Domine and Interstellar Overdrive, released in August '67, which can be classed under a number of designations, including proto-metal.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Mar 7, 2016 23:01:04 GMT -5
Re heavy metal, I read somewhere that Lennon thought Ticket to Ride had a very heavy sound for its time, with that big, thudding bass-line and I've heard it that way ever since. Has any heavy metal band ever covered it, I wonder?
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Mar 7, 2016 23:57:31 GMT -5
Re heavy metal, I read somewhere that Lennon thought Ticket to Ride had a very heavy sound for its time, with that big, thudding bass-line and I've heard it that way ever since. Has any heavy metal band ever covered it, I wonder? Proto metal
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Mar 8, 2016 0:28:44 GMT -5
Have never listened to a lot of VF.
The Emitt Rhodes thing certainly is quite Beatlesque.
IIRC, I was fooled by Badfinger's big hit, No Matter What, still one of my favourite songs and bands.
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Mar 8, 2016 0:44:47 GMT -5
Have never listened to a lot of VF. The Emitt Rhodes thing certainly is quite Beatlesque. IIRC, I was fooled by Badfinger's big hit, No Matter What, still one of my favourite songs and bands. Vanilla Fudge is best known for their super heavy magnum opus version of Diana Ross and the Supreme's hit You Keep Me Hangin' On. Worth checking it out on YouTube The weird coincidence of Emitt Rhodes is that the song and album was released just about the same time as Paul McCartney's first solo album. And on both albums, Rhodes and McCartney played all the various instruments themselves as well as all the backing vocals and all the songwriting. Some pictures of Rhodes on the album jacket look similar to Paul as well. Badfinger was such a great Beatlesque pop band in the early 70s, signed to the Beatles' Apple Records company and backing up George Harrison and others at the famous Concert For Bangladesh. Tragically I believe 2 of their members committed suicide when their record label dropped the group and they were financially struggling
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Mar 8, 2016 1:16:16 GMT -5
Yes, a tragic story. There's a good book about Badfinger called Without You that's worth tracking down for anyone who's even a bit of a fan. I believe Pete Ham also played on George Harrison's All Things Must Pass perhaps some other members of the band as well.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,197
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 8, 2016 10:50:15 GMT -5
As far as the roots of Hip Hop/Rap goes, I would point out the earlier Bob Dylan Subterranean Homesick Blues or even It's All Right Ma (I'm Only Bleeding). The Beatles and John Lennon were huge Bob Dylan fans and I wouldn't be surprised that Dylan influenced John Lennon's penchant for symbolic/ nonsense lyrics like Come Together and Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds. (A) Bob Dylan did not invent talking blues, and (B) talking blues had very, very little influence on rap. Unless I missed something, a) no one said Bob Dylan invented talking blues, and b) no one said it had an influence on rap either. Oh, and c), "Subterranean Homesick Blues" is not talking blues. At all. Not by a long shot. While it's true that Dylan wrote and recorded many examples of the talking blues, "Subterranean Homesick Blues" is much more indebted to the quick-fire lyrical whit of the likes of Chuck Berry's "Maybellene", but amped up to an even more intense and rapid delivery. Also, for the record, I called "Subterranean Homesick Blues" an important early example of proto-rapping, which it undoubtedly is. I never said it was the first rap record or some such. The same can be said for some of the spoken "raps" (for want of a better term) that Lou Rawls would pepper his songs with in the mid-60s. Of course, it isn't until you get to artists like Gil Scott-Heron or the albums put out by The Last Poets in the early '70s that you really hear anything properly approaching the genre that would become hip hop in the late '70s. But, there's little doubt that a record like "Subterranean Homesick Blues" was an important early step along that road. I care a lot about 20th century popular music, and I've been a paid pop music writer on and off for years, but I'm pretty much indifferent to the Beatles. Elvis, too - and by extension the traditional Rolling Stone/Greil Marcus narrative of the development of pop music. Ah, some things we have in common, then. I too am deeply passionate about popular music and the developmental history of the art form (yes, I do consider it an art form. Commercial art, for sure, but art nonetheless). I also worked as a professional music journalist between 2007 and 2010, by which time I'd realised that there really wasn't any money in it any more. I wrote regularly for mainstream UK music publications, such as Mojo and Q, along with many record and gig reviews in smaller publications like Rock 'n' Reel. I even had a piece about a Chicago-based singer-songwriter published in the Chicago Tribune (which was probably my greatest achievement as a music journalist). So yeah, I know my stuff too. BUT.. when you are playing radio tag (flip through the radio dial and identify the musical artist) they are very hard to identify. Not to brag, but I am a combination of Shakespeare, Batman, Jesus and Buhdda at this game. Nobody can beat me. I betcha I could! The Beatles that the band created BOTH rap (Come Together) and heavy metal (Helter Skelter). Please, please, please don't say things like this. It is painful to me. Helter Skelter was released after Are You Experienced. You can safely argue that Heavy Metal would not be possible without the British Invasion bands in toto but not the Beatles specifically. (The Kinks were probably the most important of the English Bands re: the development of metal, actually.) Yeah, clearly the Beatles didn't "invent" heavy metal. It's very difficult to pinpoint any one specific record where the various musical tributaries that lead to the genre coalesced into something that was unquestionably heavy metal (although the first Black Sabbath album gets my vote). But what is true is that "Helter Skelter" was an important antecedent, along with earlier riff-heavy offerings by Jimi Hendrix and the Kinks, as you point out. Actually, a lot of heavy metal evolved out of acid rock too. But here's the thing that sometimes gets forgotten by armchair music historians: when talking about records that have wielded influence on popular music, it's not enough to have been first, you have to have been popular enough to have impacted the public imagination enough for people to have been influenced by you. "Helter Skelter" was on an album that sold in its millions in Britain and America, and so was much more influential on the world at large than some earlier example of heavy guitar rock that maybe sold only a fraction of the number of copies (I'm thinking of a record like "Summertime Blues" by the Blue Cheer or something here). Oh, and something related to heavy guitar rock that the Beatles really did do first was deliberately use guitar feedback on a record as an effect. The buzzing, mid-range feedback at the start of "I Feel Fine" (recorded in October 1964) was the first time that feedback -- which until then had been the bane of audio engineers everywhere and something to be avoided at all costs -- was used as part of the song on purpose. But anyway, I'm digressing really. Confessor earlier pointed to the song Tomorrow Never Knows as the creation of tape loops in music or something like that. Again not correct. I never said any such thing. What I said was, "you can also hear the roots of hip hop in the drums and tape loops of the Beatles' 'Tomorrow Never Knows'". I would never suggest that the Beatles invented tape loops...that would be ridiculous. So again- Bill Haley did not invent rock n' roll with the song Rock Around The Clock See, I know that for a long time "Rock Around the Clock" was widely held to be the first rock 'n' roll record and then it became fashionable for smart alec music journalists to point to records like "Rocket 88" by Jackie Brenston and his Delta Cats (a.k.a. Ike Turner) and say, "no, that's where it all started", but I disagree. I think the old cliche about "Rock Around the Clock" being the first rock 'n' roll record is basically true. Of course, it greatly depends on your personal interpretation of what constitutes rock 'n' roll, but to my ears, a record like "Rocket 88" isn't quite it -- it's jukebox blues or rhythm 'n' blues, but it's not quite rock 'n' roll. There are many other jukebox blues records from that era that come very close to sounding like early rock 'n' roll too, records like "Down the Road Apeice" by Amos Milburn for example, but "Rock Around the Clock" just has that something extra. A little more aggression, a little more swing, a little more excitement. Just listen to the mighty "crack!" of that snare drum on Bill Haley's record or the sheer abandon and swagger of the guitar solo. That's rock 'n' roll! Edit: Of course, I'm not actually suggesting that Bill Haley "invented" rock 'n' roll, he was obviously influenced by other artists, but I am saying that "Rock Around the Clock" is the earliest record that you can point to and say unequivocally that it's a rock 'n' roll record.
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Mar 8, 2016 12:30:34 GMT -5
Ran into this clip by accident. I think this drummer really nails it and helps point out Ringo Starr's contribution to the band.
Lennon/McCartney by force of their songwriting talents and personality surely dominated the public's perception of the group. George Harrison slowly developed into a wonderful songwriter of his own too and a marvelous lead guitarist. Ringo for most was the class clown or the hapless, lovable one. But I really liked Ringo's drumming. His style was so distinctive that many times I could recognize it if he was just making a guest appearance on someone else's record.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,197
|
Post by Confessor on Mar 8, 2016 12:46:00 GMT -5
Ran into this clip by accident. I think this drummer really nails it and helps point out Ringo Starr's contribution to the band. That is a great clip. I saw it a couple of months ago. Ringo is indeed a really good drummer and exactly the right man for the job, in terms of what the Beatles needed. He really makes those Beatles' records swing.
|
|