|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2017 1:20:49 GMT -5
I haven't looked in on the Politics thread in a while either, all I know if hearsay from others saying what is happening there, nor do I care to check in on that one either. The There I Said it threads have driven away actual members away, the cover contest has driven actual members away people, the Meanwhile thread has driven actual members away, CCG threads have driven actual members away, so shall we get rid of them too? People have felt bullied in all those threads, so they must be a cancer to the site too right?
I can easily enough ignore the threads I don't like and let whoever want to engage in them do so. I'm not calling for any of the threads being deleted, but if you asked me which ones should be, well I could name a few, but that doesn't mean I am advocating for their removal. I don't make the call what threads exist and don't, nor should I (and I wouldn't want to be making those decisions-a reason I stepped down as co-admin).
It only takes 1 bad thread to give someone a bad taste for the site. One negative can undo thousands of positives (to use a comic example just ask Hank Pym what defines him for most comic fans despite hundreds of positive stories about him, one bad story by Shooter is all it took to define him negatively in the minds of fans forever). It doesn't matter how welcoming and intelligent the conversation is on hundreds of threads here on the forum, one bad thread, whether it's sexy covers, politics, or something else entirely is all it takes to form the site's reputation. Not fair sure, but it's the reality of the way things work. People ignore facts when they work against the things they like and believe anything when it works against something they don't like. It's the way bias works and every human being has their biases. I really don't care if you or anyone else posts in the sexy comics cover thread, you can do whatever you want, but if you are claiming it has no negative effect on the site, then your wrong. It may have positives too, I don't know, but I do know it has kept people who love comics and make them their life(or at least a part of how they make their living) from joining the site. That's nothing for or against anyone who does contribute to the thread. It is what it is though.
-M
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Feb 6, 2017 10:44:37 GMT -5
Man, I'm late to the discussion; but ...
1.Political thread ... I don't participate much. I mostly read it to see personal points of posters. I really enjoyed hearing poster share their stories about meeting Gerald Ford, when I brought up his name. It was like meeting him in person through the poster's words. Current event politics, I don't care for. I'm apathetic and unapologetic about it. That said, it has chased away posters now, and it's not the first time a poster has left due to their policial views. I don't care that the thread is a part of this community, but I don't pretend to think it can/could become a problem again.
2. Miss Jezebel ... if you are reading I am sorry that you do not feel welcome again. Your bias to Rob Liefield aside, I always enjoy reading your viewpoints and wished you would stay. But I can understand that need to move on to what works for you in your life. I hope that you will return again.
3. The Sexy Covers thread ... I don't understand some people's thoughts about it. I think sexuality is great and we should all not feel embarrassed by it. Our society can have the kind of deplorable violence of The Walking Dead on TV and blush at some cleavage. I was raised very sheltered. It has certainly greatly affected how I view things as an adult; especially regarding sexuality. Perhaps if we did have more female posters to start with we could get a consensus if it indeed offensive to them or not. I'm not picking on those that find it offensive, outside of feeling like that might be the case, due to the possibility a female poster might find it to be. Icctrombone does well in monitoring it and I don't see anything that is, as he pointed out, mild compared to today's entertainment. Blonde Phantom is like a 60 year old comic about a gal that fights crime in a evening dress and high heels. But I'd be lying to say that it's not a pull to want to read the issues. It's why I have a Ms Fury TPB. But I enjoyed reading it, even if a sexy gal is what got me to buy it. Covers sell the product much of the time. Even the "ridiculous covers" thread as well. I like that here it is an okay subject without making people feel guilty for a naturally human instinct. It's how we as species keep going.
And Ish, my grandmother would probably be fine with the Sexy Comic thread. After all, the reason I've seen Beastmaster and Tarzan god knows how many times is because the female members of my dad's side of the family liked beefcake. :-)
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Feb 6, 2017 10:59:44 GMT -5
I am not a mod or a admin any longer, I cannot delete anything except my own posts. You said the thread has never driven anyone away from the site, I simply informed you it has. You may not like that it has and try to justify it's existence otherwise, but it has kept people from becoming part of the community regardless of its popularity with some. Whether I personally like the thread or not, that doesn't change. I won't name names, but among those who have mentioned that thread as a reason they declined to join include 1 male comic convention promoter, 3 male comic shop owners, 2 female comic creators, 1 male comic creator, and a female who is one of the biggest Wonder Woman collectors I know. I didn't ask them about the thread, I invited them, to check out the site and when I spoke with them asked them what they thought and most of the answers were, it's not the kind of place for me, and when I asked why, they brought up threads that were unfriendly to female readers/collectors like the sexy covers threads and the like among others. If people want the thread, that's fine, it is easy enough for me to continue to ignore it, but the idea that it is not driving people away like the politics thread is, is wrong. -M Well said. The amount of hits it gets is irrelevant to the fact that it's purely a thread that objectifies women (like 95% of the times) as sex objects. That's the title of the thread. That is it's purpose. Porn sites are quite popular too but popularity does not mask their intentions. Any individual cover can seem to be relatively innocuous but lined up one after the other, on parade page after page is akin to a bunch of 13 year olds gathering around a sleaze magazine and giggling over the photos. At least with the politics thread, it deals with real life and can be an instrument for intelligent conversation. The Sexy Cover thread is just tease-a-rama I'll jump in for a minute, especially since I have the highest respect for your posts (especially when I read the politics thread, since it's on the chopping block too) but I don't get the distaste for a natural human process. Should we delete the Food Porn thread because it promotes gluttony? Or should it stay up because eating is a natural process of life? Would we all feel the same if we had more representation of males in the thread? I mean I can't participate in that way because I'm not attracted to men. But I had no problem with the guys and gals that do participate with male comic covers. I think that there is an imbalance of representation isn't the fault of the participants or that it then makes the thread lean to misogyny. I don't think that the politics thread is a liberal echo chamber because there is an overwhelmingly liberal populace to this forum. It seems unfair to judge participants in a thread for not being of a certain demographic. Which seems to be what is happening to those that participate in the Sexy Comics thread, but not in the politics thread, which has actually chased off people of only one demographic.
|
|
|
Post by Ish Kabbible on Feb 6, 2017 11:03:49 GMT -5
Man, I'm late to the discussion; but ... 1.Political thread ... I don't participate much. I mostly read it to see personal points of posters. I really enjoyed hearing poster share their stories about meeting Gerald Ford, when I brought up his name. It was like meeting him in person through the poster's words. Current event politics, I don't care for. I'm apathetic and unapologetic about it. That said, it has chased away posters now, and it's not the first time a poster has left due to their policial views. I don't care that the thread is a part of this community, but I don't pretend to think it can/could become a problem again. 2. Miss Jezebel ... if you are reading I am sorry that you do not feel welcome again. Your bias to Rob Liefield aside, I always enjoy reading your viewpoints and wished you would stay. But I can understand that need to move on to what works for you in your life. I hope that you will return again. 3. The Sexy Covers thread ... I don't understand some people's thoughts about it. I think sexuality is great and we should all not feel embarrassed by it. Our society can have the kind of deplorable violence of The Walking Dead on TV and blush at some cleavage. I was raised very sheltered. It has certainly greatly affected how I view things as an adult; especially regarding sexuality. Perhaps if we did have more female posters to start with we could get a consensus if it indeed offensive to them or not. I'm not picking on those that find it offensive, outside of feeling like that might be the case, due to the possibility a female poster might find it to be. Icctrombone does well in monitoring it and I don't see anything that is, as he pointed out, mild compared to today's entertainment. Blonde Phantom is like a 60 year old comic about a gal that fights crime in a evening dress and high heels. But I'd be lying to say that it's not a pull to want to read the issues. It's why I have a Ms Fury TPB. But I enjoyed reading it, even if a sexy gal is what got me to buy it. Covers sell the product much of the time. Even the "ridiculous covers" thread as well. I like that here it is an okay subject without making people feel guilty for a naturally human instinct. It's how we as species keep going. And Ish, my grandmother would probably be fine with the Sexy Comic thread. After all, the reason I've seen Beastmaster and Tarzan god knows how many times is because the female members of my dad's side of the family liked beefcake. :-) I hear you Adam. And just to be clear, I don't advocate deleting any thread-if I don't like it I just don't look at it. And I'm certainly no prude. What got me riled was someone else wanting to delete the politics thread for their own reasons and I found it quite hypocritical: 1-The Politics thread caused some one to leave the forum. Guess what. The weekly cover contest thread got someone to quit and someone else threaten to quit. Should we get rid of that too 2-The Sexy Cover thread is fine since it gets plenty of hits. Guess what. The politics thread got more hits. 3-The weirdest thing I read was my pointing out how the Sexy Cover thread can offend certain people meant I was defending the act of bullying in the Politics thread. I have a little bit of trouble following the logic behind that staement My grandmother is 99 years old, god bless her. She's no longer follows politics, couldn't care less about comic covers sexy or otherwise. But she loves pudding
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,821
|
Post by shaxper on Feb 6, 2017 11:35:12 GMT -5
As the staff is not currently considering deleting either thread (for reasons I outlined earlier), the point is moot and not worth anyone getting angry over. Both are problematic in their own ways. Both have the potential to offend and alienate. Neither will be removed unless they clearly violate site rules as no one here has any desire to be a fascist. If you do not agree with these threads, do not participate in them. And while they will be a turn-off to some potential members, hopefully anyone interested in the other content we have here will be able to look past them. They're nothing worse than you would find in any other online community and, I would argue, actually much tamer.
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Feb 6, 2017 11:35:44 GMT -5
Man, I'm late to the discussion; but ... 1.Political thread ... I don't participate much. I mostly read it to see personal points of posters. I really enjoyed hearing poster share their stories about meeting Gerald Ford, when I brought up his name. It was like meeting him in person through the poster's words. Current event politics, I don't care for. I'm apathetic and unapologetic about it. That said, it has chased away posters now, and it's not the first time a poster has left due to their policial views. I don't care that the thread is a part of this community, but I don't pretend to think it can/could become a problem again. 2. Miss Jezebel ... if you are reading I am sorry that you do not feel welcome again. Your bias to Rob Liefield aside, I always enjoy reading your viewpoints and wished you would stay. But I can understand that need to move on to what works for you in your life. I hope that you will return again. 3. The Sexy Covers thread ... I don't understand some people's thoughts about it. I think sexuality is great and we should all not feel embarrassed by it. Our society can have the kind of deplorable violence of The Walking Dead on TV and blush at some cleavage. I was raised very sheltered. It has certainly greatly affected how I view things as an adult; especially regarding sexuality. Perhaps if we did have more female posters to start with we could get a consensus if it indeed offensive to them or not. I'm not picking on those that find it offensive, outside of feeling like that might be the case, due to the possibility a female poster might find it to be. Icctrombone does well in monitoring it and I don't see anything that is, as he pointed out, mild compared to today's entertainment. Blonde Phantom is like a 60 year old comic about a gal that fights crime in a evening dress and high heels. But I'd be lying to say that it's not a pull to want to read the issues. It's why I have a Ms Fury TPB. But I enjoyed reading it, even if a sexy gal is what got me to buy it. Covers sell the product much of the time. Even the "ridiculous covers" thread as well. I like that here it is an okay subject without making people feel guilty for a naturally human instinct. It's how we as species keep going. And Ish, my grandmother would probably be fine with the Sexy Comic thread. After all, the reason I've seen Beastmaster and Tarzan god knows how many times is because the female members of my dad's side of the family liked beefcake. :-) I hear you Adam. And just to be clear, I don't advocate deleting any thread-if I don't like it I just don't look at it. And I'm certainly no prude. What got me riled was someone else wanting to delete the politics thread for their own reasons and I found it quite hypocritical: 1-The Politics thread caused some one to leave the forum. Guess what. The weekly cover contest thread got someone to quit and someone else threaten to quit. Should we get rid of that too 2-The Sexy Cover thread is fine since it gets plenty of hits. Guess what. The politics thread got more hits. 3-The weirdest thing I read was my pointing out how the Sexy Cover thread can offend certain people meant I was defending the act of bullying in the Politics thread. I have a little bit of trouble following the logic behind that staementMy grandmother is 99 years old, god bless her. She's no longer follows politics, couldn't care less about comic covers sexy or otherwise. But she loves pudding I do agree that it should be all or nothing, as far as what should/is allowed as oppose to what he shouldn't. We all have different feelings on this, and I certainly like that this place unlike the last, doesn't punish people or make them feel bad for having an opinion as long as it's respectful. And if the bolded part of your post, I was a part of, I apologize for Ish. It wasn't my intent. It's just those two threads were what everyone was talking about and I was late to the party. Though I did read through the whole discussion before posting. I think if one exists with the controversy it is garnering than both should. Glad that your grandmother is doing well Ish.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,146
|
Post by Confessor on Feb 6, 2017 13:18:43 GMT -5
Yo Pharo! Did you ever get a follow-up date with that girl you mentioned earlier? Unfortunately, I never heard back from her. I really want to "dislike" this post. Sorry to hear that, pharozonk. She obviously wasn't good enough for you!
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Feb 6, 2017 15:32:29 GMT -5
Good grief! I always miss the drama. I admit I don't frequent either the politics or cheesecake covers threads, but in general, if someone is getting offended by the content and discourse at CCF of all places on the internet then I just have to wonder how they can function in life. This is probably the most polite place I've ever seen online. Agreed on keeping it in its own thread. If people let it bleed into other places, it should be reported and moved/deleted then, yes? Seems a fairly straight-forward and obvious solution. Also, with as much tension is in the culture at large right now, what honestly do you expect going into a politics thread anywhere? It's too bad people get their feelings hurt. We obviously don't ever want any of that, and it's always a shame to see people go again, but let's be real. This place is pretty tame for an internet community, and I like that it covers a broad range of niche aspects of comics and culture, even if i don't care to follow them all. I just...don't follow the ones I don't want to. And on the topic of being late to the party, Iron Man 3! I don't think the Mandarin twist was bad, per se, but the fictitious movie they teased in the trailers looked more interesting to me than the actual movie that ended up being made, canceling out the clever twist for me. Plus it got a little too hard to suspect my disbelief by the end. And yeah, Stark retiring at the end to being back in action at the beginning of Avengers 2 was really weird, too. Plot hole!
|
|
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Feb 6, 2017 16:57:14 GMT -5
And on the topic of being late to the party, Iron Man 3! I don't think the Mandarin twist was bad, per se, but the fictitious movie they teased in the trailers looked more interesting to me than the actual movie that ended up being made, canceling out the clever twist for me. Plus it got a little too hard to suspect my disbelief by the end. And yeah, Stark retiring at the end to being back in action at the beginning of Avengers 2 was really weird, too. Plot hole! Another plot hole struck me yesterday... How did Scott Lang get captured in Captain America: civil war? Sure, he had just been in a big fight and was all "ouch, ouch, I give up", but couldn't he shrink to near subatomic size and escape capture instead of handing over Pym's technology to Stark and the government? Maybe a comic adaptation or a novelization will reveal that he was all out of Pym particles or whatever, but if there's one character it shouldn't have been easy to put handcuffs on, it was him!
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Feb 7, 2017 0:19:50 GMT -5
Someone left over the Cover Contest? Sorry to hear that.
Also sorry Razorgirl felt she had to leave. I enjoyed her presence on the Forum, even though I disagreed with her about almost everything from comics to politics.
And finally, sorry to hear that potential members have been put off by the Sexy Cover thread. Even though I occasionally comment in it myself, I can understand this POV and wouldn't be at all upset if it was canned. But perhaps it will eventually die a natural death without any top-down decree.
|
|
|
Post by BigPapaJoe on Feb 7, 2017 11:06:29 GMT -5
I checked out the politics thread once or twice. No interest. I try & avoid it as much as possible. That is the best part of a forum that you can avoid topics you don't want to talk about. Same. I'm not into politics in general.
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Feb 7, 2017 11:39:34 GMT -5
It's a careful balance to strike, too, cutting off pieces and self-censoring every bit that any one person finds offensive. To be clear, I am in no way suggesting that is happening here, as it clearly isn't. I'm just speaking more of the dangers of trying to please everyone this way would lead to chipping away at everything that makes this place interesting and unique and eventually make it dullsville. Classic comics, even with relevant tangential topics, is already a pretty niche interest, so it was never going to appeal to everyone, and I think it makes sense people with similar interests would want to discuss other things with the same folks, so I think it's good to allow the non-comics-specific topics. Particularly on a classic comics forum, suggestive covers are a very relevant topic and part of comics history, particularly when discussing over time as opposed to just posting for its own sake (not that I think there is anything wrong with either). It's hardly a main focus on the site, so it's pretty easy to avoid if you even come across it. It hardly dominates discussion or tone here.
Pro-Trump and anti-Trump folks are going to disagree vehemently no matter where they meet, so as long as the rules for civility and manners that this place is known for are enforced, I think the rest will take care of itself.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,821
|
Post by shaxper on Feb 7, 2017 12:33:54 GMT -5
It's a careful balance to strike, too, cutting off pieces and self-censoring every bit that any one person finds offensive. To be clear, I am in no way suggesting that is happening here, as it clearly isn't. I'm just speaking more of the dangers of trying to please everyone this way would lead to chipping away at everything that makes this place interesting and unique and eventually make it dullsville. Classic comics, even with relevant tangential topics, is already a pretty niche interest, so it was never going to appeal to everyone, and I think it makes sense people with similar interests would want to discuss other things with the same folks, so I think it's good to allow the non-comics-specific topics. Particularly on a classic comics forum, suggestive covers are a very relevant topic and part of comics history, particularly when discussing over time as opposed to just posting for its own sake (not that I think there is anything wrong with either). It's hardly a main focus on the site, so it's pretty easy to avoid if you even come across it. It hardly dominates discussion or tone here. Pro-Trump and anti-Trump folks are going to disagree vehemently no matter where they meet, so as long as the rules for civility and manners that this place is known for are enforced, I think the rest will take care of itself. Well said. We had a member storm off Sunday for this place not being friendly enough to Trump supporters, and another storm off a mere hour ago for this place being too friendly to Trump supporters. How can it be both? No doubt what's happening in our government right now is dividing the nation, but I wish people at least had the self-awareness to see what it's doing to them here. Our job here is to be welcoming to everyone who follows the rules. It's that simple. Anyone expecting anything different is in the wrong place.
|
|
|
Post by brutalis on Feb 7, 2017 13:25:35 GMT -5
Had a friend from out of town call and say he's coming down to Phoenix to visit this weekend so we made plans for spending Saturday at the opening day of the Arizona Renaissance Festival. An entire day devoted to Guinness, roast turkey legs, watching the comedy shows Ded Bob, Don Juan and Miguel, The Tortuga Twins and listening to Cast in Bronze the worlds only traveling Carillon musical act (weighs in over 4 tons with 35 differing sized bronze bells played my a set of pulleys like you would play an organ) and the Celtic interactive comedy/bag pipe playing band called Tartanic: men who play music without pants (it is in their ads) and knights and damsels and jousting meant for entertaining and reliving the 16th century. I say to thee good sirs and milady's: a hearty HUSSAH!!!!
|
|
|
Post by DE Sinclair on Feb 7, 2017 13:36:40 GMT -5
Had a friend from out of town call and say he's coming down to Phoenix to visit this weekend so we made plans for spending Saturday at the opening day of the Arizona Renaissance Festival. An entire day devoted to Guinness, roast turkey legs, watching the comedy shows Ded Bob, Don Juan and Miguel, The Tortuga Twins and listening to Cast in Bronze the worlds only traveling Carillon musical act (weighs in over 4 tons with 35 differing sized bronze bells played my a set of pulleys like you would play an organ) and the Celtic interactive comedy/bag pipe playing band called Tartanic: men who play music without pants (it is in their ads) and knights and damsels and jousting meant for entertaining and reliving the 16th century. I say to thee good sirs and milady's: a hearty HUSSAH!!!! I'm officially jelaous. In Wisconsin we have to wait until summer for our Bristol RenFair. Love the Tortuga Twins, all three of them. I got pulled on stage one time to be the Sherriff of Notingham in their version of Robin Hood. Great fun and afterwards they thanked me for doing a good job. Do the Swordsmen ("Bold and Stupid Men!) ever play at your festival?
|
|