|
Post by Gene on Feb 8, 2017 20:53:10 GMT -5
Tonight's the premier of Legion on FX!
Of all of the characters from the X-Books to bring to TV, David Haller is an interesting choice. I'm glad they're going with something left field for the X-Men's first foray into live action TV (I think we're all better off forgetting Mutant X).
I'll post my thoughts after the episode!
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Feb 8, 2017 22:13:13 GMT -5
I'm glad they're going with something left field for the X-Men's first foray into live action TV New Mutants next, please!
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Feb 9, 2017 0:12:10 GMT -5
Long story short: I liked it a lot.
With so many of the superhero movies and shows of the past couple of years all feeling the same, it's a breath of fresh air to see Fox and Marvel work together (for a change) to give us something different.
This isn't another superhero action series, although there is a good amount of action in the premier episode. It plays out more like a psychological thriller, with the viewer seeing the world from the perspective of the paranoid schizophrenic David Haller. To call him an unreliable narrator would be an understatement. It's almost impossible to place the story in any specific time period or location, because everything we see is an amalgamation of styles from the 1970s to today.
The one piece of context we can pull from the show is that it's likely taking place in the same world as Fox's X-Men films. It's never stated explicitly, and no other characters from the franchise appear, but the aesthetic and overall tone of the episode fit right into the slightly darker and less optimistic world of the X-Films.
The only other possible appearance by an X-Books character comes in the form of "The Devil with Yellow Eyes." I won't give away who I think he really is, but long time fans of the franchise are likely to come a very similar conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 22:50:29 GMT -5
We watched the first episode tonight after DVRing it yesterday. I am not sure yet if I like it, but I am intrigued enough to keep watching before I make up my mind.
-M
|
|
|
Post by rom on Feb 17, 2017 1:14:07 GMT -5
I recently saw Legion episode 1 and was completely floored - this show is superb, and is definitely one of my favorite premiere TV episodes of all time. Really enjoyed the '60's rock/folk music, as well as the setting, the trippy/surreal elements, the inability (at times) to distinguish between fantasy & reality, the effects re: Legion's mutant powers, etc.
The show reminded me somewhat of the '99 movie Girl Interrupted, which was set in a mental institution in the 1960's - great film.
The female character Sydney Barrett is an obvious reference to Syd Barrett, one of the founding members of the iconic rock/pop group Pink Floyd. He was only with the group for a short time, but IIRC was very influential. Apparently, he also ended up spending some time in a mental hospital.
As has been said, the series has a very late '60's/'70's "vibe", but there is also modern technology so it's probably set now. The hairstyles (on the women, especially) seem to definitely be 1960's/early '70's influenced.
I have many of the New Mutants Classics Trades (through #7) but haven't read all of these volumes yet. I know the Legion character makes his debut in #25/26. Back in the day, I actually preferred New Mutants to the much more iconic & popular Uncanny X-men series; though I didn't follow either series that much at that time. However, I found NM to be much trippier & more interesting - primarily when Bill Sienciewicz was drawing this. Around that same time, I was also a huge fan of BS's work on Moon Knight - he's definitely one of my top ten favorite comic book artists.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,867
|
Post by shaxper on Feb 17, 2017 7:43:22 GMT -5
Back in the day, I actually preferred New Mutants to the much more iconic & popular Uncanny X-men series; though I didn't follow either series that much at that time. However, I found NM to be much trippier & more interesting - primarily when Bill Sienciewicz was drawing this. (cough) ahem... Insert shameless self-promotion here. Not up to Sienciewicz yet, but that's definitely my favorite era.
|
|
|
Post by String on Feb 19, 2017 19:22:54 GMT -5
The female character Sydney Barrett is an obvious reference to Syd Barrett, one of the founding members of the iconic rock/pop group Pink Floyd. He was only with the group for a short time, but IIRC was very influential. Apparently, he also ended up spending some time in a mental hospital. I LOVE that. He was the founding creative genius of the band though he had mental issues. His drug use (including LSD, some of which was given to him without his knowledge), increased those issues till they became overwhelming and he was essentially kicked out of the group and replaced with David Gilmour. Having a character named so obviously for him, in this type of show with these types of themes, is endearing and sad. So far, I'm really enjoying how they are building up her relationship with David. This show is trippy good. The symbolism and motifs remind me strongly of The Prisoner. The bold use of color, the music, the fuzzy distinction between reality and symbolism (even past and present), all of it is mesmerizing. And it's sad that the second episode featured more on training and/or examination of mutant abilities than any of the films (though First Class comes close).
|
|
|
Post by Dizzy D on Apr 10, 2017 5:12:43 GMT -5
Finally managed to get caught up on this series (my intro was not the first episode, but the very weak second (or was it third) episode), but I saw the last 3 peisodes this weekend and they were very good.
SPOILERS (I guess):
Legion did one thing I never expected. It managed to get me interested in the Shadow King as a villain. Apart from David himself and the Shadow King, it seems to be mostly new characters (even if Syd is just Rogue with a new coat of paint).
I enjoyed that they were willing to do something different with a lot of the scenes. The chalkboard scene were David figures out his own backstory was pretty great, the silent movie scene in the same episode works really well.
This combined with good actors makes me eager for season 2.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Jun 17, 2017 14:11:14 GMT -5
This series was better than I expected and was equally parts creepy and trippy that made me want to keep watching. Hopefully season 2 is as high quality.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Apr 12, 2018 17:18:42 GMT -5
Two episodes in and season 2 is off to a great start!
|
|
|
Post by Reptisaurus! on Apr 21, 2018 4:43:12 GMT -5
Watched the very first episode from last year:
1) THere are a lot of superhero tv shows that I want to watch, but it takes me a long time to watch TV Shows now that I am single. I chose this one because it had Aubrey Plaza (from Parks and Recreation) in it.
2) It looks beautiful. The cinematography and camera work is amazing. The spoilers death of a major character was shocking and terrible and it was all carried by the directing, not the acting. I really, really liked how it used fashions and touchstones from different eras to come off as dislocated in time to disorient the audience.
3) The opening montage to "Happy Jack" was spectacular, very funny, very sad, amazingly well directed.
4) Everything after wasn't as good as the opening montage. It was a little too serious for my superhero tastes = the opening montage was the the last decent funny scene in the whole thing - it dropped the psychadelic nature-of-reality story about halfway through for generic "The guvment is out to gET YOU" paranoia. This episode was LONG and it kept getting worse.
5) I quite liked the government interrogator guy being awkward and socially inept rather than menacing.
6) Aubrey Plaza ia a much better comedic actress than dramatic. At least so far. Other female lead = kind of boring.
7) I dunno... Reality is a construct that functions on multiple levels and there is no objective truth to our perceived experiences is, like, my jam fiction-wise. So I"ll probably keep watching. Still, ten minutes in I was convinced this would be the greatest show ever, and I left disappointed.
8) No other X-men, no connections to Marvel continuity so far. I dunno... I am both annoyed at and empowered by Marvel Easter Egg fan pandering, but I kind of missed it here.
|
|
|
Post by Reptisaurus! on May 16, 2018 1:02:47 GMT -5
Up to episode 5 of season 1.
This is.. not something I can get through more than an episode a week because this is heavy, heavy stuff - about how we define mental illness and the nature of consciousness. There's a lot of abstraction-bordering-on-surrealism - It doesn't look anything like Bill Sienkiwicz, but it seems to be borrowing the spirit of Bill Sienkiwicz.
But this is great. I take back anything bad I said about the cast. Much better than any of the X-men movies and... I'm going with better than any X-man/Mutant comic I've ever read.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Jun 2, 2018 10:47:33 GMT -5
Glad to read this was picked up for a third season!
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Jul 3, 2019 17:22:20 GMT -5
I didn't realize this show was back but two episodes out already and its off to a good start.
|
|
|
Post by Dizzy D on Jul 27, 2019 15:03:19 GMT -5
I loved episode 3 of season 3: {Spoiler: Click to show}We get to meet David's parents: Charles and Gabrielle (also proto-Cerebro). The big improvement over the original X-Men story: Charles is a patient, like Gaby. Comic Charles starting a romantic relationship with his patient always was a terrible decision, but two patients falling in love. {Spoiler: Click to show}We get to meet David's parents: Charles and Gabrielle (also proto-Cerebro). The big improvement over the original X-Men story: Charles is a patient, like Gaby. Comic Charles starting a romantic relationship with his patient always was a terrible decision, but two patients falling in love.
|
|