Crimebuster
CCF Podcast Guru
Making comics!
Posts: 3,958
|
Post by Crimebuster on Mar 28, 2017 17:00:53 GMT -5
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on Mar 29, 2017 10:15:49 GMT -5
Cannot wait to listen!
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Mar 29, 2017 11:47:30 GMT -5
Listened this morning--another great job!
One technical issue: it seemed the sound level on RR was much higher than CB's and i had to do a lot of volume adjusting while listening int he car.
|
|
Crimebuster
CCF Podcast Guru
Making comics!
Posts: 3,958
|
Post by Crimebuster on Mar 29, 2017 12:56:00 GMT -5
Listened this morning--another great job! One technical issue: it seemed the sound level on RR was much higher than CB's and i had to do a lot of volume adjusting while listening int he car. Hmm. Has anyone else had this issue? RR's mic level is a little higher than mine throughout both episodes, but it shouldn't be drastic. I did have some issues uploading this episode, so I'm wondering if the file might have gotten messed up, though I listened to this episode earlier and I wasn't noticing this issue. Having said that, I am planning to adjust the guest mic volume going forward, I think there's a small tweak in the program I use that will help equalize things. So hopefully this won't happen again, as shaxper's volume was also a little higher than mine as well in his episodes.
|
|
|
Post by The Captain on Mar 30, 2017 15:29:23 GMT -5
Just downloaded it. Will listen to it on Tuesday during a long, boring drive to the middle of PA for work.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Mar 30, 2017 17:57:40 GMT -5
Nice work again! Heard it this morning and throroughly enjoyed every minute.
|
|
|
Post by Mormel on Mar 31, 2017 14:21:44 GMT -5
I've been really enjoying this podcast. Even though as a casual reader of comics and as a superhero junkie I'm mostly unfamiliar with these titles, it's really entertaining to hear you guys' conversations and observations. It's also nice, as folks have said before, to hear your actual voices. This was another great episode/issue, kudos to Crimebuster and RR. Will definitely tune into the next one!
|
|
Crimebuster
CCF Podcast Guru
Making comics!
Posts: 3,958
|
Post by Crimebuster on Mar 31, 2017 14:54:52 GMT -5
I've been really enjoying this podcast. Even though as a casual reader of comics and as a superhero junkie I'm mostly unfamiliar with these titles, it's really entertaining to hear you guys' conversations and observations. It's also nice, as folks have said before, to hear your actual voices. This was another great episode/issue, kudos to Crimebuster and RR. Will definitely tune into the next one! Glad you like it! I'm in the process of scheduling the next conversations, but there will definitely be some superhero stuff coming up in the next few episodes.
|
|
|
Post by Mormel on Mar 31, 2017 17:22:17 GMT -5
I've been really enjoying this podcast. Even though as a casual reader of comics and as a superhero junkie I'm mostly unfamiliar with these titles, it's really entertaining to hear you guys' conversations and observations. It's also nice, as folks have said before, to hear your actual voices. This was another great episode/issue, kudos to Crimebuster and RR. Will definitely tune into the next one! Glad you like it! I'm in the process of scheduling the next conversations, but there will definitely be some superhero stuff coming up in the next few episodes. Actually I find it refreshing to hear about comics from all different genres; for me it's a break from my usual geekdom venues that tend to be superhero-heavy. I'd say bring on the crime, romance, comedy, sci-fi, western, fantasy, adventure, and what have you! Though of course it's never tiresome to listen to discussions about the classics of the superhero genre either.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,860
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 3, 2017 10:58:32 GMT -5
Finally had time to listen today!
6:07 Any retcon compared to Highlander 2 is a terrifying concept. Interesting point how uncommon retcons were back then.
7:20 I like Ben's point about trying to give Sonja her dignity back.
8:36 They retcon the retcon? Can we retcon that?
9:41 Yes. Roy Thomas and continuity are synonymous. Amazing he performed a retcon at all.
11:45 Interesting idea about Marvel getting more prudish. Do you attribute this more to Shooter, to Reagan Conservatism, or to something else?
14:05 How rare to have a female love interest implied to be older than the male protagonist
17:30 I want a ringtone of Ben yelling "surprise!"
18:35 How would they expect readers NOT to notice the reversal on the whole oath business? Was volume 2 targeted to fans who had never read Red Sonja before
19:15 I know I read a different justification for why Marada ended up not being a Red Sonja story, but all I think I remember was that Thomas or Shooter didn't approve of some aspect of Claremont's treatment being associated with the character. Maybe the re-emphasis on the rape?
27:03 Seems like everyone who loves Louise Simonson always has a "but...". I love Louise Simonson, but...
31:05 The chess defeat is a fascinating idea, as well as great fan-service to the nerds reading this.
35:00 I'm unclear on the licensing issue. While Red Sonja is loosely based on a Howard character, isn't she actually unique to the Marvel Universe? Why did Marvel require a license to continue publishing her?
37:48 What I DON'T want as a ringtone: Scott shouting "The Horror! The Horror!"
42:55 Interesting point. Silver/Bronze Marvel so rarely considers the consequences of showing their characters in the distant future. Red Sonja suffers from the same problem Sgt. Fury's Howling Commandos do when we see them in The Korean War. They are locked into remaining status quo. Of course, with Sonja, there's a possible gender issue as well (unless you chalk it up to choice).
45:15 With all this resetting, was there an editor on the book??
44:55 Without a successful movie nor a successful solo title, Sonja's greatest value to Marvel was as a Conan supporting character. Scott's argument makes sense to me.
47:38 That's a brilliant idea! I really wish Thomas had mapped Sonja's life the way Sprague Camp did for Conan. I suppose the difference is that Thomas wanted to leave other writers some room, not presuming to be on Howard and Sprague Camp's level.
Felt like this episode ended pretty unexpectedly. When you get really into a podcast, it's hard to just get tossed out of the conversation like that. Otherwise, this two parter was definitely the best episode yet (and not just cuz I wasn't in it). Your perspectives were both incredibly informed and fascinating.
|
|
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Apr 3, 2017 11:49:27 GMT -5
35:00 I'm unclear on the licensing issue. While Red Sonja is loosely based on a Howard character, isn't she actually unique to the Marvel Universe? Why did Marvel require a license to continue publishing her? Paging Slam_Bradley, paging Slam Bradley! I often wondered the same thing. Red Sonja was inspired by Howard's Red Sonya of Rogatino, yes, but was no more derivative than, say, Claw the unconquered or Kothar the barbarian were relative to Conan. Had they called her Gutrun the unruly, nobody would even have made the connection with Sonya. I am frequently perplexed by intellectual property issues when it comes to imaginary characters.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Apr 3, 2017 12:22:46 GMT -5
35:00 I'm unclear on the licensing issue. While Red Sonja is loosely based on a Howard character, isn't she actually unique to the Marvel Universe? Why did Marvel require a license to continue publishing her? Paging Slam_Bradley , paging Slam Bradley! I often wondered the same thing. Red Sonja was inspired by Howard's Red Sonya of Rogatino, yes, but was no more derivative than, say, Claw the unconquered or Kothar the barbarian were relative to Conan. Had they called her Gutrun the unruly, nobody would even have made the connection with Sonya. I am frequently perplexed by intellectual property issues when it comes to imaginary characters. It's not really clear...how is that for an answer? It's possible, but not clear that Marvel could have gotten a copyright on Red Sonja as an original creation as opposed to being a derivative work of Red Sonya, which would not be subject to an independent copyright. However...they might not have...and it would have almost certainly have precipitated legal action between Marvel and the Howard Estate. Since Conan was one of Marvel's best-selling books at the time Sonja was created there was little financial incentive for Marvel to piss off the Howard Estate and potentially lose the rights to the whole kit & kaboodle when the contract expired over what was not a clear case of owning a secondary character. By the way, derivative work, within the copyright realm means something that is based on or derived from existing works. The best example would be a translation or a movie based on a play or novel. A derivative work has to include portions of the previous work So Claw or Kothar would not be derivative works, for copyright purposes, because they aren't actually derived from Conan as Sonja was derived from Sonya.
|
|
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Apr 3, 2017 12:34:36 GMT -5
Confusing the issue further is that Red Sonja LLC was established to exploit the "new" character. I believe the Howard estate, Roy Thomas and a few others had an interest in that.
I wonder what happened to all those legal entities, "Conan properties", "Kull properties", "Solomon Kane properties" etc. when Paradox (now called Cabinet Entertainment) bought all it could as far as Howard IP goes... and what it means when Howard's works go into the public domain, as has happened already in Canada and Australia and the UK.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Apr 3, 2017 12:47:53 GMT -5
Confusing the issue further is that Red Sonja LLC was established to exploit the "new" character. I believe the Howard estate, Roy Thomas and a few others had an interest in that. I wonder what happened to all those legal entities, "Conan properties", "Kull properties", "Solomon Kane properties" etc. when Paradox (now called Cabinet Entertainment) bought all it could as far as Howard IP goes... and what it means when Howard's works go into the public domain, as has happened already in Canada and Australia and the UK. It's already caused confusion. There was a lawsuit between Paradox and Dynamite over Red Sonja. One of the issues is that it's very possible that Shadow of the Vulture is public domain as it doesn't appear that the copyright was renewed. A lot of Howard's other works are public domain in the U.S. as well because of that same renewal issue, including, probably, the Conan stories in the form they appeared in Weird Tales. However the re-worked tales (de Camp & Carter) would be copyrighted...probably forever because I don't believe anything will ever again be allowed to enter the public domain. The lawsuit was ultimately settled allowing Red Sonja to remain in the Hyborian Age which belongs to Paradox.
|
|
Crimebuster
CCF Podcast Guru
Making comics!
Posts: 3,958
|
Post by Crimebuster on Apr 3, 2017 13:11:41 GMT -5
18:35 How would they expect readers NOT to notice the reversal on the whole oath business? Was volume 2 targeted to fans who had never read Red Sonja before On the contrary, it was so tied up in continuity - continuing exactly where the last story left off, and the introduction of Valeria - that it wouldn't have probably made much sense to people who hadn't read the previous story. Volume 3, on the other hand, paid no attention at all to anything that went before, other than her original origin story. 19:15 I know I read a different justification for why Marada ended up not being a Red Sonja story, but all I think I remember was that Thomas or Shooter didn't approve of some aspect of Claremont's treatment being associated with the character. Maybe the re-emphasis on the rape? I had a hard time researching this, though I know the info is out there in material from the time. Hopefully someone who was reading trade magazines at the time might remember the details. 37:48 What I DON'T want as a ringtone: Scott shouting "The Horror! The Horror!" That was Ben! Or should I call him Ben-X the X-Treme? 45:15 With all this resetting, was there an editor on the book?? I meant to get into that a little. We bag on the writers for messing this stuff up, but it's a big part of the editors job to make sure they get these details right. Larry Hama was the editor for volume 3; I think he might have been editing all the Conan books at the time, and from what I recall, he didn't seem to care much about continuity in any of them. Volume 2 was edited by Denny O'Neil of all people, I have no idea why. Felt like this episode ended pretty unexpectedly. When you get really into a podcast, it's hard to just get tossed out of the conversation like that. Otherwise, this two parter was definitely the best episode yet (and not just cuz I wasn't in it). Your perspectives were both incredibly informed and fascinating. I did have a harder time editing this one, which may have contributed to the abrupt ending, though it felt like a natural place to end the conversation. We actually kept talking for a while after this, and there was some good stuff left on the cutting room floor, but it was material I couldn't figure out how to fit into the narrative structure of the conversation. Hopefully I'll get smoother at this sort of thing as we go along.
|
|