Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,197 
|
Post by Confessor on Sept 23, 2014 18:15:11 GMT -5
I'm going all Silver Age with my response...
Good - John Romita
Bad - Jack Kirby.
John Romita's women are all beautiful looking, but they also have a strength and a dignity to them that typify the very essence of womanhood (if I may be so pretentious).
Jack Kirby's artwork might make for dynamic superheroics, but it also makes for decidedly butch, ungainly and un-ladylike females.
|
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Sept 23, 2014 19:32:52 GMT -5
Silver age? I can do that.
Good: Jim Mooney
Bad: Carmine Infantino
|
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Sept 23, 2014 19:56:13 GMT -5
Taking a cue from the description of Greg Land (though he<d fall into the bad/bad category for me), I'd add:
good:
early (70s) George Perez
bad:
mid (80s) George Perez
I think the later Perez, from around the late-90s onwards, lies somewhere in between but more good than bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Sept 23, 2014 20:06:17 GMT -5
Silver age? I can do that. Good: Jim Mooney Bad: Carmine Infantino[\b]
Whaaaa?!! I don't have the biggest stack of his work but I think his female form of Ship in the B&W magazine size (Marvel Premiere?) of Star Lord was great! |
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Sept 23, 2014 22:08:54 GMT -5
I have to disagree with those who find Ditko and Kirby bad at drawing women. Within the highly stylized visual contexts of their respective imaginary worlds I find their female characters can be very attractive. I thought Ditko for example gave Clea beautiful dancer's legs in the early Dr. Strange, and Kirby's Crystal seemed extremely attractive to me as a very young reader. Barda and Beautiful Dreamer come to mind as well.
|
|
