shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 23, 2020 20:32:11 GMT -5
Suspense: "The Doctor Prescribed Death" (Radio, February 2nd, 1943)Plot (0-5 points): A ludicrous premise about a mad psychologist trying to prove that people who are suicidal can be induced to become homicidal instead. The scientific community appropriately responds with "Wha...why?" and so Bela's mad psychologist gets to work seeking to prove the theory. Some wild coincidences and a plot line so convoluted that the narrator needs thirty seconds to clarify everything after its all over earn this a nice, crisp 0/5 in my book. Atmosphere (0-5 points): No memorable sound effects. 0/5Other Actors (0-3 points): I liked the female lead that Bela induces to commit murder, but the scientist's employer/intended murder victim is wooden and obnoxious. 1/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): Bela's signature move in his 1939-1946 resurgence is shifting between endearing and benign old man to twisted maniac and back. It's not only fun being able to clearly hear these shifts through vocal infection, but this script allows him to shift far more frequently than in his other roles, sometimes every sentence while attempting to persuade the vulnerable young heroine to save her own life AND murder someone else. Lots of fun if you're a fan of Bela's Monogram Era. 8/10Overall: Some great Bela moments, but a lousy production otherwise. 9/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 24, 2020 5:56:58 GMT -5
The Fred Allen Show (Radio, April 25, 1943)A pretty forgettable skit where Bela is called to play a fictional version of himself. It's all bad one-liners and over-the-top humor, so Bela doesn't really have much to do. One of his jokes mentions doing an episode of Inner Sanctum, but I can't seem to find any evidence that such an episode exists. Plot (0-5 points): Really nothing worth discussing. Mildly humorous at best. 0/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Unconvincing sound effects that were probably intended to be lousy so as not to frighten folks tuning in for a comedy show. 0/5Other Actors (0-3 points): Forgettable, just like everything else here. 0/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): He hams it up appropriately to fit the tone of the skit, and it's just as forgettable as the rest of the production. I do like how he keeps saying "Fred Allen" like it's one word. 2/10Overall: 2/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 24, 2020 6:13:03 GMT -5
Mail Call (Radio, March 11, 1944)A cute six minute bit where Bela attempts to convince a Hollywood filmmaker that he is capable of playing non-horror roles. The sad part is, while Bela probably felt it was helping get the message out that he had range, the skit itself affirms the exact opposite, having Bela comically fail at playing a wide-eyed, innocent college freshman in his best Dracula voice. Plot (0-5 points): A very cute concept, but the gags could have been better. Still, they gave Bela plenty to work with. 4/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): None, really. 0/5Other Actors (0-3 points): I didn't recognize the name of the other famous actor nor the Hollywood writer doing this skit with him, and I've since forgotten them. They were both quite fun, even though the real center of this thing was Bela. 3/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): He's fun, over the top, and gives the script exactly what it wants from him (except when he stumbles on the word "beanie," which he clearly does not know). It's no great acting role, but it's fun, and Bela delivers. 5/10 Overall: 12/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 24, 2020 7:15:19 GMT -5
Mystery House: "The Thirsty Death" (Radio, 1944)The first episode of what was initially intended to be an ongoing series starring Bela. There doesn't seem to be any information out there on why the second episode that Bela solicits at the end of this first one never ended up materializing. It's a surprisingly good story, and John Carradine co-stars. Plot (0-5 points): A relatively complex and non-traditional psychological tale in which a jealous husband has sought revenge upon his wife and the man he believes she has cheated with by injecting one with rabies in their sleep (he won't say which), locking them in, and leaving a knife. It's brief and to the point (after all, this is radio), but it would have earned a solid 5/5 if it had been properly adapted to film length. 4/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): The radio announcer won't stop bragging about how convincing those howling dogs are, and he's right. However, that's pretty much it for sound effects. 1/5Other Actors (0-3 points): John Carradine isn't as memorable as I'd like him to be here, but his voice is distinct and enjoyable in any context. 1/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): We're in late 1944 by this point, and it's great to hear Bela really acting again. Whereas the pain has really gotten to him on those extended shoots that require days of work and lots of physical movement, a radio production places far less physical demand upon him, and so we have Bela really and truly acting again. He has fantastic range here. Of course, it's hard to ever give his radio performances anything higher than an 8/10 since we're not getting the facial expressions and physical mannerisms seen in his finest 10/10 roles. Overall: A truly quality production. Definitely Bela's best radio role yet. Too bad the series didn't continue. I wonder if this was due more to Bela's medical issues or to a sponsor pulling out. 16/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 24, 2020 7:19:36 GMT -5
Well we're now caught up with the radio performances and are back to 1945 in the reviews. Next up: Zombies on Broadway, which I've only seen once, and always manage to confuse with Bela Lugosi Meets A Brooklyn Gorilla. In short, I have no clear recollection of what I'm in for.
|
|
|
Post by Rob Allen on Apr 24, 2020 13:24:40 GMT -5
Mail Call (Radio, March 11, 1944)Other Actors (0-3 points): I didn't recognize the name of the other famous actor nor the Hollywood writer doing this skit with him, and I've since forgotten them. They were both quite fun, even though the real center of this thing was Bela. 3/3 I had the time & inclination to google it... The other actor was the great Edward Everett Horton, and the other fellow was director/actor/producer Gregory Ratoff.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 25, 2020 0:34:36 GMT -5
Mail Call (Radio, March 11, 1944)Other Actors (0-3 points): I didn't recognize the name of the other famous actor nor the Hollywood writer doing this skit with him, and I've since forgotten them. They were both quite fun, even though the real center of this thing was Bela. 3/3 I had the time & inclination to google it... The other actor was the great Edward Everett Horton, and the other fellow was director/actor/producer Gregory Ratoff. Thanks for compensating for my laziness. I honestly can't say I'm familiar with either gentleman.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 25, 2020 9:43:57 GMT -5
Zombies on Broadway (1945)Forget Abbott and Costello meet Frankenstein; THIS is the best meeting of a comedy team and Bela Lugosi. While Carney and Brown have nothing on the comedy team they are clearly copying, the script itself is immensely entertaining from beginning to end, with humor, action, suspense, and a plot that never stalls nor fails to turn over new complications that never feel forced. Also worth noting that this film is a sort of unofficial sequel to RKO's I Walked with A Zombie (1943), a film that should make everyone's top ten classic horror list. While the original film is never directly acknowledged, we are on the same island, with the same sets, the same overall tone, the same creepy zombie, and the same foreboding dude with the guitar who sings the exposition. If you ever watched I Walked with A Zombie and found yourself wanting to know more about the common people on the island (who are frequently discussed, but seldom seen) here's a story told from that perspective, and it works. Sure, this one's a comedy, but it's very respectful of the original film's premise and visuals all the same. Perhaps stranger is the name of Bela's character in this film, Dr. Renault. Only a year before I Walked with a Zombie was released, 20th Century Fox produced Dr. Renault's Secret. Could the character be a nod to that film? Of course, that mad scientist was more of a Dr. Moreau, and he died at the end. Plot (0-5 points): Nothing brilliant, but thoroughly entertaining from beginning to end! The comedy isn't always laugh-out-loud, but it's quite good, and the film seamlessly blends suspense, action, and plot development along with it. It's never just a gag-a-minute script. 4/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Perfectly emulates the cinematography of the first film. Of course, there are a few less shadows, and the camera is a little less expressive, but that appropriately suits the more lighthearted nature of the film. Perhaps just as important, none of the new sets ever look cheap. Lots of furniture and ornaments in the backgrounds, always keeping the film feeling authentic. 4.5/5Other Actors (0-3 points): I really like Sheldon Leonard as a surprisingly complex ex-mafia guy/antagonist. Brown and Carney are no Abbott and Costello, but they are funny enough to make every moment of the film work. Carney particularly shines while a zombie. It's hard to be funny when you can't make facial expressions nor use your eyes, but he really makes it work. 2/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): Work is beginning to dry up for Bela again, and that seems to have given him some time to rest and recover, as he comes off more confident and physically well than he's been in a long time. He delivers a powerful performance, full of range, and channeling some of his early prowess in ways reminiscent of Dracula and White Zombie. And, while he isn't really doing anything new here, that's appropriate since the film only wants him as a cliche mad scientist. Still, he delivers laughs when he beckons, "Bring me the one called...Mike," and he truly emits pathos when he prays that his zombie injection will finally last this time. I truly wish we could have gotten this level of Bela in a more serious film, as it's a bit wasted here in a film that only needed C-level Bela acting. This film doesn't care whether Bela is providing a master performance, whereas it would have gone far in a film like Return of The Vampire. 7/10Overall: This is only my second time seeing this one, and I didn't realize how much I loved it until this viewing. Still, while Bela is fantastic in this film, he is hardly what makes the film fantastic. 17.5/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 25, 2020 9:57:40 GMT -5
The acting opportunities are drying up fast for Bela at this point (who has now gone more than a year without work), but fortunately the armed forces still need memorable Hollywood stars to entertain the troops. Command Performance: "Superman" (Radio, July 16, 1946)Who knew Bela ever performed in a Superman episode? Well, it isn't exactly an official Superman episode, but National/DC presumably lent their approval putting on this radio parody which is actually kind of hilarious. Once again though, Bela is called upon to play the cliche mad scientist, and he doesn't do all that much with the role. Though it is hilarious to see him paired with Sterling Holloway (the voice of Winnie the Pooh, among other things). Plot (0-5 points): Surprisingly funny for Old Time Radio, which often gets by on charm and personality more than clever writing. 4/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Adequate sound effects, but nothing particularly outstanding. 2/5Other Actors (0-3 points): These folks truly sound like they are having even more fun than the audience, and yet they also play their roles convincingly, even while delivering memorable one-liner after one-liner. 3/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): He plays an adequate mad scientist, but the production isn't really centered on his character, and Lugosi doesn't do all that much with it anyway. 5/10Overall: A really really fun episode, but the meeting of Bela Lugosi and Superman was far less memorable than I would have liked. 14/23
|
|
|
Post by Rob Allen on Apr 25, 2020 19:47:47 GMT -5
The other actor was the great Edward Everett Horton, and the other fellow was director/actor/producer Gregory Ratoff. Thanks for compensating for my laziness. I honestly can't say I'm familiar with either gentleman. I think you'd recognize Edward Everett Horton. He was in a ton of movies from silent films in 1922 to his death in 1970. For Boomers & subsequent generations, he was the narrator of the Fractured Fairy Tales cartoons and played medicine man Roaring Chicken on F Troop (and a similar role on an episode of Batman).
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 27, 2020 14:06:47 GMT -5
We're at that stage in Bela's career where, according to Martin landau in Ed Wood, "No one gives two f**ks for Bela." He has now gone more than a year without any significant work. Fortunately, while the previous film companies he'd worked for extensively --Fox, Universal, and Monogram-- all appear to be done with him, R.K.O. liked him enough in Zombies on Broadway to give him a second go at a Carney and Brown film. Genius At Work (1946)While nowhere near as consistently entertaining a film as Zombies on Broadway, this one still provides plenty of laughs, a good blend of action/excitement, and some impressive sets and atmosphere for such a silly comedy vehicle. If you've ever wanted to see Lionel Atwill in drag, or watch Bela actually break character and laugh, then this film has plenty to offer you, even if it's nothing all that remarkable overall. Plot (0-5 points): Slow to warm, and both the detective mystery in pursuit of a master criminal and the idea of having two radio announcers as our heroes are a little too dated to carry the film on their appeal alone. Fortunately, the film does get fun towards the end, and some of Carney and Brown's gags are actually kind of funny. 3/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): While it's not trying to mimic the stylistic atmosphere of I Walked with A Zombie this time, the sets are detailed and impressive. The camera work, lighting, and special effects are nothing special. [b3.5/5[/b] Other Actors (0-3 points): Lionel Atwill is commanding as the arch criminal, and seeing him in drag as an old lady was priceless. Brown and Carney continue to be adequate imitations of Abbott and Costello, but not particularly memorable. 2/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): In many of the early scenes, he's old and worn out again, hobbling across the screen and looking tired. Whether because the film was shot out of order or because Bela upped his morphine dosage, he's a lot more fun in the second half. He moves with seeming effortlessness (even in the action scenes), is quite funny at times, and even sends some genuine chills down the spine when he decides to terrify Carney by speaking over a loudspeaker. Bela REALLY knows how to use his voice for maximum chiller effect. Best of all, while Bela has played countless villains in countless comedies before, he has never ever broken character. Whether the script calls for it here or the morphine simply hit too hard, seeing Bela actually smile at the antics of the clowning heroes was priceless. 7/10Overall: In no way a must-see Bela film, but far more entertaining than I expected it to be. This marks one of two remaining films of Bela's that I'd never seen until now. I enjoyed myself and plan to return to this one again. 15.5/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 28, 2020 0:53:04 GMT -5
Scared To Death (1947)If you thought Monogram Studios was a low point in Bela's career, here comes a film for Golden Gate Pictures. You remember Golden Gate Pictures, don't you? According to IMDB, they released a total of six films (this being the last of them), and boy does it show. I guess someone decided springing for color would boost ticket sales, but this is sickly, ugly looking color by 1947 standards, and it absolutely conflicts with the two genres this film struggles between -- noir and horror. Fortunately, Bela brings his best to the role and justifies this film's existence almost entirely on his own merits. Plot (0-5 points): Horrendous dialogue, hideous characterization, and ill-timed humor, but the backstory is at least unique and somewhat interesting. 1/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Someone's Uncle Joe was clearly contracted out to handle the colors, and it ends up looking like grandma's shag carpet. Having a green face peer through the windows is somewhat creepy and helps try to justify the color. Otherwise, this film would have looked FAR better in black and white. It is fascinating to finally see Bela in color, though. Almost entirely what I expected, but, even though I knew his eyes were blue, I still wasn't ready for the sight of them. They are so bright in contrast to his otherwise dark features. 1/5Other Actors (0-3 points): Soooo bad. And the actors stumble over their lines so much that I wonder if they tried to do everything in one or two takes to save on the cost of color film. 0/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): He's old, he's ailing, he's clearly in pain, but he acts his heart out in this one. Possibly one of his strongest performances (certainly one of his best of the 1940s), as he is clearly desperate to convince someone...anyone...to hire him for another film. Poor poor Bela. 9/10Overall: A little painful to watch, but Bela makes it worth the journey. 11/23I'm sorry to say this is now the last readily available Bela Lugosi film that I hadn't seen. It's all familiar territory from here.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 28, 2020 10:41:33 GMT -5
The Abbott and Costello Show (Radio, May 5, 1948)I would have assumed Bela's appearance here was intended to promote the upcoming Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein film (still 40 days from release), but it's never once mentioned. Plot (0-5 points): The premise of having our radio show hosts visit "Bela Lugosi"'s haunted home is already feeling like a tired radio trope at this point. The gags aren't particularly memorable either. 1/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Really nothing. 0/5Other Actors (0-3 points): Bud and Lou are not on their A game doing a regularly scheduled live radio show. Abbott trips on his lines a few times, and Costello doesn't bring the same level of energy we'll see in Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. 1/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): He's not in much of it, but he does get to crack a few jokes. However, he stumbles badly on his final joke, and it's awkward. 3/10 Overall: When I first learned about this radio show appearance last week, I thought I was in for something special. Nope. 5/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 29, 2020 3:00:36 GMT -5
Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948)Universal's swan song for its classic horror monsters, this film gets an impressive 90 minute run time, a lavish budget, and most importantly reunites all of the original monster actors except Karloff (who refused, and yet agreed to promote the film). Why Universal suddenly invited Bela back to play his iconic role after snubbing him in the previous "House" films remains a matter of debate. Perhaps they felt he had a right to return for the final film. Perhaps Universal still felt Lugosi's name had star power and his aging and ailments would be less of a detraction in a comedy. Whatever the reason, Bela finally gets to play Dracula on the screen for the second time after fifteen years of trying. And it's a nice note to go out on because, in an age before Ed Wood was a household name, this was the last film most of mainstream America ever saw Lugosi in. Plot (0-5 points): The first 40 minutes are priceless, as Abbott and Costello bring their A game while coming face to face with the classic Universal monsters truly attempting to play it straight and not for laughs. Unfortunately, the plot is ludicrous, uninteresting, and totally out of character for all three monsters, so the film always drags for me once we are knee deep in rising action. An entertaining film throughout, but the first 40 minutes are so much more engaging than the 50 minutes that follow. 2.5/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Outstanding sets and camera work appropriate to the blending of horror and comedy. So much of what works about this film is that it still FEELS like a Universal horror. 5/5Other Actors (0-3 points): Bud and Lou (especially Lou) bring their very best. Lon Chaney Jr. and Glenn Strange are as good as ever (how good that is remains debatable). Lenore Aubert nearly steals the show as the complex and conflicted doctor working under Dracula, and Jane Randolph proves the only real weakness in the cast, feeling like the cliche girl reporter of 1940s films (even though she's actually an insurance investigator). 2/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): It's Bela back in the cloak and looking surprisingly good in spite of how badly his face has aged since the last time we saw him in a film a year earlier. My only gripe is that he isn't really playing Dracula. In both Dracula and Mark of the Vampire, there was an inhuman quality to his performance. He could entertain a parlor full of guests if necessary, but it was an act intended to lure in prey. In Return of the Vampire, he came off as more human, but only as a means of enacting a very personal revenge. Here, he feels more like the stereotypical arch-nemesis Bela often plays in his B films, only clad in the outer trappings of Dracula. He does the mannerisms and inflections, but he's just a mad scientist trying to animate the Frankenstein monster (and really, why would Dracula ever care about that?). One further peculiarity is Bela's penchant for covering his face with his cloak in this film. What was up with that? Were they having him do that so that they could use stand-ins when his leg pain got too bad? 7/10 really just on the basis of Bela playing Dracula again and looking pretty good. His performance itself is a bit of a letdown. Overall: As with any farewell episode or film, nostalgia dominates my feelings for this one, but when you look at it for what Bela is actually bringing to the role, it's not what a true fan would have hoped for it to be. 16.5/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 29, 2020 11:26:28 GMT -5
Suspense: A Cask of Amontillado (Television, October 11 1949)An adaptation of Poe's A Cask of Amontillado, altered to deliver an anti-fascist message. While the story loses so much of its delightful subtlety and ambiguity as a result, it gives Bela the opportunity to play a brilliantly complex role as Fortunado, and he truly delivers. Plot (0-5 points): A creative adaptation of the story to make Fortunado a corrupt general in the ruling party. Whereas Poe leaves you to wonder what (if anything) Fortunado had ever done to deserve being murdered, this story lays it on thick, but I give it credit in attempting to use a familiar tale to suit the global political landscape of the time. 4/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): This is my first time watching pre-1950s television, and I have to say it's better than I expected. With such a smaller viewing audience in 1949, I'd expect a much more budget-friendly production, but the sets are of reasonable quality. Not lavish, not cinema level, but not paltry either. Good camera work too. 3/5Other Actors (0-3 points): The guy playing opposite Bela stumbles on his lines a few times, but otherwise seems well suited for the role. 2/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): You'd expect Bela to appear in an episode of Suspense where he plays a monster or a crazed murderer. I definitely didn't see Fortunado coming. And yet, Bela is positively masterful in the role, balancing the ego, the hunger, the wickedness, and the benign, almost endearing helplessness of Poe's drunken antagonist all at once. Any other actor in this role would have overplayed the power Fortunado has over Montrssor in this adaptation, but perhaps because Bela knew and resisted real dictators in his native homeland, he portrays someone far more real and, therefore, a little scarier. I could see this guy getting swept into my living room in the wake of a revolution, helping himself to a beer in my fridge and casually hinting that he plans to murder me and marry my girlfriend while smiling all the same. 10/10Overall: I really didn't expect a mostly forgotten television appearance at the tail end of Bela's career to rank among his greatest works, but yeah, this deserves the recognition. 19/23
|
|