shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 29, 2020 11:45:53 GMT -5
Candid Microphone (Radio, July 18, 1950)A four minute segment in which Bela poses as the owner of a curio shop and does his best to gradually terrify a real shopper. Man, this never would have worked a decade earlier. Bela's distinct voice and looks were far too well known. It's a bit of a tragedy that the unsuspecting customer still doesn't seem to entirely understand who Bela is once he reveals himself at the close. Plot (0-5 points): The reality TV of its day, there really isn't a plot. 0/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): None. 0/5Other Actors (0-3 points): None 0/5The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): It's so easy to forget that English was not Bela's first, second, or (I believe) even third language, but here, improvising on the spot, you can hear him struggling to find the right words. It's...awkward, as is the role he is playing, so much so that I rather feel bad for the shopper. How much of this is due to good acting, to clumsy acting, and/or to a language barrier is hard to judge, but it certainly was cringe-worthy. 1/10Overall: 1/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 29, 2020 11:53:14 GMT -5
The Paul Winchell Show (Television, October 2nd, 1950)There doesn't appear to be a surviving record of this one, but we do get a promotional photo: Of course, Bela reprising Dracula for comedy shows never went particularly well on the radio, so I'm not sure we're missing much with this television appearance.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on Apr 29, 2020 11:56:24 GMT -5
Only eight reviews left. I'm both thrilled and more than a little sad to be this close to the end.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 1, 2020 7:20:05 GMT -5
Crime Does Not Pay: "Gasoline Cocktail" (December 12, 1949)My apologies for posting yet another radio appearance out of order. Belalugosi.com dates this radio appearance as February 17, 1951, but every other internet source I can find says December 12, 1949, so that's the date I've decided to go with. Plot (0-5 points): A generic crime story with a generic plot, generic characters, and generic dialogue. Really nothing distinct in this cautionary tale about pyromaniacs. 0/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Adequate radio show sound effects 2/5Other Actors (0-3 points): Nothing memorable at all. 1/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): A surprisingly poor performance in which he over-delivers nearly every line. It doesn't help that his character is horribly written, but Bela is usually able to work wonders with bad scripts. 1/10Overall: 4/10
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 1, 2020 13:27:25 GMT -5
Mother Riley Meets The Vampire / Vampire Over London (1952)I'm not proud of the fact that I adore this film. By all rights, this should have been the ultimate embarrassment of Bela's career, pairing him with a stale drag comedy act in a production he allegedly only signed on to in order to pay for airfare home from the UK. What I didn't realize until doing background research for this review was that Bela wasn't the only one at the tail end of his career here. Arthur Lucan (Mother Riley) had now been playing the role for two decades, the frequency of film releases had slowed down significantly, and he had just divorced his co-star and business partner. This would be his final film. Perhaps that's why the script seems to have such love for both characters, treating them warmly and not just playing them for stale gags. This is a genuinely cute film that genuinely understands what is adorable and endearing about both the Mother Riley character and Bela Lugosi. Plot (0-5 points): It's cute, silly, sometimes laugh-out-loud funny, and the script writer seems to have a true affinity for Bela. The role he plays compounds so many of his acting roles into one villain who is a vampire, a mad scientist, a foreign agent working on weapons he intends to sell to enemies, and a benign old man all while commanding an evil robot. That pretty much captures 90% of Bela's acting career in one single role. 3/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Good sets and lighting. A very convincing robot! 4/5Other Actors (0-3 points): Mother Riley may come off as obnoxious at first (I really could have done without that musical number in the first scene), but she/he is adorable and truly likable throughout the rest of the film, even when the comedy isn't landing. 2/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): There's no real opportunity for Bela to reach or try something new when he's playing a role that is an homage to so much of his career, but he shines brightest when sharing the screen with Mother Riley. For whatever absurd reason, this character sheds his evil and his ambitions because he has affection for the character, and it's truly adorable to watch. There is absolutely no reason for Bela's character to lend her such kindness (even if her blood type is what he needs for his experiment), but it allows Bela to show his genuine charm where one was simply expecting your standard Lugosi villain. It's a truly nice showcase for Bela. 8/10Overall: Often a source of perverse amusement or shame for fans of Bela, I truly think this one is an unsung high point in Bela's later career. If you really love Bela for his warmth and personality, this is a film that showcases that quality in spades, all while savoring the sharp contrast against Bela's more familiar roles and characterizations. 17/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 2, 2020 9:24:56 GMT -5
I keep waiting for someone to notice I've given nearly the same overall score to Mother Riley Meets The Vampire as I have to Dracula. I've pulled up a seat to the table and am ready for you to change my mind...
|
|
|
Post by beccabear67 on May 2, 2020 14:19:47 GMT -5
I've never seen a Mother Riley somehow. I remember Ma and Pa Kettle movies, and Moms Mabley, but I guess that's not much help.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 2, 2020 23:30:47 GMT -5
I've never seen a Mother Riley somehow. It's Public Domain, so Youtube has numerous copies: I'm not saying it's great, but it's genuinely entertaining, especially if you love Bela. Dracula is brilliant for the first 40 minutes and an utter drab for the remainder of the film. Mother Riley is just consistently pretty darn good. Score-wise, the two balanced out. I'd still take the first half of Dracula over most films in this thread any day, but if we are judging the work as a whole, it's merely pretty darn good.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 3, 2020 23:03:27 GMT -5
Just watched Ed Wood (1994) for the first time in anticipation of re-watching the Ed Wood trilogy for these reviews. I have to say that, as endearing a performance as Martin Landau gave as Bela, I feel the film generally did him a disservice and appealed more to Hollywood stereotypes than the truth, presenting Bela as a hopeless junkie with one and a half feet in the grave. Obviously, I have a bias in all of this, but I immediately went back to watch segments of Glen or Glenda and Bride of the Monster, and no, Bela does not look THAT old and dilapidated, and his voice and inflection are always tightly controlled, whereas Landau presents more of a lazy inflection. No one will ever know the full truth of Bela's addiction issues, but we do know he was on Methadone in an effort to kick his morphine addiction on his own, that his wife had tried numerous times to help him quit, and that (so far as I know), he left his treatment center having genuinely recovered (the film presents it as a con on the part of Ed Wood because Bela could not pay the medical fees). Even the times when Bela asserts that he only takes on these roles because he liked Ed Wood so much, we know Bela took on pretty much ANY role because he needed the money and loved to perform. So I take issue with how much of a joke the film made of Bela and his life, even if it also presented him endearingly. Bela was a man of tremendous grace and control, and presenting him as the total opposite of that feels like a bit of an insult to the man and his legacy.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 3, 2020 23:46:13 GMT -5
Spent a little time on The Bela Lugosi Blog tonight and discovered this gem I hadn't encountered previously: Baker's Broadcast (Radio, March 13 1938)Bela and Boris sing! Not really review-worthy, but man is this fun:
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on May 5, 2020 12:15:06 GMT -5
I keep waiting for someone to notice I've given the same overall score to Mother Riley Meets The Vampire as I have to Dracula. I've pulled up a seat to the table and am ready for you to change my mind... It’s been a while since I saw Mother Riley Meets the Vampire. My friend who is also a big Lugosi fan had it on VHS and I asked if we could watch it. He was rather reluctant ... and I remember understanding why after a few minutes. I also remember looking at him with my mouth open and a look on my face that made him say “I have no idea what that means, I have rewound that dialogue a bunch of times.” But the details escape me. So I won’t be trying to convince you of anything. The way I remember this movie, I’m of the opinion that you’re too far gone and there is no hope. 🤪 But then again I saw it a long time ago and maybe I’ve seen enough old British films that Mother Riley Meets the Vampire might make more sense to me. Have you ever seen a British film circa 1940 titled Ghost Train!? It’s a HOOT and a HALF!
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on May 5, 2020 12:22:39 GMT -5
Just watched Ed Wood (1994) for the first time in anticipation of re-watching the Ed Wood trilogy for these reviews. I have to say that, as endearing a performance as Martin Landau gave as Bela, I feel the film generally did him a disservice and appealed more to Hollywood stereotypes than the truth, presenting Bela as a hopeless junkie with one and a half feet in the grave. Obviously, I have a bias in all of this, but I immediately went back to watch segments of Glen or Glenda and Bride of the Monster, and no, Bela does not look THAT old and dilapidated, and his voice and inflection are always tightly controlled, whereas Landau presents more of a lazy inflection. No one will ever know the full truth of Bela's addiction issues, but we do know he was on Methadone in an effort to kick his morphine addiction on his own, that his wife had tried numerous times to help him quit, and that (so far as I know), he left his treatment center having genuinely recovered (the film presents it as a con on the part of Ed Wood because Bela could not pay the medical fees). Even the times when Bela asserts that he only takes on these roles because he liked Ed Wood so much, we know Bela took on pretty much ANY role because he needed the money and loved to perform. So I take issue with how much of a joke the film made of Bela and his life, even if it also presented him endearingly. Bela was a man of tremendous grace and control, and presenting him as the total opposite of that feels like a bit of an insult to the man and his legacy. I’m a pretty big Bela Lugosi fan and have been for a very long time. And I love this movie! Oh yeah sure, it takes a lot of liberties with the facts, but this is a biopic in only the broadest definition of the term, and it’s the life of Ed Wood, not the life of Bela Lugosi, and it’s more the legend of Ed Wood at that. It’s based on Nightmare of Ecstasy, a great book about Ed Wood, but it’s based on interviews with the Wood entourage and it’s frequently not entirely trustworthy, from what I understand. It’s still a great book. And the movie? It’s one of my Top Five Favorite movies made between 1980 and the present.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2020 2:41:10 GMT -5
Bela Lugosi Meets A Brooklyn Gorilla (1952)I may have been surprisingly enthusiastic about Mother Riley last time around, and I may not have minded Brown and Carney, but I draw the line at Mitchell and Petrillo, an insultingly unoriginal theft of Martin and Lewis that isn't even close to being in the same ballpark. Petrillo alternates between obnoxious and surprisingly endearing, but he's never ever funny, and Mitchell is just godawful to the point that I can't decide which is worse: his acting or his crooning. When they've got him in an ape suit for the last twenty minutes of the film, I find the whole thing a lot more tolerable. Plot (0-5 points): Every joke is stolen, and the plot is utterly derivative and absurd. 0/5Atmosphere (0-5 points): Surprisingly excellent lighting, but that's pretty much the only positive. Nothing else looks especially low budget, but it certainly isn't high budget nor meticulous either. 2/5Other Actors (0-3 points): Duke Mitchell hurts my soul. No one else in this film is worth a damn either, except maybe Ramona the chimp. Petrillo would be adequate if he weren't just a blatant rip-off of Jerry Lewis. -1/3The Lugosi Factor (0-10 points): he is so tired and worn out that it almost hurts to see him in this one, and yet he still gives a first class effort in most scenes. At times, if you can look past the drained-of-life look he bares so tragically, he's almost playing Murder Legendre from White Zombie again. Even in scenes where he is off to the sides, and the camera barely notices him, he's giving it his all. There are only two scenes in the film where his acting is awkward and not on point, and I find it curious that both scenes have him walking across the set. Leg pains. Poor Bela. I truly cringe when he gets knocked over late in the film, and it isn't a stunt double. He looks genuinely scared and entirely too aware that it's coming. Yet, in spite of the pain and frailty, he gives this film his best. 7/10Overall: This film didn't deserve him, but I'll take any opportunity to see Bela in one more film. I'm far too aware that there are far too few of them left. 8/23
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2020 2:51:48 GMT -5
It’s been a while since I saw Mother Riley Meets the Vampire. My friend who is also a big Lugosi fan had it on VHS and I asked if we could watch it. He was rather reluctant ... and I remember understanding why after a few minutes. I also remember looking at him with my mouth open and a look on my face that made him say “I have no idea what that means, I have rewound that dialogue a bunch of times.” But the details escape me. I'd say you captured the first ten minutes of the film quite well. It does get better. Fair enough. But did you watch the whole thing? There's no denying the very nature of the gig was a low point for Bela and that, if you expect dark, moody, and morbidly gorgeous Dracula-era Bela, this film conflicts badly with that, but if you love Bela for his personality and his B work, there really isn't anything a film like The Devil Bat had that this one does not. To be clear, I'm not espousing that Mother Riley is a GREAT film -- I'm arguing that it's as underrated as Dracula is overrated. Sounds like I've got some viewing homework!
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,871
Member is Online
|
Post by shaxper on May 6, 2020 7:39:31 GMT -5
I took some time last night to review my previous scorings, as I'm working out a Top 25 Bela Lugosi Films list to reveal in October, and (let's be honest) none of the remaining films in Bela's career are likely to make that list. I revisited quite a few of my reviews, rewatched segments of certain films, and adjusted a few scores around. Some will be happy to know that I ended up scoring Dracula slightly higher than Mother Riley and that, as of now, they are seven films apart on the list. Maybe now the men in white coats will get off of my lawn. I'm quite pleased with how the list is shaping up and look forward to sharing it in October. No, Mother Riley did not make the top ten, and no, Dracula did not make the top five
|
|