|
Post by Hoosier X on Jun 27, 2024 17:12:52 GMT -5
I was hoping to find a Golden Age Jack Frost story that’s easy to link to.
It seems to me I might’ve read one somewhere a while back. I’ve long thought the concept was interesting.
|
|
|
Post by kirby101 on Jun 27, 2024 17:16:52 GMT -5
One thing I'm curious about is why Lee's years of experience writing for Timely and Atlas over a multitude of genres is so easily dismissed. I don't think you can write that many stories without honing your skills into something that's halfway decent. I'm particularly interested in his Western fillers. They're simple morality tales, but well executed stories, and he worked with some amazing artists. The amount of genres his work covers is amazing. What's even more amazing are the blatant rip-offs of Archie, Casper the Ghost, Dennis the Menace, Carl Barks, etc. But even those hack jobs provided valuable training. None of this is to say that Stan was a great ideas man, just that he had a wealth of experience working on funny books. Lee could write dialog, he could write comic scripts when he wanted to, or had to. He could dialog 8 books a month. His years of experience brought him those skills. I think what is being debated is was Lee the prime reason those Marvel books were so good. Were any of his claims of creating the ideas for the characters or key stories true. Did he steer everything with a master's hand while people like Ditko or Kirby helped out with the art. Did they just really bring Lee's vision to life, or was Lee the one who was onboard working with what others were generating? This is a very binary way to look at it, I know. And it diminishes Stan's contribution too much. But all the same, when he is still lauded as The creator of the Marvel Universe. When he even gets recognition in Wikipedia for things he did not do, maybe pointing out his career before the FF and after 1972 did not indicate a man of great ideas is a worthy consideration.
|
|
|
Post by kirby101 on Jun 27, 2024 17:21:05 GMT -5
And I also think the idea that Stan was a genius at dialog, while Kirby was a hack whose books were no good without Stan writing the words deserves some strong push back.
"Kirby's later work sucked!" Sure nothing like Stan Lee creates the DC Universe.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Jun 27, 2024 17:50:27 GMT -5
We’re constantly being told that Stan never wrote anything so what I’m interested in is whether there are examples of Stan being a competent writer. I don’t think there’s much evidence that Stan was building to something like the FF, as I don’t believe Stan had much control over the types of books Atlas published. However, there’s more to the FF than space rockets and monsters. I’m curious as to whether Stan’s experience writing humor, romance and teen books played any role his scripting of the FF. That said, I realize that Jack was the one plotting and drawing the scenes for Stan to script over. However, we know Stan had a tendency to drastically change Jack’s dialogue suggestions for better or worse. Often for the worst in terms of how Jack intended the story to be told.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Jun 27, 2024 17:50:34 GMT -5
And I also think the idea that Stan was a genius at dialog, while Kirby was a hack whose books were no good without Stan writing the words deserves some strong push back. "Kirby's later work sucked!" Sure nothing like Stan Lee creates the DC Universe. I'm completely baffled by the contention that Jack's dialogue is bad. It's quite a bit different from Lee, that's sure. But Lee writes the bulk of his main characters like they are a bunch of rapid-firing quip-masters from a witty 1930s comedy. Which often comes pretty close to working in a lot of the Spider-Man stories. But it would be inappropriate and often ridiculous in the Fourth World comics. And what about Kamandi? I love the dialogue in Kamandi. Imagine Flower saying, "Hiya, Tiger! Aren't you brash, blond and beautiful?" And nobody ever admonished Flower for being an emotional female from whom no better could be expected. I'm not going to defend Kirby's 1970s Captain America and the Falcon in the same manner. I like it well enough, but the dialogue was sometimes ... well ... I ALWAYS WONDERED WHY CAP AND FALCON WERE YELLING ALL THE TIME! (I bought those new and so did a couple of my friends. We would take our comics to school and sit by the fence at recess and read Cap. AND WE WOULD SHOUT A LOT OF THE DIALOGUE BECAUSE OF THE GIANT LETTERING IN THE WORD BALLOONS!! And just to get it all down for posterity, one of my friends thought it was funny to read the Falcon's dialogue with a stereotypical Black accent like he was trying out for Gone With the Wind. I grinned a bit just to be polite but it made me uncomfortable. And it bothered me that my friends thought it was funny.)
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Jun 27, 2024 18:00:46 GMT -5
We’re constantly being told that Stan never wrote anything so what I’m interested in is whether there are examples of Stan being a competent writer. I don’t think there’s much evidence that Stan was building to something like the FF, as I don’t believe Stan had much control over the types of books Atlas published. However, there’s more to the FF than space rockets and monsters. I’m curious as to whether Stan’s experience writing humor, romance and teen books played any role his scripting of the FF. That said, I realize that Jack was the one plotting and drawing the scenes for Stan to script over. However, we know Stan had a tendency to drastically change Jack’s dialogue suggestions for better or worse. Often for the worst in terms of how Jack intended the story to be told. I never said Stan didn't write anything. So I don't know what people mean when they say that. I don't think they literally mean that "Stan never wrote anything." I think they mean Stan took credit for a lot of stuff that somebody else did. Maybe they are considering "writing" to be separate from "dialogue," which can be confusing. Maybe they are taking about Stan's alleged ghost writers. I certainly do wish that everyone in the discussion could be a little more precise with terms like that. Anyway, I am linking to full stories from the 1940s and 1950s that are attributed to Stan Lee. So I am providing examples of Stan's work from the Golden Age and pre-Kirby Silver Age.
|
|
|
Post by kirby101 on Jun 27, 2024 18:12:13 GMT -5
Speaking of Kamandi, there is great writing in issues #16, which tells the origin of the intelligent animals from the great collapse. But the way Kirby does it have a diary from that time while the action at the hospital Kamandi is at parrellels the action in the diary. It is a fantastic bit of writing.
|
|
|
Post by kirby101 on Jun 27, 2024 18:14:35 GMT -5
Stan wrote comic books.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Jun 27, 2024 19:04:57 GMT -5
One thing I want to say about Jack's scripting is that I really liked the way he scripted Darkseid. The tiger-force at the core of all things is the most Kirby thing ever, but I love it!
Yes and one of the key points to remember is that it isn't just that it sounds cool - a judgement which is in the end subjective t the individual reader: I like this a lot but I know there are many fans to whom the above sounds just as hokey as the infamous "Funky corn" line in the Eternals. No, the key is that it is important to the themes and ideas underlying the whole New Gods concept.
So for the fans who think Kirby should have hired a script-writer because they don't like his dialogue, I think one has to keep this in mind: there's no guarantee a scriptor would have understood how important it was not to mess with speeches such as the above. And we know from Kirby's FF pencilled pages that there were many times when Stan didn't quite grasp what Kirby was doing an I think there would have been a very high probability that he wouldn't have understood the ideas at the root of either the New Gods or the Eternals. I really think a hired scriptor would have been a disaster
|
|
|
Post by Batflunkie on Jun 27, 2024 19:53:49 GMT -5
One thing I'm curious about is why Lee's years of experience writing for Timely and Atlas over a multitude of genres is so easily dismissed. I don't think you can write that many stories without honing your skills into something that's halfway decent. I'm particularly interested in his Western fillers. They're simple morality tales, but well executed stories, and he worked with some amazing artists. The amount of genres his work covers is amazing. What's even more amazing are the blatant rip-offs of Archie, Casper the Ghost, Dennis the Menace, Carl Barks, etc. But even those hack jobs provided valuable training. None of this is to say that Stan was a great ideas man, just that he had a wealth of experience working on funny books. I think what's more telling of Stan's talent is what he did after he left Marvel. Stuff like Stripperella (which I'm surprised doesn't get talked about more), his "Just Imagine" line for DC, and his Boom! Comics titles (Soldier Zero, The Traveler, and Starborn). Most of these have been forgotten to time and that's probably for the best, but all the general public likes to recall is the "Marvel" years of 61-72
|
|
|
Post by princenamor on Jun 27, 2024 23:50:05 GMT -5
The Fantastic Four issues after Kirby left are largely mediocre but the series doesn't tank. It just lacks the excitement you'd expect from The World's Greatest Comic Magazine. Romita with the benefit of A TV Cartoon only goes up 10% and it's considered a 'win', but the Fantastic Four loses 94,758 copies a month from Kirby's last full year in the same amount of time (down 27.8%) and it's considered NOT tanking? By 1978, it was down 47.7% from Kirby's last full year. Lee jumped from a sinking ship. 1969 340,363 1970 285,639 1971 275,930 1972 245,605 (-27.8%) 1973 225,631 1974 218,330 1975 216,260 1976 199,734 1977 194,661 1978 177,802 (-47.7%) How'd Lee's 'writing' hold up in Spider-man? Down every year he remained on the book (1972 down 22.5%) and a decade of diminishing numbers.. 1969 372,352 1970 322,195 1971 307,550 1972 288,379 (-22.5%) 1973 273,204 1974 288,232 1975 273,773 1976 282,159 1977 281,860 1978 258,156 (-30.6%)
|
|
|
Post by princenamor on Jun 28, 2024 0:16:00 GMT -5
One thing I'm curious about is why Lee's years of experience writing for Timely and Atlas over a multitude of genres is so easily dismissed. I don't think you can write that many stories without honing your skills into something that's halfway decent. I'm particularly interested in his Western fillers. They're simple morality tales, but well executed stories, and he worked with some amazing artists. The amount of genres his work covers is amazing. What's even more amazing are the blatant rip-offs of Archie, Casper the Ghost, Dennis the Menace, Carl Barks, etc. But even those hack jobs provided valuable training. None of this is to say that Stan was a great ideas man, just that he had a wealth of experience working on funny books. Stan wrote less than 10% of that material. In 20 years he did... maybe 20 six page Superhero stories? 8 issues of Menace and maybe 20 or so other horror stories? His Western work was generic genre work that never used a NAME character. It was always a repeated theme. His blatant ripoffs, if you read them, lack any understanding of why those characters work in the original. (As an example, his Dextor the Demon is just MEAN. There's no wholesome innocence to the kid, or even a deniability to the mayhem caused like Dennis the Menace has.) His most consistent work is in the 'dumb blonde' books, like Millie and Patsy where he has Dan DeCarlo and Al Hartley do the stories and then he just inserts his smarty pants dialogue and sign his name to pin-ups and paper doll pages. As an example of how little Stan actually wrote during his Atlas years, I did breakdown of what he signed in 1950 as his work. He wrote 130 pages of comics to the 5976 pages that were done. That's 2.1% of the pages. 130 pages is less than 6 comics for the whole year (about 4.5 books in 1950 when they were doing 36 pages - downsizing from 52). They produced around 200 books in 1950. THAT is how little he did as a writer. 117 of those 130 pages are for Millie the Model and My Friend Irma. Realistically, over 20 years, Stan didn't actually write much and most of the ideas he had, crashed and burned pretty quickly (Black Night, Dextor the Demon, Showgirls, Cartoon Kids, etc. This is another example of a 'fan belief' that fans would carry for years that Stan never denied, and as more information and research tools became available to us, it's blantantly easy to see the truth.
|
|
|
Post by princenamor on Jun 28, 2024 0:21:58 GMT -5
We’re constantly being told that Stan never wrote anything so what I’m interested in is whether there are examples of Stan being a competent writer. I don’t think there’s much evidence that Stan was building to something like the FF, as I don’t believe Stan had much control over the types of books Atlas published. However, there’s more to the FF than space rockets and monsters. I’m curious as to whether Stan’s experience writing humor, romance and teen books played any role his scripting of the FF. That said, I realize that Jack was the one plotting and drawing the scenes for Stan to script over. However, we know Stan had a tendency to drastically change Jack’s dialogue suggestions for better or worse. Often for the worst in terms of how Jack intended the story to be told. The best example of Stan Lee as a 'writer' is in the Silver Surfer series that ran for 18 issues in 1968-70. That was HIS baby, and ultimate finger to Kirby. John Buscema couldn't write a story, so Stan had all this room to dialogue the book EXACTLY as he wanted to. And it's HORRIBLE. The Surfer books have a reputation based on Buscema's fantastic art - but the stories and dialogue are HORRIBLE. It's bad enough Stan had to solicit to the fans for how to create a new origin for the character - there's proof right there of how creative he is - but issue after issue after issue of listening to Surfer whine and moan on and on... I tried to read all 18 issues in one sitting and it was excruciatingly terrible. Let me look up some examples...
|
|
|
Post by princenamor on Jun 28, 2024 0:31:25 GMT -5
Stan did some of his worst work with John Buscema as evidenced by how lame the FF was after Kirby left and Romita couldn't continue to draw it. That's nothing against Buscema whose ART is amazing... but without a WRITER to assist him, Stan's work is... well it's pretty bad. Here's Daniel Greenberg from Facebook who's done some great analysis of some that work from the Silver Surfer series and here he breaks down an average page: EVERY character in this story is a (Dunce) for the plot to happen. John Buscema tells us he had only a "very sketchy plot outline to work from," for Silver Surfer #4. He did a strong job, yet Lee tore him apart for his story. But that still did not motivate Lee to actually write scripts. Let's examine Lee's many OBJECTIVELY BAD writing errors: 1. "Unlike the humans-- who call you beast-- there is no violence in your heart." Stan Lee does not know how lions work. 2. "no violence... Not a hint of avarice-- no smoldering hate. Yet man... is a stranger to peace-- a prisoner, caught in the web of his own nameless fears!" A few pages later, Captain Judgemental is not only lashing out violently, full of smoldering hate, he is even full of avarice, since he is attacking to regain his lost love. Lee's hypocrisy on parade makes the Surfer a (Dunce). 3. "No harm can come in combat when both hearts be truly pure." Laughs in recent reports of Indians tricked into fighting Ukrainians by Russia. Wise Odin is a complete (Dunce) when written by Stan Lee. 4. "I sense that I have been misled! --Betrayed by the one who brought me here! But right or wrong-- one fact remains-- no one calls me coward!" Even though he's aware Loki has misled him, he's overreacting to being called a "coward" with pure VIOLENCE in his heart and a not-so "nameless fear." It's called wounded vanity, Silver Surfer. You are an (Dunce) and you are everything you complain about. 5. Thor "must have suspected-- from the beginning-- that I was merely duped." Yet Thor (as a Dunce) never bothered to mention it before or during all the fighting. Not even during that time that he agreed to "lend ear to thy complaint." Why was Thor an (Dunce)? So Lee's "plot" could happen. Writing errors on EVERY PAGE below. Sort by All Comments to see each page in order.
|
|
|
Post by princenamor on Jun 28, 2024 0:35:39 GMT -5
|
|