|
Post by berkley on Oct 11, 2024 2:33:34 GMT -5
I saw Love at First Bite on video about 5 or 6 years after it came out. I can recall the circumstances pretty clearly because it was with two friends from our little neighbourhood we'd grown up in, but after a few years away from one another - it seemed like more than a few back then - and away from our home town in another province. All three of us liked it and had a good laugh. George Hamilton for me he had the wrong look for the part, but that didn't matter as much in a comedy as it would in a serious horror movie. He delivered his lines well and made us laugh, which was the main idea. Benjamin was funny too.
It's been too long for me to remember if the song was in there or not. I always liked that song, so I imagine I'd recall it being in this movie but it's possible my general liking of it has wiped out this particular instance. And of course we were talking and reminiscing while watching so we probably missed a lot of stuff. I should watch it again.
|
|
|
Post by EdoBosnar on Oct 11, 2024 3:17:01 GMT -5
I didn't think I would actively participate in this thread, as I'm not much of a horror guy, but since I see that even horror-adjacent films like the excellent Love at First Bite are being discussed here, I guess I'll throw my hat into the ring with a few entries. First, I'll cross-post this one from the : Finally got around to seeing the apparently much-reviled remade Ghostbusters from 2016... I had pretty low expectations going into it, just because of all of the (overwrought, in hindsight) negative responses it received back then, and ended up being pleasantly surprised. It's a pretty funny movie - although I think the main cast, i.e., the excellent Melissa McCarthy, Leslie Jones, Kristen Wiig and Kate McKinnon, can be thanked for that, as they really elevated a pretty middling script. Is it as good as the 1984 original? Certainly not (although I'd venture to say it's better than the 1989 sequel, which I really didn't like). But like I said, it's a perfectly enjoyable movie.
|
|
|
Post by EdoBosnar on Oct 11, 2024 4:28:38 GMT -5
...and continuing along the lines of my preceding post, I also caught (for the first time) This is the End (2013), which is pretty accurately described as an 'apocalyptic horror comedy.'
Brief plot summary for those who may not be familiar: actor Jay Baruchel arrives in LA to visit his buddy, fellow actor Seth Rogen; after smoking a lot of weed and playing video games at Seth's place, they go to a housewarming party hosted by James Franco, where a ton of well-known celebrities are in attendance. When Seth and Jay go to a convenience store on a cigarette run, what is apparently the Rapture from the Book of Revelations begins. They run back to Franco's house and soon after all hell (literally) breaks loose. Most of the attendees flee and get gruesomely killed, and Seth, Jay, Franco plus Jonah Hill, Craig Robinson and Danny McBride barricade themselves in Franco's house to hopefully wait out the crisis. I found this pretty entertaining, and it definitely has more genuine horror elements than the Ghostbusters movie I reviewed above (i.e., jump scares, gore, demonic possession, actual demons from hell, even a little post-apocalyptic cannibalism near the end). What makes it additionally amusing is that all of the actors are playing apparently more dickish versions of themselves - although, given some more recent reports, a few may in fact be tamer versions of their real life personalities (*cough* name rhymes with Jlames Flanco *cough*).
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 11, 2024 9:06:07 GMT -5
Count Dracula (Jesse Franco, 1970)
I was expecting this to be trashier since it's a Franco film, but it was a relatively straightforward adaption of Stoker's novel. The only problem is that it's deathly boring. Not even Christopher Lee as Dracula or Klaus Kinski as Renfield can inject any sort of life into the picture. It's been a long time since I've seen a Christopher Lee Dracula film, so I didn't have anything to compare his performance to. Worse yet, there's very little in the way of quality cinematography. The film had a meagre budget, but Franco could have done more with the lighting. There were some decent shots, but nothing remotely memorable. To be honest, I kind of wish it had been trashy. Perhaps I should've watched Franco's Dracula Contra Frankenstein instead.
|
|
|
Post by DubipR on Oct 11, 2024 9:45:47 GMT -5
Yesterday night and into the early morning on TCM was a good classic horror/suspense night
Rear Window Sisters Poltergeist The Haunting Spirits of the Dead Carnival of Souls
While I'm not too much of a fan of new horror but a good scare is a good scare. I love Poltergeist; we all know Spielberg directed this classic. There's straight shots that are Spielbergian. The way it looks and feels... all him. Even though Hooper's name is listed, its been known by a lot of the actors that he directed it. I was a long time since I've seen DePalma's Sisters, which is a great homage to Rear Window (which was prior). I forget how freaking good Margot Kidder was in this.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Oct 11, 2024 9:47:51 GMT -5
I’m not sure I can even imagine Love At First Bite without “I Love the Night Life.”
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 11, 2024 11:52:18 GMT -5
Love at First Bite and Zorro the Gay Blade are both hilarious films. They are George Hamilton's finest work. I had the paperback novelization of Zorro The Gay Blade and read it before seeing the film. It was funnier than hell. Then, watching the movie, a lot of stuff fell flat because of the timing of the actor. Ron Liebman especially. It's still a fun film; but, it was so much funnier on paper. I enjoy Hamilton as Evel Knievel and I would cite his Columbo episode (the original one, he did one of the reunion movies) as superior to those films.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 11, 2024 11:56:53 GMT -5
I’m not sure I can even imagine Love At First Bite without “I Love the Night Life.” It was as bad as watching the commercial WKRP 1st season dvd, when Les goes to an awards banquet with Jennifer and buys a toupee. In the dvd, Foreigner's "Hot Blooded" was replaced by some generic music and the original scene was pretty much synched to "Hot Blooded." It's that jarring, though the disco song here is at least an actual song, not an instrumental and it at least fits the theme. hout Factory also restored a lot of the music in WKRP, when they put out the complete series dvd set. They seem to have the magic touch, compared to the studios. That, or they are willing to sacrifice a bit of profit on individual units to sell more overall, by paying for the music.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 11, 2024 12:00:25 GMT -5
ps Some of my list went out the window, thanks to the hack of the Internet Archive. I had a few things bookmarked, that I didn't own and they are down completely, after a major attack and data breach.
|
|
|
Post by driver1980 on Oct 11, 2024 12:02:17 GMT -5
I thought I’d revisit Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man. Had this on VHS and DVD.
I like this, but I’m not really sure it quite lived up to my expectations. I was probably expecting some WWF-style “bout” lasting 10 or 15 minutes, but I’d be surprised if the battle between the Monster and Wolf Man lasted 4 minutes. I also felt that Wolf Man manhandled Frankenstein’s Monster a bit too easily; surely the Monster could have given Wolf Man a run for his money. Still, the spectacle is worth it, and the build up is well executed.
Boris Karloff is my definitive Monster, but Bela Lugosi does a very commendable job here - and that’s not a back-handed compliment. He did a pretty solid job, and while I would have loved to have seen Karloff here, I feel Lugosi’s performance deserves a lot of respect here.
I’d love to know how they safely did that stunt where Wolf Man pulls the Monster down some steps. It doesn’t look safe (I say that as someone who once fell down some steps in a shopping mall and was left with a few bruises). Movie magic, eh?
Revisit the clip here (after the usual crappy ads, of course):
|
|
|
Post by Jeddak on Oct 11, 2024 20:22:44 GMT -5
Terrifier - 2016 - All I knew about these movies is that the killer, Art the Clown, seems to be a new horror icon, showing up alongside Michael and Freddy at Spirit. So I gave the first one a try. And I'm not impressed.
There's no plot to speak of, just a series of people getting stalked and killed. The killer is a total cipher; no backstory, no motive, nothing. The rest of the characters are one-note idiots. The jump scares are all obvious. The only thing this movie had going for it was the violence.
There is a lot of gore, and it's pretty well done. Now, I can handle blood and guts; the original Dawn of the Dead is one of my all-time favorite movies of all time. And granted, there is one scene in this movie that almost made me quit watching. But by the end there was so much gore that I didn't care anymore.
I thought the opening sequence was setting up a big reveal about Art's identity, but it's never brought up again. And the ending, with the sudden infusion of the supernatural, made no damn sense.
Yeah, I won't be bothering with the sequels.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 11, 2024 23:44:26 GMT -5
Tonight was a double feature. First, the Hammer version of The Phantom of the Opera, starring Herbert Lom in the title role and Michael Gough as the sleazy Lord D'Arcy. I've seen it once before and I must say, it is rather underwhelming and dull. Hammer pretty much dumped most of Gaston LeRoux's classic mystery/horror novel and replaced it with a rather tepid tale of revenge for theft of one's art. The setting is transported from the Paris Opera House to a theater in London, where Lord D'arcy's new opera, Saint Joan, is to debut. The production has been beset by calamities and pranks, with the conductor's music going missing, a kettle drum punctured, sets torn, costumes damaged, etc. Then, the opening aria, by the star, is interrupted by the sudden appearance of a hanged stagehand. The star departs and a new singer must be found, which brings in Christine Charles, who soon hears a voice offering to teach her to play the role and develop her voice.
Gone from the story is Christine's romance with Raoul de Chagny, replaced by one with producer Harry Hunter, played by Edward De Souza. The original diva is not murdered, but scared away. The Phantom is no longer the tragic Erik and there is no Persian. Instead, The Phantom is a Professor Petrie, who composed the opera of Saint Joan and sold it to Lord D'arcy to have it published. he removed Petrie's name and put his own. petrie learns of the theft and tries to destroy the printings of it, at the print shop, but starts a fire and grabs nitric acid, instead of water, to put it out, scarring his face and hands with the fire and acid. He is found in the storm sewer by a dwarf, who rescues him and tends to him, and who aids him throughout.
The film really lacks the compelling mystery of the original story and the simple art theft, compared to the tragedy of birth defects in Erik, falls flat. Moving the setting to London removes some of the exotic appeal and the theater setting lacks the grandeur described in LeRoux's novel, of the Paris Opera House, inspired by the real Palais Garnier. The crashing chandelier is transposed to the climax, rather than the opening act and is one of the few elements from the original used, though with a far different result. Lom is fine and so are the other actors, but it pales compared to the silent version, with Lon Chaney, even in the make-up department, for Lom.
One upside is a character performance, as a rat catcher, by future Doctor Who Patrick Troughton, who turns in a memorable small performance.
The film was commissioned by Universal, through Hammer and the budget was low, but the script is what holds it back. Terence Fisher directs and uses techniques like Dutch angles, when depicting the past, with Professor Petrie and Lord D'arcy. It's just that none of that really aids the story. Not one of Hammer's classics.
On the plus side was the other feature: the ABC telemovie Trilogy of Terror, based on three Richard Matheson stories and directed by Dan Curtis, creator of the gothic horror soap opera, Dark Shadows. The film stars Karen Black in 4 roles, within three stories. In the first, Julie, she plays a college literature professor, who becomes the object of obsession by a student, who wonder what she looks like, under her conservative and drab clothes. She dresses plainly, with little make up, hair in a bun, and is shy and mousy. Despite prohibitions, she gives in to the student's proposition of a date, to go see a French vampire movie, at a drive-in. The student drugs her, takes her to a motel room, and takes explicit photos of her. He then uses them to blackmail her into engaging in sex and other acts.
In the second segment, Millicent and Therese, Black plays sisters, who live in their family house, after the death of their father. Millicent is prim and proper and a spinster, who abhors her sister and her affairs and claims she seduced their father into incest. Therese is a blond party girl, very aggressive with men, who dresses provocatively, smokes and drinks heavily, and treats people with contempt. Millicent consults the family doctor and is persuaded to come speak to Millicent, but finds Therese, who taunts him with lewd and insulting suggestions and questions. Millicent decides that Therese must die and creates a voodoo doll of Therese. we then see the doctor return to the house and find Therese dead.
The final segment, Amelia, is the most famous, as a woman buys a Zuni fetish doll, from a curio shop, which comes with a scroll, warning not to remove the chain around the doll. It accidentally breaks off and Amelia soon finds herself attacked by the original Chucky doll, the knife-wielding fetish. The segment is pretty damn creepy, though it is hard to take it seriously after the Simpsons lampooned it, on Treehouse of Horror, with a murderous Krusty dol. "Here's your problem; someone set this thing to evil!"
All of the segments have twist endings, as one would expect from a contributor to the Twilight Zone and one of the masters of horror and suspense. The first two segments are adapted by William F Nolan, who also wrote for television and co-wrote the original novel of Logan's Run and its sequels. Matheson adapts his own story, "Prey," for the Amelia segment, which was an inspiration for the Child's Play horror franchise, with the killer doll Chucky.
Karen Black is great in the multiple roles and the rest of the cast includes John Karlen, of Dark Shadows and Tyne Daily's husband Harv, on Cagney and Lacy, as well as George Gaynes, of Tootsie, Punky Brewster and Police Academy fame, as Commandant Lassard. There is a small role by a very young Gregory Harrison, who appears at the end of the Juile segment, which might have helped put him on the radar for the tv adaptation of Logan's Run.
Curtis and Matheson would work together again for the telemovie The Night Stalker, which introduced Carl Kolchak, played by Darren McGavin, as a reporter who investigates several killings, which suggests a vampire. That led to a sequel, The Night Strangler, and the short-lived series, Kolchak, The Night Stalker, which influenced The X-Files and McGavin was enticed to play a retired FBI agent, who started the X-Files, after turning down offers to play Kolchak, again, on the show, as well as Mulder's father.
Curtis and Nolan collaborated on a second trilogy of Terror, with Krull actress Lysette Anthony starring, in 1996. Like Black, Anthony played characters in each of three segments.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,870
|
Post by shaxper on Oct 12, 2024 0:40:37 GMT -5
Reliving my first ever guilty-pleasure horror franchise tonight: the Nightmare on Elm Street series. Such a highly uneven series, and yet it's so much fun, and the better parts use the horror as allegory for real-world issues, which I always respect.
I knew I didn't have time to watch them all tonight, so I started with 3, as I've always felt 3 and 4 were the heart of the series. I absolutely loathe 5 but decided to give it another try with an open mind tonight, and--dear god--it was worse than I'd remembered. And 6 is such an impressive balance of awesome and embarrassingly bad that I never know what to make of it.
But Part 4? That will always be my absolute favorite. Better direction, better writing, better flow, and Alice remains my favorite horror protagonist of all time, even beating out Laurie Strode (Halloween).
Time permitting, i hope to finally watch New Nightmare and Freddy vs. Jason (for the sake of completion) soon. I've heard great things about New Nightmare, and the exact opposite for FvJ.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Oct 12, 2024 2:35:20 GMT -5
Reliving my first ever guilty-pleasure horror franchise tonight: the Nightmare on Elm Street series. Such a highly uneven series, and yet it's so much fun, and the better parts use the horror as allegory for real-world issues, which I always respect. I knew I didn't have time to watch them all tonight, so I started with 3, as I've always felt 3 and 4 were the heart of the series. I absolutely loathe 5 but decided to give it another try with an open mind tonight, and--dear god--it was worse than I'd remembered. And 6 is such an impressive balance of awesome and embarrassingly bad that I never know what to make of it. But Part 4? That will always be my absolute favorite. Better direction, better writing, better flow, and Alice remains my favorite horror protagonist of all time, even beating out Laurie Strode (Halloween). Time permitting, i hope to finally watch New Nightmare and Freddy vs. Jason (for the sake of completion) soon. I've heard great things about New Nightmare, and the exact opposite for FvJ. The first one of this series or franchise is another famous horror movie I haven't seen. It's actually playing here later in the month but for one night only and of course I have to work. I'll watch it at home one of these days. I have seen one of the later entries and thought it was all right but not being familiar with the any of the previous films it didn't make a big impression.
|
|
|
Post by MWGallaher on Oct 12, 2024 6:25:56 GMT -5
Playing catch-up, I watched The Crone (2013), a Japanese movie that blends found footage/urban exploring/ghost hunting with body horror and curses. It follows a trio of would-be idols, a cute, backstabbing, modestly talented singing group called Jersey Girls, whose video exploration of a haunted abandoned hospital leads to disastrous consequences for them and their management team. There’s little fresh here, but the mélange of tropes results in a watchable enough little film. The coherence was a little off, so it was occasionally hard to follow, but it seemed to have a theme, muddled though it was among the trappings. I was mildly impressed by the actresses’ abilities to be more and more awkward and uncomfortable in their performances as the impact of the curse they’ve unleashed becomes evident. I followed with Cube 2: Hypercube, which pushes a lot of my buttons: my love for what I call WTFiction, where much is left inexplicable, my fascination with endless spaces (which long preceded the current Backrooms fascination), and my interest in higher-dimensional physics and math. Like its predecessor, Cube, the sequel follows a group of strangers who find themselves in a maze of cubes, many of which are equipped with death traps. This time, the cubes are in a 4-dimensional space, so taking a passage leading downward from one cube may lead to entering the connected tube not necessarily from its ceiling, but from its floor or one of its sides. It’s not a perfect way to convey the hypercube, but it gets to some of the more easily-grasped aspects of this mathematical construct.
|
|