|
Post by Jeddak on Oct 6, 2024 17:03:40 GMT -5
1313 Cougar Cult - 2012 - Linnea Quigley, Michelle Bauer and Brinke Stevens were 3 of the best-known Scream Queens of the '80s. Maybe they were more famous for their nude scenes and screaming than their acting, but they satisfied their fans. So why not reunite them decades later? (We interrupt this review for my Linnea Quigley story. I've met her twice, at a convention in New York and at a signing in Wyoming. We had time to talk about her movies and her animal rescue efforts. At the convention, my wife put her autographed photo in a sleeve too soon, and the marker smeared. In Wyoming, she recognized me as soon as I reached the table, and when I told her about the smear, she dug out a copy of the same photo and signed it as a free replacement. She's a sweetheart.) Anyway, the movie is about these three cougars (middle-aged women who prey on young men) who turn into cougars (fangs and growls), and who sacrifice those young men to their goddess for immortality. But the plot doesn't matter. The acting ranges from porn flick underwhelming to campy overacting. Special effects? The transformation scenes are accomplished by putting a picture of a cougar's head over the actress's head. Nope, this movie exists for one thing - the skin. At least half the run time is long, lingering shots of young hotties in the shower, or laying in bed in their underwear caressing themselves, or just walking around in their underwear. The kicker - it's all guys. Call it gender reversal to underscore the ludicrous nature of such scenes in these movies. Or maybe it's just payback, for all those times the three leads had to take their clothes off.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 6, 2024 19:42:09 GMT -5
1313 Cougar Cult - 2012 - Linnea Quigley, Michelle Bauer and Brinke Stevens were 3 of the best-known Scream Queens of the '80s. Maybe they were more famous for their nude scenes and screaming than their acting, but they satisfied their fans. So why not reunite them decades later? (We interrupt this review for my Linnea Quigley story. I've met her twice, at a convention in New York and at a signing in Wyoming. We had time to talk about her movies and her animal rescue efforts. At the convention, my wife put her autographed photo in a sleeve too soon, and the marker smeared. In Wyoming, she recognized me as soon as I reached the table, and when I told her about the smear, she dug out a copy of the same photo and signed it as a free replacement. She's a sweetheart.) Anyway, the movie is about these three cougars (middle-aged women who prey on young men) who turn into cougars (fangs and growls), and who sacrifice those young men to their goddess for immortality. But the plot doesn't matter. The acting ranges from porn flick underwhelming to campy overacting. Special effects? The transformation scenes are accomplished by putting a picture of a cougar's head over the actress's head. Nope, this movie exists for one thing - the skin. At least half the run time is long, lingering shots of young hotties in the shower, or laying in bed in their underwear caressing themselves, or just walking around in their underwear. The kicker - it's all guys. Call it gender reversal to underscore the ludicrous nature of such scenes in these movies. Or maybe it's just payback, for all those times the three leads had to take their clothes off. I know Bauer more for her work under the name Pia Snow than her own name, though I recall references in Steranko's Prevue film magazine (Quigley, as well). Brinke, of course, was married to Dave Stevens and posed as Betty/Bettie Page, in several iconic Rocketeer pin-ups and as Page, in other pin-ups. I'm not sure if I have ever seen her in a movie or not. I caught one with Quigley, once, on USA's Night Flight (or was it Up All Night, in the Rhonda Shear era?) EDIT: I take that back. Brinke Stevens had a non-speaking role in All The Marbles, which I have seen multiple times! I do recall flipping through Invasion of the B-Girls, by Jewel Shepard, which featured interviews with all 3, and various other scream queens and B-movie actresses. The book was published by Eclipse comics, when they were trying to branch into more pop culture things and I saw a copy in a local comic shop, which used to carry more non-mainstream stuff, like NBM and Catalan Communications' European translations, more indie comics and some adult comics, like the Eros line and Apple Comics' Forbidden Fruit imprint (and some of Malibu's )
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 7, 2024 1:07:37 GMT -5
My next viewing was Dracula AD 1972, the last to feature both peter Cushing and Christopher Lee, moving the action to modern London, as Cushing is the grandson of Lawrence Van Helsing and Stephanie Beachum is his granddaughter, Jessica, who is mixed up with a bunch of hippies. Nothing worse than a bunch of damn, dirty hippies...except middle class, damn dirty hippies, except middle class damn, dirty hippies who have black masses in deconsecrated churches and raise vampires from the dead......except maybe middle class damn, dirty hippies who become yuppies. Even vampires have standards! Seriously, Jessica and her friends are out for a good time, like crashing snooty upper class parties, with bad American rock bands, and dingy coffee houses, named after clubs where the Beatles played. Christopher Neame is Johnny Alucard, servant of the dark lord, but Cushing has to write it down and draw lines before he can work out the connection to Dracula. Johnny cons the rest into messing around in the occult, because it's a wild scene, man! Groovy! Sadly, the first one sacrificed is Caroline Munro and Drac is back. It's occasionally silly, but a fairly good exercise in modern vampires and Neame is a memorable vampire servant. Stephanie Beachum is in all her youthful glory, aside from a female mullet and heaves a pretty good bosom, in the climax. Cushing is brought into things by the police, then finds out his granddaughter has a connection to a murder victim found at a church scheduled for demolition....which just happened to host a demonic ritual. He fumbles around a bit, advising the police, then prepares to fight vampires, with silver crosses, a silver dagger, some holy water, a bunch of stakes, and a short spade. So, with the sounds of some funky music, he sets a trap for Drac, has a knife fight with Johnny Alucard, and spends a lot longer figuring out that Alucard is Dracula backwards (I figured it out 2 minutes into the film, when his surname is uttered. I mean, it's not like he called himself Cradlau, which would have taken a bit longer to decipher. The only thing that would have been easier if he called himself Dr Acula, MD (Monster Doctor). This film was treated rather lightly, in the day, but gained a following, over the years, especially by critic and author Kim Newman, who drew inspiration for his own Johnny Alucard, in his Anno Dracula series. Why Hollywood hasn't come knocking to film the books is beyond me, though they'd have to lose a good portion of the easter eggs, for copyright reasons. Not the greatest Hammer Dracula, but not the worst and a nice change of pace from the usual film. It even has Michael Kitchen, of Foyle's War, as one of Stephanie Beachum's friends....back when he had a full head of hair. I'd have been happier if Drac had bitten a few more hippies....maybe a Sloane Ranger or two (thousand). I'd say he could go to town on the City stockbrokers and merchant bankers; but, he'd probably avoid them, out of professional courtesy.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Oct 7, 2024 1:08:02 GMT -5
Catching up on the last few days viewing:
La Chute de la Maison Usher (The Fall of the House of Usher), a 1928 silent directed by Jean Epstein. I'd say this is one of the most faithful film adaptations of Poe that I've seen, even though it doesn't entirely stick to the text: it changes Madeleine from Roderick Usher's sister to his wife, for example. But overall it's much closer than the Karloff/Lugosi films or the Roger Corman ones. Very strong on atmosphere, even in the not great print I found online. I since found what I think is a better one and with a different soundtrack, so I'll try it again one of these days.
Alraune (1928), directed by Henrik Galeen. This is routinely listed as a classic early film in both SF and horror and technically speaking that's fair enough: the premise - an artificial woman created by a scientific application of a old superstition - partakes of both genres. And it does start off with a spooky midnight scene with the body of a hanged man still on the gallows. But after that the atmosphere felt to me much more reminiscent of other German social dramas or melodramas of the era like The Blue Angel or Pandora's Box that focus on a beautiful but seemingly amoral young woman and the havoc she wreaks on the lives of the men attracted to her. So for me, an excellent movie, highly recommended, but not really a Hallowe'en movie.
The Student of Prague (1926), also from Henrik Galeen, is on the other hand definitely a Hallowe'en movie. A penniless student sells his reflection (or his soul?) to obtain riches and a woman he desires. This definitely has a strong horror ambience from start to finish. Lots of cool stuff, with ideas drawn from Faust, Peter Schlemiel, and perhaps Poe's William Wilson, as the reflection act as an evil doppelganger in some scenes. It would be interesting to see a Herzog or someone do a modern remake of this one.
|
|
|
Post by MRPs_Missives on Oct 7, 2024 2:33:28 GMT -5
Off to a late start, watch 2 very different movies today.
Paprika (2006) I'm not a huge anime watcher, but I wan to explore more, so I searched best horror anime to see what I might find for Halloween viewing, and one of the movies that came up was Paprika from 2006, which our local library had and I borrowed. It's more sci-fi thriller, but has a lot of body horror, some tentacle horror and lots of creepy clowns and porcelain dolls so it fits in horror as well. The basic premise revolved around a device that lets others look in and enter your dreams, and a lot of the story takes place in the dreamscape. I get why it makes a lot of the best of lists it did, but it didn't hit quite that way with me. I liked it, didn't love it.
Color Out of Space (2019) This alleged Lovecraft adaptation features Nick Cage as one of the leads. It is an attempt to modernize the Lovecraft story and partakes of the cardinal sin of trying to make Lovecraft stories into action and gore vehicles, so loses all the Lovecraft feel, and in fact, aside from the basic premise (a meteor crashes into a remote farm and messes with everything) , it pretty much abandons the plot and details of the actual Lovecraft story. It's not a bad cosmic horror sci-fi flick, but it is a terrible adaptation of the Lovecraft story.
-M
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on Oct 7, 2024 5:35:36 GMT -5
For my choice last night I tried another new flick, Late Phases...and unlike my last two new watches this one was actually pretty good. To be sure, it definitely falls solidly into the B-Movie side of things so you have to be in that kind of head space if you're going to watch it. The premise is this Ambrose McKinley, a blind Vietnam vet, moves into what he thinks is a nice, quiet retirement community but on his first night there hears his next door neighbor get brutally murdered and almost suffers the same fate were it not for his German Shepard seeing eye dog who dies fending off the attacker...who is a werewolf. Of course no believes the blind old man, with the police dismissing the deaths as animal attacks that happen from time to time. With no help from the Police Ambrose sets out to find the werewolf and stop it himself and sets out to booby trap his house and on next full moon with the help of his trusty service rifle he takes out not just one werewolf but a whole pack of them. Yup, you read that last bit right. A blind man meticulously shoots and kills a whole pack of werewolves with a sniper rifle. So yeah, you definitely have to have a pretty heavy suspension of disbelief here, but other than that it works pretty well. It really plays well off of the state of care for the elderly in the US and how dismissed they tend to be as a population. I mean, it obviously exaggerates that with the police being totally nonchalant about a series of murders that crop up only in this secluded elderly community once every month but that aside it does have a strong metaphorical message that makes the film deeper than just a guy fighting werewolves. And the werewolves themselves? They're clearly dudes in harry rubber suites, but the director knew that and used them sparingly and only in the dark so the deficiencies weren't as noticeable. Thinking about it, for as much love as I have for vampires and for as many vampire movies I own I think despite there being fewer of them that there might be more hidden gems that are werewolf films than any of the other monsters.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 7, 2024 8:25:48 GMT -5
The Strange Vice of Mrs. Wardh (Sergio Martino, 1971)
If Martino can't match Bava or Argento for artistry, he sure makes up for it with plenty of vice. In fact, a line in this film inspires another picture of his named Your Vice Is a Locked Room and Only I Have the Key. This is an interesting giallo as it's less about the slasher and more of a suspense thriller with multiple twist endings. I wouldn't call it a horror film. It was more of a crime film, imo, with a strong Les Diaboliques influence. Worth watching, though.
The House by the Cemetery (Lucio Fulci, 1981)
This was the third film in Fulci's Gates of Hell trilogy. It's more of a traditional haunted house story than a supernatural zombie thriller, and is only loosely connected to the other two films (there is no gate to speak of in the film and the dead don't return to life.) It takes a while to get going, but once it does it's just as gruesome as the other films. I felt bad for the child actor who had to shoot such horrific scenes. I don't want to give away too much about the film, but the "monster" is by far the most terrifying of any film I've watched so far. The film was Fulci's most financially successful film of the 80s but was panned by critics. Clearly, they weren't chilling watching Halloween flicks for an all-month marathon because this was far from boring.
|
|
|
Post by jtrw2024 on Oct 7, 2024 11:04:21 GMT -5
Week 1
Dracula (1931)
I watched this with the alternate score, thanks to Shaxper's recommendation. I've always like the movie with its usual score, but I'll have to make a note to alternate with this version on occasion, just to keep things interesting
Cat People (1942) Curse of the Cat People (1944)
I'd never watched these before, and didn't even know what they were about, but I probably heard the names somewhere. TCM had both of them back-to-back and they sounded like horror/mystery type movies, so that caught my attention. I'm glad I watched these. They're not really scary movies, or at least not what I consider scary, but I think they're really well done. The second movie was my favourite of the two
On the TV side of things, I caught up with the first 3 episodes of Agatha All Along. I didn't like Wandavision as much as other people seem to, but I did like the parts with Agatha Harkness, and I'm enjoying this series. I'll probably catch up this week on episode 4, (and 5 as well, once its out). I think this wraps up towards the end of October which seems appropriate
I've probably got a few other movies either stored on my PVR, or set to record, plus whatever catches my eye on the streaming services. I don't necessarily have time to watch movies everyday, but I'll fit in as many as I can
|
|
|
Post by Jeddak on Oct 7, 2024 14:34:00 GMT -5
Your Vice is a Locked Room, and Only I Have the Key - 1972 - Quite a title, eh? As commond has said, the title comes from another movie. It doesn't actually mean much; one of the alternate titles of this film, Eye of the Black Cat, works better. But hey, the title got me to watch the film, so it did its job.
We start with a really unlikable guy and his abused wife. There are some killings, and unlikable guy is the obvious suspect, even forcing his wife to help cover for him. But things get twisty when the killer is revealed and killed halfway through the movie. And the twists don't stop, culminating in a reveal about who's really behind everything that's been going on that I never saw coming.
It's well shot, well acted, and more about the 3 main characters than about the killings. Not a lot of gore, but there is suspense and intensity. And a really creepy use of a black cat. The movie drew me in and kept me involved till the end. Good stuff.
Though the ending itself was a little disappointing; I wanted the one character to get away with it all.
And I may be falling in love with Edwige Fenech. Definitely need to check out more of her films.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Oct 7, 2024 20:05:52 GMT -5
Today I watched Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein.
This is my favorite monster movie ever. Yeah it’s a comedy. But only part of the cast is playing it as comedy. The monsters play it about 95% straight. I honestly think this may be Lugosi’s best performance. And Chaney is quite good. There is some truth in advertising issues, as the Monster is kind of just an add-on, but it’s still a great film. And Vincent Price voicing The Invisible Man at the very end is brilliant.
I do have to wonder about guys just answering other people’s phones. It happened two or three times in this movie. Hell, I didn’t even answer my Grandparents phone, much less a total strangers.
|
|
|
Post by MRPs_Missives on Oct 7, 2024 20:07:17 GMT -5
Today I watched Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. This is my favorite monster movie ever. Yeah it’s a comedy. But only part of the cast is playing it as comedy. The monsters play it about 95% straight. I honestly think this may be Lugosi’s best performance. And Chaney is quite good. There is some truth in advertising issues, as the Monster is kind of just an add-on, but it’s still a great film. And Vincent Price voicing The Invisible Man at the very end is brilliant. I do have to wonder about guys just answering other people’s phones. It happened two or three times in this movie. Hell, I didn’t even answer my Grandparents phone, much less a total strangers. The Abbott and Costello Meets movies were my gateway into the classic Universal monsters as a kid. -M
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Oct 7, 2024 20:45:49 GMT -5
Today I watched Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. This is my favorite monster movie ever. Yeah it’s a comedy. But only part of the cast is playing it as comedy. The monsters play it about 95% straight. I honestly think this may be Lugosi’s best performance. And Chaney is quite good. There is some truth in advertising issues, as the Monster is kind of just an add-on, but it’s still a great film. And Vincent Price voicing The Invisible Man at the very end is brilliant. I do have to wonder about guys just answering other people’s phones. It happened two or three times in this movie. Hell, I didn’t even answer my Grandparents phone, much less a total strangers. The Abbott and Costello Meets movies were my gateway into the classic Universal monsters as a kid. -M Mine too. My Mom would stay up and watch the late show with me on Friday or Saturday if it was Abbott & Costello, Martin & Lewis or Ma & Pa Kettle. The A&C films led me to stay up and watch the Universal monsters.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 8, 2024 1:51:35 GMT -5
More Hammer tonight, with The Revenge of Frankenstein. Baron Frankenstein is sentenced to the guillotine and is beheaded.....or was he? Nope. He pulled a switcheroo, with the aid of the executioner and a deformed man, named Carl. He escapes and goes to carlsbruck, where, 3 years later, he has established himself as Dr Stein, a favorite of wealthy hypochondriacs and an aid to the poor, in another clinic. He draws the ire of the Medical Council, who have lost wealthy and influential patients to him and he refuses to join their ranks. One of their members, Dr Hans Kleve, goes to see him and recognizes him as Baron Frankenstein and asks to become his pupil and learn his secrets. Dr Frankenstein has actually been using the clinic as a cover for collecting amputated body parts, to construct a new being. he will transfer Carl's brain into a more handsome version, improving on his last experiment. Hands aids him and they succeed is transporting Carl's brain into the new body, but not in eliminating Carl's nerve memories of his deformities and the bullying of one of Frankenstein's other henchmen.
Terrific film, one of Hammer's best, with Dr Frankenstein shown to be a nuanced evil, as he continues to pursue his experiments, not caring for those who suffer in the name of his perverted science. He kills a grave robber (Lionel Jeffries), though by fright and a bad heart, but also seems to take healthy limbs, for his experiments. Carl's mind is not sound, due to years of abuse and low self esteem. He tries to destroy his old body and is found by a bully, who worked for Frankenstein, who takes pleasure in beating the transformed Carl, until Carl fights back and kills him.
Peter Cushing plays the cool, calculating Baron, who cares not for impediments to his designs and will kill without conscience, though he is show to have some empathy. His work is what is important. Francis Matthews (who voiced Captain Scarlett, turning in his audial resemblance to Cary Grant up to 11), is Hans, who seeks to learn Frankenstein's secrets. Eunice Gayson (Sylvia Trench, in the first 2 Bond films) is Margaret, the privileged niece of an influential countess comes to work at the clinic for the poor and has pity for poor Carl, then aids his new body in escaping, through an abundance of charity, but not good sense.
Wonderfully done film, with fine acting and a good script, with well rounded characters and motivations. The Hammer Frankenstein is a favorite, as the Baron descends further and further into evil with each transgression. He is the ultimate Hammer villain, even more than Count Dracula, as Dracula is driven as much by thirst, as a lust for power. Frankenstein seeks to play god, with little remorse for those he uses. He starts off somewhat sympathetic, in The Curse of Frankenstein; but transforms across that film, as he creates his creature, then the continuing series finds him cheating death and carrying out more horrible experiences, kidnapping and murdering to perpetuate them, or hide his identity. he is amoral cunning, while Dracula is more a force of nature. You could do a really great 19th century adventure horror series, using Dr Frankenstein and Dracula as the central villains, aided by monsters and allies, opposed by heroes like Captain Kronos and Dr Van Helsing, as well as other adventurers, in a battle against their twisted evil. Planetary kind of hinted at that, when we saw the hidden past clues of Elijah Snow, as he seeks out Sherlock Holmes, who is under the control of Dracula, while the monsters of Frankenstein attack Snow, in the lab. Imagine such a group against an earlier League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, such as that of Sir Percy and Lady Blakeney, Lemuel Gulliver, Fannie Hill, Natty Bumpo and Dr Christopher Synn.
Fantastic stuff.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on Oct 8, 2024 2:40:49 GMT -5
Any Lon Chaney (Sr.) experts and/or fans out there? Because my Hallowe'en movie tonight was The Monster (1925) a Lon Chaney horror-comedy that I never heard of until a few days ago. Since I'm reading a book from 1912 I started looking for the earliest horror movies I could find and this one came up so I gave it a try.
Lo and behold, it was really good: the comedy parts were funny and the scary parts were still scary. After an opening scene that sets up the horror scenario the comedy stuff dominated the screen-time a bit too much for the next 25 minutes or so, but after that it's a very effective blend of the two genres. Lon Chaney plays a mad scientist - according to wikipedia, one of the first in film history - and the action in the last 2/3 takes place in a a supposedly empty sanatorium that turns out to be full of hidden passages, etc - again according to wiki one of the earliest instances of the "spooky old house" in film history.
|
|
|
Post by jtrw2024 on Oct 8, 2024 4:29:56 GMT -5
Today I watched Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. This is my favorite monster movie ever. Yeah it’s a comedy. But only part of the cast is playing it as comedy. The monsters play it about 95% straight. I honestly think this may be Lugosi’s best performance. And Chaney is quite good. There is some truth in advertising issues, as the Monster is kind of just an add-on, but it’s still a great film. And Vincent Price voicing The Invisible Man at the very end is brilliant. I do have to wonder about guys just answering other people’s phones. It happened two or three times in this movie. Hell, I didn’t even answer my Grandparents phone, much less a total strangers. This is one of those movies I revisit frequently, and I expect I'll get to it this year too. It's interesting that even though Bela Lugosi seems to be so well associated with Dracula, he only really played him in the first movie, and in this one. I still consider all the Universal Monster movies (and the Abbott and Costello ones too) to be part of one big shared cinematic universe despite any inconsistencies that may pop-up. In Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein, Lon Chaney even refers to his previous meetings with Dracula when confronting Lugosi, even though it was actually John Carradine with whom he interacted, which is a nice bit of continuity
|
|