OK, I'm back from holiday and I've just re-read the first three issues of
Dark Empire. Overall, I think this series makes for a pretty strong revival of
Star Wars comics, even if it is ultimately inferior to Timothy Zahn's Thrawn trilogy of books.
Tom Vietch's writing is pretty good and he manages to capture the "voices" of most of the main cast members. I love the "story so far" recaps at the start of each issue and how they are formatted like the opening crawl from the original trilogy.
Dave Dorman's cover art is pretty good for the most part. In particular, I like that some of the covers look like unused
Star Wars movie posters, rather than a traditional comic book cover. Just like the "story so far" crawl on the first page of each issue, these painted covers somehow make the series feel more important than just another comic book and more like a proper sequel to
Return of the Jedi.
Anyway, here are a few comments related to specific parts your excellent reviews,
wildfire2099 ...
Dark Empire #1 My view: ...I know it's not for everyone, and at times it gets a bit TOO sketchy, but for the most part I really love the art and coloring, it matches the mood well and the characters are all instantly recognizable...
I have always quite liked Cam Kennedy's artwork and I already knew him when
Dark Empire came out from his work on Judge Dredd and Rogue Trooper in
2000AD. But
Dark Empire might well be the best art that I've ever seen from him. He manages to tell the story very clearly, while still capturing the Lucas-style "faster, more intense!" flavour of the action sequences that we expect from a
Star Wars movie. I'm reminded that originally this series was supposed to be published as a 3-issue prestige format series and I think Kennedy is raising his game here art-wise, knowing that this wasn't "just" another comic book series.
That said, I do NOT like the colouring and never have. I don't necessarily expect everything in a comic to be coloured realistically, but the florescent pinks, greens, reds and blues that bathe everything make it look like the story is happening in a discoteque! Not that the colouring choices spoil my enjoyment at all, but still, I'm really not a fan of the day-glo palette used.
...yet Luke is clearly not ok.. that is not how he looks on the cover
Yeah, I think Kennedy goes out of his way to deliberately draw Luke unlike how he looked in the original trilogy. His depictions of Han, Leia and Lando...and even the Emperor a bit later on...are very good and instantly recognisable as the characters we know and love from the films. But Luke is definitely off and I think that is a deliberate choice to underscore how fraught and over-burdened he has become by the encroaching Dark Side.
The discussion of the center of the Empire is referred to as the 'Imperial System' and 'Imperial City'...not yet called Coruscant. It's also clear it's not the hyper-developed planet-city we have now, as there are open fields where battles are happening.
I think this is something that is a holdover from when the story was first written for Marvel, back in late 1989 and early 1990. Timothy Zahn's
Heir to the Empire book, which was the first place where the Imperial Capital Planet was named as Coruscant, came out in 1991 and was likely started after DE was complete. Certainly, it was published after DE was finished. Vietch may've done a little bit of tweaking to get things to line up more with
Heir to the Empire – such as referring to Han and Leia's twins, though they weren't named as Jacen and Jaina Solo. Likewise, Thrawn isn't actually mentioned in the story itself, if memory serves, right? Nor is there any mention of Mara Jade or Jorus C'baoth. Even if Vietch saw an early draft of Zahn's book, those characters may not have been named in it yet.
Incidentally, the concept of an "Imperial Capital Planet" or "Imperial City" originates from an early draft of the script for
Return of the Jedi, in which George Lucas was toying with the idea of an Imperial world called Had Abbadon (Ralph McQuarrie even did concept art for it). The Imperial Capital Planet was first mentioned in print in Marvel's
Star Wars #61, written by David Michelinie in early 1982.
Due to the moody lighting and coloring of the issue, it's not totally clear what lightsaber Luke is using... it appears light blue, but so does everything else that is energy related.
I have always assumed it was the lightsabre that he constructed on Tatooine as part of his Jedi training, in order to replace his father's, which was lost on Cloud City. Not that Kennedy draws it remotely resembling that lightsaber, of course, but yeah...I'm pretty sure that's what it's supposed to be.
Dark Empire #2 ...Boy, things sure are moving fast...
Yes, they are moving fast. I love that about Vietch's story pacing: it's very much like the full-throttle storytelling of the first three
Star Wars films.
It feels very rushed, especially with key details not mentioned in the first issue suddenly popping in, namely Wedge being one of the people saved and that the 'storm' the got Luke was made of the the Dark Side somehow.
I agree. Issue #2 definitely feels less tightly plotted than issue #1.
That said, I LOVE the World Devastators.. conquering the galaxies with giant floating factories? Yes, please.
Ha! this will be our first point of real disagreement. I always thought that the World Devastators sucked.
Kennedy's design for them looks cr*p, but I also find it cringy how often Vietch has to have characters telling the readers that these things are far more lethal than the Death Star. I mean, c'mon…the World Devastators (God, I hate that name) are clearly a pretty big threat, but more lethal than a moon-sized battle-station that could destroy an entire planet with one superlaser blast? I don't think so!
Its now extremely clear that the last movie took this plot (and mangled it horribly).. spliting the part of Luke into two new characters, among other bad decisions.
I've still never watched
The Rise of Skywalker – I was too annoyed by
The Last Jedi to bother watching it. But yes, from the little I know of the film's plot, it does indeed sound very reminiscent of
Dark Empire.
Dark Empire #3 ...leading to her being sure she has to go save him, and my favorite line in the book:
Yeah, Han's "voice" isn't always perfect in this series, but that's an example of Vietch really nailing it. You can definitely hear Harrison Ford saying that line.
Unfortunately, at other times the characterisation of Han just seems kinda off. I mean, at one point (in issue #2, I believe) Vietch has Solo uttering the word "Gosh!" I really can't imagine Ford saying that!
To be honest, this slightly off characterisation of Solo was also a recurring problem in the old Marvel series too, especially under the pens of Roy Thomas and Archie Goodwin.
why is Lando is charge of space combat again? He was the governor of a planet, how does that qualify him he run a fleet?
Well, don't forget that there were all those stories about Lando's "little manoeuvre at the battle of tanaab". Plus, he was a seasoned veteran of the second Death Star battle.
But hey, this is the same Rebel Alliance who let Luke Skywalker fly an X-Wing Fighter against the first Death Star -- their most perilous and important battle to date -- with little more experience than bulls-eyeing womp rats in his T-16 back home!
That makes it seem the big battle in Return of the Jedi was a lot less exciting... sure they took out the 2nd Death Star, but we know now the Emperor lived.. how much damage did it really do? (This was Zahn's argument against bringing him back).
In a nutshell, this is my entire argument against anything involving the Skywalker family that is set after RotJ. Whatever you have happen, be it the resurrection of the Emperor, the resurgence of the Empire (or First Order, whatever), or an alien invasion from outside the SW galaxy, it will always devalue the ending of
Return of the Jedi. That particular story ends with RotJ.
The only adventures that really work for me, without undermining the character arcs and sacrifices in the original trilogy, are those that don't centre on Luke, Leia, Han, or the Empire. Like
The Mandalorian or the
Crimson Empire comic trilogy.
Vima is the first of what I recall are a few references that end up setting up Tales of the Jedi (or maybe that's in Dark Empire II? We'll see!). I know for sure the events between her and Leia are referenced again later in the books.
Leia's encounter with Vima-Da-Boda here really made an impression on me back when I first read this issue. She's such a mysterious character and it's great that the foundations of the later
Tales of the Jedi comics are being laid.
One continuity error that I think you might've missed: General Rieekan makes an appearance in this issue, but established canon at this point was that he had been killed during the battle of Hoth, as detailed in the
Empire Strikes Back novelization by Donald F. Glut.
Anyway, great reviews Wildfire2099. Keep 'em coming!