|
|
Post by Phil Maurice on Sept 14, 2015 18:23:00 GMT -5
I thought about the fact that it's comic-related but not a comic. Does that disqualify my entry ? Would pulp covers count ? Your Howard cover was the one I almost went with. Tough one. To my thinking, the cover that gets the most votes wins. Vox populi. However, there are certain accepted practices that we adhere to, such as a cover requiring a decade before eligibility. I'm personally fine with pulp covers, but I don't think that should open the door to all covers. Jane Austen, for example, has no place in this contest.  |
|
|
|
Post by benday-dot on Sept 14, 2015 18:59:21 GMT -5
I thought about the fact that it's comic-related but not a comic. Does that disqualify my entry ? Would pulp covers count ? Your Howard cover was the one I almost went with. Hey... great minds think alike. I'd just go with it unless mrp (who is responsible for this week's theme, and it is a great theme) says otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by benday-dot on Sept 14, 2015 19:01:07 GMT -5
I thought about the fact that it's comic-related but not a comic. Does that disqualify my entry ? Would pulp covers count ? Your Howard cover was the one I almost went with. Tough one. To my thinking, the cover that gets the most votes wins. Vox populi. However, there are certain accepted practices that we adhere to, such as a cover requiring a decade before eligibility. I'm personally fine with pulp covers, but I don't think that should open the door to all covers. Jane Austen, for example, has no place in this contest. Well it is a good thing that the date consideration already excludes this tandem:  |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Sept 14, 2015 19:21:56 GMT -5
Tough one. To my thinking, the cover that gets the most votes wins. Vox populi. However, there are certain accepted practices that we adhere to, such as a cover requiring a decade before eligibility. I'm personally fine with pulp covers, but I don't think that should open the door to all covers. Jane Austen, for example, has no place in this contest. Well it is a good thing that the date consideration already excludes this tandem: Too bad she's not with her Mummy. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2015 19:28:58 GMT -5
No mummies but zombies....  -M |
|
|
|
Post by Phil Maurice on Sept 14, 2015 19:51:06 GMT -5
Oh, it's been ages since I've had a good chastening!
Thanks all!  |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Sept 14, 2015 21:50:19 GMT -5
Oh, it's been ages since I've had a good chastening!
Thanks all! Let the canings begin! |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Sept 14, 2015 21:58:16 GMT -5
Tough one. To my thinking, the cover that gets the most votes wins. Vox populi. However, there are certain accepted practices that we adhere to, such as a cover requiring a decade before eligibility. I'm personally fine with pulp covers, but I don't think that should open the door to all covers. Jane Austen, for example, has no place in this contest. Well it is a good thing that the date consideration already excludes this tandem: I'm a huge fan of Jane Austen, and that Pride and Prejudice cover is HILARIOUS! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2015 2:05:08 GMT -5
MW Gallaher and that phenomenal Outsiders cover. but honorbale mention to Slam for that Simonson gem and MDG for posting one of my favorite Kubert covers. Any other time those would have gotten my vote but I had never seen the Outsiders cover before and was taken with it immediately.
-M
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -5
Phil Maurice, with that Adventure Comics #71!
|
|
|
|
Post by foxley on Sept 15, 2015 2:52:39 GMT -5
MatthewP.
|
|
|
|
Post by tingramretro on Sept 15, 2015 3:06:53 GMT -5
Phil Maurice
|
|
|
|
Post by Paradox on Sept 15, 2015 4:31:32 GMT -5
Slam Bradley's Unca Walt
|
|
|
|
Post by DubipR on Sept 15, 2015 6:23:19 GMT -5
MW Gallaher
|
|
|
|
Post by pinkfloydsound17 on Sept 15, 2015 7:41:08 GMT -5
It was close but Hoosier X wins it with a beauty last entry. Fantastic!
|
|
