bor
Full Member
Posts: 238
|
Post by bor on Jul 24, 2017 11:49:39 GMT -5
So I was thinking of preordering the SNES classic mini because it seems cool. 21 games from the golden era of gaming for me and it's all for $70. But then I hear how how badly things went for people that tried to get their hands on the NES classic a few months back. Scalpers basically took over everything, buying up all stock. I really can't stand people like that. Even though Nintendo says they are greatly increasing stock for this new release, I'm not going to even try to jump hoops just to be disappointed. Reading people's comments online it seems getting one of these at fair price will be an almost insurmountable task. I really just wanted to get this for my son. He's a baby now, but maybe just have this around until he is old enough to play at 5 or something. That is a while from now, but I thought it might be interesting to let him play games I used to enjoy as a kid. Emulator it is then :/ I though about buying one but the price in here Denmark is completely stupid even for normal preorders. The original store price for the nes classic was 699 DK. (A normal new xbox/ps4/nintendo game is about 599kr.) That was a good price if you could find it. But for the Snes classic the stores has raised the price to 1299kr! That is waaaay more then I am willing to pay for it. Thats more then half the price I would pay for a Nintendo Switch! I get that the SNES classic costs more other places too but not that much. I also recently build a retro pie so I am perfectly fine with sticking to that.
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Jul 24, 2017 13:45:29 GMT -5
I really want Nintendo to be successful, and I believe they make quality products most of the them, but MAN, they are so aggravating sometimes. They are sitting on a goldmine of both money for them and nostalgia/happiness/goodwill for their customers, and sometimes it seems like they don’t care. They are some of the most vocal complainers about emulators and piracy yet they make it prohibitively difficult to give them money to play their stuff, and that’s not even going into the software that there is literally no legal way to even obtain anymore in a reasonable manner for rights disputes, etc. I am not advocating piracy, and I have a bunch of old physical games and systems tucked away, but it’s 50/50 if the 30 year old equipment will even run without crashing to say nothing about the hassle of digging it out, setting it up, etc.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, if they sold an iPhone case with built in Nintendo/Super Nintendo physical controls and sold games online I’d be throwing money at them.
|
|
|
Post by sunofdarkchild on Jul 24, 2017 15:51:07 GMT -5
Anyone playing Splatoon 2? I'm surprised how much I'm enjoying the multiplayer.
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Jul 25, 2017 9:35:55 GMT -5
Anyone playing Splatoon 2? I'm surprised how much I'm enjoying the multiplayer. I never even played the original, though I wanted to. It does not have local multiplayer, right?
|
|
|
Post by sunofdarkchild on Jul 25, 2017 10:14:15 GMT -5
Anyone playing Splatoon 2? I'm surprised how much I'm enjoying the multiplayer. I never even played the original, though I wanted to. It does not have local multiplayer, right? No. No splitscreen.
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Jul 25, 2017 10:37:20 GMT -5
I never even played the original, though I wanted to. It does not have local multiplayer, right? No. No splitscreen. Boo. That's a disappointing for a company that largely built its following on couch multiplayer. My wife and I are always passively looking for new low cost, easy activities to do together for when the little ones are in bed. We got a Wii U and had high hopes, but found options limited aside from Mario Kart and dance games. (Smash isn't really her thing).
|
|
bor
Full Member
Posts: 238
|
Post by bor on Jul 25, 2017 10:56:58 GMT -5
Boo. That's a disappointing for a company that largely built its following on couch multiplayer. My wife and I are always passively looking for new low cost, easy activities to do together for when the little ones are in bed. We got a Wii U and had high hopes, but found options limited aside from Mario Kart and dance games. (Smash isn't really her thing). Yeah thats to bad. This was one of the games I was going to buy when I do eventually buy a switch. Now there isnt really anything on it I actually really want to play. I already played Zelda on wii u and while I really liked it I dont see the need to play it again on another platform. The same with Mario Kart.
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Jul 25, 2017 13:18:06 GMT -5
Boo. That's a disappointing for a company that largely built its following on couch multiplayer. My wife and I are always passively looking for new low cost, easy activities to do together for when the little ones are in bed. We got a Wii U and had high hopes, but found options limited aside from Mario Kart and dance games. (Smash isn't really her thing). Same for me, but with my kids. My wife doesn't play video games much. And it doesn't seem to be Nintendo. There's quiet a few games on the 360/PS3 that I have passed up for being multiplayer but lack local co-op/multiplayer. In fact now that I think about, the only other game since RE5 my wife played with me, she wanted to when she saw trailers of Tom Clancy's The Division, but it had no local co-op. I wonder if this is a thing of the future in gaming. Everything or most all multiplayer going online exclusively.
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Jul 25, 2017 13:27:39 GMT -5
Yeah, my wife doesn't normally play video games, but she is willing to try. Non-traditional control schemes are fun for her, like the steering wheel motion control for Mario Kart for example, but she was open to trying Splatoon. Ah, well.
And yeah, the trend seems to be shifting away from local multiplayer, but hopefully it will self correct some. The most recent Halo didn't even have split screen multiplayer. How are you going to do that in a Halo game??
|
|
|
Post by sunofdarkchild on Jul 25, 2017 13:37:10 GMT -5
The single player mode in Splatoon 2 is pretty good though.
Arms has split-screen multiplayer. I didn't get it because of the lack of a proper single player mode, but it might be a better fit if you specifically want local multiplayer. I believe it has 4 player split screen for 2v2 battles as well as 2 player split screen, and the motion controls are supposed to be very good.
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Jul 25, 2017 13:52:37 GMT -5
Yeah, my wife doesn't normally play video games, but she is willing to try. Non-traditional control schemes are fun for her, like the steering wheel motion control for Mario Kart for example, but she was open to trying Splatoon. Ah, well. And yeah, the trend seems to be shifting away from local multiplayer, but hopefully it will self correct some. The most recent Halo didn't even have split screen multiplayer. How are you going to do that in a Halo game??I am going to have two very upset children when that one comes out. Halo, any of them, rarely get played by just one person in our house.
|
|
|
Post by impulse on Jul 25, 2017 14:56:03 GMT -5
Yeah, my wife doesn't normally play video games, but she is willing to try. Non-traditional control schemes are fun for her, like the steering wheel motion control for Mario Kart for example, but she was open to trying Splatoon. Ah, well. And yeah, the trend seems to be shifting away from local multiplayer, but hopefully it will self correct some. The most recent Halo didn't even have split screen multiplayer. How are you going to do that in a Halo game??I am going to have two very upset children when that one comes out. Halo, any of them, rarely get played by just one person in our house. It's already out. Halo 5.
|
|
|
Post by adamwarlock2099 on Jul 25, 2017 15:28:06 GMT -5
I am going to have two very upset children when that one comes out. Halo, any of them, rarely get played by just one person in our house. It's already out. Halo 5. Oh damn. It's already ordered with the console. Well, I'll let em find out then. At least we'll be able to play the Master Chief collection and GoW4.
|
|
|
Post by lobsterjohnson on Jul 26, 2017 23:29:54 GMT -5
I haven't paid much attention to VR games before, but this stealth game looks interesting: link. I bet stealth is really tense in VR.
|
|
|
Post by Dizzy D on Jul 31, 2017 4:22:50 GMT -5
Played and finished Hard West the last few weeks;
it's a relatively short game (15-20 hours or so), an independent, turn-based weird western (for those who haven't played Deadlands: Weird Western is a genre that combines westerns with some supernatural elements. In case of Hard West, curses, magic cards, the Devil, clairvoyants and more). Gameplay is most like the X-com series on battle maps with a worldmap that has some text-adventure type gameplay (you pick places on a map, chose one from several predefined options and occassionally you'll enter a battle map).
There are several scenarios (with some characters returning from other scenarios) and most scenarios have their own gameplay gimmick on the battle map (a scenario with an inventor has a bit of gameplay where you can develop weapons, items and other bonuses by collecting blueprints and building them in your lab, a scenario with an expedition has you manage food and laborers and so on).
I've played mostly on medium (one map I turned to easy, because I was seriously outnumbered and kept losing). You have the option to turn on Wounds (damage may cause a disability in your characters, which have to be healed by a doctor or so on the worldmap.) or Iron Man (if you lose a critical character, you'll have to restart the whole scenario). I played with Wounds, but not Iron Man.
The scenarios are relatively short, 3 or 4 battle maps per scenario, 8 scenarios total. You usually have 3-4 characters, some battle maps can be completed with stealth, but usually you'll have to fight at some point and you can just use the stealth part to make sure you are positioned correctly for the inevitable fight. Occassionally you have some optional objectives that'll get you extra money or weaponry.
Completing a scenario unlocks up to 3 weapons/items per scenario that will be available for sale at the Fate Trader that is on most world maps. You also unlock playing cards. Each card gives a special ability or a bonus and you can assign up to 5 cards to a character. If you make poker hands with those cards, you get extra bonuses (weirdly enough, I don't think the higher hands give better bonuses, just different ones. Can be my style of playing though, where I prefer glass cannons to tanks).
Combat is turned-base, though if you step into an opponents sphere of influence (a small sphere around each character), they can get a free shot at you. Characters get 2 actions each turn (actions are moving, reloading, shooting, using an ability or item). Shooting a gun usually ends the turn for that character, though there are guns that can be shot twice. Each character also has an amount of luck; luck helps to avoid enemy fire. Shots that miss you deplete your luck, shots that hit you give you extra luck. Characters usually have few hitpoints, so make sure you stay in cover, because 1-3 hits are usually enough to take out your character and healing is limited.
You get some moral choices, but I don't think they mattered that much playwise (maybe some bonus/penalty to luck).
Overall a game I quite enjoyed. It's short, a bit rough and quite difficult (to you can manage difficulty a lot with options and once you get the better weapons, the game can become really easy. In the final fight one of the characters had a rifle that was basically a guaranteed one-hit kill). Downsides: not al game mechanics are explained well and characters sphere of influence could be a bit larger (X-Com uses line of sight for the same thing), the sphere of influence would be like 3 feet in all directions, so a quite useful tactic against isolated enemies is to use your first action to run up to them, stay at 4 feet and shoot them point-blank.
|
|