|
|
Post by MWGallaher on Jun 8, 2017 20:45:24 GMT -5
  Very different approaches by Harry Anderson on the original, Larry Leiber on the reprint in the 70's. |
|
|
|
Post by dbutler69 on Jun 9, 2017 8:30:54 GMT -5
I think it's odd because a bear and loose bats have nothing to do with the team up. Yup, that's what I was getting at. It's like a modern cover, where it's just a cool pin-up that's got nothing to do with the story inside. |
|
|
|
Post by tarkintino on Jun 14, 2017 13:14:21 GMT -5
I doubt anyone can create a suitable replacement for a Neal Adams cover. The reprint lacks the realism and drama as only Adams could capture it. |
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Jun 15, 2017 4:49:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Jun 18, 2017 7:33:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Jun 18, 2017 16:13:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tarkintino on Jun 21, 2017 6:35:32 GMT -5
Ugh. By the time the early 70s arrived, rich dye work was a thing of the past, thus a lot of mood was lost on covers. This can be seen on several Marvel reprint titles such as the second Fantasy Masterpieces, Marvel Triple/ Super Action and Marvel Tales. Comics lost something special when things started to look as flat (color wise) as a Harvey comic. |
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Jun 24, 2017 6:15:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Jun 25, 2017 7:01:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dbutler69 on Jun 26, 2017 16:17:09 GMT -5
Hmm. I think I like the reprint better. |
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Jun 26, 2017 16:52:53 GMT -5
It seems that Starlin always does the covers to his reprint volumes.
|
|
|
|
Post by LovesGilKane on Jun 27, 2017 1:26:42 GMT -5
i love Staton. even in DC stuff he drew women with natural curves rather than fashion-parade mannequins with silicone 'blown up like a balloon bits'. |
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Jul 4, 2017 11:00:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 1, 2017 14:53:20 GMT -5
 The Original  |
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Aug 26, 2017 6:00:01 GMT -5
|
|
