|
Post by beccabear67 on Jun 1, 2020 13:55:09 GMT -5
Yul was cool in Westworld! I have seen him in some early movies where he does have hair though. I am a bit weird for Vin, at least in the Pitch Black movies, he's cool 2... could care less about Fast & Furious as I don't drive. Then again I did like the Jason Statham Transporter movies. Other people rolled their eyes at them but I thought they were a lot of fun. So the answer is... Tor Johnson! Inspiration to both Gilbert Hernandez and Sal Buscema!
|
|
|
Post by brutalis on Jun 1, 2020 14:38:31 GMT -5
What? Tor over Uncle Fester from Addam's Family television show? You scare me sometimes beccabear67 ... next you'll be telling us George the Animal Steele in WWE is a bald force to be reckoned with?
|
|
|
Post by foxley on Jun 1, 2020 17:45:33 GMT -5
For classic, I'll have to say Yul Brynner. His lean build and sharp features combined with his baldness to give him an undefinable exoticness. Telly's heavier build made his baldness look menacing and thuggish, which was cool in its own way, but didn't have the mystique of Yul's.
For modern, I'll say Jason Statham, although I suspect a large chunk of this is because I prefer him as an actor. If I have to say something about their appearances, it would be that Vin's baldness feels like an affectation, while Jason's baldness feels more natural (for want of a better word).
|
|
|
Post by beccabear67 on Jun 1, 2020 20:56:47 GMT -5
next you'll be telling us George the Animal Steele in WWE is a bald force to be reckoned with? I don't know who that is, but then I don't know who 90% of celebrities are anymore... if anyone wants to talk Giant Haystacks fighting Shirley 'Big Daddy' Crabtree though...
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,203
|
Post by Confessor on Jun 2, 2020 13:45:50 GMT -5
next you'll be telling us George the Animal Steele in WWE is a bald force to be reckoned with? I don't know who that is, but then I don't know who 90% of celebrities are anymore... if anyone wants to talk Giant Haystacks fighting Shirley 'Big Daddy' Crabtree though... "Easy! Easy! Easy! Easy!" Used to love watching Big Daddy go up against Giant Haystacks in the early 80s on World Of Sport with Dickie Davis. Ah, Shirley Crabtree, we loves ya.
|
|
|
Post by beccabear67 on Jun 3, 2020 14:01:52 GMT -5
Used to love watching Big Daddy go up against Giant Haystacks in the early 80s on World Of Sport with Dickie Davis. Ah, Shirley Crabtree, we loves ya. There was a surprise on a fairly recent Antiques Roadshow where someone brought his collection of Big Daddy memorabilia including one of his outfits! I think at one time they didn't put things like that on the show, but after carriage clock number one thousand I expect someone weakened. pbs.twimg.com/media/DSZqCMWWAAEb14g.jpg
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2020 1:56:39 GMT -5
Since there's a lot of looting going on, I'm looting Which One?
Which 'trilogy' do you prefer - The Clint Eastwood Spaghetti Western Trilogy...or the first 3 Clint Eastwood Dirty Harry Films? (Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, The Enforcer).
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly is my favourite Clint film of all time....I never get tired of it. But today I watched Magnum Force....
|
|
Roquefort Raider
CCF Mod Squad
Modus omnibus in rebus
Posts: 17,420
Member is Online
|
Post by Roquefort Raider on Jun 6, 2020 7:55:37 GMT -5
Since there's a lot of looting going on, I'm looting Which One?
Which 'trilogy' do you prefer - The Clint Eastwood Spaghetti Western Trilogy...or the first 3 Clint Eastwood Dirty Harry Films? (Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, The Enforcer).
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly is my favourite Clint film of all time....I never get tired of it. But today I watched Magnum Force.... I prefer the Cowboy With No Name trilogy... the Morricone scores alone would do it, and the outstanding direction clinches it! It's funny to think that Eastwood was judged physically too frail for the role at the time, which is why his character wears an ample poncho. That never happened to Dirty Harry, I'm sure!
|
|
|
Post by brutalis on Jun 6, 2020 10:56:02 GMT -5
Since there's a lot of looting going on, I'm looting Which One?
Which 'trilogy' do you prefer - The Clint Eastwood Spaghetti Western Trilogy...or the first 3 Clint Eastwood Dirty Harry Films? (Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, The Enforcer).
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly is my favourite Clint film of all time....I never get tired of it. But today I watched Magnum Force....
You can loot Rags (saves me making a new one Monday) as your choice is in my list of questions (I gots lots more) and for me its Spaghetti with lots of sauciness in actors and meat in the storytelling. Dirty Harry is a very close 2nd though. Cowboys over cops for me every time!
|
|
|
Post by tartanphantom on Jun 7, 2020 0:43:04 GMT -5
Eastwood's western trilogy over Dirty Harry-- no contest at all.
Unlike Harry Callahan, The Man With No Name would never have any need to brag about the power of his sidearm.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Jun 7, 2020 9:35:25 GMT -5
The Dollars over Dirty Harry. At this point it's not even close. Leone's films changed cinema and, along with Pekinpah, completely changed the western genre. The Dirty Harry movies, in retrospect, are reactionary cartoons that are only marginally interesting if you keep in mind the context in which they were made. And I say that as a fan of Don Siegel as a film-maker.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,203
|
Post by Confessor on Jun 7, 2020 9:39:06 GMT -5
Since there's a lot of looting going on, I'm looting Which One? Which 'trilogy' do you prefer - The Clint Eastwood Spaghetti Western Trilogy...or the first 3 Clint Eastwood Dirty Harry Films? (Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, The Enforcer).
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly is my favourite Clint film of all time....I never get tired of it. But today I watched Magnum Force.... The so-called Man With No Name trilogy, hands down. The first Dirty Harry movie is great, but every subsequent film in the series was victim to the law of diminishing returns, as far as I'm concerned. None of them are unwatchable, mind you, but the Sergio Leone spaghetti trilogy is just utterly fantastic. I think my absolute favourite of the three films is probably For A Few Dollars More.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Jun 7, 2020 9:49:30 GMT -5
Since there's a lot of looting going on, I'm looting Which One? Which 'trilogy' do you prefer - The Clint Eastwood Spaghetti Western Trilogy...or the first 3 Clint Eastwood Dirty Harry Films? (Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, The Enforcer).
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly is my favourite Clint film of all time....I never get tired of it. But today I watched Magnum Force.... The so-called Man With No Name trilogy, hands down. The first Dirty Harry movie is great, but every subsequent film in the series was victim to the law of diminishing returns, as far as I'm concerned. None of them are unwatchable, mind you, but the Sergio Leone spaghetti trilogy is just utterly fantastic. I think my absolute favourite of the three films is probably For A Few Dollars More. As I grow older, and as I watch the films more, I think I agree with you. For a Few Dollars More is a terribly ignored middle child who is an unassuming prodigy. It's more complex than Fistful and the addition of Van Cleef (who steals the show) makes it more interesting. GB&U tends to feel somewhat bloated and meandering to me at this point. And while I'll give props to Eastwood as an actor and a director, he's the least interesting part of both of the latter two films with Van Cleef and then Eli Wallach stealing the latter two movies respectively.
|
|
Confessor
CCF Mod Squad
Not Bucky O'Hare!
Posts: 10,203
|
Post by Confessor on Jun 7, 2020 13:26:28 GMT -5
The so-called Man With No Name trilogy, hands down. The first Dirty Harry movie is great, but every subsequent film in the series was victim to the law of diminishing returns, as far as I'm concerned. None of them are unwatchable, mind you, but the Sergio Leone spaghetti trilogy is just utterly fantastic. I think my absolute favourite of the three films is probably For A Few Dollars More. As I grow older, and as I watch the films more, I think I agree with you. For a Few Dollars More is a terribly ignored middle child who is an unassuming prodigy. It's more complex than Fistful and the addition of Van Cleef (who steals the show) makes it more interesting. GB&U tends to feel somewhat bloated and meandering to me at this point. And while I'll give props to Eastwood as an actor and a director, he's the least interesting part of both of the latter two films with Van Cleef and then Eli Wallach stealing the latter two movies respectively. Yeah, love it though I do, I've always found The Good, the Band and the Ugly to be a bit "bloated", as you say. For A Few Dollars More takes everything that was already great about A Fisful of Dollars and refines it. The script is sharper, the comedy is funnier, and the action scenes are more innovative and exhilarating. Right from that great openning shot of a lone rider -- seen from the persepective of a bounty hunter -- alone on a vast desert plain, getting killed by a single shot, just before Ennio Morricone's fantastic theme music begins, it's clear that Sergio Leone really means business this time. As you say, Lee Van Cleef's character Mortimer is a show-stealing protagonist, and the chemistry between him an Clint is a joy to watch. Mortimer's tragic tale of vengence against the bandit El Indio is also really gripping and the music that Mortimer's pocket-watch plays -- and how Leone uses it to ramp up tension -- is just fantastic. And the brilliantly orchestrated showdown between Mortimer and El Indio at the end, with Clint refereeing, is just a classic piece of cinema. Actually, I think El Indio is hands down the most genuinely sinister and threatening villain in the trilogy. I mean, there's the brutal rape and execution of Mortimer's sister, of course, but let's not forget the scene in the gang's hideout where he murders a mother and her newborn baby! For A Few Dollars More is that cinematic rarity: a sequel that is better than the original film in the franchise. And of course, we also find out in For A Few Dollars More that the so-called "Man with No Name" is actually called Manco. Whether that's his real name or not is imaterial; this character definitely has a name.
|
|
|
Post by beccabear67 on Jun 7, 2020 15:15:07 GMT -5
I may have seen all of those or only some so I guess they don't rank up there with greatest trilogies for me. No offense to Clint (and certainly not to Ennio Morricone either) but I would probably pick The Godfather trilogy and just throw out the third one.
|
|