|
Post by thwhtguardian on Dec 1, 2014 21:42:18 GMT -5
I put an asterisk next to my first pick this month, as I technically saw it when I was 7 but truly I couldn't tell you the plot of Star Trek: The Motion Picture, even watching it now(I'm a half hour in) hasn't really jogged my memory. All I remember is not liking it then and in all the years since I never revisited until now and so far I'm liking it. It's my favorite Trek film by far, but I wouldn't have liked it as a 7 year old either. Yeah, I definitely see why seven year old Bill didn't care for it despite loving TOS, but the adult me liked it just fine. I could have perhaps done with out a few of the long exterior shots of the Enterprise seemingly doing nothing but I really liked the character work, and I loved that opening scene with Spock on Vulcan. I really wish he had kept that long haired hippie look the whole time: And my girlfriend enjoyed seeing Reverend Camden, who to me was the real stand out character of the film.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 1, 2014 21:46:21 GMT -5
I could have perhaps done with out a few of the long exterior shots of the Enterprise seemingly doing nothing Yeah, that made perfect sense in 1979 when the new models and special effects were mind-blowing updates from what had come before, but it feels totally unnecessary now. I wrote this review of the film a decade back:
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on Dec 1, 2014 21:59:04 GMT -5
That's a pretty excellent write up, about the only thing I would disagree with was your estimation of Decker as I really enjoyed him as a character to the point where I wish we had gotten Phase II as I would have loved to see more of him.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 2, 2014 0:00:49 GMT -5
That's a pretty excellent write up, about the only thing I would disagree with was your estimation of Decker as I really enjoyed him as a character to the point where I wish we had gotten Phase II as I would have loved to see more of him. In that case, check out the deleted scenes. He had one really great moment that was cut from the theatrical release.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 4, 2014 21:59:44 GMT -5
My viewing pleasure this evening: WOW was this fun! Hard to believe there's never been a sequel or remake. A satire in which creepy short aliens inject their enemies with large doses of alcohol? Priceless! I know Mars Attacks was visually based on the aliens in this film and that it was a satire; did it borrow any other elements?
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on Dec 4, 2014 22:06:54 GMT -5
That poster looks amazing! I need to see that.
I watched the Star Wars Holiday special for my pick this evening, I'd seen bits like the Boba Fett cartoon before but this was the first time I'd seen the whole thing...and aside from giving Chewbacca's son and father stupid names(Lumpy and Itchy) it actually wasn't as terrible as I had heard.
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Dec 5, 2014 12:37:42 GMT -5
My viewing pleasure this evening: WOW was this fun! Hard to believe there's never been a sequel or remake. A satire in which creepy short aliens inject their enemies with large doses of alcohol? Priceless! I know Mars Attacks was visually based on the aliens in this film and that it was a satire; did it borrow any other elements? Not really. (I often wonder if this started out as a straight horror and they switched gears with the final draft.) Also, do you mean Mars Attacks the movie or the card series? The martians for the cards were designed by Wally Wood. And I'd be surprised if Paul Blaisdell wasn't drawing on Wood's EC work for the saucermen designs. Oh, and it has been remade: Even better:
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier X on Dec 5, 2014 16:38:32 GMT -5
As I recall this episode of MST3K, Joel and the bots don't like the movie very much, prompting them to skewer it mercilessly.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 7, 2014 14:36:20 GMT -5
So my tentative plans for viewing for the rest of the month (time permitting):
Ray Harryhausen 1. The First Men in the Moon 2. Earth vs. The Flying Saucers 3. Twenty Million Miles to Earth
Star Trek 1. Forbidden Planet (Roddenberry pretty much stole everything from this film; might as well be Star Trek I) 2. Star Trek: The Motion Picture 3. Star Trek II 4. Star Trek III 5. Star Trek IV 6. Star Trek V 7. Star Trek VI
Thoughtful Sci-Fi 1. Solaris 2. 2001: A Space Odyssey
The Alien films
Predator
District 9
Flight of the Navigator
Space Camp
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 7, 2014 23:51:14 GMT -5
I edited the thread's title to reflect the current month's assignment. We lost quite a few folks after October and are down to only four participants, so I'm hoping this will help bring a few people back.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2014 0:13:21 GMT -5
So my tentative plans for viewing for the rest of the month (time permitting): Ray Harryhausen1. The First Men in the Moon 2. Earth vs. The Flying Saucers 3. Twenty Million Miles to Earth Star Trek1. Forbidden Planet (Roddenberry pretty much stole everything from this film; might as well be Star Trek I) 2. Star Trek: The Motion Picture 3. Star Trek II 4. Star Trek III 5. Star Trek IV 6. Star Trek V 7. Star Trek VI Thoughtful Sci-Fi1. Solaris 2. 2001: A Space Odyssey The Alien films
Predator
District 9
Flight of the Navigator
Space CampThe three Ray H. films are a classic - to me they're the best 50 Sci-Fi films ever made and Ray is the Master of his craft of who created a form of stop-motion model animation known as "Dynamation." I seen pretty much all the Star Trek Films - and my two favorites are Star Trek II - Wrath of Khan and Star Trek IV, the one with the Space Probe/Whales. Predator, District 9, and Flight of the Navigator - are favorites of mine also and of course I do love the 2001 Space Odyssey as well. You are in a treat!
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 8, 2014 9:03:00 GMT -5
Ah, I am in Ray Harryhausen wonderland! I watched Earth vs. the Flying Saucers last night and enjoyed myself thoroughly. Beyond Harryhausen's thoroughly realistic saucers and effects, I was impressed by Curt Siodmak's epic writing and pacing, making this film feel truly bigger than life and impossible to dismiss as light-hearted fluff. And I think I might be in love with Joan Taylor.
This morning, I watched 20 Million Miles to Earth and loved it even more. The plotting was abysmal, but this was definitely the best specimen of Dynamation I've ever seen. Harryhausen truly outdid himself on this one, and the coloring he personally oversaw for the Blu Ray edition of these films brought his work to life even more vividly. I'm normally not a fan of coloring black and white films, but it completely enhances these films and is done with utter respect/integrity for the original works.
Next up is First Men on the Moon, which I saw once and enjoyed but barely remember.
|
|
|
Post by thwhtguardian on Dec 8, 2014 13:33:00 GMT -5
So my tentative plans for viewing for the rest of the month (time permitting): Ray Harryhausen1. The First Men in the Moon 2. Earth vs. The Flying Saucers 3. Twenty Million Miles to Earth Star Trek1. Forbidden Planet (Roddenberry pretty much stole everything from this film; might as well be Star Trek I) 2. Star Trek: The Motion Picture 3. Star Trek II 4. Star Trek III 5. Star Trek IV 6. Star Trek V 7. Star Trek VI Thoughtful Sci-Fi1. Solaris 2. 2001: A Space Odyssey The Alien films
Predator
District 9
Flight of the Navigator
Space CampIf you're a fan of Solaris and 2001 I'd also try 2009's "Moon", it's definitely in the "thoughtful sci-fi" vein.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 8, 2014 14:11:39 GMT -5
If you're a fan of Solaris and 2001 I'd also try 2009's "Moon", it's definitely in the "thoughtful sci-fi" vein. I appreciated the nods it made to Solaris, 2001, and also Silent Running, and I loved the setup, but I was disappointed with the second half of the film. It all felt too easy after providing us with such a thoughtful mystery.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,864
|
Post by shaxper on Dec 8, 2014 14:16:49 GMT -5
Just finished First Men in the Moon and would definitely count it as my favorite film yet this month. Funny, intelligent, strong characterization, and gorgeous production value. Though I approached the film looking for Ray Harryhausen effects, I found the set designs, props, and costumes even more compelling. In fact, Harryhausen's talents were really underutilized for this one. I'd love to do a remake of this film with Ian McKellen as Dr. Cavor. I'd make it the first film in decades to utilize Dynamation, as well as the full puppeteering talents of the Jim Henson Workshop. Absolutely no CG would be used
|
|