|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 23, 2022 22:04:57 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm pretty well out of this stuff. I read Brubaker's Cap, up to Bucky starting out as Captain Puerto Rico (based on the costume design); but, that was about it. Not deliberate, just didn't see the book come in the store. All-Star Superman is the only thing I see there that I have read the entirety. I find it odd that it was voted best continuing series; it doesn't state that it is a mini-series, on the cover; but, wasn't it stated, from the start, that it was a finite series?
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 27, 2022 18:52:06 GMT -5
2008 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nominees2008 marked the 20th Anniversary of the Eisner Awards. Jackie Estrada celebrated the occasion by declaring the 2008 Nominees the most diverse list ever. Whether by accident or design, no single publisher dominated the nominations. Instead, the nominations were spread over the entire industry. Even DC, who had traditionally been at the top of the list, only received 11 nominations (the same as Marvel and Fantagraphics.) Darkhorse led the way with 12 nominations. That's all well and good for the ballot, but the winners tended to be trendy picks, not far outside the mainstream. Ed Brubaker won Best Writer again, Y: The Last Man was voted Best Continuing Series, and Buffy was Best New Series. There was no surprise in Chris Ware and Eric Powell winning Eisners again. Pia Guerra was a new recipient, benefitting from the overall success of Y: The Last Man as a the "it" book of 2007. That's not to say that these creators didn't produce good work. I happily binge-read Y: The Last Man and enjoyed every bit of it. But if you look at the original Eisners, you get the vibe that there was very much an "us against them" mentality among the small publishers. The mainstream tended to be ignored unless it was intended for mature readers. The sea change the Eisners voting either reflects independent creators being embraced by the mainstream, or a crumbling of the old "us against them" attitude. I didn't know that Buffy continued as a comic. I was only ever a casual viewer, but my wife was really into the show when we started living together. I also had no idea that The Umbrella Academy did so well in both the Eisners and the Harveys. I read it after I saw the Netflix show and thought it was substantially poorer than the TV show. The Nominating Panel appear to have gone overboard with the separate categories for younger readers. I suppose this reflects the growing market for young readers in bookstores and other outlets. Younger reader titles have been hit and miss for me so far, but it's a genre that's easy to overlook so I suppose we should praise the panel for promoting such a diverse range of books.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 30, 2022 4:26:55 GMT -5
2009 Will Eisner Comic Industry Awards Winners and nominees2009 was a big year for Dark Horse. Not only did they led all publishers with 13 individual nominations and 5 shared, they took home the most trophies of any publisher as well. Mignola was the big winner with three Eisners, while Hellboy spin-off, B.P.R.D., netted Guy Davis the Eisner for Best Penciler. Bill Willingham deservingly won an Eisner for Best Writer, and All-Star Superman won Best Continuing Series, presumably because of how long it took to come out, the twelve issue series running from November 2005 to October 2008. Interesting to see websites now winning the award for Best Comics-Related Periodical/Journalism. I guess that speaks to the decline of the print medium, but it makes me wonder, if the website shuts down there's a chance that all that Eisner award winning content is lost to the sands of time, or the fickleness of the Wayback Machine. The Cartoonist Kayfabe boys often do videos on old Wizard or Comic Book Journals. It's hard to see any reminiscing over websites in the future, but perhaps there will be. Eddie Campbell has a nomination! I was a big fan of Eddie's work throughout the 90s on Bacchus, Alec and From Hell, and often wondered what he did post-From Hell. I will have to check that out. Matt Wagner's Madame Xanadu did well in the nominations. I love Wagner, so there's another title I need to find time for. Yoshihiro Tatsumi's work continues to be nominated. I saw an interview on Cartoonist Kayfabe with Adrian Tomine where he talked about the effort he made to get Tatsumi's work into print. Monster continues to be nominated as one of the best continuing series of the era. That's cool to see. There are times when the Eisner voters act like manga begins and ends with Tezuka. I'm happy to see a contemporary mangaka being recognized (outside of the reprint category, that is.) Usagi got a nomination! I don't know what was happening in Usagi in 2008 (never got that far), but I'm glad to see the nomination as his work was continually overlooked in the early years of the Eisner Awards. I see Terry Moore had a new series in 2008. I assume that was post Strangers in Paradise. Vertigo seemed to do well with new series nominations in 2009. I'm not really familiar with this era of Vertigo. I did not know there was an Eisner Award winning Iron Man series from 2008. I wonder how long that run lasted.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 2, 2022 19:28:47 GMT -5
2010 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsNomineesWinners
We reach the end of the decade with a group of nominees that was considered "middlebrow" by some comics sites. Jackie Estrada defended the list, saying that for every person who complains that the nominations are middle-of-the-road, there's someone who complains it's a list of books no-one's ever heard of. You're never going to be please everyone with the nominations. There was a bit of a surprise with the winners, as I don't think anyone expected The Wonderful Wizard of Oz to take home two Eisners. I remember seeing house ads for Eric Shanower's Oz work in old First comics. Naturally, I had no idea that he returned to Oz with Marvel in 2009. Gene Colan won an Eisner for the Captain America story he did with Ed Brubaker (which is a nice story, btw.) This was about a year before he died. Some people have quibbled about the problems Colan had with perspective, but he was 82 with poor eyesight. Penciling an entire story was pretty good going if you ask me. Brubaker took him Best Writer, Chew won Best New Series, and The Walking Dead was Best Continuing Series. This is the part where I admit that i have never read a single panel, or watched a single second, of The Walking Dead. I was off the grid for a long time once I moved to Japan. J.H. Williams was the other big winner for his work with Greg Rucka on Detective Comics. Not sure how readable that is. Apparently, it focuses on a Batwoman character. The most exciting thing to come out of the 2009 Eisners was the success of David Mazzucchelli's Asterios Polyp. I've gotta admit that I wasn't overly keen on Mazzucchelli's stylistic shift in Rubber Blanket, but I have high hopes for Asterios Polyp. I am also keen on reading Tatsumi's A Drifting Life.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Nov 3, 2022 11:38:01 GMT -5
I could have sworn Asterios Polyp was older than 2009; but, I see it wasn't. I think it might be because he may have discussed it in a Comics Journal interview, when he was doing Rubber Blanket, as it was originally intended there. When we got it in Barnes & Noble, I think I must have assumed it was a reprint.
The Bill Finger Award, which started as a joke comment, became a sort of FU to certain parties. If memory serves, Gary Friedrich's award here, was tied to his legal battle over Ghost Rider. Otto Binder had been pushed out in the writer's purge of 1968, along with personal issues, around the death of his daughter. The man was most responsible for the success of the Marvel Family, at Fawcett, with his inventive and charming stories, which led to him doing the same for the Superman and related titles, after Fawcett shut down.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 4, 2022 17:55:58 GMT -5
In comics, there's good weird, bad weird, and ambivalent weird. Eddy Current was ambivalent weird.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 5, 2022 19:42:25 GMT -5
2011 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsNominees WinnersThis appears to be the year where IDW burst onto the scene in terms of winning Eisner Awards with Joe Hill taking home best Writer for Locke & Key and Darwyn Cooke winning Best Writer/Artist for his Parker book. Other than that, there's not much to say about these awards. Chew was recognized which was nice to see, as was Juanjo Guarnido's beautiful artwork on Blacksad. Tardi won two awards, which is excellent. Urawawa continues to be regarded as the preeminent mangaka of the era, which is interesting, and the voters continued to be interested in Shanower's Oz work. American Vampire is a new book for me, and highlights that Vertigo was still quite successful at this time, even if I think of their major runs being largely over by this point. A minor controversy was resolved with Todd Klein winning Best Letterer after not being nominated for a few years.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 9, 2022 19:37:24 GMT -5
2012 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsNomineesWinnersThe big winner at the 2012 Eisner Awards was Mark Waid's Daredevil, which received the award for Best Single Issue, Best Continuing Series, and Best Writer. I'm not a huge fan of Waid, though I can see how his writing would appeal to a broad spectrum of comic book fans, especially readers who enjoy traditional superhero fare. I haven't begun Brubaker's run on Daredevil let alone gotten to Waid's run, but Daredevil remains one of my favorite all-time characters, and I'm proud as punch that the character has provided the impetus for three Eisner winning runs in the 00s. Take that Batman. Given the voters' tastes in recent years, it's not surprising to see Richard Stark's Parker and Criminal pick up awards. I've made a start on Cooker's Parker and so far it's living up to the hype. Jim Henson’s Tale of Sand is a book that did well in the awards. I believe it was created from an unmade film script by Henson. That seems like as good a pitch as any for why I ought to read it. Nominee-wise, I'm happy to see Usagi being nominated on a consistent basis after being overlooked for so long. I don't know if this was a particularly rich period of Sakai's work, but the Nominating Panel is starting to recognize it as one of the best regular series of the era. Kevin Huizenga is a name that seems to be popping up as a big talent in alternative comics. I'm more familiar with 90s alternative comics than the work that came afterward, but I'm interested in exploring this era too. There seems to be a trend towards alterative cartoonists publishing hardcover graphic novels as opposed to a traditional floppy, which presumably is going to have an effect on how the creators structure their stories, i.e. giving us that single "Wilson" style story instead of random ideas. Craig Thompson's Habibi and Mike Allred's iZombie are books I'll get to eventually. I am also interested in Terry Moore's work post-Strangers in Paradise. Next up, we have the work that became classic comics this year!
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 12, 2022 20:17:49 GMT -5
2013 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nomineesAnd now for the comics that became classics in 2022. There weren't any major surprises at the 2013 Eisners. Chris Ware took home 4 Eisners for his graphic novel, Building Stories, which is largely considered his masterpiece. It had a unique publication design as it came in a box set with fourteen different printed works, including cloth-bound books, newspapers, flipbooks, etc. The other big winner was Saga, which was a smash hit from the beginning and probably lays claim to being the book of the 2010s. Oddly, Fiona Staples didn't achieve much recognition for her part in making Saga a success, though that would quickly change. Other notable winners include David Aja for his work on Hawkeye (which I haven't read yet), Juanjo Guarnido for Best Painter, and Blacksad and Naoki Urasawa's 20th Century Boys as best US reprints. Cooke also continued to woo voters with his work on Parker. Among the nominees, Athos in America was a well-received Jason book. Eric Shanower had another Oz book out, and I've heard good things about Hope Larson's adaptation of A Wrinkle in Time. Charles Burns had a new graphic novel out this year. Unterzakhn has its fans. Both of the Hernandez brothers were nominated for the Best Writer/Artist category, which was a bit of makeup, in many people's eyes, for not being nominated for the previous year's Love and Rockets volume. Best Continuing Series is an eye-opener. Four out of the five nominees were published by Image, which is recognition, I suppose, of Image's status as a leading publisher of creator-owned content. Jonathan Hickman is a name I know but haven't read anything by. Manhattan Projects seems like a solid jumping on spot. One thing I've noted about the modern Eisner Awards is that you don't get a lot of consistency from one year to the next. The year before, Mark Waid's Daredevil swept the Eisners, but in 2013 it was barely nominated. You can't tell me the quality of the book dropped off so far it was no longer a contender for best series. Having a different group of judges each year means the focus often shifts from the mainstream to the smaller publishers. The organizers seem a bit sensitive about too Hollywood, and too Oscary, despite adding more ritz to the ceremony each year. There have been some consistent nominees in the 00s, but a lot of books, like 100 Bullets, for example, generate buzz and are seldom nominated again. My plan, at this stage, is to begin a more detailed look at the 2014 Eisner Award winners beginning in January, as 2023 is the year where they become classic comics. Hopefully, that will give me a bit of time to catch up on the 90s and 00s Eisner works I've glossed over in the past several weeks.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 25, 2022 0:41:11 GMT -5
I finished Charles Burns’ Black Hole, which was published over a lengthy period of time from 1995 to 2005, first by Kitchen Sink Press, and then when they went out of business, picked up by Fantagraphics. Darker in tone than a lot of Burns’ early work, it retains the elements of surrealism you’d expect from Burns’ work but without the quirky, offbeat humour.
Set in the 70s, it tells the story of a group of teenagers who catch a mysterious STD that causes strange mutations. It’s basically a metaphor for adolescence, sexual awakening, and coming of age, and largely focused on atmospherics over plot. The most striking feature of the book is the black and white art. Burns won the Harvey Award for Best Inker several times during the book’s publication, which is impressive given the black and white work of other artists during the time frame.
The story isn’t as weird as it may seem at a glance, and the topic isn’t as weighty as a lot of other graphic novels at the time, but as a feat of cartooning, it rates as a seminal work among 80s and 90s cartoonists. Definitely worth a read for people who enjoy 90s comics as much as Ido. Burns, like many of his contemporaries, shifted to graphic novels after Black Hole was completed, and thus it represents one of the last floppy series of perhaps my favorite era of alternative comics.
|
|
|
Post by MDG on Nov 25, 2022 9:18:01 GMT -5
I finished Charles Burns’ Black Hole, which was published over a lengthy period of time from 1995 to 2005, first by Kitchen Sink Press, and then when they went out of business, picked up by Fantagraphics. Darker in tone than a lot of Burns’ early work, it retains the elements of surrealism you’d expect from Burns’ work but without the quirky, offbeat humour. Burns had touched on the "teen plague" theme earlier in shorter pieces. Black Hole felt like the full exploration of the idea that he had to get out.
|
|
|
Post by mistermets on Nov 27, 2022 16:17:54 GMT -5
This is a fun idea for a project and a good way to cover a lot of good and diverse modern age material.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 27, 2022 19:08:42 GMT -5
I haven't read enough from this century to tell whether Asterios Polyp is the best work that's been produced thus far, but it's a major feat in cartooning. I think I may have mentioned that I was disappointed when David Mazzucchelli ditched penciling mainstream superhero comics to become an alternative cartoonist, largely because the change in style was so drastic, but it led a masterpiece. Mazzucchelli is one of the few artists who can claim to have created important works at both ends of the spectrum.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Nov 30, 2022 19:26:44 GMT -5
Paul Pope's Batman: Year 100 is okay. I prefer the projects Pope did for Vertigo (Heavy Liquid and 100%), and I actually kind of like the Batman stories he did in his issue of Solo more. Year 100 was all right as far as alternative cartoonist doing a mainstream superhero goes, but it didn't really add much to the Batman experience. Personally, I'm not that interested in seeing Batman in the future. I prefer modern reworkings of old Golden Age stories to future, Elseworlds stories. Pope draws a very distinctive Batman, though. He really plays up the bat element. He even has Batman use fake teeth to make himself look like more of a creature. I can understand why the series has its fans, but I'm far more interested in hunting down THB.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Dec 4, 2022 18:06:37 GMT -5
Darwyn Cooke's first Parker adaptation is excellent. I'm always a bit wary of modern takes on older crime genres. No matter how well told they are, I have doubts over their authenticity. Fortunately, Cooke's source material is from an era where the crime fiction genre was still being mass produced and feels like the genuine article. I wasn't sure about the water colors at first, but Cooke won me over, as he so often does. I'm looking forward to reading his other Parker stories. I wonder how many more he would have adapted if not for his untimely death.
|
|