|
Post by commond on Oct 11, 2022 19:19:04 GMT -5
Xenozoic Tales is a terrific series that ends mid-story arc with issue 14. Interestingly, the issues were released so far apart that you get a clear sense of the growth and development of Mark Schultz as an artist from '86 through to '96. He's released other projects since then, which I'll be sure to check out at some stage. Every once and a while, there's a tease that he'll finish the arc from issue 14 but nothing's ever come of it. It joins the pile with other great unfinished series like Tyrant and Vagabond. After the 80s black and white boom ended, Shultz only released one or two issues per year, but even at that slow pace, the book was constantly among the Eisner nominations and Shultz was highly regarded in the industry. That reputation has faded over time, but if you're interested in what the early 90s comic book landscape looked like, Xenozoic Tales was a release, along with From Hell and several others, that people eagerly anticipated. It's not entirely original, as a lot of people were doing riffs on similar ideas, but if you like dystopian sci-fi, it's a neat series.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 13, 2022 19:23:03 GMT -5
2003 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nominees2003 is more of the same. Bendis wins Best Writer for the second straight year, only this time Daredevil is also voted Best Continuing Series. Bendis' Daredevil run ranges from good-to-excellent. It took me a while to get used to Bendis' writing style and Alex Maleev's art, but once I did, I was hooked. I'm not sure if it was the best series on the market -- Age of Bronze and Fables are excellent, haven't gotten to Louis Riel or this era of Strangers in Paradise yet, and True Story, Swear to God is news to me -- but it does mark the first time, IIRC, that a Marvel title has taken the honor. I'm a fan of Fables, so I'm happy to see it do well here. It's interesting how Bill Willingham seemingly came from nowhere to create his magnus opus. He was nominated for his short-lived Coventry series in 1997, which served as a type of prototype for Fables, but he certainly wasn't as well-recognized as a lot of the other name writers of this era. It was a good year for new titles in general, as I'm a fan of both Gotham Central and Y: The Last Man (which the wrestling fan in me wants to call Y: The Last Man Standing.) The League of Extraordinary Gentleman sequel was well-received. It did well in both the Eisners and Harveys. Anything that can beat out a Hellboy limited series at this point is doing pretty well. Congratulations to Eric Shanower for winning Best Writer/Artist. I'm only a few issues into Age of Bronze, but I'm thoroughly enjoying it. I'm not really familiar with a lot of the alternative stuff from this era like Jason Shiga or Lynda Barry's work. I didn't know that JRJR had a Hulk run. I'm a little afraid to read it after the awful Wolverine stuff I read recently, but it's enticing.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 14, 2022 10:47:16 GMT -5
Willingham had been working in the indies, mostly, for some time, going back to Elementals. He was also doing quite a bit of non-comics work. He had also been writing some stuff for DC's hero books; so, not exactly out of nowhere. With Fables, I think he finally found the right vehicle for the time and place.
Lynda Barry had been around a while. I've never really gravitated towards her stuff, partially due to her visual style, partially because it just never clicked with me. Shiga is not a name I recognize.
Amazing Screw-on Head was a fun title.
LOEG Vol 2 was the pinnacle of the series, to me, as it had everything I loved about the series and concept, without much of the more esoteric and downright dull stuff that filtered in later. It also went nuts with the easter eggs.
My only other major interest in the nominated works was Francois Schuiten's Invisible Frontier. The book was gorgeous, like all of his works, though he excelled on this one. The story was interesting too, as a cartographer deals with political revisionism, as it tries to reshape geography. It kind of shows how politics can affect what seems to be pure technical work and serves well as a metaphor for the problems of modern political discourse.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Oct 14, 2022 11:38:25 GMT -5
2003 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nomineesCongratulations to Eric Shanower for winning Best Writer/Artist. I'm only a few issues into Age of Bronze, but I'm thoroughly enjoying it. I loved Age of Bronze. Just don't ever expect to get a conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by Rob Allen on Oct 14, 2022 18:36:52 GMT -5
2003 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nomineesCongratulations to Eric Shanower for winning Best Writer/Artist. I'm only a few issues into Age of Bronze, but I'm thoroughly enjoying it. I loved Age of Bronze. Just don't ever expect to get a conclusion. {Spoiler: Click to show}The Greeks win.
|
|
|
Post by EdoBosnar on Oct 15, 2022 3:17:28 GMT -5
I loved Age of Bronze. Just don't ever expect to get a conclusion. {Spoiler: Click to show} The Greeks win. Wait, wha- ? I bet they cheated...
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 15, 2022 7:11:01 GMT -5
{Spoiler: Click to show} The Greeks win. Wait, wha- ? I bet they cheated... Show me where in the rule book it says you can't hide in the mascot costume.........
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 15, 2022 21:18:52 GMT -5
2004 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nomineesBrian Michael Bendis and Greg Rucka were both nominated for 5 Eisner Awards in 2004, including an extraordinary amount of double nominations for Best Serialized Story and Best Continuing Story. I'm not sure if they cannibalized each other, but only Rucka managed to win an award. Best Writer went to Alan Moore. Apparently, voters weren't tired of him yet. The Harveys went down an entirely different route by awarding Chester Brown its Best Writer award. For all my talk about Marvel starting to earn some respect in the awards, it was DC that led the way with 35 nominations (plus 5 shared.) That was more than twice as many as their closest competitor, Dark Horse. Marvel did land an Eisner, however, for Unstable Molecules. I was intrigued by the notion of Guy Davis doing a Marvel book. From the panels I've seen, it doesn't look like your typical Marvel book. The new kid on the block is The Goon. Not too sure about that one. Seems like another spin on Hellboy. I'm interested in Kurt Busiek's Conan, but I haven't finished Thomas' work in its entirety yet. Kyle Baker's Plastic Man did well in both the Eisners and the Harveys, and Craig Thompson's Blankets was another book that both voting bodies agreed on. They were also in agreement in regards to Derek Kirk Kim. I haven't read Same Difference, but the pages I've seen remind me of Optic Nerve. I like John Cassaday's work, so I'm happy to see him win an Eisner. Interesting to see contemporary mangakas start to get nominated like Takehiro Inoue. Quiet nomination there for Jaime Hernandez too. I like how both the Eisners and Harveys keep quietly nominating Dave Sim for Best Letterer as well. He probably deserves a Best Cartoonist nomination, tbh. His stories may have gotten worse, but his cartooning keep growing from what I recall.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 16, 2022 11:42:39 GMT -5
Alan Moore keeps winning because the ABC line was so good; there was something for everyone and it was fun! That stood out.
Rucka is a better writer than Bendis, in my opinion, with more of his own style, which is why I think he won. Also, he was writing crime fiction in a superhero world; Bendis was doing superhero stuff, when crime fiction was a more natural fit. Powers, in my opinion, was has best superhero-related material, since it was still using a crime fiction structure. Rucka was doing a police procedural, with Gotham Central.
The Graphic Album category really shows the influence of the trade book market on that material, vs comic shops. Blankets and the other nominees were all big sellers in bookstores and only The Fixer wasn't published through a major book publisher (iBooks was Byron Preiss, but distributed by Pocket Books, which was a division of Simon & Schuster) Drawn & Quarterly did have decent book distribution and our graphic novel buyer, at Barnes & Noble, stocked some of those, but not much Joe Sacco (in my area, anyway). Blankets was a perennial seller for us. Persepolis would become a very big deal and we carried it in our biography section, along with Maus and Alison Bechdel's personal work (Dyke's to Watch Out For material was carried in our Gay & Lesbian section). We had Blacksad, which is where I discovered it and fell in love with it. It would have been my personal choice, for album and Foreign Material.
This was a good time for foreign material. Manga was dominating thing and selling more outside of comic shops. DC's distribution deal with Humanoids brought a lot of European material, including the Freddy Lombad books mentioned, from Yves Charland. They also reprinted Jodorowsky's Incal and White Lama, plus most of Enki Bilal's major works, including the collected Nikopol Trilogy.
Manga's dominance probably motivated the induction of Kazuo Koike and Goseki Kojima to the Hall of Fame, based on their seminal Lone Wolf and Cub.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 16, 2022 18:46:09 GMT -5
2005 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nomineesThe 2005 awards were tinged with sadness as Will Eisner had died earlier in the year. Many of the winners paid tribute to him during their acceptance speeches. Digital comics were recognized for the first time with their very own category, and an interesting trend began to emerge with many of the winners employing what you might call a more cartoony style. The Goon continues to be popular. I read the first issue and wasn't blown away, but I'll give it a chance. Brian K. Vaughan wins a breakthrough Eisner, which I'm sure did more for his confidence than many realize. I haven't read Ex Machina, that's a treat I'm saving for myself. Paul Chadwick returns with a new Concrete story and automatically wins an Eisner (amid some pretty strong competition, too.) The Cassaday/Quitely tie seems apt, as its clear now that we're in a new era of comics. That said, Eisner favorite David Gibbons put out an interesting looking graphic novel through Vertigo. I'm a bit wary of Gibbons as a writer, but I always like seeing creators branch out. Michael Chabon Presents: The Amazing Adventures of the Escapist is the best comic book title I've read in a while. Looks interesting too. Blacksad, Finder, and Persepolis are on my radar, and I'm kind of intrigued that a Tezuka manga about the life of Buddha would be so popular with Eisner voters decades after it was published. The New Frontier was a big winner at the Harveys and Eisners and deservedly so.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 17, 2022 20:28:31 GMT -5
Interesting to note one of the nominees for Best Humor Publication: Birth of a Nation, by Aaron McGruder, Reginald Hudlin and Kyle Baker. This was a satirical graphic novel, where the city of East St Louis (on the Illinois side of the Mississippi River, across from St Louis, MO), secedes from the Union, because of the corruption within the State and Federal governments, which ignores the plight of the impoverished city. McGruder was the creator of the comic strip Boondocks and had not, to my knowledge, worked in comic books. Hudlin was well known in comics, having written Black Panther, for Marvel, including the character's marriage to Storm. He directed several films, including House Party, Boomerang, and Bebe's Kids. He also produced and directed for The Bernie Mac Show. He was a native of East St Louis and his experiences inspired House Party and elements of the graphic novel. The book took the premise of a contested election, as in 2000 and a president who ignores the inner cities, leading to the city seceding. It was one that probably had a higher profile in bookstores, where McGruder's Boondocks collections were strong sellers, than in comic shops.
The Fantagraphics Complete Peanuts reprints get some lovin', which was deserved. They were nice editions, reprinting the entire 50 years of the strip, where previous books had predominantly been themed collections or "best of" types of books. I also see Locas nominated, for Fantagraphics, which collected the entire run of Jaime Hernadez's Maggie & Hopey stories, in one huge volume. Those were my favorite pieces and I bought that as soon as it came out.
I see that the nomination records haven't been update, since it lists Doc Frankenstein as being by the Wachowski "Brothers," rather than the now-more correct "Siblings."
The Adv of the Escapist was a terrific series and I loved the work down by the variety of artists.
In regards Tezuka's Buddha work; I believe it was the first time it was published in the US, in an English translation. Several of Tezuka's works got first time publication in the US, during the manga boom. Also nominated was Barefoot Gen (by Keiji Nakazawa, based on his personal experiences, at Hiroshima), which dates back to 1973. There had been an attempt to publish it in the US, via EduComics, but it didn't prove popular enough to continue, beyond 2 volumes.
Jon Cooke's The Comic Artist continues to dominate the Comic Periodical category. It was a great series, particularly its extensive looks at some of the smaller publishers of the comics industry, including Western (both the Dell and Gold Key phases), Atlas/Seaboard, Charlton, and Harvey.
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 22, 2022 17:56:39 GMT -5
2006 Will Eisner Comic Industry Awardswww.hahnlibrary.net/comics/awards/eisner06.phpSo, Warren Ellis led the nominations for writers with six, Brian K. Vaughan had five, and Grant Morrison books won Best Limited Series and Best Continuing Series, and yet Alan Moore still took home the Eisner. It's interesting (i.e. a bit fishy) that Moore won Best Writer when so little of his work was nominated. I was extremely disappointed by Darwyn Cooke's Solo. I wasn't sure what to expect from the Solo anthology, but I'd always heard great things about Cooke's issue. I have yet to read the Paul Pope issue. Solo looks so good in theory, but I have my doubts over the execution. Paul Pope is the coolest guy in comics, if you ask me. I'm not sure how I feel about him doing Batman, but I will cross that bridge at some point. I'm a few issues into Astonishing X-Men and it's okay... Not great, not bad... I prefer Morrison's X-Men, tbh. Cassaday wins his third straight Eisner, cementing his place as a modern darling. I suppose it's because he has a clean style. Another guy who keeps winning Eisners is Kyle Baker. To be fair, he kind of has a niche category sewn up, but there seems to be a few default winners each year -- Moore, Jill Thompson, Todd Klein, Kyle Baker. Geoff Darrow is a refreshing pick, though. I guess I need to add Shaolin Cowboy to my reading pile. For some reason, the Nominating Panel added a new category this year -- Best Reality-Based Work. I'm not sure why they chose to do that, but it does point to a trend in graphic novels and (then) modern cartooning. Speaking of which, it's nice to see Drawn and Quarterly doing well in the nominations. Over time, the awards have grown more open to the mainstream, which I suppose makes them more representative of the comic industry as a whole, but they've neglected the smaller publishers of late. Not this year.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 23, 2022 16:16:31 GMT -5
I think the Reality-Based category is a nod to the increase in alternative comics and the influence of bookstores and internet bookselling opening up new avenues for those creators. We got a lot of that kind of thing, at Barnes & Noble and media outlets like NPR were all over that kind of thing. DC was still pretty strong in their trade programs; but Marvel sucked, as they would do one printing and let it sell out and not go back to press. They also put out a lot of shoddy work, with frequent bad bindings on their trades. The American Bookseller Association put out public pleas to Marvel to reprint more and go back to press, as there was a proven audience, but they were focused so heavily on the Direct Market. DC had cultivated the book market, since the late 80s and kept their stuff in print (as much to F with Alan Moore as to meet perpetual demand).
I'm also not big on Astonishing X-Men. It's fine and seems rather like Claremont, with Whedon basically doing his Claremont X-Men fan fiction. I have only skimmed Morrison's X-Men; but, he seemed to have a more unique take on things, by comparison. That said, I have never understood the attraction to the whole Seven Soldiers project, as it really did nothing for me. All-Star Superman was more my cup of tea. I suppose part of it is the weirdness for weirdness sake element of Seven Soldiers, which is often a part of Morrison's work that loses me.
As far as Moore goes, I don't see anything fishy, as Top Ten: The Forty Niners was that good. Also, looking at how the Eisners tended to go, it encapsulates a lot of the medium's history, the types of stories that have had enduring appeal, and some terrific characters. Of the other nominees, Brian K Vaughn is the one I would vote for, as an alternate recipient. Ellis is another who seems more a collection of influences than an evolution. Moore seems to distill his influences into something that is his own, while Ellis and Morrison, I find, are less able to do that. They do interesting things in their work and it is quite enjoyable; but, like a Tarantino film, I spend as much time picking out the influences , if not more, than reading their take on things. I love Planetary; but the part that doesn't seem like Phillip Jose Farmer is pretty much the same thing he did in Authority and Stormwatch (especially his vaguely defined wonder powers of the characters).
I love Darrow's work, but also haven't read Darrow's Shaolin Cowboy. I believe I have some digital files of some of it. Doc Frankenstein was the one that sounded interesting to me, as a concept, from the Burly Man releases; but, I haven't looked at it, either.
Gee, what a surprise, a Calvin & Hobbes complete collection wins an award for archival project. I love having it all together; but, those volumes are really unwieldy and the weight puts too much stress on the binding. The Peanuts collections were a better formatting of the material. I think the Calvin Collection would have been better by making it 5 volumes, instead of 3 and reducing the thickness of the individual volumes.
By this point, I am almost exclusively reading graphic novels and trade collections and no longer have a comic subscription. It was like I was on a comic methadone program, for a while, as I was getting fewer and fewer books each week and started going to the comic shop every other week, to every few weeks and finally just told my local to cancel me as a subscriber, as so little was coming out that I needed it held. My employee discount was a bit deeper than the comic shop subscriber discount, so there was little point. I could keep track of releases with the online version of Previews and then reserve copies in our store ordering system. Most of what I was getting was from Cinebook, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by codystarbuck on Oct 23, 2022 16:19:15 GMT -5
ps I find the win of the Eisner & Frank Miller interview book as amusing as the book itself, especially in light of how badly Miller crapped on the Spirit in that abomination of a movie. It's pretty sad that an alleged fan of the work produced something far worse than the failed tv pilot movie (which is actually pretty decent, if low budget).
|
|
|
Post by commond on Oct 23, 2022 19:46:08 GMT -5
2007 Will Eisner Comic Industry AwardsWinners and nominees
The Nominating Panel for the 2007 Eisners made a strong push for diversity, encompassing the full spectrum of the comic book industry from the major publishers to non-comic book publishing houses and small-press titles. No one creator or title dominated the nominations, and there was a push for more female nominees and greater representation of manga. Female creators garnered more nominations than in any previous year with 24 nominations among 20 creators, including 8-year-old Alexa Kitchen, who became the youngest Eisner nominee ever. The judges decided to make a separate category for manga by splitting the Best U.S. Edition of Foreign Material Award into "International" and "Japan" categories, and Naoki Urasawa's Monster was nominated for Best Continuing Series, which I believe was a first in the history of the awards. DC had dominated the nominations prior to 2007, but this year it was Fantagraphics who led all publishers with 22 nominations (plus 1 shared.) Despite all that diversity, DC cleaned up at the Awards. That's largely because creators whose work was popular -- Paul Pope, Darwyn Cooke, the Fables creators -- tended to win multiple categories. To be honest, that makes me wonder how familiar the voters are with a lot of the nominees. It's fantastic that the Nominating Panel is trying to be representative of the entire industry, including overseas markets, but I imagine the voters only read a fraction of what was nominated. The exception to DC's dominance of the awards was Ed Brubaker winning Best Writer and Criminal winning Best New Series. Brubaker paid his dues before winning this award, and it was well-deserved. His Captain America run went from something I binge read every day to a run I can barely muster the enthusiasm to finish, but I'm trying to not let that sour how amazing it was at the beginning. I like Criminal, but I don't think it's an amazing groundbreaking work. I tend to like the film noir influences it draws from more than the series itself. I haven't got to his Daredevil run yet, but it's impressive that he was writing all three at the same time. I'm thrilled to see Bob Burden's name appear! I love Bob Burden. I didn't know he did more Gumby work. That's awesome. One of my favorite unsung creators.
|
|