|
Post by Cei-U! on May 20, 2015 10:49:48 GMT -5
I'm of two minds about Englehart's work. I liked his writing a lot on Dr. Strange, Captain America, Master of Kung Fu, Batman and Justice League (not to mention my all-time favorite issues of Hero for Hire, where Cage works for Dr. Doom) but I'm not particularly enamored of his Avengers or Defenders runs. His characterization of the female Avengers is abominable (bitchy Wanda, bitchy Moondragon, and cruel, slutty Mantis, probably the least likeable superheroine in Marvel's history)and his overuse of Kang, a villain I already couldn't stand, made those issues a chore to wade through. Of his contemporaries at Marvel in the '70s, I prefer Gerber, Moench, Claremont and Wein over Englehart, but I still have to give it up for him because of the titles I mentioned earlier.
Cei-U! I summon the mixed feelings!
|
|
|
Post by wildfire2099 on May 20, 2015 14:53:21 GMT -5
Ahhh... I didn't realize Englehart had THAT long an Avengers run... I think in my head I thought some of that stuff was Roy Thomas. Some of that is pretty good.
The 70s is really the decade I've read the least of, I realize now.
|
|
|
Post by MDG on May 20, 2015 15:43:29 GMT -5
I became a big fan of Englehart because my roomate got me back into comics through Englehart's run on Detective. Before that, i don't think I'd seen anything by him--never read bronze age Marvels. But after Detective, JLA, and his aborted Mr Miracle revival, I followed him to Marvel when he did the interlocking West Coast Avengers and Vision/Scarlet Witch miniseries.
I know they're not his best, but I was impressed by the way he pretty seamlessly delivered exposition for stories that relied pretty heavily on continuity I had no clue about. but it was pretty obvious that he was more interested in exploring ideas he felt like exploring than the stories themselves; moreso on his Surfer revival which simultaneously introduced me to and made me annoyed with Mantis.
|
|
|
Post by fanboystranger on May 20, 2015 21:43:37 GMT -5
One of the things I've always been impressed with Englehart's writing is how he finds ways to tie continuity elements together without it seeming like a lecture. There's been some misses in that regard-- Millenium, the last few issues of his WCA-- but all in all, he tends to enrich the stories he's referring to. There's not a lot of other writers who really have that gift, and these days, it really seems like a lost art. (Busiek, Ostrander, Matt Wagner, sometimes James Robinson are among the very few contemporary writers who seem to have that gift.)
|
|
Crimebuster
CCF Podcast Guru
Making comics!
Posts: 3,958
|
Post by Crimebuster on May 21, 2015 0:15:02 GMT -5
I'm of two minds about Englehart's work. I liked his writing a lot on Dr. Strange, Captain America, Master of Kung Fu, Batman and Justice League (not to mention my all-time favorite issues of Hero for Hire, where Cage works for Dr. Doom) but I'm not particularly enamored of his Avengers or Defenders runs. His characterization of the female Avengers is abominable (bitchy Wanda, bitchy Moondragon, and cruel, slutty Mantis, probably the least likeable superheroine in Marvel's history)and his overuse of Kang, a villain I already couldn't stand, made those issues a chore to wade through. Of his contemporaries at Marvel in the '70s, I prefer Gerber, Moench, Claremont and Wein over Englehart, but I still have to give it up for him because of the titles I mentioned earlier. Cei-U! I summon the mixed feelings! You have blasphemed!! Couldn't agree more about Mantis, though. Every and any counter-argument against Englehart pretty much begins and ends with Mantis in my book. I think he's mostly great, but she's his Achilles Heel.
|
|
|
Post by berkley on May 21, 2015 0:42:46 GMT -5
Mantis wasn't perfect - no character is - but she was an integral part of what most Avengers readers would rank as one of if not the top Avengers epics of all time, a story that wouldn't have been the same if she had been a more easily likeable character from the start.
To Cei-U's charge of cruelty, etc in Mantis's case, I'd respond that she was shown to acknowledge her errors, to show remorse for and learn from them. That in itself made her interesting, especially in the context of the Celestial Madonna story.
To the charge of bitchiness in Moondragon's case, I'd say that what some readers saw as bitchiness, I saw as a mixture of alien mentality with a sort of cold formality, and, yes, some aristocratic haughtiness, that didn't usually elicit the same kind of criticism in male characters.
As for the Scarlet Witch, to be honest, my memory of the details of Englehart's SW are a bit hazy, but she too was kind of distant and "foreign" to everyone but her brother in her earliest appearances, wasn't she? I liked the scene where she more or less told Hawkeye to keep quiet if he didn't know what he was talking about, one time when Hawkeye challenged Captain America's leadership - this was probably still in the Stan Lee era. If Englehart brought some of that back, I'd probably see it as an improvement over the annoyingly limp and weepy SW I seem to recall from Roy Thomas's Avengers.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2015 1:12:29 GMT -5
I'm of two minds about Englehart's work. I liked his writing a lot on Dr. Strange, Captain America, Master of Kung Fu, Batman and Justice League (not to mention my all-time favorite issues of Hero for Hire, where Cage works for Dr. Doom) but I'm not particularly enamored of his Avengers or Defenders runs. His characterization of the female Avengers is abominable (bitchy Wanda, bitchy Moondragon, and cruel, slutty Mantis, probably the least likeable superheroine in Marvel's history)and his overuse of Kang, a villain I already couldn't stand, made those issues a chore to wade through. Of his contemporaries at Marvel in the '70s, I prefer Gerber, Moench, Claremont and Wein over Englehart, but I still have to give it up for him because of the titles I mentioned earlier. Cei-U! I summon the mixed feelings! You have blasphemed!! Couldn't agree more about Mantis, though. Every and any counter-argument against Englehart pretty much begins and ends with Mantis in my book. I think he's mostly great, but she's his Achilles Heel. This one may be cross with you... -M
|
|
|
Post by Paradox on May 21, 2015 1:25:09 GMT -5
I am VERY fond of Steve Englehart's '70s work. His '80s work can go sit on a pole and rotate.
I swear, it's like he had a stroke and never told anyone or something.
|
|
|
Post by tolworthy on May 21, 2015 9:47:37 GMT -5
After Jack Kirby he's my favourite Marvel writer ever. 7) He also wrote the Hulk. (I haven't read much of his Hulk, and what I have read wasn't very good.) Anybody Counterpoint? His Hulk is what turned me into a fan. Maybe I was young, but his Captain Omen was unforgettable, and his Zzax was a lot of fun: Englehart's take on the Abomination turned me into a fan of old fish ears - it felt so sympathetic, so real. Gradually I realised that all my favourite Hulk stories were either very early Kirby (or Ditko) or Englehart. As for his 1980s work, I can't speak for his non-FF work, but I preferred his FF run to Byrne's. Mainly because I'm a continuity nut, and Englehart finally did what should have been done when Kirby left, but nobody else had the guts. That's a minority opinion, I know.
|
|
|
Post by Reptisaurus! on May 21, 2015 10:24:06 GMT -5
Mantis wasn't perfect - no character is - but she was an integral part of what most Avengers readers would rank as one of if not the top Avengers epics of all time, a story that wouldn't have been the same if she had been a more easily likeable character from the start. To Cei-U's charge of cruelty, etc in Mantis's case, I'd respond that she was shown to acknowledge her errors, to show remorse for and learn from them. That in itself made her interesting, especially in the context of the Celestial Madonna story. Yeah! I really liked Mantis (the Swordsman too) , and I was happy to see her wherever she popped up.
|
|
|
Post by Cei-U! on May 21, 2015 10:35:14 GMT -5
HULK (after hearing the Defenders are fighting near Broadway): "How does Hulk get to Broadway?" SPIDER-MAN (?): "I'm tempted to say "practice" Any particular reason you're quoting Len Wein dialogue in a post praising Englehart? Cei-U! I summon the case of mistaken identity!
|
|
Crimebuster
CCF Podcast Guru
Making comics!
Posts: 3,958
|
Post by Crimebuster on May 21, 2015 10:38:57 GMT -5
Mantis was key to the Celestial Madonna storyline, which is pretty much the only thing that justifies her existence.
Beyond that, however.
A) Her tremendously annoying speech pattern grew really old after about one panel
B) She was introduced in the most Mary Sue possible way, with the obnoxious trope of establishing how awesome she is by having her defeat everyone else, no matter how preposterous such a thing is. I'm pretty sure she defeated Thor with a nerve pinch. Thor, defeated by Kung Fu. Because, obviously.
C) Englehart's insistence on dragging her around with him to every damn title he worked on for the next 40 years regardless of what universe he was writing in or whether she had any role at all in the story was essentially just trolling comic fans. It's taking the self-indulgence of 70's comic writers and blowing it out to a whole new epic level pretty much untouched by anyone else. Earth-Prime Cary Bates thinks it was over the top.
She's just a black mark on his record as far as I'm concerned. Any time Englehart was on a series, I'd think, well, this will be good for a while until he drags Mantis into it. As Ben Franklin famously said, "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes and Steve Englehart shoehorning Mantis into every story."
|
|
|
Post by Reptisaurus! on May 21, 2015 10:44:44 GMT -5
HULK (after hearing the Defenders are fighting near Broadway): "How does Hulk get to Broadway?" SPIDER-MAN (?): "I'm tempted to say "practice" Any particular reason you're quoting Len Wein dialogue in a post praising Englehart? Cei-U! I summon the case of mistaken identity! OK, that was impressive. Is that the Defenders? It's not Marvel Team-Up. (I quite liked Len Wein's Defenders, too, though!)
|
|
|
Post by Cei-U! on May 21, 2015 11:03:07 GMT -5
It's Marvel Team-Up #27.
Cei-U! I summon the ID!
|
|
|
Post by tolworthy on May 21, 2015 11:07:24 GMT -5
Any particular reason you're quoting Len Wein dialogue in a post praising Englehart? Er... because I was seven years old at the time? (embarrassed) The Zzzax story was in a large size hard back British annual. The Spidey-Hulk story must have been in a similar annual. All these years I remembered them as the same story. Childhood ruined. EDIT: I think the Len Wein issue was in the following year.
|
|