|
Post by tolworthy on Feb 9, 2016 10:47:39 GMT -5
(includes some fake covers)
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Feb 9, 2016 11:41:07 GMT -5
I think that's Sharon Ventura (the former She-Thing) wearing a Thing exo-suit, but I haven't read the books themselves, only solicitations when it was coming out. -M No, that's a girlfriend--or ex-girlfriend-- of Johnny's, wearing a Thing exo-suit, as a member of the "new" FF. I haven't actually read these issues, but I'd read the hype on various boards when this occurred. marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Darla_Deering_(Earth-616)It's Darla Deering, AKA Ms. Thing. She activates the suit by using the Thing Rings!
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Feb 10, 2016 6:57:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2016 12:51:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 12:55:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Prince Hal on Feb 12, 2016 10:49:03 GMT -5
(includes some fake covers) That's it? Good to see you around agin, Tolworthy!
|
|
|
Post by tolworthy on Feb 12, 2016 15:31:00 GMT -5
That's it? Good to see you around agin, Tolworthy! That's it? Heck no, there are plenty more where that came from. My favourite homages are the models and cakes. I missed them from the montage as they're not technically covers. (Well, OK I included the Simpsons cake next to the cover it meta-homages. Hmm.. meta homages... And if FF1 is itself a homage to the first justice league cover,as some have suggested, that's four levels of inception. I wonder what Brave and Bold 18 was itself a swipe or homage from something earlier? Good to see you guys again too! Though I feel like a relapsed addict. Last year I thought I'd kicked the Fantastic Four drug. But I may as well face it, will always pull me back. Having a life is overrated anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Feb 12, 2016 16:55:31 GMT -5
Hey tolworthy , whats's your take on the cancellation of the FF title?
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Feb 12, 2016 16:58:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tolworthy on Feb 13, 2016 2:51:51 GMT -5
Hey tolworthy , whats's your take on the cancellation of the FF title? Weariness? Its so hard to care. When they come back it will be the FIFTH reboot, and they make the same mistakes every time. I think "Lornelb" spoke for all long time FF fans when he summed up the problem, in response to tom Brevoort's comment that there isn't much passion for the FF. My own view is that the FF were replaced by clones at the end of issue 333, and that Englehart's prophecy came true: all we have seen since then is pastiche, and it doesn't work. Marvel vaguely recalls that the FF were hot once, but can't remember why. So yeah, they reboot them, kill them, give them to Mark Millar to abuse, and it makes no difference. Occasionally they get a writer who cares - Hickman did a reasonable job - but then the very next writer ignores and reverses everything. I sometimes devise theories about how there is some hidden structure to all this, but really there isn't. Marvel can create fake events and rearrange deckchairs all they want, but after after three decades of reboots and alternate versions it's hard to care. Still, we'll always have the reprints.
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Feb 13, 2016 17:13:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2016 11:53:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Icctrombone on Feb 14, 2016 16:12:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chadwilliam on Feb 14, 2016 19:48:45 GMT -5
Though it may be heresy, I've never been too fond of the cover of Fantastic Four 1. Instead it's the cover to issue three that carries the promise of unbridled excitement within the pages contained therein. It looks like the cover of a new era; an image that must have exploded out of Jack Kirby's head. That's the image that should be constantly reproduced, homaged, and pointed to as the start of the Marvel Age of comics, as the image that best defines the Fantastic Four.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2016 21:10:18 GMT -5
|
|