|
Post by dupersuper on Jun 25, 2015 22:43:24 GMT -5
I just thank Cthullu that I'm Canadian...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2015 22:54:42 GMT -5
On the other hand, if a group of co-workers all know English, then speaking another language is the equivalent of whispering to someone so others can't hear. That's fine. And that's where you vote with your wallet and shop somewhere else if it bothers you. Not demand that the government revoke their citizenship. Not saying that's what you said, but that is the point I am responding against. People have the freedom to speak whatever they want to speak, and if you want your cashier to speak only in English, then shop somewhere that has that policy. When I was a truck driver English was the only language allowed on our work frequency radio. There's no law against implementing such rules.
|
|
|
Post by spoon on Jun 25, 2015 23:33:52 GMT -5
On the other hand, if a group of co-workers all know English, then speaking another language is the equivalent of whispering to someone so others can't hear. That's fine. And that's where you vote with your wallet and shop somewhere else if it bothers you. Not demand that the government revoke their citizenship. Not saying that's what you said, but that is the point I am responding against. People have the freedom to speak whatever they want to speak, and if you want your cashier to speak only in English, then shop somewhere that has that policy. When I was a truck driver English was the only language allowed on our work frequency radio. There's no law against implementing such rules. Like I said, I have no problem with my cashier speaking other languages to other people to accommodate their proficiency. To me that seems like a no-brainer. With a group of co-workers who all speak English proficiently, that's a different story. It comes across as intentionally exclusionary, and it's bad for cohesion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2015 0:13:16 GMT -5
And like I said, that's a matter for management to handle, not the government.
|
|
|
Post by hondobrode on Jun 26, 2015 0:18:57 GMT -5
Ok, this kind of goes back to the Hillary thread, at least for me, as Ted Cruz came up fairly highly for me on the exercise.
I pretty much can't stand Ted Cruz and feel most of what he does is for sensationalism and positioning within his political party, but, even though I wouldn't vote for him, I begrudgenly agree with the idea behind his immigrant stand that A. we should secure the border and B. enforce and encourage legal immigration.
If you want to come here, you have to do it the right way : legally.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire2099 on Jun 26, 2015 5:58:15 GMT -5
On the other hand, if a group of co-workers all know English, then speaking another language is the equivalent of whispering to someone so others can't hear. That's fine. And that's where you vote with your wallet and shop somewhere else if it bothers you. Not demand that the government revoke their citizenship. Not saying that's what you said, but that is the point I am responding against. People have the freedom to speak whatever they want to speak, and if you want your cashier to speak only in English, then shop somewhere that has that policy. When I was a truck driver English was the only language allowed on our work frequency radio. There's no law against implementing such rules. No one wants to revoke anyone's citizenship.. that would be insane. I said I wanted to make it EASIER to be a citizen, I just think there should be a language requirement. That's it. No other nonsense. In a perfect world(IMO), here's what would happen: 1) person comes to a border crossing, the guard on/server/whatever to ensure the person in front of them isn't a criminal trying to avoid justice. 2) Assuming all is well, they're given a work visa, and a little packet that tells they what to do to be an actual citizen. Or not, if they don't plan on staying. 3) They fill out the application, pass a language test, and get a social security card. poof. done.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire2099 on Jun 26, 2015 5:59:46 GMT -5
Ok, this kind of goes back to the Hillary thread, at least for me, as Ted Cruz came up fairly highly for me on the exercise. I pretty much can't stand Ted Cruz and feel most of what he does is for sensationalism and positioning within his political party, but, even though I wouldn't vote for him, I begrudgenly agree with the idea behind his immigrant stand that A. we should secure the border and B. enforce and encourage legal immigration. If you want to come here, you have to do it the right way : legally. I think the best way to do that is to make it easier to do it legally. By most accounts, it's a horror show right now. Fix that, and most people, I think, won't bother trying to sneak in.
|
|
|
Post by Slam_Bradley on Jun 26, 2015 10:53:10 GMT -5
It may seem flippant, but it's absolutely true. The Idaho dairy industry would be dead without illegal immigrant workers. Because people who live here are "too good" to do that work. And those dairy jobs actually pay pretty damn well. Even most of the documented aliens working on them speak little to no English.
|
|
|
Post by Rob Allen on Jun 26, 2015 11:23:58 GMT -5
There's a difficult balancing act that we haven't figured out yet. If legal immigration is too difficult, we get illegal immigrants living in an underground economy; if it's too easy, we get half the population of every poor country in the world heading this way until we reach the point where life here is no better than it is there - and is turning the US into a third-world country really a solution?
In recent decades we've had the pendulum on the "difficult" end of the range, and the problems inherent in that approach have led to growing pressure to make immigration easier, fairer and more sensible. Inevitably, this trend will continue until the problems of integrating large numbers of immigrants leads to fears of a breakdown like the Western Roman Empire (the barbarians who overran the Empire were not trying to destroy it, they were trying to immigrate), and that will lead to calls for tightening immigration again. We've been thru this cycle over the last two centuries, and will probably go thru it for the next two, at least.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2015 13:01:39 GMT -5
That's fine. And that's where you vote with your wallet and shop somewhere else if it bothers you. Not demand that the government revoke their citizenship. Not saying that's what you said, but that is the point I am responding against. People have the freedom to speak whatever they want to speak, and if you want your cashier to speak only in English, then shop somewhere that has that policy. When I was a truck driver English was the only language allowed on our work frequency radio. There's no law against implementing such rules. No one wants to revoke anyone's citizenship.. that would be insane. I said I wanted to make it EASIER to be a citizen, I just think there should be a language requirement. That's it. No other nonsense. In a perfect world(IMO), here's what would happen: 1) person comes to a border crossing, the guard on/server/whatever to ensure the person in front of them isn't a criminal trying to avoid justice. 2) Assuming all is well, they're given a work visa, and a little packet that tells they what to do to be an actual citizen. Or not, if they don't plan on staying. 3) They fill out the application, pass a language test, and get a social security card. poof. done. Then what exactly does this mean? Then there's the issue of people at a business I'm patronizing speaking another language in front of me, a customer. How do I know they're not saying 'this guy's a live one, let's charge him extra'. Or, 'he's white, give him the crappy stuff'?' Again, if I was travelling and choose not to learn the language of the place I was visiting, that's on me, and I accept it. In MY country, I don't think soSounds like you want to make it illegal for people to speak their native language in public, because this is YOUR country, and not theirs.
|
|
|
Post by DE Sinclair on Jun 26, 2015 13:14:12 GMT -5
I think it's safe to say that this isn't MY country, or THEIR country, it's OUR country. While it is far from perfect, we enjoy freedoms here that many countries envy, and many people from all over the world come here to join all the other immigrants already here, which is to say ALL OF US (excepting the Native Americans, of course). We have the inalienable rights to worship or not as we please, believe as we please, and speak as we please in whatever language we please. I think we're getting too side-tracked on what language is being spoken and not on how to best balance the number of people who want to live here with maintaining or raising everyone's (new to the country or born here) standard of living (except the extremely rich, because they always do just fine).
|
|
|
Post by DE Sinclair on Jun 26, 2015 13:18:00 GMT -5
I just thank Cthullu that I'm Canadian... That made me wonder, does Canada have a problem with immigration? Any requirements or restrictions to move there? Because there have been many times while I was paying off medical bills that I've thought moving to Canada might be nice. I would just need to find a warm spot to settle...
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,865
|
Post by shaxper on Jun 26, 2015 15:22:51 GMT -5
I just thank Cthullu that I'm Canadian... That made me wonder, does Canada have a problem with immigration? Any requirements or restrictions to move there? Because there have been many times while I was paying off medical bills that I've thought moving to Canada might be nice. I would just need to find a warm spot to settle... A friend of mine wanted to move to Canada. Their immigration restrictions are very high. I believe you need a job waiting for you and a certain amount if money in savings, in addition to the standard citizenship requirements. Suffice to say, none of us could move there tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by DE Sinclair on Jun 26, 2015 15:35:11 GMT -5
That made me wonder, does Canada have a problem with immigration? Any requirements or restrictions to move there? Because there have been many times while I was paying off medical bills that I've thought moving to Canada might be nice. I would just need to find a warm spot to settle... A friend of mine wanted to move to Canada. Their immigration restrictions are very high. I believe you need a job waiting for you and a certain amount if money in savings, in addition to the standard citizenship requirements. Suffice to say, none of us could move there tomorrow. Hmmm. I wonder how they deal with illegal immigrants. After all, it's not like it's hard to get into Canada. Though, seriously, it's just too cold to go there.
|
|
shaxper
CCF Site Custodian
Posts: 22,865
|
Post by shaxper on Jun 26, 2015 17:24:42 GMT -5
A friend of mine wanted to move to Canada. Their immigration restrictions are very high. I believe you need a job waiting for you and a certain amount if money in savings, in addition to the standard citizenship requirements. Suffice to say, none of us could move there tomorrow. Hmmm. I wonder how they deal with illegal immigrants. After all, it's not like it's hard to get into Canada. Though, seriously, it's just too cold to go there. Well, if what's attracting ypu is the socialized benefits -- medical coverage and all -- then immigrating illegally is going to be pretty pointless
|
|