|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Mar 16, 2016 8:09:25 GMT -5
Are you seriousy putting Warren Ellis and Morrison's level of quality above Art Spieglman, Chris Ware, Dan Clowes, Robert Crumb, Jim Woodring, Jamie or Gilbert Hernandez, Paul Pope, Jeff Smith, Frank Miller, Dave Lapham, Dave Cooper, etc? I haven't read all of them, for the rest yes. Things like Planetary and The Coyote Gospel are just one step behind the works mentioned earlier. I give up, as this statement (I guess you meant one step before...) once again illustrates a bias towards superhero "juvenile" comics, entertainment above anything else. But hey, it's alright, just a disagreement in a discussion. Oh and by the way, this isn't specific to you, but I'm tired of the "you can't compare two different things" argument : just stating their differences technically is a comparison. There, I've said it Edit : I just re-read this, and I have to highlight this " Planetary > Maus/Eightball/ACME Novelty Library/Love & Rockets/Stray Bullets/Frank/THB/etc..."
|
|
|
Post by tingramretro on Mar 16, 2016 8:53:53 GMT -5
Are you seriousy putting Warren Ellis and Morrison's level of quality above Art Spieglman, Chris Ware, Dan Clowes, Robert Crumb, Jim Woodring, Jamie or Gilbert Hernandez, Paul Pope, Jeff Smith, Frank Miller, Dave Lapham, Dave Cooper, etc? I haven't read all of them, for the rest yes. Things like Planetary and The Coyote Gospel are just one step behind the works mentioned earlier. The fact is, the mainstream in any given country is always going to consist primarily of domestic talent. Pretty much every high street newsagent, supermarket and convenience store in Britain stocks some comics, but none of tbem stock foreign comics; if you want US imports, you go to a comics shop, of which there are only about 70 in the entire UK, because they're a niche interest. So why would anyone outside of comics fans ever have heard of any of the creators? The general public are only really even familiar with American comics characters when they appear in movies or on TV. Well, if you are going to step out of a comic shop, so to speak, people in Spain will hardly be able to name anybody. Ibañez at most. But if we talk about people from outside the comic fan base, who eventually step inside, they will ask for Watchmen and Maus, most of the time. Foreign authors in both cases. I guess you can't compare Great Britain to Spain to France to the USA. Probably very different markets with very different cultural attitudes to comics, I agree, though I'm surprised to hear Spain seems to have such a low profile domestic comics industry as you suggest, given the number of talented Spanish artists working in the international markets over the last few decades (people like Carlos Ezquerra, Enrique Romero, Jesus Redondo and Alfonso Azpiri ).
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Mar 16, 2016 14:19:00 GMT -5
I give up, as this statement (I guess you meant one step before...) once again illustrates a bias towards superhero "juvenile" comics, entertainment above anything else. But hey, it's alright, just a disagreement in a discussion. Oh and by the way, this isn't specific to you, but I'm tired of the "you can't compare two different things" argument : just stating their differences technically is a comparison. There, I've said it Edit : I just re-read this, and I have to highlight this " Planetary > Maus/Eightball/ACME Novelty Library/Love & Rockets/Stray Bullets/Frank/THB/etc..." I meant what I said (behind), here's a tentative list of comics between 7.5 and 10: - Watchmen
- TDKR, Understanding Comics
- Year One, Born Again, A Dream of Flying, Europe After the Reign
- Saga of the Swamp Thing, Fragmentos de la Enciclopedia Délfica, Planetary, The Red King Syndrome, Olympus, This Vicious Cabaret, The Land of Do-As-You-Please, Ronin, Elektra: Assassin and something I'm surely forgetting
- Stratos, Paracuellos, La Zizanie, El Eternauta (Breccia version), Jaka's Story, Enigma, Seasons of Mist, The kindly Ones, From Hell, Sin City, The High Cost of Living and not that many more
- The Republic is Burning and quite a few others
The last comic in the list, also marks the highest point in my latest rating graphs, were you can find 1,500 superhero comics rated much lower than that. The point is, if it's good, I don't care what genre it pertains to. I don't feel the urge to diversify my tastes, to the point were I would have to dig outside the predominant genre, looking for material to dress my selves, to finally try and sell it to myself, as a good investment of my time. Probably very different markets with very different cultural attitudes to comics, I agree, though I'm surprised to hear Spain seems to have such a low profile domestic comics industry as you suggest, given the number of talented Spanish artists working in the international markets over the last few decades (people like Carlos Ezquerra, Enrique Romero, Jesus Redondo and Alfonso Azpiri ). After the political transition, we picked up on the foreign (european) production. At some point, at the beginning of the 80's, you could count up to 18 magazines, lots of catching up to do. There was also a lot of autochthonous production, both from artists who had been previously been working for international publishers, most notably the british female market, as well as new talent that flourished in that rich environment. The 90's marked the end of all that, and people either resumed their "professional life", or looked elsewhere in publicity, TV or other media. A good part of them found work inside the comic industry, but abroad: Pacheco, Larroca or Ferry, in the USA; Juan Giménez in France; Segura & Ortiz in Italy… There's still some residual activity, but the big publishers basically translate foreign production. Public awareness towards comics, is almost non-existent.
|
|
|
Post by tingramretro on Mar 16, 2016 15:00:49 GMT -5
I consider that a great shame. Spanish artists produced what I consider to be some of the best comics work I was exposed to, growing up.
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Mar 16, 2016 15:31:23 GMT -5
If you say "behind", that would mean it's not as good as Maus and the rest of the list. You're entitled with your own opinion, not with your own facts.
You do realize that out of the top 16 titles of your list 14 are super hero comics, right (I take that the first two lines are the best ones since you rated Watchmen 10 and said t was one of the 4 bes comic book ever, whatever the genre it is)?
Also, you say you don't care what genre the comic is, but right after that you state that you don't feel an urge to diversify your tastes outside superheroes (since it's the dominant genre in your library). You just make no sense. I really struggle understanding what you mean as it just looks like contradiction after contradiction.
About the spanish cultural sphere, having performed there many times as a musician, it's true that the long lasting dictatorship has left a grimm mark still deeply felt, which result in making it almost impossible to build anything of substance in the long run, apart from a few directors, thanks to international co-productions (Most Almodovar movies are produced by Canal Plus). It's sad, since there of course is talent, but difficult to develop localy. the music scene is a sad testimony of that.
BTW, Prado's Stratos was indeed a fine comic, I enjoyed it when I was a young teen. Has it aged well?
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Mar 16, 2016 17:21:34 GMT -5
If you say "behind", that would mean it's not as good as Maus and the rest of the list. You're entitled with your own opinion, not with your own facts. You do realize that out of the top 16 titles of your list 14 are super hero comics, right (I take that the first two lines are the best ones since you rated Watchmen 10 and said t was one of the 4 bes comic book ever, whatever the genre it is)? Also, you say you don't care what genre the comic is, but right after that you state that you don't feel an urge to diversify your tastes outside superheroes (since it's the dominant genre in your library). You just make no sense. I really struggle understanding what you mean as it just looks like contradiction after contradiction. A little thread-drift recap, I first mentioned Watchmen, Born Again, Year One and TDKR, later came Gaiman, Morrison and Ellis, as authors better than the rest (at their highest) but "behind the works mentioned earlier". That was in a reply to a post from you were you mentioned Art Spieglman, Chris Ware, Dan Clowes, Robert Crumb, Jim Woodring, Jamie or Gilbert Hernandez, Paul Pope, Jeff Smith, Frank Miller, Dave Lapham, Dave Cooper, etc. If I'm talking works, and you cited authors, it's clear I'm referring to the "works mentioned earlier", which were ahead. No one's playing with facts, you just didn't get them straight, that's all. If you bent numbers backwards I guess. There's actually 12 works. I divided V and Miracleman into books, because I think the UK ones were better, and since I was doing a more detailed list, it was appropriate to place material were it should. Of those 12 works, maybe half of them can be considered superhero stuff, maybe. Ronin, Elektra, Swamp Thing and V can hardly be classified. But even if all them were, what of it? Now you're reorganizing my words to form phrases, "the dominant genre in [my] library"? My library represents what's out there, if superheroes dominate in the comic shop, that has consequences. I guess I could further minimize the imbalance, by doing more research, giving more second chances and trying more new authors, from outside the superhero genre, but I've done that many times, and it more usually ends up in a waste of time and money, than not. That doesn't make sense to you? That I would rather stick with tried and true authors? Allow me to doubt it, I think you just want to find contradictions and that all your talk, about it being fine me liking superhero comics, is only true if I'm biased. If I'm not, there's a problem.
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Mar 16, 2016 18:11:33 GMT -5
This is mesmerizing... I didn't bent numbers backwards : I respected the fact that YOU divided it into separate volumes! I don't want to find contradiction, I just want to find something that makes sense. This last post furthers those problems. Of course when I mention authors in this thread I mean their work. And in my book, Ronin, Elektra, V for Vendetta and even Swamp hThing to a certain degree belong to the superhero genre, solo vigilantes with extraordinary aptitudes set against vilains. Sure those are more than that, but furthermore, those are perceived like htat by mainstream audiences (Swamp Thing, V for Vendetta and Elektra even had movies marketed as superhero movies FCS!). So. Didn't you indeed state that Planetary was greater then any works of the authors I listed? That was my question. To which you appear to have answered yes, or have I gotten that wrong as well? Anyhow, You might think Watchmen, DKR, Born Again, Planetary, etc are the pinacle of the medium, but all your giberish about this being close to facts due to research and statistics still sounds like total pointless nonsense until you explain it further. But all in all, there are so many factors that make this pointless (the fact that you will never have read every good comics of every country, not even of america, the fact the the cursor of judgement is your own sole subjective opinion, etc) that I struggle to understand why you don't let this go. Believe me I have no personnal beef about that, it's just frustrating to hit a wall And for the record, I find most of Ed Brubakers works are far superior to Planetary on both a story and art level, but that's just my opinion, one that doesn't matter less or more then yours, until it is truthfully debated
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Mar 17, 2016 3:00:10 GMT -5
This is mesmerizing... I didn't bent numbers backwards : I respected the fact that YOU divided it into separate volumes! [..] This last post furthers those problems. Of course when I mention authors in this thread I mean their work. And in my book, Ronin, Elektra, V for Vendetta and even Swamp hThing to a certain degree belong to the superhero genre, solo vigilantes with extraordinary aptitudes set against vilains. Sure those are more than that, but furthermore, those are perceived like htat by mainstream audiences (Swamp Thing, V for Vendetta and Elektra even had movies marketed as superhero movies FCS!). So. Didn't you indeed state that Planetary was greater then any works of the authors I listed? That was my question. To which you appear to have answered yes, or have I gotten that wrong as well? Anyhow, You might think Watchmen, DKR, Born Again, Planetary, etc are the pinacle of the medium, but all your giberish about this being close to facts due to research and statistics still sounds like total pointless nonsense until you explain it further. But all in all, there are so many factors that make this pointless (the fact that you will never have read every good comics of every country, not even of america, the fact the the cursor of judgement is your own sole subjective opinion, etc) that I struggle to understand why you don't let this go. Mesmerizing? Giberish? 14 out of 16 is a bigger proportion than 10 out 12. Should I add an exclamation mark, likewise? If you want to refer to works, do, but you didn't, so you can hardly use your undisclosed intentions, to bent the meaning of my words. "Behind" still stands. So they're superheroes "to a certain degree". Well, you can't argue with that, dark grey is also white, "to a certain degree". Yes, you got that wrongly too. I placed Planetary above the quality shown by the authors you mentioned, in the instances where I have read something from them. I didn't mention any specific work, neither did you, "the works mentioned earlier" were those actually mentioned, not those implied. You only mentioned them in your reply to my "the works mentioned earlier", as if wanting to include them as soon as possible, rescuing one from a different part of the discussion and retroactively introducing the rest, to support your own argument, which you then proceeded to highlight. Anyhow, I never said Planetary was a pinnacle of the medium, just better than work done by american authors. The pinnacle of the medium was "the works mentioned earlier", the ones that started the thread-drift, the ones in the FB screenshot: Watchmen, Born Again, Year One and TDKR. And again, don't twist my words, I mentioned facts because you said: "You're entitled with your own opinion, not with your own facts." Remember? So don't try to open now a new front. My ratings are my opinions, not facts. I won't let all of this go, because I don't like someone twisting my words, and that's what you've been doing for quite some posts now. Deliberately? I don't know, to each his conscience.
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Gordon Scratch on Mar 17, 2016 7:42:17 GMT -5
OMG... You're unbelievable, and you can't even see it. I don't have an argument, just questions and disbelief. Now I can only conclude you're trolling. Enjoy that and your social skills, cheers
|
|
|
Post by DE Sinclair on Mar 17, 2016 7:53:58 GMT -5
I think the two of you have covered this quite thoroughly. Please move on.
|
|
|
Post by rberman on Apr 12, 2018 20:23:15 GMT -5
A great series, but I was a little disappointed by the ending with the fake alien. I actually think the movie's ending, using Dr. Manhattan as the supposed threat was a better idea. I agree. Moore was trying to tie in a comics creator to the story and also give a nod to the whole genre of monster comics that preceded the Marvel Age. But just for tight storytelling, having Doctor Manhattan be the alleged threat was a much more elegant solution, both because he was already part of the story and because the whole world was kind of worried about him anyway, for good reason, and the last time he was seen, he was a little enraged. That makes his possible return that much more likely, as opposed to a giant alien squid that comes out of nowhere, so that "We'd better lay aside all human conflict in case more of these things attack us and we can do something about it proactively next time" is not a very realistic scenario. Mind you, I don't think Ozymandias' solution would really work for very long in either case. Unless there's an actual ongoing stream of attacks or disasters, it won't be long before the nations are back to their squabbles. And Ozymandias would be smart enough to know that and wouldn't actually declare victory just because world peace broke out for five minutes.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Apr 16, 2018 5:31:29 GMT -5
[...] having Doctor Manhattan be the alleged threat was a much more elegant solution, both because he was already part of the story and because the whole world was kind of worried about him anyway, for good reason, and the last time he was seen, he was a little enraged. That makes his possible return that much more likely, as opposed to a giant alien squid that comes out of nowhere, so that "We'd better lay aside all human conflict in case more of these things attack us and we can do something about it proactively next time" is not a very realistic scenario. Mind you, I don't think Ozymandias' solution would really work for very long in either case. Unless there's an actual ongoing stream of attacks or disasters, it won't be long before the nations are back to their squabbles. And Ozymandias would be smart enough to know that and wouldn't actually declare victory just because world peace broke out for five minutes. It was obviously a gamble, even faced with continued attacks from an outside force, history shows different groups of people keeping their old grievances, right until the very moment when they face extinction. So the question is, would the human race perceive such a menace as an extinction level one? Who can say for sure?
|
|
|
Post by Reptisaurus! on Apr 16, 2018 6:05:25 GMT -5
The Comics Journal put it as # 91 on the best Comics of the 20th Century list, and that's probably pretty close to where I'd rank it on my favorites list. On a very basic level I don't think "dour" and "humorless" is a great fit for superheroes, even if the execution is spectacularly good. If we're rating things, Watchmen is # 4 on my list of post-bronze age corporate produced superhero mini-series: # 1 Enigma # 2 Flex Mentallo # 3 Dark Knight Returns # 4 Watchmen Although both V for Vendetta and Foolkiller would be higher on my favorites list if you want to count those as "superhero."
|
|